Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
[email protected] makolber@yahoo.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 614
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

I just bought a used 100 foot snake.

I was surprised at the configuration.
It has 2 pair of heavy wires designated as speaker 1 and 2.

I had always though that running amps of current through a cable parallel to
mic cables would magnetically induce unacceptable amounts of crosstalk into the mic cables.

So I ran a test.

There was some measurable crosstalk but is was surprisingly low. Low enough that if the mic and speaker are in the same room, acoustic feedback by far dominates the electrical feedback caused by the crosstalk.

So it seems this is a usable configuration.

Does anyone have experience with snakes of this configuration?

thanks

Mark






  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Mike Rivers[_2_] Mike Rivers[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,190
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables

On 5/29/2018 9:49 AM, wrote:
I just bought a used 100 foot snake.
I was surprised at the configuration.
It has 2 pair of heavy wires designated as speaker 1 and 2.


I had always though that running amps of current through a cable parallel to
mic cables would magnetically induce unacceptable amounts of crosstalk into the mic cables.


There was some measurable crosstalk but is was surprisingly low. Low enough that if the mic and speaker are in the same room, acoustic feedback by far dominates the electrical feedback caused by the crosstalk.


Does anyone have experience with snakes of this configuration?


No problems, as long as it's built correctly. It works because you have
balanced connections. Your mic inputs are differential, so that any
induced current in the mic pair will be cancelled out at the preamp
input. And, to boot, the speaker leads are, in essence, balanced, since
one goes positive and the other goes negative at the same time, so the
electromagnetic field around the speaker pairs is mostly cancelled, too.
It's not perfect, but as you determined, it's good enough for the
application for which you intend to use it.

Sometimes technology works in your favor.
--

For a good time, call
http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Don Pearce[_3_] Don Pearce[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,417
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

On Tue, 29 May 2018 10:15:13 -0400, Mike Rivers
wrote:

On 5/29/2018 9:49 AM, wrote:
I just bought a used 100 foot snake.
I was surprised at the configuration.
It has 2 pair of heavy wires designated as speaker 1 and 2.


I had always though that running amps of current through a cable parallel to
mic cables would magnetically induce unacceptable amounts of crosstalk into the mic cables.


There was some measurable crosstalk but is was surprisingly low. Low enough that if the mic and speaker are in the same room, acoustic feedback by far dominates the electrical feedback caused by the crosstalk.


Does anyone have experience with snakes of this configuration?


No problems, as long as it's built correctly. It works because you have
balanced connections. Your mic inputs are differential, so that any
induced current in the mic pair will be cancelled out at the preamp
input. And, to boot, the speaker leads are, in essence, balanced, since
one goes positive and the other goes negative at the same time, so the
electromagnetic field around the speaker pairs is mostly cancelled, too.
It's not perfect, but as you determined, it's good enough for the
application for which you intend to use it.

Sometimes technology works in your favor.


Balanced connections work well, but not when they are very close to a
source of interference. They rely for their effect on exactly the same
field impinging on both phases. This doesn't apply when the source of
interference is close by - whichever wire is locally closer will
receive more interference. That's why cancellation is not perfect. I
would not run cables this way.

d

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

  #4   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
PStamler PStamler is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 882
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

On Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 8:49:40 AM UTC-5, wrote:
I just bought a used 100 foot snake.

I was surprised at the configuration.
It has 2 pair of heavy wires designated as speaker 1 and 2.

I had always though that running amps of current through a cable parallel to
mic cables would magnetically induce unacceptable amounts of crosstalk into the mic cables.

So I ran a test.

There was some measurable crosstalk but is was surprisingly low. Low enough that if the mic and speaker are in the same room, acoustic feedback by far dominates the electrical feedback caused by the crosstalk.

So it seems this is a usable configuration.

Does anyone have experience with snakes of this configuration?

thanks

Mark


I've used snakes like this, admittedly in relatively low-volume applications (folk clubs). Never had any problems.

Peace,
Paul Stamler
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Mike Rivers[_2_] Mike Rivers[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,190
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables

On 5/29/2018 12:35 PM, Don Pearce wrote:

Balanced connections work well, but not when they are very close to a
source of interference.


I test common mode rejection by holding The Wall Wart From Hell (I
believe Paul Stamler owns a copyright on that name) right next to a
cable going to whatever I'm testing. The test fixture that THAT uses to
demonstrate the CMRR of their inGenius chip consists of two pieces of
cable as close together as they can get, one with the interference, and
that's a good enough demo for them.

