Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Audio filtering (was: Best equipment for stealth recording of voice (not music))
This is related to the other query I posted several days ago regarding "electronic note taking" at meetings using a digital voice recorder and Radio Shack microphone. My main problem is that usually the audio quality is marginal at best, and often large blocks of audio are indecipherable. I received several helpful responses to that query, for which I thank you and will try them. I had another thought, though. I wonder if I could put a bandpass filter on the audio output from the recorder, and set the bandwidth from say around 500 Hz to 1500 Hz, or some other range, to cut out as much of the unwanted frequency spectrum as I can, and enhance that part of the audio range that I want. There are audio DSP filters available such as the MFJ 784B (http://www.mfjenterprises.com/produc...rodid=MFJ-784B) that have very sharp skirts, very flat tops, and will allow you to adjust the lower and upper cutoff frequencies and the bandwidth. They are typically used by amateur radio operators to help cut down on interference and help their desired received signals come through. This particular one is rather pricey and I'd like to know it will help make the audio more intelligible before I spend the money. Thanks... |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Audio filtering (was: Best equipment for stealth recording of voice (not music))
"R. L. Drake" wrote...
I wonder if I could put a bandpass filter on the audio output from the recorder, and set the bandwidth from say around 500 Hz to 1500 Hz, or some other range, to cut out as much of the unwanted frequency spectrum as I can, and enhance that part of the audio range that I want. There are audio DSP filters available such as the MFJ 784B (http://www.mfjenterprises.com/produc...rodid=MFJ-784B) that have very sharp skirts, very flat tops, and will allow you to adjust the lower and upper cutoff frequencies and the bandwidth. They are typically used by amateur radio operators to help cut down on interference and help their desired received signals come through. This particular one is rather pricey and I'd like to know it will help make the audio more intelligible before I spend the money. You can do it for free (or close to free) on your computer. Try it and see how helpful it is. Don't set your expectations too high. |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Audio filtering (was: Best equipment for stealth recording of voice (not music))
On Apr 7, 9:32 am, "R. L. Drake" wrote:
This is related to the other query I posted several days ago regarding "electronic note taking" at meetings using a digital voice recorder and Radio Shack microphone. My main problem is that usually the audio quality is marginal at best, and often large blocks of audio are indecipherable. I received several helpful responses to that query, for which I thank you and will try them. I had another thought, though. I wonder if I could put a bandpass filter on the audio output from the recorder, and set the bandwidth from say around 500 Hz to 1500 Hz, or some other range, to cut out as much of the unwanted frequency spectrum as I can, and enhance that part of the audio range that I want. There are audio DSP filters available such as the MFJ 784B (http://www.mfjenterprises.com/produc...rodid=MFJ-784B) that have very sharp skirts, very flat tops, and will allow you to adjust the lower and upper cutoff frequencies and the bandwidth. They are typically used by amateur radio operators to help cut down on interference and help their desired received signals come through. This particular one is rather pricey and I'd like to know it will help make the audio more intelligible before I spend the money. Thanks... You might want to try a restoration program like the one at the link below. http://www.acondigital.com/features/...ion/index.html |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Audio filtering (was: Best equipment for stealth recording of voice (not music))
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 07:15:08 -0700, Richard Crowley wrote:
You can do it for free (or close to free) on your computer. Try it and see how helpful it is. Don't set your expectations too high. Good morning, Richard. "jwvm" suggested something from Acon Digital Media, which looks like it has possibilities. Is this what you were referring to? If not, can you tell me what computer application you had in mind? My expectations aren't high at all, or at least I don't think they are... anything that will give me decipherable output most of the time is fine for me, doesn't need to be hi-fidelity or anything close to it. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Audio filtering (was: Best equipment for stealth recording ofvoice (not music))
R. L. Drake wrote:
"jwvm" suggested something from Acon Digital Media, which looks like it has possibilities. Is this what you were referring to? that's not free. I'd rather start with a simple equalizer to cut the frequencies you don't want. If not, can you tell me what computer application you had in mind? I'm not him, but you could try for example Audacity: http://audacity.sourceforge.net It's a free program for editing audio files, in the effect menu you find an equalizer function. Of course you have to get your recording into your computer first. But if you use of those little digital recorders, it might have USB so you can simply transfer the file. Boris -- http://www.borislau.de - computer science, music, photos |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Audio filtering
R. L. Drake wrote:
Richard Crowley wrote: You can do it for free (or close to free) on your computer. Try it and see how helpful it is. Don't set your expectations too high. Good morning, Richard. "jwvm" suggested something from Acon Digital Media, which looks like it has possibilities. Is this what you were referring to? If not, can you tell me what computer application you had in mind? My expectations aren't high at all, or at least I don't think they are... anything that will give me decipherable output most of the time is fine for me, doesn't need to be hi-fidelity or anything close to it. Richard is appropriately suggesting that you can load the files into your computer and experiment with EQ to your heart's delight without incurring much expense. -- ha Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Audio filtering (was: Best equipment for stealth recording of voice (not music))
"R. L. Drake" wrote ...
