Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default KISS 112 by Andre Jute

KISS 112 by Andre Jute
This text is copyright Andre Jute 2004 and may not be reproduced except
in the thread KISS xxx on rec.audio.tubes
THE VOLTAGES IN THIS AMP WILL KILL YOU. GET EXPERIENCED SUPERVISION IF
IT IS YOUR FIRST TUBE AMP.I
f you have arrived late to this project, you can get an overview at
http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/The KISS Amp INDEX.htm
or by finding a file called KISS 100.
=20
=20
Choosing an operating point for a new design
Andr=E9 Jute
=20
In electrical engineering theory, where all components are hogged out
to a limit predetermined by their desired service life in the
application under consideration, you would take the power required by
your preferred speakers in one hand and in the other a list of only
those tubes capable of giving the required output plus the longevity
margin. Higher power tubes would not even be considered unless they
were cheaper. In DIY audiophile practice we don't care much for the
cost constraints of production engineering and our primary interest is
in choosing tubes that will sound right with the speakers, or sound
right on some other parameter. Thus the power we calculated so
carefully is irrelevant. If we like the sound of a tube that makes less
power, we can parallel two or several of those tubes. If a tube makes
more power, even much more power, we can apply the extra capability to
other desirable purposes, like reducing distortion and thereby making a
more silent amp.
=20
However, as I explained in an earlier installment, the choice is not as
unlimited as seems at first glance. If you have your heart set on
joining the ultrafidelista with a directly heated triode (DHT) amp your
span of choices is not huge and your reasonable choices are pitifully
few, and even fewer if like me you prefer designing with current
production tubes rather than NOS. (Once I had to, for commercial
reasons. Now I do it by choice, in order to leave NOS big DHT to those
who think there is something special about them. I happen to think that
many modern tubes are just fine.) However, you can triode-couple many
pentodes for pleasing results. One of the first amps I ever built was a
6V6 triode-coupled SE adapted and developed from a Princeton guitar
amp. Use what you can get and afford. EL34 and their little sister the
EL84 can be ordered out of many general electronics catalogues. Think
laterally. The 6SN7 is not only a superb driver but a 4.5Wpower tube
you can parallel to make enough very clean power to drive sensitive
speakers easily.
=20
Back to the DHT. In fact, you don't start a design process like this
without already having a tube in mind, even if only provisionally. The
first tube in my mind whenever I start a new design is the 300B. It
sounds good, it is long-lasting, it is available in a range of prices.
Most of all, it is the only DHT which comes even near to the
availability of guitar tubes like the EL34 and the EL84. Sure, I like
Svetlana's SV572-xx even better but who will assure me of a guaranteed
supply? 845 are grand but they are very big, very hot, and they don't
run right under 960V operating voltage, which means a supply of over
1100V.
=20
Thus I started The KISS Amp with 300B in the back of my mind, plus a
lot of other high-quality luggage from various 300B amps I have built.
At this point, having finalized the speakers and their power
requirement (1.5W minimum, 3W absolute max) we can make other choices.
The 2A3 is a well-reputed tube in that power bracket which even has the
added attraction of 6.3V filament octal based version, the 6B4G, which
could be a good cost saving and ease construction. I am somewhat
underwhelmed by it, mainly because it does not live up to its billing
as a cut-down 300B. A triode coupled EL34 will make the power without
breaking sweat. Even EL84 will cut it. I will show at the end of the
series how to adapt a design like this for inexpensive tubes and
transformers.
=20
For this project I shall stick to 300B.
=20
There are two really good reasons for choosing 300B even for a newbie
project. The obvious one is that it doesn't matter which tube I choose
as long as the process is transparent, because the newbie who has all
the facts can adapt the design to whichever tube he wants, so I may as
well choose one of the tubes I have a huge amount of experience with
rather than some cheaper tube that I have worked with much less often.
The other overarching reason is that the 300B is an aspirational tube
with a huge reputation. Eventually every serious audiophile gives a
300B amp a whirl of some kind, either by making a serious effort to
listen to one belonging to someone else or by building one (or even
buying one, ouch!). It follows that a 300B which can be built at any
component level is a Good Idea because it can be upgraded over time.
