Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Speaker Cable v. Lamp Cord
Hello All,
Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On 29 Oct 2004 23:06:49 GMT, Michael Dombrowski
wrote: Hello All, Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. Mike Same stuff, just different price. Lamp cord is even marked for polarity, usually by either a ribbed or hex-shaped insulation over one of the conductors. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Michael Dombrowski wrote:
Hello All, Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. Mike If the gauges are the same, then there is no difference. No one has been able to measure any differences that could be audible at the speaker terminals. Assuming the same lengths, of course. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On 29 Oct 2004 23:06:49 GMT, Michael Dombrowski
wrote: Hello All, Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. There has been for about five or six years now, a pool of around $5,000 for anyone who can tell the difference between basic zipcord (lamp cord, if you will) and the most exotic 'audiophile' speaker cable (which can run up to more than $1,000 a *foot*!), under level-matched double blind conditions. i.e. when they don't actually *know* what's connected. In all that time, and despite many claims of 'obvious', 'night and day', and 'pretty amazing' differences, not one single person has even *attempted* to claim this money. That should indicate to you that 'wire is wire', certainly no one has been able to demonstrate an ability to *hear* any differences, whatever they may *claim* on this or any other newsgroup. I find it fascinating that the more vocal claimants tend to appear in places such as Audio Asylum (a well-named group if ever there was one!), where discussion of blind testing is effectively banned by the moderators/censors. A more cynical person might think that they don't *want* to know the truth................... -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On 2004-10-30 09:06:49 +1000, Michael Dombrowski
said: Hello All, Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. Mike If you can't see or hear the difference, then you're obviously not in marketing =) for the record, no, I'm not in marketing either and am quite happy with a pair of $1500 speakers hanging off the ends of some 10 Amp mains flex... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Michael Dombrowski wrote:
Hello All, Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. Mike Thanks all, that pretty much confirms what I thought. Cheapest cable of the proper gauge and some decent connectors for my next system. Thanks Mike |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
On 30 Oct 2004 15:04:51 GMT, B&D wrote: On 10/29/04 11:54 PM, in article , "John C." wrote: On 29 Oct 2004 23:06:49 GMT, Michael Dombrowski wrote: Hello All, Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. Mike Same stuff, just different price. Lamp cord is even marked for polarity, usually by either a ribbed or hex-shaped insulation over one of the conductors. There *are* some fancier speaker cables that are a good deal more complex/engineered than lamp cord. Whether it is worth the extra money charged for that or dedicated speaker cables depends upon system and taste. I beg to differ. Whether it is worth the extra money depends on whether it *sounds* any better - or even different. As of this date, not one single person has been able to demonstrate an ability to hear *any* difference between basic 'zipcord' and the most 'advanced' and 'engineered' speaker cables. Indeed, even the legendary John Dunlavy, who manufacures one of the most technically perfect speaker cables available, states quite unequivocally that in almost all systems, there will be no *audible* difference between his cable and zipcord. Many years ago - decades in fact, respected UK pro-audio magazine Studio Sound conducted some tests on various speaker cables. The tests included 'scientific' tests like pulse waveforms, monitored at the load. There were discernable differences, both audible and on the scope, but mainly on account of *wire gauge*. One of the *best* results was standard house wiring cable of 2.5mm^2 cross sectional area ! God knows what that is in funny AWG. Graham |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On 30 Oct 2004 19:51:53 GMT, B&D wrote:
On 10/30/04 11:04 AM, in article , "Stewart Pinkerton" wrote: There has been for about five or six years now, a pool of around $5,000 for anyone who can tell the difference between basic zipcord (lamp cord, if you will) and the most exotic 'audiophile' speaker cable (which can run up to more than $1,000 a *foot*!), under level-matched double blind conditions. i.e. when they don't actually *know* what's connected. In all that time, and despite many claims of 'obvious', 'night and day', and 'pretty amazing' differences, not one single person has even *attempted* to claim this money. That should indicate to you that 'wire is wire', certainly no one has been able to demonstrate an ability to *hear* any differences, whatever they may *claim* on this or any other newsgroup. I find it fascinating that the more vocal claimants tend to appear in places such as Audio Asylum (a well-named group if ever there was one!), where discussion of blind testing is effectively banned by the moderators/censors. A more cynical person might think that they don't *want* to know the truth................... The existence of a pool does not *prove* anything except the existence of the challenge. While you may be building a lot of confidence