"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:39:35 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 00:15:51 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

And your stupid


Oh no, another typo/spelling error. How will I stand the shame?

By knowing I'm not a nitpicking asshole of a waiter.

LOL!

Notice that nitpicking typos is a bad thing when Weil makes them...


That's the way it with all hippocrites.

Keep digging yourself deeper and deeper, Mr. "I Can Right Good".


Let me make sure I have this correct.

My inability in the area of the written word some how means that Socialism
is the moral high ground, Richman's not a fraud and liar, Boon's not a liar,
Weil's not a nitpicking anal retentive waiter, JBorg is not a digusting
piece of ****, Middius is a saint, and Liberals aren't snobby and elitist.
OK, I think I have it.

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:39:35 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 00:15:51 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

And your stupid


Oh no, another typo/spelling error. How will I stand the shame?

By knowing I'm not a nitpicking asshole of a waiter.

LOL!

Notice that nitpicking typos is a bad thing when Weil makes them...


That's the way it with all hippocrites.

Keep digging yourself deeper and deeper, Mr. "I Can Right Good".


Let me make sure I have this correct.

My inability in the area of the written word some how means that
Socialism is the moral high ground, Richman's not a fraud and liar,
Boon's not a liar, Weil's not a nitpicking anal retentive waiter,
JBorg is not a digusting piece of ****, Middius is a saint, and
Liberals aren't snobby and elitist. OK, I think I have it.

Exactly.

Michael McKelvy a écrit :

Weil's not a nitpicking anal retentive waiter...

Just for this one I love you Michael.
It's surely the best concise psychological portrait I have never read on
RAO.
Congratulation Michael, yes I am really sincere. Middius with his
painful, laborious, lengthy, galeries can get lessons from you (lol)

Is it possible that a new Sigmund Freud, a Leonard De Vinci of the
characters, emerges from McKelvy chrysalis ?

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:40:24 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

That's the way it with all hippocrites.

Keep digging yourself deeper and deeper, Mr. "I Can Right Good".


Let me make sure I have this correct.

My inability in the area of the written word some how means that Socialism
is the moral high ground, Richman's not a fraud and liar, Boon's not a liar,
Weil's not a nitpicking anal retentive waiter, JBorg is not a digusting
piece of ****, Middius is a saint, and Liberals aren't snobby and elitist.
OK, I think I have it.

No you don't.

As usual.

Thanks for continuing to make my case that you are a poor communicator
and a poor spokesman for whatever it is that you represent.

On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 06:57:28 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:39:35 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 00:15:51 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

And your stupid


Oh no, another typo/spelling error. How will I stand the shame?

By knowing I'm not a nitpicking asshole of a waiter.

LOL!

Notice that nitpicking typos is a bad thing when Weil makes them...


That's the way it with all hippocrites.

Keep digging yourself deeper and deeper, Mr. "I Can Right Good".


Let me make sure I have this correct.

My inability in the area of the written word some how means that
Socialism is the moral high ground, Richman's not a fraud and liar,
Boon's not a liar, Weil's not a nitpicking anal retentive waiter,
JBorg is not a digusting piece of ****, Middius is a saint, and
Liberals aren't snobby and elitist. OK, I think I have it.

Exactly.

Yep, you got it wrong as well.

"dave weil" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:40:24 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

That's the way it with all hippocrites.

Keep digging yourself deeper and deeper, Mr. "I Can Right Good".


Let me make sure I have this correct.

My inability in the area of the written word some how means that
Socialism
is the moral high ground, Richman's not a fraud and liar, Boon's not a
liar,
Weil's not a nitpicking anal retentive waiter, JBorg is not a digusting
piece of ****, Middius is a saint, and Liberals aren't snobby and
elitist.
OK, I think I have it.

No you don't.

As usual.

Thanks for continuing to make my case that you are a poor communicator
and a poor spokesman for whatever it is that you represent.

And thank for demonstrating your complete lack of self awareness. Not that
it was ever in any doubt.

On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 11:50:20 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:40:24 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

That's the way it with all hippocrites.

Keep digging yourself deeper and deeper, Mr. "I Can Right Good".


Let me make sure I have this correct.

My inability in the area of the written word some how means that
Socialism
is the moral high ground, Richman's not a fraud and liar, Boon's not a
liar,
Weil's not a nitpicking anal retentive waiter, JBorg is not a digusting
piece of ****, Middius is a saint, and Liberals aren't snobby and
elitist.
OK, I think I have it.

No you don't.

As usual.

Thanks for continuing to make my case that you are a poor communicator
and a poor spokesman for whatever it is that you represent.