=20
OoOoo
=20
You need a set of data sheets for the 300B. It is available several
places on the net. Use Google.
=20
For your convenience I have put a set of the famous STC 4300B data
sheets on my site; these are generally the sheets to use with Chinese
300B.
112-4300b-1h.jpg 300B physical dimensions, standard and limiting
parameters.
112-4300b-2h.jpg Typical operating conditions table, generic 300B.
112-4300b-3h.jpg 300B Transfer curves: your Bible, Koran and pinup.
In addition there is
WE300BindivSPEC.jpg
the individually-taken curves for the pair of WE300B I shall be using
in The KISS Amp.
=20
The data consists of the operating conditions for the fixed services of
the tube like the filaments, specifications of characteristics like the
nominal plate resistance Rp of the tube, recommended operating
conditions for parameters over which you have control like voltage and
grid bias, and so on. There will alsobe a set of graphs of which the
most important will consume the rest of this article.
=20
There are usually some warnings in footnotes to which you should pay
attention if you are of a nervous disposition or poor. Two warnings are
generally important for every tube: the warning about permitted
variation of the filament voltage and the warning that maximum
operating conditions are not intended to be usual operating conditions.
Also mind the convention that not more than one operating parameter
must be maxed out at a time. Whether the rest of the limits are
important to an audiophile depends on the tube and its original
purpose. Many tubes are grotesquely overspecified for audio use because
they were designed for the military or the telephone company. The
WE300A and B tubes were designed to be used in bank upon bank not for
music reproduction but by the telephone company who didn't mind paying
for a good tube if it saved the labor of finding and replacing a faulty
tube. It is an intrinsically very sturdy tube. I use some from broken
pairs and quads for shunt regulators and they just last and last.
=20
AN ANALOGY
=20
A tube is a sort of pump, which accounts for its British name of valve.
A triode consists of three main operational elements (there are others,
of which the most notable is the absence of air, the vacuum that gives
the vacuum tube its name). The signal will be injected at the grid.
Power to operate the pump flows into the plate, also called the anode.
At the cathode a small outside motor pulls down the grid to make space
for the signal, which is then squirted out of the plate at a much
larger pressure. At this point it meets the primary of the OPT and is
rolled along its slope into the sort of pressure (power!) the
loudspeaker can use.
=20
The power injected at the plate is called plate voltage, the signal is
also a voltage (but of another kind called AC for alternating current),
and the amount of voltage the external circuit element pulls down on
the grid is called the negative bias voltage. These voltages will
relate back via current to the power in watts required at the
loudspeakers.
=20
TUBE OPERATING CLASSES
It really is as simple as that. Every tube works that way, though some
have so much excess baggage that it may take many, many pages to
described the action.
=20
However, though the analogy seems dynamic enough, it is really a static
description. The moment the tube starts working it gets more
complicated.
=20
I want at this stage to eliminate one possible complication altogether.
This is tube classes of operation. The question has already arisen with
some of you, and will arise with all the minute you see the graphs in
the data sheets: what happens when the signal is bigger than the
negative grid bias? The exam answer is that it starts drawing grid
current.
=20
Grid current is an ultrafi baddie in the nastiest possible odour.
Kondo-san, a giant of audio design, couldn't resist hogging out a
little more power by letting his Ongaku run into grid current
(technically called Class A2 Operation) and thereby made it less
perfect than it might have been.
=20
An ultrafidelista amplifier does not soil itself with grid current. It
doesn't even come near it. An ultrafidelista amp runs in Class A1 under
any and all operating conditions.
=20
Once you decide that, you do not even want to know about Class B
(horrid cross-over distortion), Class C (semi-permanent distortion) or
class D (permanent distortion, not fit for human or animal
consumption). Amplifier operating classes are of no further interest to
you. If it operates outside Class A1, it is beyond the pale.
=20
WHEN YOU HAVE DOWNLOADED THE DATA SHEETS...
=20
Study the tables. Identify the main operating graph, which will have
volts along the bottom, current in milliamps up the side, and lines at
an angle which curve at the bottom. The lines are the negative grid
bias voltage lines.
=20
WARNING ABOUT DEVILRY
=20
We will shortly arrive at a point where you will compare an answer you
have derived from a graph with a table printed by that biblical
authority, Western Electric. Oh, horrors, your answer will not match
theirs!