in the supposition that it doesn't make a difference, and you are probably right, drawing the conclusions you do is not scientifically tight. The problem is you are trying to prove a negative - so you are stuck building confidence, I know. Quite so. It is true that I cannot actually *prove* that some part of the moon is *not* made of green cheese. OTOH, what odds would you give? :-) Still, if one were to offer a prize of any arbitrary amount - you cannot say that lack of somone claiming the prize is any indication of anything as broad as you are saying. Again, there is no argument from me that the DBT will show no differences, just be careful of your conclusions! I draw no *definite* conclusion from that particular quarter, I simply state the *fact* that no one has been able to demonstrate an ability to *hear* any differences. OTOH, I can certainly point to the easily *measurable* differences between 'zipcord' and an equivalent gauge of 'audiophile' wire, and conclude from those differences that no *audible* difference is possible, given known limits of human hearing. It therefore remains for those who make extraordinary claims for Kimber 'Black Pearl' et al, to *prove* their claims. No such proof has been forthcoming, or even an *attempt* at such proof, despite the existence for several years of a substantial reward. Why would you suppose that is? -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
On 29 Oct 2004 23:06:49 GMT, in article , Michael
Dombrowski stated: Hello All, Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. Mike It's not, but lamp cord is really ugly, and some speaker cable looks really cool! If it makes u feel better and it appeals to your sense of aesthetics, by all means buy some expensive cable. There is not likely to be any audible difference. Note the review of AQ's DBS cable system in the current issue.... no audible difference to the other cables. For most people, the greatest gain is to be made by room treatment and or room correction. But that's a pain in the butt, not a quick fix, so few go there, I suspect. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:06:49 +0000, Michael Dombrowski wrote:
Hello All, Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. Mike __________________________________________________ Mike.. If one believes there is no difference in audio cable and that lamp cord is sufficient...then, so be it. However, should one happen to go into a room where the audio setup is rather foolishly setup with some "audio cable"...and, the setup is "audio-wise" superior to anything heard prior to that...well, we all know it is not the cable..is it? Could it be the amplifier...but, we hear they all are the same...maybe just the source and speakers and the ambiance of the room..maybe? But, others with excellent sounding systems think not!! One will have to make these decisions on his own...mind you, there are newsgroups that are crowded with those that will tell you what you hear and what you don't. Keep in mind that it is redundantly stated enough..."there is no difference"..some types will come to believe this. So be it! Looking for decision making thoughts on these groups is not the answer.....one must cross this "decision" bridge on his own...krewl world!! Looking for "like minds" or espousing "agendas" on these groups won't cut it! Much fodder will be created for this Newsgroup with this much repeated question..nothing will be resolved! Leonard... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
-SNIP-
One of the *best* results was standard house wiring cable of 2.5mm^2 cross sectional area ! God knows what that is in funny AWG. Graham Somewhere between 14 and 12 gauge depending on strand count. -Guy |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
On 30 Oct 2004 22:47:18 GMT, Pooh Bear
wrote: Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On 30 Oct 2004 15:04:51 GMT, B&D wrote: On 10/29/04 11:54 PM, in article , "John C." wrote: On 29 Oct 2004 23:06:49 GMT, Michael Dombrowski wrote: Hello All, Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. Mike Same stuff, just different price. Lamp cord is even marked for polarity, usually by either a ribbed or hex-shaped insulation over one of the conductors. There *are* some fancier speaker cables that are a good deal more complex/engineered than lamp cord. Whether it is worth the extra money charged for that or dedicated speaker cables depends upon system and taste. I beg to differ. Whether it is worth the extra money depends on whether it *sounds* any better - or even different. As of this date, not one single person has been able to demonstrate an ability to hear *any* difference between basic 'zipcord' and the most 'advanced' and 'engineered' speaker cables. Indeed, even the legendary John Dunlavy, who manufacures one of the most technically perfect speaker cables available, states quite unequivocally that in almost all systems, there will be no *audible* difference between his cable and zipcord. Many years ago - decades in fact, respected UK pro-audio magazine Studio Sound conducted some tests on various speaker cables. The tests included 'scientific' tests like pulse waveforms, monitored at the load. There were discernable differences, both audible and on the scope, but mainly on account of *wire gauge*. One of the *best* results was standard house wiring cable of 2.5mm^2 cross sectional area ! God knows what that is in funny AWG. It's a fraction more than 10AWG, so pretty heavy-duty stuff. One would reasonably expect that it would do very well. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
HOO BOY!!!
