Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Doug wrote:
Scotty wrote: "bob wald" wrote in message ... that is the dumest statement i've heard since the internet was invented......you win the top prize...... I agree Bob PS: So what about the Kicker square subs! Do they only produce square wave signals? What's with all the negative replies and flames? I'm not looking for a flame war. I'm just trying set things straight about Ovals vs Rounds. You need to understand the construction of a speaker to understand what I am getting at. I'll try to explain it plain and simple. Oval speakers are not as rigid as round speakers, they are an oblong shape, therefore, distortion is audible more quickly than a round speaker. Some people just done deserve a PC eh. I agree, that's why I am using a Mac... Sorry doug, but you have shot yourself in the foot by trying to show that round is BETTER then oval, when it's not. The RAC is just trying to make you PROVE your points, which will be pretty difficult seeing as you are incorrect. The shape of the speaker has precisely butkiss to do with creating distortion, or in other ways degrading the sound being reproduced. Do I use round speakers? Absolutely, because I haven't found a 6x9 component system. However, I will not bother guessing at why oval component systems aren't made, because I don't know ... I could guess (like you are guessing about the differences between oval and round) but that's a pointless exercise. One thing is for sure, I have heard some stellar bass come out of a 6x9 (the upgraded Monsoon system in a new Cobalt comes to mind) Maybe it wasn't much in the 20 - 35Hz range, but it was plenty of output for the average citizen looking to buy a car that he doesn't want to gut for sound. Come to think of it, Chysler is using 6x9's in the front doors of the 300 series (I should know, I built the assembly line that produces them, and watched the prototypes get built by hand) I haven't heard complaints about the sound quality in one of those bad boys. Best you backpedal on your views, or find some hard data to back them up ... people don't let these things go unanswered around here :-/ -- Dan Snooks |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
"Do I use round speakers? Absolutely, because I haven't found a 6x9
component system." Years and years ago I used to own an Infinity 3-way component set with 6x9 midwoofers, 3-inch midranges, and their EMIT tweeters. It was an AWESOME set and I used them until they wouldn't play any more. Tony -- 2001 Nissan Maxima SE Anniversary Edition Eclipse CD8454 Head Unit, Phoenix Gold ZX475ti, ZX450 and ZX500 Amplifiers, Phoenix Gold EQ-232 30-Band EQ, Dynaudio System 360 Tri-Amped In Front and Focal 130HCs For Rear Fill, 2 Soundstream EXACT10s In Aperiodic Enclosure 2001 Chevy S10 ZR2 Pioneer DEH-P9600MP Head Unit, Phoenix Gold Ti500.4 Amp, Focal 165HC Speakers & Image Dynamics ID8 D4 v.3 Sub |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
I wrote: "Years and years ago I used to own an Infinity 3-way component set
with 6x9 midwoofers, 3-inch midranges, and their EMIT tweeters. It was an AWESOME set and I used them until they wouldn't play any more." And I suddenly remembered it was their CS1-A set. Tony -- 2001 Nissan Maxima SE Anniversary Edition Eclipse CD8454 Head Unit, Phoenix Gold ZX475ti, ZX450 and ZX500 Amplifiers, Phoenix Gold EQ-232 30-Band EQ, Dynaudio System 360 Tri-Amped In Front and Focal 130HCs For Rear Fill, 2 Soundstream EXACT10s In Aperiodic Enclosure 2001 Chevy S10 ZR2 Pioneer DEH-P9600MP Head Unit, Phoenix Gold Ti500.4 Amp, Focal 165HC Speakers & Image Dynamics ID8 D4 v.3 Sub |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
"Doug" wrote in message ups.com... Scotty wrote: "bob wald" wrote in message ... that is the dumest statement i've heard since the internet was invented......you win the top prize...... I agree Bob PS: So what about the Kicker square subs! Do they only produce square wave signals? What's with all the negative replies and flames? I'm not looking for a flame war. I'm just trying set things straight about Ovals vs Rounds. You need to understand the construction of a speaker to understand what I am getting at. I'll try to explain it plain and simple. Oval speakers are not as rigid as round speakers, they are an oblong shape, therefore, distortion is audible more quickly than a round speaker. Would like to read some scientific evidence on your theory about oval speakers sounding worse than round. How about some reading for us eh? Some people just done deserve a PC eh. I agree, that's why I am using a Mac... Damn, that almost explains it. Im sure that Mac have perfected the audio speaker, they would run super efficient, quality of a diamond and will produce tones from 5Hz to 50,000Hz, but it would only run on 5% of stereo systems. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Bloody simple things to build yourself, just need to pull out the mid and
tweeter and you have a 6x9 bass driver. Find some nice 5inch mids and a set of tweeters. Build a crossover from various websites and stores and you have a fully component set. Not at all hard to do. (Just that buying a decent set of 6x9s and chopping out the extra bits would be the hardest part.) "Tony F" wrote in message ... "Do I use round speakers? Absolutely, because I haven't found a 6x9 component system." Years and years ago I used to own an Infinity 3-way component set with 6x9 midwoofers, 3-inch midranges, and their EMIT tweeters. It was an AWESOME set and I used them until they wouldn't play any more. Tony -- 2001 Nissan Maxima SE Anniversary Edition Eclipse CD8454 Head Unit, Phoenix Gold ZX475ti, ZX450 and ZX500 Amplifiers, Phoenix Gold EQ-232 30-Band EQ, Dynaudio System 360 Tri-Amped In Front and Focal 130HCs For Rear Fill, 2 Soundstream EXACT10s In Aperiodic Enclosure 2001 Chevy S10 ZR2 Pioneer DEH-P9600MP Head Unit, Phoenix Gold Ti500.4 Amp, Focal 165HC Speakers & Image Dynamics ID8 D4 v.3 Sub |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
"Kirby" wrote in message news:KYFve.1808428$Xk.362988@pd7tw3no... I should have been more specific, by the continous power of the speaker. When was the last time you seen a reputable speaker be rated at 100 watts RMS when it distorts at 75? Distorsion is not always created by over powering a speaker. Ive blown speakers (Old ones as an experiment of course, gotta love customers old OEM units) with less than half the rated power but with a distorted signal from the amp. Playing with high powered stuff into someone elses gear makes for interesting afternoons when your works already done. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
I should have been more specific, by the continous power of the speaker.
When was the last time you seen a reputable speaker be rated at 100 watts RMS when it distorts at 75? Distorsion is not always created by over powering a speaker. Ive blown speakers (Old ones as an experiment of course, gotta love customers old OEM units) with less than half the rated power but with a distorted signal from the amp. Your experience is quite common. It's another example of overpowering the speaker with less than the rated power for the speaker. Another example is how tweeters are sometimes rated at "system power". This means that the true power handling of the tweeter is nowhere to be found on the spec sheet. Instead, they give you a number which corresponds to the size of the power amplifier that will blow the tweeter if the supplied passive crossover is used. Quite misleading actually, but a lot of reputable companies do it. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Best way to connect multiple Speakers? | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Surround speakers the same size - question | Audio Opinions | |||
KISS 102 by Andre Jute | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Are there in-line amplifiers for speakers? | Tech | |||
Remote speakers? L-pads? Totally confused! | General |