Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Shure X2U
Does anyone here have any experience with the Shure X2U XLR to USB adapter? My
first one had what sounded like a high frequency oscillation that manifested itself as a loud hiss. Shure replaced it. I don't know if the old one did this, but the new one is difficult to set the mic gain correctly. The gain changes dramatically at the top end of movement of the gain pot. The gain (as viewed in Audition) goes from -12 to DFS with a very slight movement of the gain control. I'm using it with a dynamic mic. |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Shure X2U
On 2/24/2012 7:41 AM, mcp6453 wrote:
but the new one is difficult to set the mic gain correctly. The gain changes dramatically at the top end of movement of the gain pot. This seems to be how the industry is making inexpensive mic preamps (which this is) nowadays. The same is true with a lot of the small mixers and USB/Firewire audio I/O interfaces. Nobody makes an off-the-shelf pot with a taper that gives a more uniform gain adjustment and at that price point they can't afford to have a custom part designed and built. Do what real engineers do. Don't push the level when you record. Better for it to be too low and need boosting on playback or mixing than to have it too high and clip the A/D converter on peaks. For what it's worth, I have a CEntrance MicPort Pro which is essentially what Shure made with their in-line mic-USB adapter, and its gain control isn't terribly finicky. I wouldn't suggest that you switch horses over this, though. Just work with the Shure as it is and learn how to get good results with it. Judge by the sound, not by how loud the playback is (you have a playback volume control, don't you?) or how wide the squiggles on the waveform graphic are. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com - useful and interesting audio stuff |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Shure X2U
On 2/24/2012 11:41 PM, Mike Rivers wrote:
On 2/24/2012 7:41 AM, mcp6453 wrote: but the new one is difficult to set the mic gain correctly. The gain changes dramatically at the top end of movement of the gain pot. This seems to be how the industry is making inexpensive mic preamps (which this is) nowadays. The same is true with a lot of the small mixers and USB/Firewire audio I/O interfaces. Nobody makes an off-the-shelf pot with a taper that gives a more uniform gain adjustment and at that price point they can't afford to have a custom part designed and built. Do what real engineers do. Don't push the level when you record. Better for it to be too low and need boosting on playback or mixing than to have it too high and clip the A/D converter on peaks. For what it's worth, I have a CEntrance MicPort Pro which is essentially what Shure made with their in-line mic-USB adapter, and its gain control isn't terribly finicky. I wouldn't suggest that you switch horses over this, though. Just work with the Shure as it is and learn how to get good results with it. Judge by the sound, not by how loud the playback is (you have a playback volume control, don't you?) or how wide the squiggles on the waveform graphic are. Because the X2U is a cheap preamp, the signal-to-noise ratio is not good with the gain set to a low level. The problem is that low is VERY low. There is almost no in between. Shure should be ashamed of themselves. The Blue Icicle is not as finicky and is 1/3 the price. For this application, I'm going to solve the problem by using an RNP and a Roland UA-1G converter. I may send the X2U back again, just in case there is something wrong with it. It's a handy device to have. |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Shure X2U
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:31:16 -0500, mcp6453 wrote:
On 2/24/2012 11:41 PM, Mike Rivers wrote: On 2/24/2012 7:41 AM, mcp6453 wrote: but the new one is difficult to set the mic gain correctly. The gain changes dramatically at the top end of movement of the gain pot. This seems to be how the industry is making inexpensive mic preamps (which this is) nowadays. The same is true with a lot of the small mixers and USB/Firewire audio I/O interfaces. Nobody makes an off-the-shelf pot with a taper that gives a more uniform gain adjustment and at that price point they can't afford to have a custom part designed and built. Do what real engineers do. Don't push the level when you record. Better for it to be too low and need boosting on playback or mixing than to have it too high and clip the A/D converter on peaks. For what it's worth, I have a CEntrance MicPort Pro which is essentially what Shure made with their in-line mic-USB adapter, and its gain control isn't terribly finicky. I wouldn't suggest that you switch horses over this, though. Just work with the Shure as it is and learn how to get good results with it. Judge by the sound, not by how loud the playback is (you have a playback volume control, don't you?) or how wide the squiggles on the waveform graphic are. Because the X2U is a cheap preamp, the signal-to-noise ratio is not good with the gain set to a low level. The problem is that low is VERY low. There is almost no in between. Shure should be ashamed of themselves. The Blue Icicle is not as finicky and is 1/3 the price. For this application, I'm going to solve the problem by using an RNP and a Roland UA-1G converter. I may send the X2U back again, just in case there is something wrong with it. It's a handy device to have. The RNP, despite its reputation, has a poor SNR at ALL gain levels. If noise is your problem (and I really don't understand how it is given that you need to reduce gain), then the RNP is not where you should be looking. d |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Shure X2U
On 2/25/2012 9:01 AM, Don Pearce wrote:
The RNP, despite its reputation, has a poor SNR at ALL gain levels. If noise is your problem (and I really don't understand how it is given that you need to reduce gain), then the RNP is not where you should be looking. When using the X2U, the gain setting controls in Windows are disabled. The only gain control is on the X2U. At least that's the way things are on my system. So, when the gain jumps to max on the X2U, it's clipping at DFS. When the level is inched down, it jumps way down. When the level on the X2U is correct, which is achievable but difficult and touchy, the SNR is okay. It's definitely worse than the RNP, which I already have. |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Shure X2U
"Don Pearce" wrote in message
... On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:31:16 -0500, mcp6453 wrote: The RNP, despite its reputation, has a poor SNR at ALL gain levels. If noise is your problem (and I really don't understand how it is given that you need to reduce gain), then the RNP is not where you should be looking. ALL gain levels? I beg to differ - it's a little noisier than some, which you can clearly hear on the highest gain settings, but it's fine at more moderate gains. Too noisely for a ribbon mic, but fine for a typical dynamic or condensor, IMHO. Sean |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Shure X2U
On 2/25/2012 8:31 AM, mcp6453 wrote:
The Blue Icicle is not as finicky and is 1/3 the price. For this application, I'm going to solve the problem by using an RNP and a Roland UA-1G converter. I may send the X2U back again, just in case there is something wrong with it. It's a handy device to have. Try a CEntrance MicPort Pro. That was the first one of these gadgets to the market and it's probably the best because it didn't have to be cheaper than anyone else. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com - useful and interesting audio stuff |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Shure X2U
On 2/25/2012 10:19 AM, mcp6453 wrote:
When using the X2U, the gain setting controls in Windows are disabled. The only gain control is on the X2U. At least that's the way things are on my system. So, when the gain jumps to max on the X2U, it's clipping at DFS. When the level is inched down, it jumps way down. Is this Windows 7? I wonder if Windows thinks it's a mic input device. I was helping a neighbor of mine through a "too much gain" problem with his M-Audio interface when he got a new computer with Windows 7 pre-installed. I found something in the Windows Control Panel that somehow decided that it was a microphone and therefore needed a gain boost (which would explain the poor noise performance at low gain). Yours might be like that and you'll have to figure out how to disable that gain boost setting. I can't remember how I did it. That's the trouble with Windows - once I stumble across a solution, it's so unintuitive that I don't remember it. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com - useful and interesting audio stuff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Shure KSM-44 | Pro Audio | |||
Shure E3, E3c or E3g?? | Pro Audio | |||
Shure E2C | High End Audio | |||
Which Is Better For Live Singing - Shure SM58 or Shure Beta 58 | Pro Audio | |||
shure sm7 | Pro Audio |