And thank for demonstrating your complete lack of self awareness. Not that
it was ever in any doubt.

How does your misinterpretation of my point indicate a lack of
self-awareness on *my* part?

You just keep proving my point over and over...

dave weil said to the Bug Eater:

Thanks for continuing to make my case that you are a poor communicator
and a poor spokesman for whatever it is that you represent.

And thank for demonstrating your complete lack of self awareness. Not that
it was ever in any doubt.

How does your misinterpretation of my point indicate a lack of
self-awareness on *my* part?

Maybe Mikey has been following the instructions for plying Krooger's
"debating trade". In a rote manner, I mean. One of the chief tenets
is when the practitioner has lost a point, the desired followup is
to throw out a random and irrelevant accusation, or insult, or other
antagonstic remark. The more inflammatory the better. So if you keep
beating on duh-Mikey, it won't be long before he accuses you of
practicing cruelty to animals, suffering from sexual perversion, or
being a Nazi.

Dave Weil wrote:


On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 11:50:20 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:40:24 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

That's the way it with all hippocrites.

Keep digging yourself deeper and deeper, Mr. "I Can Right Good".


Let me make sure I have this correct.

My inability in the area of the written word some how means that
Socialism
is the moral high ground, Richman's not a fraud and liar, Boon's not a
liar,
Weil's not a nitpicking anal retentive waiter, JBorg is not a digusting
piece of ****, Middius is a saint, and Liberals aren't snobby and
elitist.
OK, I think I have it.

No you don't.

As usual.

Thanks for continuing to make my case that you are a poor communicator
and a poor spokesman for whatever it is that you represent.

And thank for demonstrating your complete lack of self awareness. Not that
it was ever in any doubt.

How does your misinterpretation of my point indicate a lack of
self-awareness on *my* part?

You just keep proving my point over and over...








McKelvy's use of logic is nonexistent. The puppet character called "Special
Ed" that appears on the Comedy Network program called Crank Yankers was
probably based on him.



Bruce J. Richman

George M. Middius wrote:

dave weil said to the Bug Eater:

Thanks for continuing to make my case that you are a poor communicator
and a poor spokesman for whatever it is that you represent.

And thank for demonstrating your complete lack of self awareness. Not
that
it was ever in any doubt.

How does your misinterpretation of my point indicate a lack of
self-awareness on *my* part?

Maybe Mikey has been following the instructions for plying Krooger's
"debating trade". In a rote manner, I mean. One of the chief tenets
is when the practitioner has lost a point, the desired followup is
to throw out a random and irrelevant accusation, or insult, or other
antagonstic remark. The more inflammatory the better. So if you keep
beating on duh-Mikey, it won't be long before he accuses you of
practicing cruelty to animals, suffering from sexual perversion, or
being a Nazi.











Or you may achieve even greater elevation according to the duh-Mikey randomized
roulette wheel of non-sequiturs that he uses in "debating" . You can became "a
fraud" or........ (drum roll, pleae)............. "you don't exist".

That is when you know you must be doing something right !



Bruce J. Richman

McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"dave weil" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:33:33 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

It's just a rumor, there's no proof but it is an interesting
theory.

There's a rumor that Howard Dean and Albert Gore Jr. have a plan
to
kill
Hilary Clinton.

It's just a rumor.


It's a dumb rumor, started by a dumb Internet geek named McKelvy.

Boon

Given the way the Clinton faction has been trying to sabotage the
Dean
campaign, it's not even that far fetched an idea.

Actually, I'm not dumb, I speak quite well.

If only it transferred to the written medium. I guess we just have
to
take your word for it.

Actually I think I write well too, I just don't type well and this
isn't
important enough for me to get wrought with angst because it bothers
you
or
anybody else. People seem to understand well enough if they want to.

Bull****. You're engaged in about twenty different arguments with
about
ten
different people, and you're losing them all. You're as dumb as they
come.

Now deny it like a good boy.

Boon

Dear Mr. Bug:

You lose an argument when your proven wrong. This being an opinion NG
Nobody ever wins because nobody ever proves anything. You should know
that
better than anyone, you keep hammering out the same tired bull**** as if
it
were gospel and then make fun of anyone who doesn't go along on your sick
ride.

Ah, that's how Arny and you get away with all of your lies. Evidently you
never
use facts to support your arguments, just your opinion.

Sure I do. It doesn't make any difference though, since nobody ever
concedes.

Is that right? How
about logic? Do you shun that also, because it takes a back seat to your
opinions, i.e. whatever you can make up out of thin air?

No, if I did that, I'd be calling people pedophile for no reason whatsoever.

