[Arny Krueger]

"Chris Hornbeck" wrote in
message
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 06:48:48 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Paul Stamler" wrote in message


Some of the audible differences in
capacitors, for example, are clearly due to things we
can easily measure.

No, all of them.

Rather a sweeping generalization, the sweepingness of
which gets to the heart of the philosophy of science, and its
fundamental difference from religion.

Prove me wrong with a working example.

More specifically, no such statement can be made in
science, but is often made in religion.

No, it is not a sweeping generalization in the context that it is stated.

Science is *not* a method of hammering down loose nails;
it's a process for discovering which nails might be loose.

That's true, but how is it relevant to the discussion at hand?

Thanks, as always,

Chris Hornbeck