Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
2pid, you have to help me understand
You said today that you couldn't define "wingnut" and that therefore
the term is meaningless. Yet you constantly refer to "nutters" when referring to liberals and others who disagree with you during your frequent OT barrages. Here I am, freely admitting that your command of English exceeds mine. So could you spell out the difference in meaning between the two? I'm confused. Here's your statement: ************************* (Stephen) How do wingnuts and Birchers diverge? (2pid) Same way you and wingnuts converge. Silly questions beget silly answers. (Stephen) If you won't answer them, how is one to know? (2pid) I won't answer because I can't define a "wingnut". Neither can you for that matter. ************************* I hope you can understand my confusion... |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
2pid, you have to help me understand
On Sep 28, 3:06 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Sep 28, 12:57 pm, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote: You said today that you couldn't define "wingnut" and that therefore the term is meaningless. Yet you constantly refer to "nutters" Nutters are people whose opinion is not based on reality or facts, has nothing to do with left or right. I think it does. Using that definition, ultra-right religious types are nutters. Ultra-left are also nutters. Ultra-fanatic Muslims are nutters, as are ultra-fanatic christians. Sadly, the center remains pretty much unrepresented, at least since Clinton left office. People claiming Schaivo should not have been killed based upon claims of possible recovery are nutters with regard to that topic AFAIAC. Well, lookee there! We agree on something. Now how about those nutters who are against joining every single industrialized nation WRT health care? Crazy, huh? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Well, 2pid | Audio Opinions | |||
Say, 2pid, have you seen this? | Audio Opinions |