You do need to use good twisted pair for the gozinta in order to get the
best results.

I would not run cables this way.


Well, don't, if you don't have a need to. But it's a convenience for
certain setups, for example, when using a powered mixer. And in general,
people who use powered mixers don't worry about a barely measurable
amount of crosstalk. My preference is to put the power amplifiers near
the speakers and run line level from the mixer to the amplifiers. But
there's less need to do that in smaller installations now that powered
speakers are becoming the norm for a "no engineer" system.

--
For a good time, call http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com


  #6   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Scott Dorsey Scott Dorsey is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,853
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

wrote:
I just bought a used 100 foot snake.

I was surprised at the configuration.
It has 2 pair of heavy wires designated as speaker 1 and 2.


This is called a "powered snake" which seems like a bad description to me,
but that's what it is.

I had always though that running amps of current through a cable parallel to
mic cables would magnetically induce unacceptable amounts of crosstalk into the mic cables.


It can. You don't have capacitive coupling so much to worry about because
the shielding is pretty effective against that, but you do have inductive
coupling especially at very low frequencies.

One of the tricks to dealing with this is cable twist, and having different
twist lengths on different cables (which cat5 cable does). If everything
is done just right, the inductive coupling on one twist is opposite polarity
from the coupling on the next twist and they all cancel one another out.

So I ran a test.

There was some measurable crosstalk but is was surprisingly low. Low enough that if the mic and speaker are in the same room, acoustic feedback by far dominates the electrical feedback caused by the crosstalk.

So it seems this is a usable configuration.


I have seen some very crappy (and possibly damaged) powered snakes where there
was enough coupling to cause very low frequency motorboating on the amp.
Mike will know what I mean when I mention the old Adventure Theatre. But
I have also seen a lot more where everything worked just fine.

Does anyone have experience with snakes of this configuration?


Yes, they mostly work just fine. But, they are much less popular in the modern
age of powered speakers.

Also... don't use the speaker returns to run AC power to the board. I saw
someone do that once too. Interference resulted, and also the cable is not
rated for that.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #7   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
geoff geoff is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,812
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables

On 30/05/2018 9:48 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:


Yes, they mostly work just fine. But, they are much less popular in the modern
age of powered speakers.

Also... don't use the speaker returns to run AC power to the board. I saw
someone do that once too. Interference resulted, and also the cable is not
rated for that.
--scott


However in this day of powered speakers we now have combination speaker
and mains cable. Official, compliant ones. Just one balanced signal pair
with mains included.

The ones that I tried (10m, ~33ft) had no obtrusive induced hum. However
the signal wires would fracture (2 sets = same result) presumably due to
them being stressed when curved along beside the heavier, thicker mains
wires/lead. So I gave up.

However an acquaintance who uses similar cables of another brand has not
had this problem.

geoff
  #8   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Phil Allison[_4_] Phil Allison[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 499
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

wrote:

I just bought a used 100 foot snake.

I was surprised at the configuration.
It has 2 pair of heavy wires designated as speaker 1 and 2.

I had always though that running amps of current through a cable parallel
to mic cables would magnetically induce unacceptable amounts of crosstalk
into the mic cables.

So I ran a test.


** Can you detail how you did that?

Were mics connected to the balanced lines ?


There was some measurable crosstalk but is was surprisingly low. Low
enough that if the mic and speaker are in the same room, acoustic
feedback by far dominates the electrical feedback caused by the crosstalk..

So it seems this is a usable configuration.

Does anyone have experience with snakes of this configuration?


** In a portable PA system, this can be risky when you allow for simple mistakes made during set up. The risk is supersonic oscillation, induced by crosstalk.

Running balanced and speaker lines tied together is commonly done with amp racks. It works fine until someone powers the rack up without connections being made at the far end of the cables and advances the amp gain controls. The unterminated balanced line couples capacitively to the hot speaker wire and oscillation is possible. Usually at a frequency like 50 or 100kHz.

The risk is higher if you are using a powered desk since so much more gain is available.



..... Phil






  #9   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Phil Allison[_4_] Phil Allison[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 499
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

Phil Allison wrote:



** In a portable PA system, this can be risky when you allow for simple mistakes made during set up. The risk is supersonic oscillation, induced by crosstalk.