Talk about opening a can of worms Some "audiophiles" swear there is a difference between say, a silver cable and a plain old lamp cord Others think that they, to be polite, are imagining things My advice is to get speaker wire that has oxygen free copper, which will cut down on corrosion, and get at least 16 guage. A hundred foot roll at wall mart is under 20 bucks, you arent giving up much on price and are getting good quality Then go to radio shack and get some gold plated connectors to connect it to your stuff, makes for a clean hookup "Michael Dombrowski" wrote in message ... Hello All, Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. Mike |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Michael Dombrowski wrote:
Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? No. But the more important question is: What gauge wire should I use? That depends largely on the length of your speaker cables. For a given gauge, the total resistance of the wire is directly proportional to its length. For lengths up to 10 or 15 feet, 14 gauge (AWG) should be fine. Art Harris |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Well here is an excample
http://www.taralabs.com/catalog/cata...BEBB2C2 F4B88 A pair of these cables cost here 15,000,00 $ Absurd or not? Ben |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
lcw999 wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:06:49 +0000, Michael Dombrowski wrote: Hello All, Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. Mike __________________________________________________ Mike.. If one believes there is no difference in audio cable and that lamp cord is sufficient...then, so be it. However, should one happen to go into a room where the audio setup is rather foolishly setup with some "audio cable"...and, the setup is "audio-wise" superior to anything heard prior to that...well, we all know it is not the cable..is it? Could it be the amplifier...but, we hear they all are the same...maybe just the source and speakers and the ambiance of the room..maybe? But, others with excellent sounding systems think not!! How about starting with the obvious? Maybe it's the speakers? Maybe it's the acoustical properties of the room? Maybe the listener has a preconception that the new system should sound different, if not better? Why do you overlook the likely reasons? skip Much fodder will be created for this Newsgroup with this much repeated question..nothing will be resolved! Nothing will be resolved if there is no attempt to resolve it... Leonard... |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
On 7 Nov 2004 16:34:57 GMT, "Pena" wrote:
Well here is an excample http://www.taralabs.com/catalog/cata...BEBB2C2 F4B88 A pair of these cables cost here 15,000,00 $ Absurd or not? Absurd. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
B&D wrote:
On 10/30/04 6:47 PM, in article , "Stewart Pinkerton" wrote: It therefore remains for those who make extraordinary claims for Kimber 'Black Pearl' et al, to *prove* their claims. No such proof has been forthcoming, or even an *attempt* at such proof, despite the existence for several years of a substantial reward. Why would you suppose that is? You and I both probably think the megabuck cable may not make much of an audible difference, if any -- however, it could be possible that they simply have good sales therefore have nothing to gain by such a challenge is they have somehow found "the elixir" or something. Who knows! :-) It's for the same reason that nobody has ever independently verified the 100 mpg carburetor or breast and penis enlargement claims .... the claims aren't verified because they are simply not verifiable under bias controlled conditions. Instead the makers and distributors rely on 'white papers', high-end magazine reviews and customer testimonials. These are common merchandising techniques but generally say nothing about the actual performance of the product in question. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
On 7 Nov 2004 16:34:57 GMT, "Pena" wrote: Well here is an excample http://www.taralabs.com/catalog/cata...0953181024E3C9 7E9BEBB2C2F4B88 A pair of these cables cost here 15,000,00 $ Absurd or not? Absurd. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering Absurdly absurd. Beyond the horizon. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Stewart Pinkerton wrote in message ...
