Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
DC Offset???
Hi. Today my intern asked me a question that I did not have a clear answer for (this happens now and then). While I was describing various menus and their definitions and functions in Pro Tools he asked me what DC Offset was. "Good Question" I said. "It has something to do with very low frequency hum that can be introduced into a signal from power sources", I said. He then asked me what that menu select did in PT and I quickly changed the subject. "Hey..look at that bird out the window!" God forbid I should look that up. Or even know this by now. Could anyone please ellaborate on DCoffset. Is this below human hearing? Is this purely a restoration issue? Thanx BP. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
DC Offset???
Robert Pascarella wrote: Hi. Today my intern asked me a question that I did not have a clear answer for (this happens now and then). While I was describing various menus and their definitions and functions in Pro Tools he asked me what DC Offset was. "Good Question" I said. "It has something to do with very low frequency hum that can be introduced into a signal from power sources", I said. He then asked me what that menu select did in PT and I quickly changed the subject. "Hey..look at that bird out the window!" God forbid I should look that up. Or even know this by now. Could anyone please ellaborate on DCoffset. Is this below human hearing? Is this purely a restoration issue? DC = Direct Current. DC is 0 Hz. It just sits there at some voltage level with respect to signal return. For audio if that level is 0 Volts then you don't worry about such things as wasting energy heating voice coils in speakers. If it is not 0 Volts then you can see intersting things like woofers suddenly moving to a new position in the basket and staying there when your signal is applied. Too much of this and you lose dynamic range amongst other ills. It's like having a battery in series with the AC component of the signal. bobs Bob Smith BS Studios we organize chaos http://www.bsstudios.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
DC Offset???
"Robert Pascarella" wrote in message
Today my intern asked me a question that I did not have a clear answer for (this happens now and then). While I was describing various menus and their definitions and functions in Pro Tools he asked me what DC Offset was. "Good Question" I said. "It has something to do with very low frequency hum that can be introduced into a signal from power sources", I said. Wrong. DC offset is not low frequency, its DC. DC means that the frequency is zero. Could anyone please elaborate on DCoffset. DC offsets are mistakes that sometimes creep into recordings because of human, equipment or software errors. Is this below human hearing? It is until you start chopping audio up and matching it up with audio that lacks the identical same DC offset. Then you get tics and pops at the edit points. Is this purely a restoration issue? The problem with DC offset is that it creates tics and pops when you paste in audio that lacks the identical same DC offset. Rather than trying to match DC offsets, its easier to just eliminate them. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
DC Offset???
Robert Pascarella wrote:
Could anyone please ellaborate on DCoffset. Is this below human hearing? Is this purely a restoration issue? DC offset occurs when the long-term average of a waveform overall (taking into account both its positive and negative excursions) is something other than exactly 0. This can occur because some signals themselves are not perfectly symmetrical, but in the most common recording situations it occurs simply because most A/D converters aren't designed specifically to "center" their output exactly around 0--because very little harm is actually caused by small, relatively constant amounts of offset, and if it is a problem in a particular situation, it can always be removed. In fact in the old days, some converters deliberately introduced small amounts of DC offset because it was thought that this would improve the sonic performance of D/A converters. And perhaps back then it did. DC offset can become a problem particularly when you're editing material that has it in varying amounts--i.e. if take 4 of a piece has a DC offset value that's markedly different from the DC offset value of take 2 and you have to make an abrupt transition from one to the other. Under some circumstances a thump or an "unidentifiable something wrong" can occur at the transition point, giving away the fact that an edit was made. Or it can simply be unaccountably difficult to find a good edit point. Actually it takes quite a bit of DC offset to restrict the dynamic range of a system significantly, because in linear PCM the value of one LSB is large only near the zero (crossing) point; closer to full scale, one LSB represents only a tiny fraction (e.g. 1/10000 or less IIRC) of a dB. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
DC Offset???
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
DC Offset???
