Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The History of the CD Player
I am looking to write a white paper on technological development and
continuous improvement. I would like to use the CD player as an example. Specifically I am interested in the small incremental changes that take place every model upgrade that at the time do not seem much but when viewed over a 20 year period they are amazing. Can anyone help me find a history in pictures? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Unfortunately, much of the developement since about 1989 has been to reduce
cost, not to improve sound, function, or reliability. This would make an interesting aspect to your paper, however. Mark Z. wrote in message oups.com... I am looking to write a white paper on technological development and continuous improvement. I would like to use the CD player as an example. Specifically I am interested in the small incremental changes that take place every model upgrade that at the time do not seem much but when viewed over a 20 year period they are amazing. Can anyone help me find a history in pictures? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Mark D. Zacharias" wrote in
: Unfortunately, much of the developement since about 1989 has been to reduce cost, not to improve sound, function, or reliability. This would make an interesting aspect to your paper, however. Meridian recently released a 20 year anniversary overkill CD player: http://www.meridian.co.uk/m_800_bro_800DVD.htm These CD/DVD players have all the latest and greatest features developed over the last 20 years. -- Lucas Tam ) Please delete "REMOVE" from the e-mail address when replying. http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/coolspot18/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Continous development is an interesting subject to reply to both of
the replies sent. I need photos to show the incremental change in size. I suppose being an F1 engineer I am more interested in the proportional size change of the part. I believe it shows real engineering gains in design. Pooh Bear wrote in message ... wrote: I am looking to write a white paper on technological development and continuous improvement. I would like to use the CD player as an example. Specifically I am interested in the small incremental changes that take place every model upgrade that at the time do not seem much but when viewed over a 20 year period they are amazing. Can anyone help me find a history in pictures? You want pictures ? How does that help. Best technological improvement ever IMHO - so I finally bought a CD player - *oversampling*. My Denon DCD 1700 is still in use. Graham |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Presspley wrote:
Continous development is an interesting subject to reply to both of the replies sent. I need photos to show the incremental change in size. I suppose being an F1 engineer I am more interested in the proportional size change of the part. I believe it shows real engineering gains in design. Well, the size of the box hasn't changed that much ( you need room for the controls and display ! ) but a lot more of it is full of fresh air now ! Also there's no weight in most modern CD players. My DCD-1700 in comparison is actually quite heavy. Graham |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In .com, on 10/14/04
at 03:32 PM, said: I am looking to write a white paper on technological development and continuous improvement. I would like to use the CD player as an example. Specifically I am interested in the small incremental changes that take place every model upgrade that at the time do not seem much but when viewed over a 20 year period they are amazing. Can anyone help me find a history in pictures? Unless you want to track radical changes in style, pictures of the outside won't be very interesting because component size is still about 17" wide. Colors? They were mostly black, but we seem to be tiring of black. Silver and gold seem to be making a comeback. More interesting would be pictures of the inside. As others mentioned, transports haven't changed drastically, but the electronics have. Early units were stuffed from "floor to ceiling" with components. Now, the units are embarrassingly empty inside. Each model year there are less and less wires, fewer and larger chips. Current units tend to have fewer front panel buttons. Buttons have migrated to the remotes. I'm not sure where to find appropriate images. If you have the time, you may be able to find some older units at flea markets or estate sales. ----------------------------------------------------------- spam: wordgame:123(abc):14 9 20 5 2 9 18 4 at 22 15 9 3 5 14 5 20 dot 3 15 13 (Barry Mann) [sorry about the puzzle, spammers are ruining my mailbox] ----------------------------------------------------------- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Lucas Tam" wrote in message .. . "Mark D. Zacharias" wrote in : Unfortunately, much of the developement since about 1989 has been to reduce cost, not to improve sound, function, or reliability. This would make an interesting aspect to your paper, however. Meridian recently released a 20 year anniversary overkill CD player: http://www.meridian.co.uk/m_800_bro_800DVD.htm snip I'm sure it's a nice player, but I'll bet it uses the same laser and chipset as a low-medium priced consumer model, right down to the D/A converters, though it probably uses "selected" ones. It's likely their only significant addition is their own analog output stage. It's doubtful their design is "cutting edge" so much as a refinement of the analog stage. Besides, I didn't know we were talking "high-end" models, but the advancement of the general state-of-the-art, which for cd players hasn't changed much for the past 15 years. Mark Z. