Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Using power triode/pentode wired as triode as a split load phase splitter tube?
Hi,
Ok, I've spent time designing my amp with an experienced designer. For personal tastes and reasons, I've planned to build an integrated push-pull power triode amp using 300B power tubes. (Thanks for Fabio about his concerns about the 250V driving voltage, as this amp is being designed by a competent designer, I have trust that the desing will be workable, and I'll manage to build it so it'll work :-). Also thanks go for all you good people here in this newsgroup who have shared your experience, and answered my many questions in detail! I'd rather save you from the details why I would like to build this amp, because they're very personal and related to the planned use of the amp, and rather ask you about the following subject. The amp is going to have either a transformer phase splitter, or a split load phase splitter. Well, that's what has been suggested to me. This is the only designing question left, what kind of phase splitter to use. I've searched the net about the subject, and did find some info. Something that caught my attention (especially as my amp will be using power triodes as output tubes), was the mentioning that a power triode tube or a power pentode wired as triode could be used as the split-load phase splitter tube to get lower output impedance. Now, I'm asking you experts, is this idea sensible, and beneficial, as the original author is claiming it might be? Here's the whole piece of text in question: 1.. split load inverter: Arguably the best balanced of all phase splitters (in terms of unloaded voltage balance), it has two serious difficulties, namely that the output impedance of the two voltages is radically different, and it has NO gain. in a split load, the plate and cathode loads are identical resistors, and output is taken from the plate and cathode. the bottom part is functionally a cathode follower, and the top part is a grounded cathode circuit with a large unbypassed cathode resistor. i.e., low z out in the K circuit and high z out of the P circuit. If the high Z signal is looking at the starving mouth a power triode grid represents, you can easily imagine that it will be really easy to load it down. A typical power triode might have 15pf of grid to plate C, plus the socket stray (5pf), times the Miller number (mu times 20pf times the driver Miller, which might easily be 20pf by the time you're swinging 30-60 vrms, if you are not using a cathode follower...). All in all, it could typically shift from 60pf at 0 signal to about 400 pf at full output. If the driving Z is 50k (approximately 1/2 a 6SN7 with 20k p+k resistors), the top tube will load down by 8khz at full swing. The bottom tube will not load down until 80khz or there-abouts. Additionally, you will need about 400 volts B+ to swing 40 top and bottom, not to mention that the tube in front will have to provide 40 volts to the phase inverter! Weird! This is why Williamson used a combo cathodyne and a diff amp. It's a good solution. The cathodyne splits phase with near perfect balance, but it drives the much easier grids of a small dual medium mu voltage amp (2 or 3 pf instead of 15 or 20), which in turn have the same output z and easily drive pp grids. One further consideration that few have considered is using a power triode as a P/K inverter. An EL-34 wired in triode, with 4k P+K resistors could have an output z low enough to avoid problems in the audio range. The same 400v B+ would still apply... I'm not pretending I did understand all the technical factors involved. That's why I would appreciate your expertise on the matter. So, for my application, would there be any benefit for using a power triode/pentode wired as a triode as the phase splitter tube, to get that lower output impedance? I've got spare EL-34 tubes and other pentodes lying around so I could use them, or buy more 300B tubes. Or would some other phase-splitter configuration work better for my project? Of course, if I decide to go the transformer way this question isn't needed, but I doubt it, based on the high price tags associated with quality phase splitter transformers. If I'm wrong, and you know some good and "inexpensive" transformers for this use, please correct me. If you feel this question was complete spamm, my apologies! Thanks! -at |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
at wrote: Hi, Ok, I've spent time designing my amp with an experienced designer. For personal tastes and reasons, I've planned to build an integrated push-pull power triode amp using 300B power tubes. (Thanks for Fabio about his concerns about the 250V driving voltage, as this amp is being designed by a competent designer, I have trust that the desing will be workable, and I'll manage to build it so it'll work :-). Also thanks go for all you good people here in this newsgroup who have shared your experience, and answered my many questions in detail! I'd rather save you from the details why I would like to build this amp, because they're very personal and related to the planned use of the amp, and rather ask you about the following subject. The amp is going to have either a transformer phase splitter, or a split load phase splitter. Well, that's what has been suggested to me. This is the only designing question left, what kind of phase splitter to use. I've searched the net about the subject, and did find some info. Something that caught my attention (especially as my amp