I gave you the evidence, and you dismissed it. I asked you if you even looked
at it, and you lied and said you did, and you got caught when you slipped up on
a very major point that was the crux of the whole situation.

Here is the truth, McKelvy. You are not smart enough to be here. Everyone
gets the better of you constantly, and you are oblivious to that fact. You are
the Usenet equivalent of the loud, drunk guy at the bar who says a lot of
stupid **** even though everyone else is telling him to shut the **** up so
they can watch the game. Either you can leave and preserve whatever dignity
you think you have left, or we can continue rolling you in the parking lot
every night.

Boon

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"dave weil" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:33:33 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

It's just a rumor, there's no proof but it is an interesting
theory.

There's a rumor that Howard Dean and Albert Gore Jr. have a
plan
to
kill
Hilary Clinton.

It's just a rumor.


It's a dumb rumor, started by a dumb Internet geek named
McKelvy.

Boon

Given the way the Clinton faction has been trying to sabotage
the
Dean
campaign, it's not even that far fetched an idea.

Actually, I'm not dumb, I speak quite well.

If only it transferred to the written medium. I guess we just
have
to
take your word for it.

Actually I think I write well too, I just don't type well and this
isn't
important enough for me to get wrought with angst because it
bothers
you
or
anybody else. People seem to understand well enough if they want
to.

Bull****. You're engaged in about twenty different arguments with
about
ten
different people, and you're losing them all. You're as dumb as
they
come.

Now deny it like a good boy.

Boon

Dear Mr. Bug:

You lose an argument when your proven wrong. This being an opinion NG
Nobody ever wins because nobody ever proves anything. You should know
that
better than anyone, you keep hammering out the same tired bull**** as
if
it
were gospel and then make fun of anyone who doesn't go along on your
sick
ride.

Ah, that's how Arny and you get away with all of your lies. Evidently
you
never
use facts to support your arguments, just your opinion.

Sure I do. It doesn't make any difference though, since nobody ever
concedes.

Is that right? How
about logic? Do you shun that also, because it takes a back seat to
your
opinions, i.e. whatever you can make up out of thin air?

No, if I did that, I'd be calling people pedophile for no reason
whatsoever.

I gave you the evidence, and you dismissed it.

That's the problem, you didn't give me evidence, you gave me some unknown
person's unsubstantiated OPINION.

You desparately want me to and others to think it's evidence so they won't
think you're the smarmy little slug that you are.


I asked you if you even looked
at it, and you lied and said you did,

There ya go again. I did look at it, it was a refresher, since I remember it
from when it first happened.

and you got caught when you slipped up on
a very major point that was the crux of the whole situation.

The crux of the situation is you WANT people to believe unsubstantiated
opinions by an unknown person about another person you don't like.

Here is the truth, McKelvy. You are not smart enough to be here.

That can't be true, BECAUSE I AM HERE.

Everyone
gets the better of you constantly, and you are oblivious to that fact.

OSAF.

You are
the Usenet equivalent of the loud, drunk guy at the bar who says a lot of
stupid **** even though everyone else is telling him to shut the **** up
so
they can watch the game.

Then we have that in common, then?

Either you can leave and preserve whatever dignity
you think you have left, or we can continue rolling you in the parking lot
every night.

Boon

Bring it on meat.

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 11:50:20 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"dave weil" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:40:24 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

That's the way it with all hippocrites.

Keep digging yourself deeper and deeper, Mr. "I Can Right Good".


Let me make sure I have this correct.

My inability in the area of the written word some how means that
Socialism
is the moral high ground, Richman's not a fraud and liar, Boon's not a
liar,
Weil's not a nitpicking anal retentive waiter, JBorg is not a
digusting
piece of ****, Middius is a saint, and Liberals aren't snobby and
elitist.
OK, I think I have it.

No you don't.

As usual.

Thanks for continuing to make my case that you are a poor communicator
and a poor spokesman for whatever it is that you represent.

And thank for demonstrating your complete lack of self awareness. Not
that
it was ever in any doubt.

How does your misinterpretation of my point indicate a lack of
self-awareness on *my* part?

You make my point. You are a nitpicking asshole. The main reason you
participate here is to make you feel less like the overeducated,
underemployed bitch that you are.

On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 18:18:39 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:

How does your misinterpretation of my point indicate a lack of
self-awareness on *my* part?

You make my point. You are a nitpicking asshole.

I see. It's nitpicking to point out your inability to understand the
written word.

The main reason you
participate here is to make you feel less like the overeducated,
underemployed bitch that you are.

Well, I hope you feel better now. Maybe one day we'll learn what *you*
do for a living. We know what you're *not* good at, in terms of
business.

McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"dave weil" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:33:33 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

It's just a rumor, there's no proof but it is an interesting
theory.

There's a rumor that Howard Dean and Albert Gore Jr. have a
plan
to
kill
Hilary Clinton.

It's just a rumor.


It's a dumb rumor, started by a dumb Internet geek named
McKelvy.

Boon

Given the way the Clinton faction has been trying to sabotage
the
Dean
campaign, it's not even that far fetched an idea.

Actually, I'm not dumb, I speak quite well.

If only it transferred to the written medium. I guess we just
have
to
take your word for it.

Actually I think I write well too, I just don't type well and this
isn't
important enough for me to get wrought with angst because it
bothers
you
or
anybody else. People seem to understand well enough if they want
to.

Bull****. You're engaged in about twenty different arguments with
about
ten
different people, and you're losing them all. You're as dumb as
they
come.

Now deny it like a good boy.

Boon

Dear Mr. Bug:

You lose an argument when your proven wrong. This being an opinion NG
Nobody ever wins because nobody ever proves anything. You should know
that
better than anyone, you keep hammering out the same tired bull**** as
if
it
were gospel and then make fun of anyone who doesn't go along on your
sick
ride.

Ah, that's how Arny and you get away with all of your lies. Evidently
you
never
use facts to support your arguments, just your opinion.

Sure I do. It doesn't make any difference though, since nobody ever
concedes.

Is that right? How
about logic? Do you shun that also, because it takes a back seat to
your
opinions, i.e. whatever you can make up out of thin air?

No, if I did that, I'd be calling people pedophile for no reason
whatsoever.

I gave you the evidence, and you dismissed it.

That's the problem, you didn't give me evidence, you gave me some unknown
person's unsubstantiated OPINION.

No, I didn't, dumbass. Thanks for proving you lied again. You didn't read
anything.


You desparately want me to and others to think it's evidence so they won't
think you're the smarmy little slug that you are.

I don't desperately want you to think anything. I don't care what you think.
I and almost everyone else here receive great joy from watching clueless,
ignorant people like you and Arny try to compete with the big boys, and fail
miserably.



I asked you if you even looked
at it, and you lied and said you did,

There ya go again. I did look at it, it was a refresher, since I remember it
from when it first happened.

Then why did you make that huge whopper of a mistake, then?


and you got caught when you slipped up on
a very major point that was the crux of the whole situation.

The crux of the situation is you WANT people to believe unsubstantiated
opinions by an unknown person about another person you don't like.

That's your fantasy.


Here is the truth, McKelvy. You are not smart enough to be here.

That can't be true, BECAUSE I AM HERE.

No, if you were smarter, you wouldn't have people lining up to kick your ass.
You either have zero self-awareness, or zero self-esteem, because you and Arny
are nothing more than punching bags for the vast majority of RAO regulars, and
you still remain here, pretending that you're actually winning arguments. No
wonder you hate Dr. Richman, because having a psychologist observe your
behavior has to be your worst nightmare.


Everyone
gets the better of you constantly, and you are oblivious to that fact.

OSAF.

Nope. You're just biased toward yourself. Do you really think anyone here
sees you as you apparently see yourself? Why do people call you a bug eater?
Why do they call you stupid? Why do they call you duh-Mikey? Are you just
hopelessly misunderstood? Or are you just another Internet geek who thinks he
is smarter, more powerful, or more important than he is in real life?


You are
the Usenet equivalent of the loud, drunk guy at the bar who says a lot of
stupid **** even though everyone else is telling him to shut the **** up
so
they can watch the game.

Then we have that in common, then?

Another IKYABWAI. It's a testament to your stupidity that you haven't yet
understood that when you make an IKYABWAI, it means you have automatically
conceded the argument, because you have run out of things to say.


Either you can leave and preserve whatever dignity
you think you have left, or we can continue rolling you in the parking lot
every night.

Boon

Bring it on meat.

Bring what on? I'm trying to help you. You need to give it up, because you're
a waste of bandwidth. I'm a conservative, too, yet your presence here
embarrasses me because you are a walking, talking stereotype of what the
liberals hate about conservatives. Why do you think I can get along with
liberals like George and Jim? Because I don't walk around saying idiotic
things about my politics.

Listen, you really aren't smart enough to be here. You are entertainment here.
You are stress relief. You are a punching bag. You are a joke. You are
duh-Mikey, the Bug Eater. Why the **** would you want to stay here? I JUST
DON'T GET IT.

Boon

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message


No, if you were smarter, you wouldn't have people lining up to kick
your ass.

Translation: If you are part of my clique, you get a free pass.