"Richard Crowley" wrote in message ... "Geoff Tanner" wrote ... Is there really a software dc offset adjustment on the outputs of a protools system? I would think that any decent audio software would have a function to adjust DC offset. I would have guessed that they would have had dc servo amps specifically to clamp the outputs at 0v and so negate the need for dc blocking capacitors. Few pieces of audio equipment outside "golden-ears" audiophile circles are DC-coupled end-to-end. The first capacitor or trans- former in the path will eliminate any DC-offset. Another good reason to always fade-in and fade-out when finishing a mix. You CAN hear the "click" if you leave the DC-offset in a CD track without fading in and out. Hi I'm still puzzled why the D to A has to have a client accessible DC offset adjustment and why the amplifier should not be set permanently to zero dc offset. What possible advantage is there is having the audio riding on a dc level... other than biasing an electrolytic capacitor you would fit there to zap the offset? Geoff www.auroraaudio.net |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
DC Offset???
"Geoff Tanner" wrote in message
ink.net I'm still puzzled why the D to A has to have a client accessible DC offset adjustment We're talking legacy equipment,here. Things like the old 3M digital recorder ca. late 70s, early 80s. Modern equipment lacks just about any kind of adjustment that clients or the production line can foul up. and why the amplifier should not be set permanently to zero dc offset. What possible advantage is there is having the audio riding on a dc level... other than biasing an electrolytic capacitor you would fit there to zap the offset? Once upon a time some converters treated the transition from positive to negative signal voltages as a special case. Like most special cases, there could be some pathological behavior associated with the transition at zero. The idea of adding an offset was to move this pathological behavior to signal levels where it was a smaller percentage of the total signal. On a mostly-irrelevant note, in telecommunications there was a similar concept called "sealing current". The effects of incidental contact rectification was reduced by biasing the line so there never was a change in the direction that current flowed through it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
DC Offset???
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
DC Offset???
Rick Thomas wrote: So when I am in logic audio and I check for DC offset, and it says 0.003 percent found, and I remove it, does it effect my audio at all by removing any of the audio signal also. Depends on the method. I've seen it done with a highpass filter with a high enough cutoff that there was phase shift into the audible range and I've seen it done by just averaging all the samples in the track and then subtracting that from every sample in which case the effective cutoff is so low that there are no artifacts at all. To see what is happening for a particular implementation, do a removal on a single sample pulse in a few seconds of silence. If what remains is still a single sample pulse with just a slight level shift everywhere then it is the latter method. If you see a change in the shape of the pulse it is the former. Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
DC Offset???
in article znr1060863536k@trad, Mike Rivers at wrote on
8/14/03 10:13 AM: In article writes: So when I am in logic audio and I check for DC offset, and it says 0.003 percent found, and I remove it, does it effect my audio at all by removing any of the audio signal also. The functional way that DC offset is removed (regardless of exactly how the math is done) is by filtering out everything below a very low frequency, usually 5 Hz or lower. So, yes, if you actually recorded anything down that low, it will affect it. In practice, it won't. DC offset used to be a bigger problem than it is with today's A/D converters. The two main consequences of having significant DC offset are a loss of symmetrical headroom (by the amount of the offset), and the tendency to generate a click at an edit point when you think you're cutting at the zero crossing (but are actually cutting at zero plus the DC offset. It's a problem that you shouldn't worry about until you find a problem. Ok, Ive noticed that when I trim an audio file to get rid of all the lead in time and end time I allways end up with a click at the beginning of the track. I guess this must be the DC offset. Wow, it just goes to show no matter how long youve done something you allways learn something new. From now on I will remove Dc offset from every single track before editing. -- I'm really Mike Rivers - ) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
DC Offset???
This is great, guys. I want to thank you for these comments. So, anything at 0hz (DC) would imply that the signal polarity never changes. There are NO cycles per second. Thus meaning that any two signals with these requirements would match perfectly. No pops or ticks. Anything higher would be considered an Alternating Current or AC? If something (like a bad A/D) changes the value from 0hz, you may hear those pops and ticks inedits due to the "unmatched frequencies"? By applying the offset, are we restoring the signal to 0hz? Thanx again BP. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
DC Offset???
"Mike Rivers" wrote in message
news:znr1060863536k@trad... The functional way that DC offset is removed (regardless of exactly how the math is done) is by filtering out everything below a very low frequency, usually 5 Hz or lower. So, yes, if you actually recorded anything down that low, it will affect it. In practice, it won't. I don't know if there's any practical purpose for frequencies that low, but I did make a recording with functional low frequencies, once. As an experiment, I recorded a five-second copyright notice, stretched it out to a couple of minutes and mixed it in with some tracks. It was too low to hear, but when the final product was played back at high speed, the notice became audible. dtk |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
DC Offset???