Running balanced and speaker lines tied together is commonly done with amp racks. It works fine until someone powers the rack up without connections being made at the far end of the cables and advances the amp gain controls.. The unterminated balanced line couples capacitively to the hot speaker wire and oscillation is possible. Usually at a frequency like 50 or 100kHz.

The risk is higher if you are using a powered desk since so much more gain is available.



** I should point out that supersonic oscillations, while inaudible, will destroy high frequency drivers and seriously damage most power amplifiers in a few seconds.


..... Phil





  #10   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
[email protected] makolber@yahoo.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 614
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables



The risk is higher if you are using a powered desk since so much more gain is available.



** I should point out that supersonic oscillations, while inaudible, will destroy high frequency drivers and seriously damage most power amplifiers in a few seconds.


.... Phil


Yep, thats what I was worried about, the magnetic coupling between the balanced lines has a high pass characteristic.



For the tests I ran, yes I had a mic connected and the other end connected to a mixer. The crosstalk was not present with the mic disconnected but was present with the mic connected. That makes sense that it is magnetic coupling that needs a closed circuit. The mic pairs are electrostatic shielded with foil so that should do a good job to drastically reduce capacitive coupling, but no so effective for magnetic coupling. But still the coupling is more effective at the higher frequencies so I was concerned about ultrasonic oscillations.

I plan to use these only for the stage monitors and will keep the high end EQd down in the amp.

I get all the theory but practice and theory don't always agree, that's why I am asking about real world experiences with these types of snakes.

thanks

Mark


  #11   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
[email protected] makolber@yahoo.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 614
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables



It can. You don't have capacitive coupling so much to worry about because
the shielding is pretty effective


yes it appears that way, no crosstalk with the mic unplugged.

but you do have inductive
coupling especially at very low frequencies.

my observation is the opposite, the inductive coupling is greater at the high end.

m

  #12   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Phil Allison[_4_] Phil Allison[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 499
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

wrote:


** I should point out that supersonic oscillations, while inaudible, will destroy high frequency drivers and seriously damage most power amplifiers in a few seconds.


.... Phil


Yep, thats what I was worried about, the magnetic coupling between
the balanced lines has a high pass characteristic.


For the tests I ran, yes I had a mic connected and the other end connected
to a mixer. The crosstalk was not present with the mic disconnected but
was present with the mic connected. That makes sense that it is magnetic
coupling that needs a closed circuit. The mic pairs are electrostatic
shielded with foil so that should do a good job to drastically reduce
capacitive coupling, but no so effective for magnetic coupling. But still
the coupling is more effective at the higher frequencies so I was concerned
about ultrasonic oscillations.


** A lot depends on the mic pre-amps, usually they have good common mode rejection of low and mid frequencies diminishing at high and supersonic frequencies. They deal with supply frequency hum and harmonics well - but not so well with supersonics.



I get all the theory but practice and theory don't always agree, that's
why I am asking about real world experiences with these types of snakes.


** Other folks experience may have no relevance to to yours.
You need to be sure that YOUR set up is not susceptible to supersonic oscillation - or somehow, one day it will happen.


..... Phil
  #13   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Phil Allison[_4_] Phil Allison[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 499
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

wrote:


but you do have inductive
coupling especially at very low frequencies.


my observation is the opposite, the inductive coupling is greater
at the high end.


** Do this simple experiment.

With a mic plugged in, wrap one turn of balanced line around a transformer wall wart.

For a comparison, place the mic head next to the same wall wart.



..... Phil

  #14   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
[email protected] makolber@yahoo.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 614
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

I can confirm that this type snake CAN create an ultrasonic oscillation that can quickly damage a power amp.

Fortunately this happened during my testing and not during an event and it was a small amp with easy to replace 2N3055's.

I WOULD NOT use this configuration with speaker level signals in the snake.
If you MUST use it, keep the High end rolled off on the amp.

Also I found that the wires intended to be used for the speakers are shielded well enough by all the other cables that the speaker lines can be used to carry line level audio signals. There was some small cross talk between the 2 speaker cables when used as line level but this is of no issue if they are used for 2 monitor mixes for example or for left and right.

Bottom line, try very hard to avoid speaker lines and mic lines in the same snake. It definitely can easily damage the amplifier.

Mark





  #15   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
geoff geoff is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,812
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables

On 6/06/2018 2:24 AM, wrote:
I can confirm that this type snake CAN create an ultrasonic oscillation that can quickly damage a power amp.