You either have zero self-awareness, or zero self-esteem,
because you and Arny are nothing more than punching bags for the vast
majority of RAO regulars, and you still remain here, pretending that
you're actually winning arguments.

Remember, the perpetrator of this run-on brags about his great writing
skills.

No wonder you hate Dr. Richman,
because having a psychologist observe your behavior has to be your
worst nightmare.

Given that Richman sees nothing wrong with your reprehensible behavior
Phillips, his opinions are easy to dismiss.

Everyone
gets the better of you constantly, and you are oblivious to that
fact.

OSAF.

Nope. You're just biased toward yourself. Do you really think
anyone here sees you as you apparently see yourself?


If irony killed.

Why do people call you a bug eater?

Because they look up to one of the biggest numskulls in the history of
Usenet, George Middius.

Why do they call you stupid?

Because it's what they do. It makes them feel smart.


Why do they call you duh-Mikey?

Because they look up to one of the biggest numskulls in the history of
Usenet, George Middius.

Are you just hopelessly misunderstood?

Not at all. He's understood as being a threat.

Or are you
just another Internet geek who thinks he is smarter, more powerful,
or more important than he is in real life?

We leave that sort of self-delusional behavior to people like you, Phillips.
Mike and I are just a couple of guys among the few who see through your
shtick and aren't afraid to speak up against you. You've turned RAO into
something like a bad high school angst movie because that's a mental level
that you can comprehend.

You are
the Usenet equivalent of the loud, drunk guy at the bar who says a
lot of stupid **** even though everyone else is telling him to shut
the **** up so they can watch the game.

Then we have that in common, then?

Another IKYABWAI.

If irony killed...

It's a testament to your stupidity that you
haven't yet understood that when you make an IKYABWAI, it means you
have automatically conceded the argument, because you have run out of
things to say.

No Phillips, it just means that most of your ranting is so childish that it
doesn't deserve much creative thought.

Either you can leave and preserve whatever dignity
you think you have left, or we can continue rolling you in the
parking lot every night.

Bring it on meat.

Bring what on?

Why Phillips, we want to see this great terror that you and Zelniker are
threatening this place with.

I'm trying to help you.

First help yourself, Phillips. For openers, try responding to people at some
social level more advanced than high school.

You need to give it up, because you're a waste of bandwidth.

If irony killed. When is the last time you made an audio post around here,
Phillips?

I'm a conservative, too, yet
your presence here embarrasses me because you are a walking, talking
stereotype of what the liberals hate about conservatives.

Phillips, since you admit that you've got some kind of offline relationship
with Sanders, why don't you show us how you can help him stop acting like
the National Lampoon's version of a liberal? Oh yes, and since you claim to
be self-aware why don't you show us that you can cure yourself of behaving
like the captain of my old high school's girl's cheerleading team?

Why do you
think I can get along with liberals like George and Jim?

Phillips, the reason why would be desperation. Most of us have social lives,
but sucking up to these losers is about as close as you can get.

Because I don't walk around saying idiotic things about my politics.

If irony killed.

Listen, you really aren't smart enough to be here.

If irony killed.

You are entertainment here.

If irony killed.

You are stress relief.

If irony killed.

You are a punching bag.

If irony killed.

You are a joke.

If irony killed.

You are duh-Mikey, the Bug Eater. Why the **** would you want to stay
here?

Think of RAO as a pet store. Not all pets are completely benign. Ever wonder
why anybody keeps a rattlesnake for a pet? If you could answer that
question, you'd understand what people like you and Middius mean to me.

I JUST DON'T GET IT.

If only you were self-aware, Phillips.

Boon

If irony killed.

If irony killed...

If irony killed.

If irony killed.

If irony killed.

If irony killed.

If irony killed.

If irony killed.

If irony killed.


If redundancy killed.

"S888Wheel" wrote in message


If redundancy killed.

You'd be dead!

I said


If redundancy killed.


Arny said


You'd be dead!


LOL you just have no sense of self-awareness do you? Did you count the number
of times you said "if irony killed" in that one post? Given your enormous
volume of posts on Usenet and your lack of imagination I would bet the number
of times you have posted that tired cliche is somewhere in the neighborhood of
a six figure number. If redundancy killed you would have taken out half your
town with you. If redundancy killed you would make armed forces obsolete.

S888Wheel a écrit :


If irony killed.

If irony killed...

If irony killed.

If irony killed.

If irony killed.

If irony killed.

If irony killed.

If irony killed.

If irony killed.


If redundancy killed.