"Rick Thomas" wrote in message
... in article znr1060863536k@trad, Mike Rivers at wrote on Ok, Ive noticed that when I trim an audio file to get rid of all the lead in time and end time I allways end up with a click at the beginning of the track. I guess this must be the DC offset. Wow, it just goes to show no matter how long youve done something you allways learn something new. From now on I will remove Dc offset from every single track before editing. You don't need to remove DC offset every time (if at all most times nowadays). Just make sure the cut points happen at a zero crossing. Most all editing software has an option to make sure that all edits have zero crossing. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
DC Offset???
"Robert Pascarella" wrote ...
So, anything at 0hz (DC) would imply that the signal polarity never changes. There are NO cycles per second. Yes. Thus meaning that any two signals with these requirements would match perfectly. No pops or ticks. Few people would consider 0Hz (dead silence) to be a "signal". Anything higher would be considered an Alternating Current or AC? Yes. But 0Hz is no signal at all (at least in the audio sense). If something (like a bad A/D) changes the value from 0hz, you may hear those pops and ticks inedits due to the "unmatched frequencies"? You seem to be confusing Hz (AC frequency, cycles-per-second) with Volts (signal amplitude, or "strength"). Not the same in any way! Hz measures the "length" of the waveform (in cycles/second). Most would say it measures the "frequency". While V measures the "height" of the waveform (in Volts or milli-volts, etc. By applying the offset, are we restoring the signal to 0hz? No. You are restoring the signal to 0 volts offset. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
DC Offset???
Yes. Bob didn't explain it in a way that you might SEE on the screen, but
look at the way things are described. We have ZERO dBFS (Full Scale), which is the absolute maximum any signal digitally can obtain, and we have ZERO in the sense of the visible scale representing the point between positive bits and negative bits. In a 16 bit environment that would be between 32767 and -32768 in the computer ( and we talk about 16 bit because that's the CD Redbook Standard). If a signal is centered directly between both extremes then it is the normally recorded file. If it starts somewhere higher than ZERO (not dBfs) then it's due to DC offset. So while one channel is playing along fine at the right reference level, the other is starting higher, still can't exceed the max ZERO dBFS, and consequently brings less dynamic range into the picture and insinuates noise. Calculating for DC offset subtracts the noise and re-establishes dynamic range. Now if Logic Audio is good enough to discern .003 percent, then I'd say NO, you're not going to hear the difference. 3 thousandths of a percent is pretty negligable. However, if you do a lot of mixing with DC offset being consistent within the tracks being mixed, you ain't going to get it out from the mix. If you have this problem then you need to go through and calculate the DC offset for all offending tracks before you mix the material. And an even better exercise is to find out why any DC offset is being induced into your system. That's a totally different subject. -- Roger W. Norman SirMusic Studio Purchase your copy of the Fifth of RAP CD set at www.recaudiopro.net. See how far $20 really goes. "Rick Thomas" wrote in message ... So when I am in logic audio and I check for DC offset, and it says 0.003 percent found, and I remove it, does it effect my audio at all by removing any of the audio signal also. in article , Bob Smith at wrote on 8/14/03 12:58 AM: Robert Pascarella wrote: Hi. Today my intern asked me a question that I did not have a clear answer for (this happens now and then). While I was describing various menus and their definitions and functions in Pro Tools he asked me what DC Offset was. "Good Question" I said. "It has something to do with very low frequency hum that can be introduced into a signal from power sources", I said. He then asked me what that menu select did in PT and I quickly changed the subject. "Hey..look at that bird out the window!" God forbid I should look that up. Or even know this by now. Could anyone please ellaborate on DCoffset. Is this below human hearing? Is this purely a restoration issue? DC = Direct Current. DC is 0 Hz. It just sits there at some voltage level with respect to signal return. For audio if that level is 0 Volts then you don't worry about such things as wasting energy heating voice coils in speakers. If it is not 0 Volts then you can see intersting things like woofers suddenly moving to a new position in the basket and staying there when your signal is applied. Too much of this and you lose dynamic range amongst other ills. It's like having a battery in series with the AC component of the signal. bobs Bob Smith BS Studios we organize chaos http://www.bsstudios.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
DC Offset experts! | Pro Audio |