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Mark D. Zacharias" wrote in message ... "Lucas Tam" wrote in message .. . "Mark D. Zacharias" wrote in : Unfortunately, much of the developement since about 1989 has been to reduce cost, not to improve sound, function, or reliability. This would make an interesting aspect to your paper, however. Meridian recently released a 20 year anniversary overkill CD player: http://www.meridian.co.uk/m_800_bro_800DVD.htm snip I'm sure it's a nice player, but I'll bet it uses the same laser and chipset as a low-medium priced consumer model, right down to the D/A converters, though it probably uses "selected" ones. It's likely their only significant addition is their own analog output stage. It's doubtful their design is "cutting edge" so much as a refinement of the analog stage. Besides, I didn't know we were talking "high-end" models, but the advancement of the general state-of-the-art, which for cd players hasn't changed much for the past 15 years. Mark Z. P.S. The rules have apparently changed - the Meridian mentioned is a DVD player, not a plain CD player. BTW I would agree that the engineering SOA generally has improved - one only has to look at the circuit boards inside any DVD player to marvel at the digital processing that is now possible. If we are now to include DVD in this discussion, which is fine, I will concede the engineering improvements - but the fact remains that Meridian could not have built the most essential parts of their 800 player. The laser ass'y, IC chipset and DVD processing (servo, video etc) were surely made by Pioneer, Philips (ugh) or another of the general electronics manufactuers. Meridian probably added a nice box, their own power supply and an analog audio output stage - perhaps even a gratuitous one, then charged what - perhaps $20,000? Mark Z. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:49:58 GMT, Lucas Tam
wrote: Meridian recently released a 20 year anniversary overkill CD player: http://www.meridian.co.uk/m_800_bro_800DVD.htm "...The result is so astounding that Stereophile magazine has created a new Class A+ for the 800...." I wonder how it would have sounded in testing if the price wasn't known :-) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 12:52:09 +0100, Laurence Payne
wrote: On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:49:58 GMT, Lucas Tam wrote: Meridian recently released a 20 year anniversary overkill CD player: http://www.meridian.co.uk/m_800_bro_800DVD.htm "...The result is so astounding that Stereophile magazine has created a new Class A+ for the 800...." I wonder how it would have sounded in testing if the price wasn't known :-) It would indeed be interesting to compare the 800 under level-matched DBT conditions, to any old transport hooked up to a Benchmark DAC-1. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 07:32:16 +0000 (UTC), Stewart Pinkerton
wrote: There has been *no* incremental change in size. The original Sony CDP-101 was a conventional 'full size' component, same as you'll find in most ranges today, while the Hitachi DA-1000 was much taller due to featuring vertical disc positioning, and the Philips/Marantz CD63 was a very compact top loader, an elegant unit that might still be regerded as the best looking player ever made. Was that its name, really? I remember the top loader to be the Philips CD100, I never saw the Marantz version at that time. Is it this machine you are thinking of: http://www.hupse.nl/radio/images_1960/PhilipsCD100.jpg ? The CD63 was a name used for a good meidum priced player for many years in the nineties by Marantz, but perhaps the tag has been on an M. machines since 1982? Ah, the Hitachi DA-1000 aka the Toaster! http://www.joeres.de/da10001.jpg Sweet memories of the times when they CD players were expensive and rare. My first player was the first NAD (model number forgotten) model that came to Sweden. Price at that time (1983) around $700. It still works, by the way. Per. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Laurence Payne wrote in message . ..
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:49:58 GMT, Lucas Tam wrote http://www.meridian.co.uk/m_800_bro_800DVD.htm "...The result is so astounding that Stereophile magazine has created a new Class A+ for the 800...." This is not correct. As it says in the prologue to Stereophile's "Recommended Components," we created Class A+ to recognize the fact that the 24/96 DVD and SACD media have the capability of sounding superior to conventional "Red Book" CD. That the Meridian player is rated in that category recognizes that it offers, for now, one of the best realizations for DVD-A playback. But there are other components also rated in that category. I wonder how it would have sounded in testing if the price wasn't known :-) You need to read the review coverage, available in the free online archives at www.stereophile.com. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 20:56:52 +0200, Per Stromgren
wrote: On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 07:32:16 +0000 (UTC), Stewart Pinkerton wrote: There has been *no* incremental change in size. The original Sony CDP-101 was a conventional 'full size' component, same as you'll find in most ranges today, while the Hitachi DA-1000 was much taller due to featuring vertical disc positioning, and the Philips/Marantz CD63 was a very compact top loader, an elegant unit that might still be regerded as the best looking player ever made. Was that its name, really? I remember the top loader to be the Philips CD100, I never saw the Marantz version at that time. The Philips was CD100, the Marantz was CD63. Is it this machine you are thinking of: http://www.hupse.nl/radio/images_1960/PhilipsCD100.jpg ? Yup, that's the one. Philips was silver, Marantz was 'champagne', but otherwise the same player. I had the Marantz, which cost an eye-watering £480, serious money in 1983. The CD63 was a name used for a good meidum priced player for many years in the nineties by Marantz, but perhaps the tag has been on an M. machines since 1982? Yep, you can win some money down the pub by claiming that you had a top-loading CD-63, and producing the photograph to prove it! :-) Ah, the Hitachi DA-1000 aka the Toaster! http://www.joeres.de/da10001.jpg Also aka the complete pile of crap! Possibly responsible for the early reports of 'digititis' from CD.................... -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"John Atkinson" wrote in message