=20
Someone relatively new to valve design looking at, say, the WE 300B
data can easily be baffled because his calculations show 2W of output
power at a particular set of operating parameters while the iconic data
sheet claims 6.7W.
=20
Amazingly, it is more likely that you are right than that WE is right.
=20
WE and STC (makers of the British 300B workalike, publishers of a
widely used datasheet which is commonly applied to modern Chineses
copies) were commercial organisations. They exaggerated, either
directly or by implication, to make their product seem more than it
was. We cannot at this distance see the exaggeration too clearly
because it has become the accepted axiom of reference. It is as if you
let Ford of Detroit write the new DIN PS standard!
=20
Specifically, even in Class A, tube makers, engineers and radio
designers accepted 5% distortion as the standard reference at which
they measured full power. To a modern audiophile that is of course
entirely unacceptable. Secondly, check those sheets. It doesn't
actually say 'Class A' or 'Class A1'--that is merely another modern
assumption. I suspect that when they took those power and distortion
figures the grid had already been driven well into current. You are
therefore calculating by a different standard assumption than the one
they applied.
=20
If you were to calculate where five per cent distortion will fall and
then measure the voltage and current swing regardless of the fact that
it extends beyond Class A and is asymmetrical, you will probably
approximate their published measurement.
=20
ON CHOOSING OPERATING POINTS
So, after studying the tables for a bit, forget them. Also forget
whatever you've read about other people's operating points; some of
them parrot WE without any investigation or thought. The curves are the
only true authority.
=20
Study of the tables will have shown you that a range of OPT primary
impedances are suitable for loading the plate of the 300B. Let's
arbitrarily pick 3K, a traditional, very common 300B load.
=20
Lay a ruler on the current-voltage-negative grid bias (Ia-Eb-Eg) graph
at the load angle of your output transformer, which is roughly
-RL=3DdeltaEb /deltaIa where delta means change and stands for the
triangular symbol the net does reproduce reliably, and ignoring
rectification effects (explained later) for the moment or for good if
you are lazy.
=20
The minus sign indicates that the line is angled from top left to
bottom right. Since your OPT primary Z is normally fixed by what is
available, the formula is more conveniently written as
-RL*deltaIa=3DdeltaEb, which in English reads as "multiply the output
transformer primary impedance in ohms by an arbitrary amount of current
in amps to discover how much the plate voltage will move because of
it". Thus if your OPT primary Z is 3000 ohms, multiplying it by 150mA
or 0.15A, tells you the plate voltage will move 450V because of the
150mA change in its current.
=20
Now along this line you can choose any operating point of
voltage/current/grid bias at which the dissipation is not more than 40W
(max for the 300B). Better to work on 32W or 80%.
=20
You can draw a maximum power dissipation (Pdmax) curve as voltamp
points (VA, which are virtual watts called apparent power): for the
300B if you calculate 40W/V (eg. 40W/400V =3D 100mA) for every 50 or 100V
across the bottom of the page (the plate supply) and draw it on the
sheet, that is accurate enough because you won't in any event go near
max dissipation. Perhaps you want to draw 80% dissipation or 32W as
well or whatever dissipation level you believe in.
=20
The next thing you need to understand about the data is that the curves
are often only partially drawn. On the 300B graph we are interested in,
for instance, the entire right hand side of the graph is left to your
imagination because it was not originally an audio tube. So, when I
refer to the middle of operating band or the design centre or
quiescence, all theoretically the same point, in fact it will be marked
much nearer the right hand edge of the page than the middle.
=20
The operating point is a design centre value. When WE says the max
plate V is 450, they mean at quiescence i.e. no signal. The quiescent
point is usually near or on the halfway mark as the loadline (the
impedance of the OPT primary) runs across the negative grid bias lines.
It follows that in fact the valve is good to 900V at maximum swing even
if you may not put more than 450V into it at the no signal condition,
and given of course that you do not exceed the 40W maximum dissipation.

=20
Note now that the response curves (negative grid bias lines) curl at
their bottoms. You don't want to be there either: distortion. Also, the
zero bias line is not a good place to be too near to, as many valves
start drawing grid current well into the negative grid area. So you
want to start operating your valve on the loadline somewhat to the
right of the 0V grid bias line to ensure class A1 output. You want to
stop operating it at a point before the response becomes non-linear.