Richard Crowley wrote: You can do it for free (or close to free) on your computer. Try it and see how helpful it is. Don't set your expectations too high. Good morning, Richard. "jwvm" suggested something from Acon Digital Media, which looks like it has possibilities. Is this what you were referring to? No, but it is a likely candidate. You problem won't be trying to find something, but to wade through all the many possibilities to find what you want. If not, can you tell me what computer application you had in mind? I was thinking of (free) Audacity http://sourceforge.net/projects/audacity My expectations aren't high at all, or at least I don't think they are... anything that will give me decipherable output most of the time is fine for me, doesn't need to be hi-fidelity or anything close to it. You may not realize that what you are asking to do is actually significantly more difficult that it sounds. But perhaps in your case, it is less demanding because you need only "transcription-quality". But still, removing broadband noise (street traffic, clothing rubbing, etc.) is difficult without severely impacting the desired signal also. And you may have already noticed that microphones don't "hear" like your ears do. Especially in reverberant spaces, you need to get the mic a lot closer to get a decent recording than you ears would have to be, etc. |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Audio filtering (was: Best equipment for stealth recording of voice (not music))
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:32:52 +0200, Boris Lau wrote:
I'm not him, but you could try for example Audacity: http://audacity.sourceforge.net It's a free program for editing audio files, in the effect menu you find an equalizer function. Of course you have to get your recording into your computer first. But if you use of those little digital recorders, it might have USB so you can simply transfer the file. Good afternoon, Boris. Yes, my recorder has a USB port and I can easily download audio into the computer as WAV files. Thanks to you and everyone who suggested Audacity. I'll give it a try. |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Audio filtering (was: Best equipment for stealth recording of voice (not music))
On Apr 7, 11:17 am, "R. L. Drake" wrote:
snip "jwvm" suggested something from Acon Digital Media, which looks like it has possibilities. Is this what you were referring to? If not, can you tell me what computer application you had in mind? My expectations aren't high at all, or at least I don't think they are... anything that will give me decipherable output most of the time is fine for me, doesn't need to be hi-fidelity or anything close to it. The advantage of programs like Acoustica is that you can select a portion of the waveform where there is only noise and let the program figure out how to filter the data. It can greatly reduce background noise although audible artifacts become apparent as noise suppression increases. Audacity apparently has similar capabilities so given that it is free, you might try that first. You can also download a trial version of Acoustica if you want another option. |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Audio filtering (was: Best equipment for stealth recording of
R. L. Drake wrote: "jwvm" suggested something from Acon Digital Media, which looks like it has possibilities. Is this what you were referring to? that's not free. I'd rather start with a simple equalizer to cut the frequencies you don't want. snippage I'm not him, but you could try for example Audacity: It's a free program for editing audio files, in the effect menu you find an equalizer function. Of course you have to get your recording into your computer first. But if you use of those little digital recorders, it might have USB so you can simply transfer the file. I'd say you want to process *after* you record anyway. My problem with any kind of filtration, noise gate etc. on recorded tracks while recording is that I can't undo them. i was mastering a gospel album for some clients at a friend of mine's studio a few years ago, and one of the album tracks was a song that began just with high hat cymbal and electric piano before the bass and full kit plus other layers came in. tHe afternoon we'd done that track that keyboard he was using had a ground loop problem and was delivering me a little 60 hz, but he wouldn't retake the damned thing. I wanted to retake anyway with the drums mic'd somewhat differently as we'd been doing in later sessions, or at least get him to retake the electric piano. NO soap, he was satisfied. My host for the evening's mastering session is always wanting to show me what his magic plug-ins will do for mastering, and 90% of the time i turn up my nose. HE can't interest me in the old use the eq curve of the client's favorite album trip. TO make a long one short he grabbed cedar and hit the intro pulling it off when the arrangement was full and nobody would be likely to notice the 60 hz hummmmm. WE were able to dial in just enough to wipe the 60 hz without really hurting the electric piano sound too badly at all. STill for live recording combined with sr I like to have some good parametric eq available. Richard webb, Electric Spider Productions Replace anything before the @ symbol with elspider for real email address. Braille: support true literacy for the blind. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Best equipment for stealth recording for voice (not music) | Pro Audio | |||
How do I encode Voice and Music Content with Windows Media Audio 9 Voice | Pro Audio | |||
Seeking a stealth digital voice recorder | Tech | |||
Filtering hiss behind voice recording | General | |||
Recording Voice - What equipment do we need? | Pro Audio |