Watching to your previous exchange with me and with GeoSync we must
confess that you are on a good way to compete... (lol)

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"dave weil" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:33:33 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

It's just a rumor, there's no proof but it is an
interesting
theory.

There's a rumor that Howard Dean and Albert Gore Jr. have
a
plan
to
kill
Hilary Clinton.

It's just a rumor.


It's a dumb rumor, started by a dumb Internet geek named
McKelvy.

Boon

Given the way the Clinton faction has been trying to sabotage
the
Dean
campaign, it's not even that far fetched an idea.

Actually, I'm not dumb, I speak quite well.

If only it transferred to the written medium. I guess we just
have
to
take your word for it.

Actually I think I write well too, I just don't type well and
this
isn't
important enough for me to get wrought with angst because it
bothers
you
or
anybody else. People seem to understand well enough if they
want
to.

Bull****. You're engaged in about twenty different arguments
with
about
ten
different people, and you're losing them all. You're as dumb as
they
come.

Now deny it like a good boy.

Boon

Dear Mr. Bug:

You lose an argument when your proven wrong. This being an opinion
NG
Nobody ever wins because nobody ever proves anything. You should
know
that
better than anyone, you keep hammering out the same tired bull****
as
if
it
were gospel and then make fun of anyone who doesn't go along on
your
sick
ride.

Ah, that's how Arny and you get away with all of your lies.
Evidently
you
never
use facts to support your arguments, just your opinion.

Sure I do. It doesn't make any difference though, since nobody ever
concedes.

Is that right? How
about logic? Do you shun that also, because it takes a back seat to
your
opinions, i.e. whatever you can make up out of thin air?

No, if I did that, I'd be calling people pedophile for no reason
whatsoever.

I gave you the evidence, and you dismissed it.

That's the problem, you didn't give me evidence, you gave me some unknown
person's unsubstantiated OPINION.

No, I didn't, dumbass. Thanks for proving you lied again. You didn't
read
anything.


Who the **** is Leon North?


You desparately want me to and others to think it's evidence so they
won't
think you're the smarmy little slug that you are.

I don't desperately want you to think anything. I don't care what you
think.
I and almost everyone else here receive great joy from watching clueless,
ignorant people like you and Arny try to compete with the big boys, and
fail
miserably.

But at least we have you to kick around.

I asked you if you even looked
at it, and you lied and said you did,

There ya go again. I did look at it, it was a refresher, since I remember
it
from when it first happened.

Then why did you make that huge whopper of a mistake, then?


Leon North is not anybody that anybody even knows for sure exists. You're
taking his word.

and you got caught when you slipped up on
a very major point that was the crux of the whole situation.

The crux of the situation is you WANT people to believe unsubstantiated
opinions by an unknown person about another person you don't like.

That's your fantasy.


Here is the truth, McKelvy. You are not smart enough to be here.

That can't be true, BECAUSE I AM HERE.

No, if you were smarter, you wouldn't have people lining up to kick your
ass.

Oooooh, I 'm so scared.

You either have zero self-awareness, or zero self-esteem, because you and
Arny
are nothing more than punching bags for the vast majority of RAO regulars,
and
you still remain here, pretending that you're actually winning arguments.

We may be punching bags, but it for clueless, no life havin', gotta attack
somebody to make me feel better, assholes like you. Hardly counts for
anything in the real world.

No
wonder you hate Dr. Richman, because having a psychologist observe your
behavior has to be your worst nightmare.


I despise him because he's an unprofessional lying SOB.
He doesn't know me and hasn't gotten anything right about me ever.

Everyone
gets the better of you constantly, and you are oblivious to that fact.

OSAF.

Nope. You're just biased toward yourself. Do you really think anyone
here
sees you as you apparently see yourself?

Do you think there's anyone here whose opinion I care that much about?

Why do people call you a bug eater?

Because it makes them feel better to be able to denigrate somebody that
disagrees with them by pretending their less than human.

Why do they call you stupid?

Because they are.

Why do they call you duh-Mikey? Are you just
hopelessly misunderstood?

See above. I think to a certain degree I am misunderstood, but partly
that's by choice. Nobody here "knows" me or anyone else here.

Or are you just another Internet geek who thinks he
is smarter, more powerful, or more important than he is in real life?

None of the above. I'm just a guy who thinks for himself and some people
don't like it. They're entitled. I don't lose any sleep over it.



You are
the Usenet equivalent of the loud, drunk guy at the bar who says a lot
of
stupid **** even though everyone else is telling him to shut the ****
up
so
they can watch the game.

Then we have that in common, then?

Another IKYABWAI.

No, it's a appropriate response to the pot calling the kettle black. You
come here, apparently for one reason and that's to be a rude asshole.