On 30 Oct 2004 15:04:51 GMT, B&D wrote: On 10/29/04 11:54 PM, in article , "John C." wrote: On 29 Oct 2004 23:06:49 GMT, Michael Dombrowski wrote: Hello All, Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. Mike Same stuff, just different price. Lamp cord is even marked for polarity, usually by either a ribbed or hex-shaped insulation over one of the conductors. There *are* some fancier speaker cables that are a good deal more complex/engineered than lamp cord. Whether it is worth the extra money charged for that or dedicated speaker cables depends upon system and taste. Stewart said: I beg to differ. Whether it is worth the extra money depends on whether it *sounds* any better - or even different. As of this date, not one single person has been able to demonstrate an ability to hear *any* difference between basic 'zipcord' and the most 'advanced' and 'engineered' speaker cables. Indeed, even the legendary John Dunlavy, who manufacures one of the most technically perfect speaker cables available, states quite unequivocally that in almost all systems, there will be no *audible* difference between his cable and zipcord. First of all I want to make it clear that I am in substantial agreement with you on this issue. But to say that there are no audible differences among cables might be too absolute of a position based on what you have previously stated. On September 1, 2004 we had the following exchange: I said, There are dozens and dozens of different speaker cables out there. Some of them "look" quite complicated or "exotic" with transformer like boxes, etc. Are some of them *designed* to change the sound when compared to a simple cable, whereas you may be able to pick one out in a dbt (I realize this topic, per say, is off limits)? You said: "Some of them certainly roll off the treble. It's interesting that you'll pay $50,000 or more for a pair of ultra high end speakers with Beryllium or ceramic tweeters which extend the response past 30kHz, and then your friendly dealer will charge you several thousands more to have that treble rolled off by MIT, Transparent, Tara etc. :-)" You also said: "p.s. If you *like* the droopy sound of those 'exotic' cables with little boxes attached, Naim NACA 5 will give you identical sound for a lot less money and no connecting hassle! Basic engineering, as opposed to snake-oil....................." As far as I'm concerned this does not compromise your position. It only shows that there are exceptions, even if those exceptions may be misguided. But there are some "high-end" manufacturers that purposely change or "voice" their products. I have spoken to some that happily will admit to doing that. Also in referencing John Dunleavy you quote or paraphrase him as having said "states quite unequivocally that in almost all systems, there will be no *audible* difference between his cable and zipcord". The word "almost" can leave a lot of wiggle room, especially among audiophiles that pride themselves in building systems that are the "exception". Robert C. Lang -- |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Stewart Pinkerton wrote in message ...