This point can be extended by sliding your ruler up while holding it at
the same angle so that at any plate voltage you are using higher
current and somewhat lower bias. Slide the ruler, still standing in for
your loadline, until it touches your chosen dissipation level and note
that at this point the distance between the zero bias line (or some
line you have drawn to the right of it and parallel to it to distance
your ears from grid current) and the furthest portion of straight,
equidistant output curve (again, the negative grid bias lines) it
touches is longer than it can possibly be at any lower point.
=20
Now choose the point, normally tangent to your desired dissipation
curve, halfway between the ends of this loadline, and there is your
voltage at the plate and plate current, and your negative grid bias.
=20
The negative grid bias you set and the plate voltage you supply, both
of which are under your direct control, between them set the quiescent
current. Clever, eh? There will be more semi-automatic benefits to our
design and our sound from the way tubes work with audiophiles rather
than against them.
=20
We should pause here a moment. The voltage you must supply to the plate
(for auto cathode bias, which is what we are assuming) is the sum of
the plate voltage chosen above plus the negative bias voltage. The
output at the smoothing filter of your power supply must be higher
still by the voltage dropped over the copper resistance (this is a real
resistance you can measure with your multimeter, not the same as the
load impedance) of the OPT.
=20
POWER OUTPUT AND DISTORTION
=20
Calculate the true power output and distortion by measuring on the
curves, extending them upwards as required because their cutoff at the
top includes another implied and untrue assumption, viz that the tube
is perfectly and symmetrically linear.
=20
The output power is the product of the peak to peak voltage swing and
the peak to peak current swing divided by 8. Peak to peak means you
measure along the loadline (representing the OPT transformer) for both
the positive- and negative-going sections of the signal, which is short
of twice the negative bias by twice the distance you chose to remove
the end from the 0V negative bias line. To repeat, this loadline is
centred on the quiescent operating point or design centre you chose.
=20
The 2nd harmonic distortion % is
=20
((((Imax + Imin)/2)-Io)*100)/ (Imax-Imin)
=20
where Io is the current at your chosen operating point. In Class A
single-ended operation you can disregard third harmonic distortion;
with this method it is not likely ever to get into your aural threshold
because you will be able to see something is wrong by visual inspection
of the curves long before you hearit.
=20
It really is that easy once one finds the right tools to do the job
properly.
=20
ooOoo
=20
Notice how, except to tell you to work with a traditional 3K OPT, I
gave you no numbers? I want you to do this by yourself for several good
reasons beyond familiarizing yourself with the most important graph in
your life as an audiophile. You will be horrified by some of the
numbers you work out. You will ask, But can this be true about the
great 300B? Can it really be that distorted?
=20
Because it is so common (relatively speaking in ultrafi, not in guitar
amps!) the 300B is a relatively easy tube to design with for the
experienced, and SE amps are simple to build once someone else has
developed a quiet layout. But the 300B does have its pitfalls for the
careless and the ignorant. Now, while it still costs nothing, wallow in
a bit of carelessness and ignorance. Do outrageous things to that sheet
of graph paper. Burn up a virtual 300B at 60W. Choke it into submission
with a 10K OPT.
=20
Beyond this point knowledge will corrupt you with lust for the 300B
sound. You have been warned!
=20
(c) 1997, 2004 Andre Jute=20
=20
NEXT: THE KISS AMP POWER STAGE WHOLE

=20

Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KISS 100 by Andre Jute at 31 March 2004 -- The KISS Amp INDEX [email protected] Vacuum Tubes 0 April 1st 05 04:45 AM
KISS 123 by Andre Jute: Why the KISS 300B is ZNFB Patrick Turner Vacuum Tubes 82 December 19th 04 09:29 PM
Re KISS 123 by Andre Jute Andre Jute Vacuum Tubes 0 December 14th 04 12:27 AM
KISS 100 4 December 2004 Andre Jute Vacuum Tubes 0 December 5th 04 11:20 PM
KISS 114 by Andre Jute Andre Jute Vacuum Tubes 0 November 21st 04 06:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:08 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"