It's a testament to your stupidity that you haven't yet
understood that when you make an IKYABWAI, it means you have automatically
conceded the argument, because you have run out of things to say.


It's atestament to YOUR stupidity that you don't see you ARE everything you
accuse me of.

Either you can leave and preserve whatever dignity
you think you have left, or we can continue rolling you in the parking
lot
every night.

Boon

Bring it on meat.

Bring what on? I'm trying to help you. You need to give it up, because
you're
a waste of bandwidth. I'm a conservative, too, yet your presence here
embarrasses me because you are a walking, talking stereotype of what the
liberals hate about conservatives.

I'm not a conservative.

Why do you think I can get along with
liberals like George and Jim?

Because they are ****heads too.

Because I don't walk around saying idiotic
things about my politics.

And?

Listen, you really aren't smart enough to be here.

OSAF

You are entertainment here.
You are stress relief. You are a punching bag. You are a joke. You are
duh-Mikey, the Bug Eater. Why the **** would you want to stay here? I
JUST
DON'T GET IT.

Boon


I get you. You're a liar. **** off.

McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"dave weil" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:33:33 -0800, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

It's just a rumor, there's no proof but it is an
interesting
theory.

There's a rumor that Howard Dean and Albert Gore Jr. have
a
plan
to
kill
Hilary Clinton.

It's just a rumor.


It's a dumb rumor, started by a dumb Internet geek named
McKelvy.

Boon

Given the way the Clinton faction has been trying to sabotage
the
Dean
campaign, it's not even that far fetched an idea.

Actually, I'm not dumb, I speak quite well.

If only it transferred to the written medium. I guess we just
have
to
take your word for it.

Actually I think I write well too, I just don't type well and
this
isn't
important enough for me to get wrought with angst because it
bothers
you
or
anybody else. People seem to understand well enough if they
want
to.

Bull****. You're engaged in about twenty different arguments
with
about
ten
different people, and you're losing them all. You're as dumb as
they
come.

Now deny it like a good boy.

Boon

Dear Mr. Bug:

You lose an argument when your proven wrong. This being an opinion
NG
Nobody ever wins because nobody ever proves anything. You should
know
that
better than anyone, you keep hammering out the same tired bull****
as
if
it
were gospel and then make fun of anyone who doesn't go along on
your
sick
ride.

Ah, that's how Arny and you get away with all of your lies.
Evidently
you
never
use facts to support your arguments, just your opinion.

Sure I do. It doesn't make any difference though, since nobody ever
concedes.

Is that right? How
about logic? Do you shun that also, because it takes a back seat to
your
opinions, i.e. whatever you can make up out of thin air?

No, if I did that, I'd be calling people pedophile for no reason
whatsoever.

I gave you the evidence, and you dismissed it.

That's the problem, you didn't give me evidence, you gave me some unknown
person's unsubstantiated OPINION.

No, I didn't, dumbass. Thanks for proving you lied again. You didn't
read
anything.


Who the **** is Leon North?


You desparately want me to and others to think it's evidence so they
won't
think you're the smarmy little slug that you are.

I don't desperately want you to think anything. I don't care what you
think.
I and almost everyone else here receive great joy from watching clueless,
ignorant people like you and Arny try to compete with the big boys, and
fail
miserably.

But at least we have you to kick around.

I asked you if you even looked
at it, and you lied and said you did,

There ya go again. I did look at it, it was a refresher, since I remember
it
from when it first happened.

Then why did you make that huge whopper of a mistake, then?


Leon North is not anybody that anybody even knows for sure exists. You're
taking his word.

and you got caught when you slipped up on
a very major point that was the crux of the whole situation.

The crux of the situation is you WANT people to believe unsubstantiated
opinions by an unknown person about another person you don't like.

That's your fantasy.


Here is the truth, McKelvy. You are not smart enough to be here.

That can't be true, BECAUSE I AM HERE.

No, if you were smarter, you wouldn't have people lining up to kick your
ass.

Oooooh, I 'm so scared.

You either have zero self-awareness, or zero self-esteem, because you and
Arny
are nothing more than punching bags for the vast majority of RAO regulars,
and
you still remain here, pretending that you're actually winning arguments.

We may be punching bags, but it for clueless, no life havin', gotta attack
somebody to make me feel better, assholes like you. Hardly counts for
anything in the real world.

No
wonder you hate Dr. Richman, because having a psychologist observe your
behavior has to be your worst nightmare.


I despise him because he's an unprofessional lying SOB.
He doesn't know me and hasn't gotten anything right about me ever.

Everyone
gets the better of you constantly, and you are oblivious to that fact.