Fortunately this happened during my testing and not during an event and it was a small amp with easy to replace 2N3055's.


Potentially damaging such a vintage amp !

geoff


  #16   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Tim Sprout[_2_] Tim Sprout[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables

On 6/5/2018 6:24 AM, wrote:
I can confirm that this type snake CAN create an ultrasonic oscillation that can quickly damage a power amp.

snipped

Mark


How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations?

Tim Sprout

  #17   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Phil Allison[_4_] Phil Allison[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 499
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

wrote:


I can confirm that this type snake CAN create an ultrasonic
oscillation that can quickly damage a power amp.

Fortunately this happened during my testing and not during an
event and it was a small amp with easy to replace 2N3055's.

I WOULD NOT use this configuration with speaker level signals
in the snake.
If you MUST use it, keep the High end rolled off on the amp.


** Not a simple thing to do ...

Bottom line, try very hard to avoid speaker lines and mic lines
in the same snake. It definitely can easily damage the amplifier.



** Glad to hear you took the advice and tried using the snake in test situation rather than at a gig.

I did a bench test with a 1m length of figure 8 speaker cable running alongside a balanced mic line and found that while cross-talk was only minor at audible frequencies it could became severe at 70 kHz or so depending on the mic cable in use.


..... Phil





  #19   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Phil Allison[_4_] Phil Allison[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 499
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

Tim Sprout wrote:




How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations?



** The first sign will usually be that VU meters on the amplifier or desk become hard pegged when there is no loud sound.

A few seconds later, smoke will appear from the amp/amp rack.

Large cone speakers are normally immune from damage ( VC inductance saves them) while small horn driers including piezos are vulnerable and will also smoke.


...... Phil


  #20   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
geoff geoff is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,812
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables

On 6/06/2018 4:46 PM, Tim Sprout wrote:
On 6/5/2018 6:24 AM, wrote:
I can confirm that this type snake CAN create an ultrasonic
oscillation that can quickly damage a power amp.

snipped

Mark


How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations?

Tim Sprout


See if your bat cringes. Or smoke comes from tweeters. Or an oscilloscope.

geoff


  #21   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Mike Rivers[_2_] Mike Rivers[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,190
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables

On 6/6/2018 12:46 AM, Tim Sprout wrote:
How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations?


With an ultraoscilloscope, of course. Actually, any oscilloscope worth
a hoot will display waveforms up to 500 kHz which, other than in
exceptional cases, is all you need to worry about. You can still find 50
year old Hewlett-Packard scopes for under $25, and you can learn a lot
about audio (and about oscilloscopes) with one.




--
"Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without
a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be
operated without a passing knowledge of audio" - John Watkinson

Drop by http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com now and then
  #23   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Ty Ford[_2_] Ty Ford[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 102
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

I recall an event at Peabody Institute in Baltimore. They ran long lines from a concert hall to their recording studio. How long I don't recall, but long. They had a Sony MXP3000 console. The long lines were ringing so much from local EMI that it was blowing out the preamps in the console. They had to modify the console inputs with transformers. That solved the problem.
  #24   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
geoff geoff is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,812
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables

On 7/06/2018 1:40 AM, Mike Rivers wrote:
On 6/6/2018 12:46 AM, Tim Sprout wrote:
How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations?


With an ultraoscilloscope, of course.Â* Actually, any oscilloscope worth
a hoot will display waveforms up to 500 kHz which, other than in
exceptional cases, is all you need to worry about. You can still find 50
year old Hewlett-Packard scopes for under $25, and you can learn a lot
about audio (and about oscilloscopes) with one.


Surely most of even the cheapest nastiest (but perfectly adequate)
scopes from the last 50 years do 10MHz ?

geoff
  #25   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
geoff geoff is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,812
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables

On 7/06/2018 3:05 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article , Tim Sprout wrote:
On 6/5/2018 6:24 AM, wrote:
I can confirm that this type snake CAN create an ultrasonic oscillation that can quickly damage a power amp.


How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations?


Usually by the smoke. I once saw a Phase Linear amp shoot fire three feet
in the air due to stability issues. It was very impressive but cut the band's
act somewhat short.
--scott



Naa - it was part of the stage-show pyrotechnics.

geoff


  #26   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Trevor Trevor is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,820
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables

On 7/06/2018 6:26 AM, geoff wrote:
On 7/06/2018 1:40 AM, Mike Rivers wrote:
On 6/6/2018 12:46 AM, Tim Sprout wrote:
How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations?