I draw no *definite* conclusion from that particular quarter, I simply state the *fact* that no one has been able to demonstrate an ability to *hear* any differences. Actually, according to your previous post it is most definitely NOT A FACT that "no one has been able to demonstrate an ability to *hear* any differences". Rather, according to you, "not one single person has even *attempted* to claim this money." Ergo, the only FACT one can glean from your data is that no one has yet demonstrated an ability to hear any differences. It's a subtle distinction, but one worth pointing out, especially if one is going to go on about "Facts". |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
On 9 Nov 2004 00:49:02 GMT, (Robert C. Lang)
wrote: Stewart Pinkerton wrote in message ... On 30 Oct 2004 15:04:51 GMT, B&D wrote: On 10/29/04 11:54 PM, in article , "John C." wrote: On 29 Oct 2004 23:06:49 GMT, Michael Dombrowski wrote: Hello All, Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. Mike Same stuff, just different price. Lamp cord is even marked for polarity, usually by either a ribbed or hex-shaped insulation over one of the conductors. There *are* some fancier speaker cables that are a good deal more complex/engineered than lamp cord. Whether it is worth the extra money charged for that or dedicated speaker cables depends upon system and taste. Stewart said: I beg to differ. Whether it is worth the extra money depends on whether it *sounds* any better - or even different. As of this date, not one single person has been able to demonstrate an ability to hear *any* difference between basic 'zipcord' and the most 'advanced' and 'engineered' speaker cables. Indeed, even the legendary John Dunlavy, who manufacures one of the most technically perfect speaker cables available, states quite unequivocally that in almost all systems, there will be no *audible* difference between his cable and zipcord. First of all I want to make it clear that I am in substantial agreement with you on this issue. But to say that there are no audible differences among cables might be too absolute of a position based on what you have previously stated. Not if you include the usual precondition of level matching at 20kHz, it isn't! On September 1, 2004 we had the following exchange: I said, There are dozens and dozens of different speaker cables out there. Some of them "look" quite complicated or "exotic" with transformer like boxes, etc. Are some of them *designed* to change the sound when compared to a simple cable, whereas you may be able to pick one out in a dbt (I realize this topic, per say, is off limits)? You said: "Some of them certainly roll off the treble. It's interesting that you'll pay $50,000 or more for a pair of ultra high end speakers with Beryllium or ceramic tweeters which extend the response past 30kHz, and then your friendly dealer will charge you several thousands more to have that treble rolled off by MIT, Transparent, Tara etc. :-)" Indeed so, and such cables will produce an easily *measurable* difference which would immediately exclude them from any listening comparison. There are *much* cheaper ways of reducing your treble by 1 or 2 dB at 20kHz, than by spending $10,000 on speaker cables! :-) You also said: "p.s. If you *like* the droopy sound of those 'exotic' cables with little boxes attached, Naim NACA 5 will give you identical sound for a lot less money and no connecting hassle! Basic engineering, as opposed to snake-oil....................." As far as I'm concerned this does not compromise your position. It only shows that there are exceptions, even if those exceptions may be misguided. But there are some "high-end" manufacturers that purposely change or "voice" their products. I have spoken to some that happily will admit to doing that. Nol contendere, and such cables have always been excluded from listening comparisons, although I'd be happy to match their FR with a few cents worth of components to achieve a level-match, if anyone thinks this is somehow cheating. Also in referencing John Dunleavy you quote or paraphrase him as having said "states quite unequivocally that in almost all systems, there will be no *audible* difference between his cable and zipcord". The word "almost" can leave a lot of wiggle room, especially among audiophiles that pride themselves in building systems that are the "exception". It's simply not a problem, as it's possible to match the performance of *any* 'exotic' cable in *any* system, for just a few dollars. Whatever ludicrously incompetent system those 'exceptional' audiophiles produce, I'll match *any* of their cabling at virtually no cost. The only reason for the existence of the above caveats is that not *all* cables will instantly produce a good level-match in *all* systems - but you can easily produce a low-cost alternative that *will* provide a good match. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Stewart Pinkerton wrote in message ...
