Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Why do (some) FM stations have such apallingly bad sound?
On 2/24/2012 2:09 AM, Trevor wrote:
"Marc Wielage" wrote in message .com... But the problem is, most FM stations choose to subdivide their bandwidth into multiple streams, and as a result, most of what you hear on HD Radio is maybe 120kbps, at best. We can only dream of that here, with most digital radio stations closer to 64kbs. :-( The good news at least is that I don't listen to radio anyway, and I sure don't need to buy a digital one! :-) AM provides better coverage for news and traffic reports, which is all I ever want on radio, and talkback radio seems to be the most listened too by other people, and that sounds just as bad on anything, or at any bit rate. CD's are for listening to recorded music! I solved my frustration with radio the same way Trevor did: I stopped listening to it. When I'm listening to online content, it's almost always from the Internet. Most of the streams I listen to are 128K even for talk. |
#42
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Why do (some) FM stations have such apallingly bad sound?
Marc Wielage writes:
But the problem is, most FM stations choose to subdivide their bandwidth into multiple streams, and as a result, most of what you hear on HD Radio is maybe 120kbps, at best. That's the dark side of digital. While digital in theory could provide very high bandwidth of very high quality, all too often it is used instead to create quantity rather than quality, e.g., 1000 channels of terrible image or sound quality rather than one channel of superlative quality. The push is always towards the lowest common denominator, because that's what makes the most money. |
#43
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Why do (some) FM stations have such apallingly bad sound?
Mxsmanic wrote:
Marc Wielage writes: But the problem is, most FM stations choose to subdivide their bandwidth into multiple streams, and as a result, most of what you hear on HD Radio is maybe 120kbps, at best. That's the dark side of digital. While digital in theory could provide very high bandwidth of very high quality, all too often it is used instead to create quantity rather than quality, e.g., 1000 channels of terrible image or sound quality rather than one channel of superlative quality. The push is always towards the lowest common denominator, because that's what makes the most money. Like "I can cram half a million (crappy sounding) songs on my iPod" is some sort of nirvana. geoff |
#44
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Why do (some) FM stations have such apallingly bad sound?
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:09:45 -0800, Mxsmanic wrote
(in article ): That's the dark side of digital. While digital in theory could provide very high bandwidth of very high quality, all too often it is used instead to create quantity rather than quality, e.g., 1000 channels of terrible image or sound quality rather than one channel of superlative quality. The push is always towards the lowest common denominator, because that's what makes the most money. ------------------------------snip------------------------------ Yep. A couple of years ago, Sirius Radio talkshow host Howard Stern had on as a guest the person who came up with the concept of satellite radio 20 years ago, including the various techniques for signal compression. As the story goes, they originally intended for Sirius to have _twice the bandwidth_ it does now, but the FCC forced Sirius to divide up their bandwidth with XM Radio, which required twice as much compression. As a result, the average Sirius channels are broadcast at about 64kbps (according to most estimates), or 128kbps via internet streaming. This is a huge step down in quality from what it could have been. The same problem has happened in HDTV broadcasting, where many local stations have taken a chunk of their available bandwidth and allocated it instead to sub-channels, sacrificing picture quality for a little extra money. I hate this. Unnecessary compression is bad. --MFW |
#45
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Why do (some) FM stations have such apallingly bad sound?
Marc Wielage writes:
The same problem has happened in HDTV broadcasting, where many local stations have taken a chunk of their available bandwidth and allocated it instead to sub-channels, sacrificing picture quality for a little extra money. I hate this. Unnecessary compression is bad. It's an unavoidable consequence of going from analog to digital. Once people discover that they can delivery quantity rather than quality and reap higher margins in the process, any additional quality provided by digital methods goes out the window, and is replaced with quantity instead. |
#46
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Why do (some) FM stations have such apallingly bad sound?
Marc Wielage wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:09:45 -0800, Mxsmanic wrote (in ): That's the dark side of digital. While digital in theory could provide very high bandwidth of very high quality, all too often it is used instead to create quantity rather than quality, e.g., 1000 channels of terrible image or sound quality rather than one channel of superlative quality. The push is always towards the lowest common denominator, because that's what makes the most money. ------------------------------snip------------------------------ Yep. A couple of years ago, Sirius Radio talkshow host Howard Stern had on as a guest the person who came up with the concept of satellite radio 20 years ago, including the various techniques for signal compression. As the story goes, they originally intended for Sirius to have _twice the bandwidth_ it does now, but the FCC forced Sirius to divide up their bandwidth with XM Radio, which required twice as much compression. As a result, the average Sirius channels are broadcast at about 64kbps (according to most estimates), or 128kbps via internet streaming. This is a huge step down in quality from what it could have been. The same problem has happened in HDTV broadcasting, where many local stations have taken a chunk of their available bandwidth and allocated it instead to sub-channels, sacrificing picture quality for a little extra money. I hate this. Unnecessary compression is bad. --MFW The entertainment industry has always gotten the short end of the Sherman Act. -- Les Cargill |
#47
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Why do (some) FM stations have such apallingly bad sound?
Mxsmanic wrote:
Marc Wielage writes: The same problem has happened in HDTV broadcasting, where many local stations have taken a chunk of their available bandwidth and allocated it instead to sub-channels, sacrificing picture quality for a little extra money. I hate this. Unnecessary compression is bad. It's an unavoidable consequence of going from analog to digital. Once people discover that they can delivery quantity rather than quality and reap higher margins in the process, any additional quality provided by digital methods goes out the window, and is replaced with quantity instead. People (in general) won't pay for quality, so this preference is revealed by price. If quality had mattered, reel to reel would have eclipsed vinyl. -- Les Cargill |
#48
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Why do (some) FM stations have such apallingly bad sound?
Les Cargill writes:
People (in general) won't pay for quality, so this preference is revealed by price. If quality had mattered, reel to reel would have eclipsed vinyl. One of my family elders invested in a very good reel-to-reel system once, and it still whipped anything more recent even after its owner was long gone. I was amazed by the quality the first time I heard it. And it was a high-end prosumer system, not an actual professional system. Tape is one of those technologies that is fairly open-ended. You can always run the tape faster with more aggressive noise reduction and get better results, within broad limits. But things like 8-track cartridges gave it a bad name, I think. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FM stations boosting bass? | High End Audio | |||
Get over 3000 STATIONS on your PC or Laptop! | Pro Audio | |||
How to resolve XLR picking up radio stations | Pro Audio | |||
Record audio from AM/FM Stations | Pro Audio | |||
Broadcastdb - New stations: | Audio Opinions |