With an ultraoscilloscope, of course.Â* Actually, any oscilloscope
worth a hoot will display waveforms up to 500 kHz which, other than in
exceptional cases, is all you need to worry about. You can still find
50 year old Hewlett-Packard scopes for under $25, and you can learn a
lot about audio (and about oscilloscopes) with one.


Surely most of even the cheapest nastiest (but perfectly adequate)
scopes from the last 50 years do 10MHz ?


Yep, my first scope was made well over 50 years ago and did 10MHz. But
there have been some cheap audio scopes over the years that only did
1MHz. But of course even a 1MHz analog scope will still display
waveforms well above that frequency at a reduced level.

Trevor.

  #28   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Phil Allison[_4_] Phil Allison[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 499
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

Tim Sprout wrote:


How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations?



** Strangely, an analog multimeter does the job quite well.

My own 20kohms/V one is only -3dB at 150kHz on the 50V AC range,


...... Phil
  #30   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
david gourley[_2_] david gourley[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 233
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

Trevor said...news
On 7/06/2018 6:26 AM, geoff wrote:
On 7/06/2018 1:40 AM, Mike Rivers wrote:
On 6/6/2018 12:46 AM, Tim Sprout wrote:
How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations?

With an ultraoscilloscope, of course.Â* Actually, any oscilloscope
worth a hoot will display waveforms up to 500 kHz which, other than in
exceptional cases, is all you need to worry about. You can still find
50 year old Hewlett-Packard scopes for under $25, and you can learn a
lot about audio (and about oscilloscopes) with one.


Surely most of even the cheapest nastiest (but perfectly adequate)
scopes from the last 50 years do 10MHz ?


Yep, my first scope was made well over 50 years ago and did 10MHz. But
there have been some cheap audio scopes over the years that only did
1MHz. But of course even a 1MHz analog scope will still display
waveforms well above that frequency at a reduced level.

Trevor.


Still have mine, a Heathkit 10-12 (500kc) scope I bought at a Ham Fest 40
years ago. It needs a little TLC, but still very functional.

Always reminds me of the intro to "The Outer Limits" TV show.

david

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



  #31   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Scott Dorsey Scott Dorsey is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,853
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

Phil Allison wrote:
Tim Sprout wrote:


How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations?


** Strangely, an analog multimeter does the job quite well.

My own 20kohms/V one is only -3dB at 150kHz on the 50V AC range,


Old-style VU meters are pretty good at responding to ultrasonic and subsonic
stuff.

It's kind of cool using B&K mikes and watching the meters bouncing up and
down from the air currents in the hall.

However, if you're looking for very small ultrasonic sources (or even high
frequency sonic ones, like small amounts of TV sweep leakage), you'll need
something a bit tighter, like an FFT display.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #34   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Phil Allison[_4_] Phil Allison[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 499
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

david gourley wrote:



Still have mine, a Heathkit 10-12 (500kc) scope I bought at a Ham Fest 40
years ago. It needs a little TLC, but still very functional.


** That Heathkit model is an "IO-12" with 5 MHz bandwidth.

The fastest sweep is 500kHz.


Always reminds me of the intro to "The Outer Limits" TV show.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CtjhWhw2I8


..... Phil
  #35   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Mike Rivers[_2_] Mike Rivers[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,190
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables

On 6/7/2018 9:06 AM, Phil Allison wrote:
** Strangely, an analog multimeter does the job quite well.

My own 20kohms/V one is only -3dB at 150kHz on the 50V AC range,


Today, someone who doesn't already own a multimeter will almost
certainly buy a digital one, and most all of those poop out somewhere
between 200 and 500 Hz. I have one that measures frequency up to a few
MHz, but not AC voltage.

--
"Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without
a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be
operated without a passing knowledge of audio" - John Watkinson

Drop by http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com now and then


  #36   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
geoff geoff is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,812
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables

On 8/06/2018 12:50 PM, Mike Rivers wrote:
On 6/7/2018 9:06 AM, Phil Allison wrote:
** Strangely, an analog multimeter does the job quite well.
My own 20kohms/V one is only -3dB at 150kHz on the 50V AC range,


Today, someone who doesn't already own a multimeter will almost
certainly buy a digital one, and most all of those poop out somewhere
between 200 and 500 Hz. I have one that measures frequency up to a few
MHz, but not AC voltage.