You also said: "p.s. If you *like* the droopy sound of those 'exotic' cables with little boxes attached, Naim NACA 5 will give you identical sound for a lot less money and no connecting hassle! Basic engineering, as opposed to snake-oil....................." As far as I'm concerned this does not compromise your position. It only shows that there are exceptions, even if those exceptions may be misguided. But there are some "high-end" manufacturers that purposely change or "voice" their products. I have spoken to some that happily will admit to doing that. Nol contendere, and such cables have always been excluded from listening comparisons, although I'd be happy to match their FR with a few cents worth of components to achieve a level-match, if anyone thinks this is somehow cheating. This is good information. Specifically, what brand or model cables would be excluded from listening comparisons? But also would listening comparisons (blind) still be valuable in a case where there are subtle differences if only to determine which cable the listener *really* likes the best? Robert C. Lang |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
On 29 Oct 2004 23:06:49 GMT, Michael Dombrowski wrote: Hello All, Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. There has been for about five or six years now, a pool of around $5,000 for anyone who can tell the difference between basic zipcord (lamp cord, if you will) and the most exotic 'audiophile' speaker cable (which can run up to more than $1,000 a *foot*!), under level-matched double blind conditions. i.e. when they don't actually *know* what's connected. In all that time, and despite many claims of 'obvious', 'night and day', and 'pretty amazing' differences, not one single person has even *attempted* to claim this money. That should indicate to you that 'wire is wire', certainly no one has been able to demonstrate an ability to *hear* any differences, whatever they may *claim* on this or any other newsgroup. I find it fascinating that the more vocal claimants tend to appear in places such as Audio Asylum (a well-named group if ever there was one!), where discussion of blind testing is effectively banned by the moderators/censors. A more cynical person might think that they don't *want* to know the truth................... In addition to Audio Asylum, I have read a number of reviews of speaker cables in Stereophile Review. Various adjectives describing the (clearly audible) qualities of such cables, and, in some cases, their "break-in" characteristics, are included in many such reviews. Since I would assume that John Atkinson is at least partially responsible for the editorial policies at Stereophile, and since he apparently follows these discussions, having posted a comment on the ng on 10/29, one might assume that he is at least aware of this discussion. So, I'm curious as to why SR isn't involved in this exchange, which in some respects reflects on the intellectual honesty of SR's editorial policies. Any explanations will be appreciated. - Maybe I'm just confused about the whole issue. Jim |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
1. The name of the publication is Stereophile, not Stereophile
Review. 2. Each review is the opinion of the writer of the review, not of the editor. John Atkinson sets editorial policy but he does not write all the reviews. Kal policy On 12 Nov 2004 00:17:52 GMT, Jim Cate wrote: Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On 29 Oct 2004 23:06:49 GMT, Michael Dombrowski wrote: Hello All, Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. There has been for about five or six years now, a pool of around $5,000 for anyone who can tell the difference between basic zipcord (lamp cord, if you will) and the most exotic 'audiophile' speaker cable (which can run up to more than $1,000 a *foot*!), under level-matched double blind conditions. i.e. when they don't actually *know* what's connected. In all that time, and despite many claims of 'obvious', 'night and day', and 'pretty amazing' differences, not one single person has even *attempted* to claim this money. That should indicate to you that 'wire is wire', certainly no one has been able to demonstrate an ability to *hear* any differences, whatever they may *claim* on this or any other newsgroup. I find it fascinating that the more vocal claimants tend to appear in places such as Audio Asylum (a well-named group if ever there was one!), where discussion of blind testing is effectively banned by the moderators/censors. A more cynical person might think that they don't *want* to know the truth................... In addition to Audio Asylum, I have read a number of reviews of speaker cables in Stereophile Review. Various adjectives describing the (clearly audible) qualities of such cables, and, in some cases, their "break-in" characteristics, are included in many such reviews. Since I would assume that John Atkinson is at least partially responsible for the editorial policies at Stereophile, and since he apparently follows these discussions, having posted a comment on the ng on 10/29, one might assume that he is at least aware of this discussion. So, I'm curious as to why SR isn't involved in this exchange, which in some respects reflects on the intellectual honesty of SR's editorial policies. Any explanations will be appreciated. - Maybe I'm just confused about the whole issue. Jim |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim Cate" wrote in message