om Laurence Payne wrote in message . .. On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:49:58 GMT, Lucas Tam wrote http://www.meridian.co.uk/m_800_bro_800DVD.htm "...The result is so astounding that Stereophile magazine has created a new Class A+ for the 800...." This is not correct. As it says in the prologue to Stereophile's "Recommended Components," we created Class A+ to recognize the fact that the 24/96 DVD and SACD media have the capability of sounding superior to conventional "Red Book" CD. That the Meridian player is rated in that category recognizes that it offers, for now, one of the best realizations for DVD-A playback. But there are other components also rated in that category. Yet another example of a scientific-sound claim presented without a shred of anything like scientific proof. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
On 16 Oct 2004 12:54:12 -0700, (John
Atkinson) wrote: Laurence Payne wrote in message . .. On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:49:58 GMT, Lucas Tam wrote http://www.meridian.co.uk/m_800_bro_800DVD.htm "...The result is so astounding that Stereophile magazine has created a new Class A+ for the 800...." This is not correct. As it says in the prologue to Stereophile's "Recommended Components," we created Class A+ to recognize the fact that the 24/96 DVD and SACD media have the capability of sounding superior to conventional "Red Book" CD. That the Meridian player is rated in that category recognizes that it offers, for now, one of the best realizations for DVD-A playback. But there are other components also rated in that category. I wonder how it would have sounded in testing if the price wasn't known :-) You need to read the review coverage, available in the free online archives at www.stereophile.com. That is not an answer to the very relevant question. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 20:56:52 +0200, Per Stromgren wrote: On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 07:32:16 +0000 (UTC), Stewart Pinkerton wrote: There has been *no* incremental change in size. The original Sony CDP-101 was a conventional 'full size' component, same as you'll find in most ranges today, while the Hitachi DA-1000 was much taller due to featuring vertical disc positioning, and the Philips/Marantz CD63 was a very compact top loader, an elegant unit that might still be regerded as the best looking player ever made. Was that its name, really? I remember the top loader to be the Philips CD100, I never saw the Marantz version at that time. The Philips was CD100, the Marantz was CD63. Is it this machine you are thinking of: http://www.hupse.nl/radio/images_1960/PhilipsCD100.jpg ? Yup, that's the one. Philips was silver, Marantz was 'champagne', but otherwise the same player. I had the Marantz, which cost an eye-watering £480, serious money in 1983. My first player was the Meridian version of the Phillips player. Cost me about $650 US ($800 Canadian--I bought it in Vancouver, B.C.). Great-sounding; I sometimes wonder if any player I've owned subsequently has been much better. Bob Harper |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:12:53 GMT, Bob Harper
wrote: My first player was the Meridian version of the Phillips player. Cost me about $650 US ($800 Canadian--I bought it in Vancouver, B.C.). Great-sounding; I sometimes wonder if any player I've owned subsequently has been much better. Have any been much worse? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
I think most people are missing the point of continuos development.
The less wires, fewer parts etc is exactly what I am talking about. I was under the impression that portable units were getting smaller? Certainly the old TEAC portable CD player I had way back couldn't handle bumps, was cheap moulding, larger than the size of the actual CD, bad mechanical mechanisms, low battery life, etc etc..... Unless you want to track radical changes in style, pictures of the outside won't be very interesting because component size is still about 17" wide. Colors? They were mostly black, but we seem to be tiring of black. Silver and gold seem to be making a comeback. More interesting would be pictures of the inside. As others mentioned, transports haven't changed drastically, but the electronics have. Early units were stuffed from "floor to ceiling" with components. Now, the units are embarrassingly empty inside. Each model year there are less and less wires, fewer and larger chips. Current units tend to have fewer front panel buttons. Buttons have migrated to the remotes. I'm not sure where to find appropriate images. If you have the time, you may be able to find some older units at flea markets or estate sales. ----------------------------------------------------------- spam: wordgame:123(abc):14 9 20 5 2 9 18 4 at 22 15 9 3 5 14 5 20 dot 3 15 13 (Barry Mann) [sorry about the puzzle, spammers are ruining my mailbox] ----------------------------------------------------------- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
We passed the DBT. | High End Audio | |||
Denon 5900 Universal Player - I'm In Bliss | High End Audio | |||
connecting mp3 player -- need tripole switch? | Car Audio |