My multimeter collection, HF responses starting to drop at:
Fluke 114 4.5kHz
Fluke 17B+ 2.5kHz
Dick Smith (OEM ?) 10kHz

versus
Fluke 8050A benchtop 20kHz(+?), which is as high as my iPod Touch with
SignalSuite goes ...

geoff
  #37   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Phil Allison[_4_] Phil Allison[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 499
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

Mike Rivers wrote:

Phil Allison wrote:


** Strangely, an analog multimeter does the job quite well.

My own 20kohms/V one is only -3dB at 150kHz on the 50V AC range,



Today, someone who doesn't already own a multimeter will almost
certainly buy a digital one, and most all of those poop out somewhere
between 200 and 500 Hz.



** An analogue multimeter is still vastly cheaper, easy enough to find and easy to carry about than any scope.



--
"Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without
a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be
operated without a passing knowledge of audio" - John Watkinson


** Oh that is good !!


..... Phil

  #38   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Mike Rivers[_2_] Mike Rivers[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,190
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables

On 6/7/2018 9:47 PM, geoff wrote:
My multimeter collection, HF responses starting to drop at:
Fluke 114Â*Â*Â* 4.5kHz
Fluke 17B+Â*Â*Â* 2.5kHz
Dick Smith (OEM ?)Â*Â*Â* 10kHz


That's pretty good. My Fluke 77 goes up to about 2 kHz if I recall
correctly. I'm not near it at the moment.


Fluke 8050A benchtopÂ*Â*Â* 20kHz(+?), which is as high as my iPod Touch
with SignalSuite goes ...


The iPad is limited to 20 kHz or so due to the fact that it's going
through an A/D converter running at a sample rate of 44.1 or maybe 48 kHz.

--
"Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without
a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be
operated without a passing knowledge of audio" - John Watkinson

Drop by http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com now and then
  #39   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Don Pearce[_3_] Don Pearce[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,417
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables

On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 20:50:02 -0400, Mike Rivers
wrote:

On 6/7/2018 9:06 AM, Phil Allison wrote:
** Strangely, an analog multimeter does the job quite well.

My own 20kohms/V one is only -3dB at 150kHz on the 50V AC range,


Today, someone who doesn't already own a multimeter will almost
certainly buy a digital one, and most all of those poop out somewhere
between 200 and 500 Hz. I have one that measures frequency up to a few
MHz, but not AC voltage.


My Fluke meter does a lot better than that. I also have a very old
analogue scope - but that lives in a cupboard awaiting the day it may
fetch something on Ebay. My best ever move was taking advantage of a
deal from Rigol. I bout one of their four-channel digital scopes and
it is nothing short of brilliant.

d

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

  #40   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
geoff geoff is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,812
Default Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables

On 8/06/2018 2:12 PM, Mike Rivers wrote:
On 6/7/2018 9:47 PM, geoff wrote:
My multimeter collection, HF responses starting to drop at:
Fluke 114Â*Â*Â* 4.5kHz
Fluke 17B+Â*Â*Â* 2.5kHz
Dick Smith (OEM ?)Â*Â*Â* 10kHz


That's pretty good. My Fluke 77 goes up to about 2 kHz if I recall
correctly. I'm not near it at the moment.


Fluke 8050A benchtopÂ*Â*Â* 20kHz(+?), which is as high as my iPod Touch
with SignalSuite goes ...


The iPad is limited to 20 kHz or so due to the fact that it's going
through an A/D converter running at a sample rate of 44.1 or maybe 48 kHz.



iPOD. Yeah. Only Apple product I own - got it especially for
SignalSuite and Guitar Toolbax. Android didn't do that back then.

geoff
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crosstalk on snake David Grant Pro Audio 6 November 14th 08 04:04 AM
Feeder cables to the snake Robert Morein Audio Opinions 19 May 11th 06 07:26 PM
Feeder cables to the snake Robert Morein Pro Audio 25 May 11th 06 07:26 PM
Monster RCA cables vs. regular RCA cables for analog devices Leonid Makarovsky Pro Audio 67 December 26th 05 01:58 PM
FS: Speaker cables: Zu Cable, Discovery, RIPOFF ALERT! Robert Morein Marketplace 0 August 19th 03 04:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:24 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"