will be using power triodes as output tubes), was the mentioning that a power triode tube or a power pentode wired as triode could be used as the split-load phase splitter tube to get lower output impedance. Now, I'm asking you experts, is this idea sensible, and beneficial, as the original author is claiming it might be? Yes, if well implemented. Here's the whole piece of text in question: 1.. split load inverter: Arguably the best balanced of all phase splitters (in terms of unloaded voltage balance), it has two serious difficulties, namely that the output impedance of the two voltages is radically different, and it has NO gain. in a split load, the plate and cathode loads are identical resistors, and output is taken from the plate and cathode. the bottom part is functionally a cathode follower, and the top part is a grounded cathode circuit with a large unbypassed cathode resistor. i.e., low z out in the K circuit and high z out of the P circuit. If the high Z signal is looking at the starving mouth a power triode grid represents, you can easily imagine that it will be really easy to load it down. A typical power triode might have 15pf of grid to plate C, plus the socket stray (5pf), times the Miller number (mu times 20pf times the driver Miller, which might easily be 20pf by the time you're swinging 30-60 vrms, if you are not using a cathode follower...). All in all, it could typically shift from 60pf at 0 signal to about 400 pf at full output. If the driving Z is 50k (approximately 1/2 a 6SN7 with 20k p+k resistors), the top tube will load down by 8khz at full swing. The bottom tube will not load down until 80khz or there-abouts. Additionally, you will need about 400 volts B+ to swing 40 top and bottom, not to mention that the tube in front will have to provide 40 volts to the phase inverter! Weird! This is why Williamson used a combo cathodyne and a diff amp. It's a good solution. The cathodyne splits phase with near perfect balance, but it drives the much easier grids of a small dual medium mu voltage amp (2 or 3 pf instead of 15 or 20), which in turn have the same output z and easily drive pp grids. One further consideration that few have considered is using a power triode as a P/K inverter. An EL-34 wired in triode, with 4k P+K resistors could have an output z low enough to avoid problems in the audio range. The same 400v B+ would still apply... The Williamson drive amp is a good drive amp for 300B. But I would try something like this at http://www.turneraudio.com.au/websch...ma550w335h.gif I'm not pretending I did understand all the technical factors involved. That's why I would appreciate your expertise on the matter. So, for my application, would there be any benefit for using a power triode/pentode wired as a triode as the phase splitter tube, to get that lower output impedance? I've got spare EL-34 tubes and other pentodes lying around so I could use them, or buy more 300B tubes. Or would some other phase-splitter configuration work better for my project? Of course, if I decide to go the transformer way this question isn't needed, but I doubt it, based on the high price tags associated with quality phase splitter transformers. If I'm wrong, and you know some good and "inexpensive" transformers for this use, please correct me. If you feel this question was complete spamm, my apologies! Thanks! -at Good luck, Patrick Turner. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"at" wrote in message
... Hi, Ok, I've spent time designing my amp with an experienced designer. (snip) The amp is going to have either a transformer phase splitter, or a split load phase splitter. Well, that's what has been suggested to me. This is the only designing question left, what kind of phase splitter to use. Have you considered this phase splitter. http://www.bonavolta.ch/hobby/en/audio/el84_7.htm This was a very nice little amplifier in its day (I built two.) Cheers, Roger |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Engineer" wrote in message
... Have you considered this phase splitter. http://www.bonavolta.ch/hobby/en/audio/el84_7.htm Only if you change R6 to a CCS. Otherwise, the plate resistors have to be suitably unbalanced. Tim -- "I've got more trophies than Wayne Gretsky and the Pope combined!" - Homer Simpson Website @ http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Engineer wrote: "at" wrote in message ... Hi, Ok, I've spent time designing my amp with an experienced designer. (snip) The amp is going to have either a transformer phase splitter, or a split load phase splitter. Well, that's what has been suggested to me. This is the only designing question left, what kind of phase splitter to use. Have you considered this phase splitter. http://www.bonavolta.ch/hobby/en/audio/el84_7.htm This was a very nice little amplifier in its day (I built two.) Yes, this amp, which is very similar to a Mullard design has a simple pentode input with 12AX7 LTP, and is ok where a tiny drive voltage is needed, but the driver circuit is right out of its depth for a pair of 300B. 6SN7 or trioded 6V6 or EL84 are then required for the 300B. Or possibly a couple of 6SH7 of 6BX6/EF80 for a circuit like the Quad 40. Patrick Turner. Cheers, Roger |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
here is how firewire ports fail | Pro Audio | |||
Using power triode or power pentode wired as a triode as a split-load phase splitter tube? | Vacuum Tubes | |||
List of NOS mostly tubes | Vacuum Tubes | |||
FS: SOUNDSTREAM CLOSEOUTS AND MORE!! | Car Audio |