... Any explanations will be appreciated. - Maybe I'm just confused about the whole issue. People (1) get to play with these toys free of charge, (2) pay their bills (wholly or in part) by their writings, and (3) attend conventions and meetings to party around at reader's expense. Not bad at all if you can swing it and manage a straight face. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Jim Cate wrote:
Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On 29 Oct 2004 23:06:49 GMT, Michael Dombrowski wrote: Hello All, Is there any difference between (same gauge) speaker cable and lamp cord? I cannot see any reason why there would be, especially if bannana plugs are soldered on to both ends. If there are differences, why? I can't for the life of me think why speaker cable would be better than standard wire. There has been for about five or six years now, a pool of around $5,000 for anyone who can tell the difference between basic zipcord (lamp cord, if you will) and the most exotic 'audiophile' speaker cable (which can run up to more than $1,000 a *foot*!), under level-matched double blind conditions. i.e. when they don't actually *know* what's connected. In all that time, and despite many claims of 'obvious', 'night and day', and 'pretty amazing' differences, not one single person has even *attempted* to claim this money. That should indicate to you that 'wire is wire', certainly no one has been able to demonstrate an ability to *hear* any differences, whatever they may *claim* on this or any other newsgroup. I find it fascinating that the more vocal claimants tend to appear in places such as Audio Asylum (a well-named group if ever there was one!), where discussion of blind testing is effectively banned by the moderators/censors. A more cynical person might think that they don't *want* to know the truth................... In addition to Audio Asylum, I have read a number of reviews of speaker cables in Stereophile Review. Various adjectives describing the (clearly audible) qualities of such cables, and, in some cases, their "break-in" characteristics, are included in many such reviews. Since I would assume that John Atkinson is at least partially responsible for the editorial policies at Stereophile, and since he apparently follows these discussions, having posted a comment on the ng on 10/29, one might assume that he is at least aware of this discussion. So, I'm curious as to why SR isn't involved in this exchange, which in some respects reflects on the intellectual honesty of SR's editorial policies. He has no techincal basis to refute the assertion that wire is wire. Now, oxygen-free wire can measure different under immensely bad loads and long runs, but going even one gauge higher with common non-ofc wire is more than enough to compensate. Even then, it's a fraction of a db difference - way too small for our ears to hear. My advice is forget about the fancy wires - if your ultra-wires are 14 gauge, get 12 gauge common wire and laugh at the money you saved. It's something like $25 a roll for electrical wire - enough to make 250ft, or a full HT setup. Add in good connectors and a crimping tool and you're at maybe $100($40-$50 of that for the tool). |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
"B&D" wrote in message
... On 11/12/04 2:04 PM, in article , "Norman M. Schwartz" wrote: "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Any explanations will be appreciated. - Maybe I'm just confused about the whole issue. People (1) get to play with these toys free of charge, (2) pay their bills (wholly or in part) by their writings, and (3) attend conventions and meetings to party around at reader's expense. Not bad at all if you can swing it and manage a straight face. Hey - they have the subscribers to do it. I wouldn't blast them as they offer value to their subscribers otherwise there wouldn't be any subscribers. Hey - the question *is* whether or not speaker cable is better than lamp cord. IF it is not better, they are robbing their subscribers BLIND, not by a $14.97/year subscription, but by leading gullible readers to financially support dealers and cable manufacturers. I believe the original poster (sincerely ??) inquired about the basis for the entire hullabaloo if all cable of similar gauge sounded the same, and if so, what is the basis for the "whole issue"? Unfortunately the basis for the issue, like far too many others, is $$$. Their *value* to subscribers might be entertainment, but that entertainment subsides when you come to the realization that you are contributing to their life style and wasting valuable serious listening hours reading fantasies. And it's most unfortunate should anyone go spend their hard earned dollars buying wire or equipment based upon writers and editors life styles. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to measure speaker cable inductance and capacitance? | Tech | |||
Seeking advice on speaker cable | General | |||
Seeking advice on speaker cable | Audio Opinions | |||
Testing speaker cable. | High End Audio | |||
Speaker cables | Pro Audio |