OSAF.

Nope. You're just biased toward yourself. Do you really think anyone
here
sees you as you apparently see yourself?

Do you think there's anyone here whose opinion I care that much about?

Why do people call you a bug eater?

Because it makes them feel better to be able to denigrate somebody that
disagrees with them by pretending their less than human.

Why do they call you stupid?

Because they are.

Why do they call you duh-Mikey? Are you just
hopelessly misunderstood?

See above. I think to a certain degree I am misunderstood, but partly
that's by choice. Nobody here "knows" me or anyone else here.

Or are you just another Internet geek who thinks he
is smarter, more powerful, or more important than he is in real life?

None of the above. I'm just a guy who thinks for himself and some people
don't like it. They're entitled. I don't lose any sleep over it.



You are
the Usenet equivalent of the loud, drunk guy at the bar who says a lot
of
stupid **** even though everyone else is telling him to shut the ****
up
so
they can watch the game.

Then we have that in common, then?

Another IKYABWAI.

No, it's a appropriate response to the pot calling the kettle black. You
come here, apparently for one reason and that's to be a rude asshole.

It's a testament to your stupidity that you haven't yet
understood that when you make an IKYABWAI, it means you have automatically
conceded the argument, because you have run out of things to say.


It's atestament to YOUR stupidity that you don't see you ARE everything you
accuse me of.

Either you can leave and preserve whatever dignity
you think you have left, or we can continue rolling you in the parking
lot
every night.

Boon

Bring it on meat.

Bring what on? I'm trying to help you. You need to give it up, because
you're
a waste of bandwidth. I'm a conservative, too, yet your presence here
embarrasses me because you are a walking, talking stereotype of what the
liberals hate about conservatives.

I'm not a conservative.

Why do you think I can get along with
liberals like George and Jim?

Because they are ****heads too.

Because I don't walk around saying idiotic
things about my politics.

And?

Listen, you really aren't smart enough to be here.

OSAF

You are entertainment here.
You are stress relief. You are a punching bag. You are a joke. You are
duh-Mikey, the Bug Eater. Why the **** would you want to stay here? I
JUST
DON'T GET IT.

Boon


I get you. You're a liar. **** off.

What a big baby you are.

Boon

Booniebug (I just think that's so cutesy)Sez:


Here is the truth, McKelvy. You are not smart enough to be here.

That can't be true, BECAUSE I AM HERE.

No, if you were smarter, you wouldn't have people lining up to kick your
ass.
You either have zero self-awareness, or zero self-esteem, because you and
Arny
are nothing more than punching bags for the vast majority of RAO regulars,
and
you still remain here, pretending that you're actually winning arguments.
No
wonder you hate Dr. Richman, because having a psychologist observe your
behavior has to be your worst nightmare.


Everyone
gets the better of you constantly, and you are oblivious to that fact.

OSAF.

Nope. You're just biased toward yourself. Do you really think anyone
here
sees you as you apparently see yourself? Why do people call you a bug
eater?
Why do they call you stupid? Why do they call you duh-Mikey? Are you
just
hopelessly misunderstood? Or are you just another Internet geek who
thinks he
is smarter, more powerful, or more important than he is in real life?


You are
the Usenet equivalent of the loud, drunk guy at the bar who says a lot
of
stupid **** even though everyone else is telling him to shut the ****
up
so
they can watch the game.

Then we have that in common, then?

Another IKYABWAI. It's a testament to your stupidity that you haven't yet
understood that when you make an IKYABWAI, it means you have automatically
conceded the argument, because you have run out of things to say.


Either you can leave and preserve whatever dignity
you think you have left, or we can continue rolling you in the parking
lot
every night.

Boon

Bring it on meat.

Bring what on? I'm trying to help you. You need to give it up, because
you're
a waste of bandwidth. I'm a conservative, too, yet your presence here
embarrasses me because you are a walking, talking stereotype of what the
liberals hate about conservatives. Why do you think I can get along with
liberals like George and Jim? Because I don't walk around saying idiotic
things about my politics.

Listen, you really aren't smart enough to be here. You are entertainment
here.
You are stress relief. You are a punching bag. You are a joke. You are
duh-Mikey, the Bug Eater. Why the **** would you want to stay here? I
JUST
DON'T GET IT.

Boon

I'm sorry you don't get the fact that I'm not intimidated by you.

I'm sorry you feel so threatened by my being here even though you think I'm
not smart enough.

Mostly though, I'm confused at why you and your buddies feel so compelled to
use me as punching bag, when you claim I'm not really a worthy opponent.
Because if all that's true, what does it say it about YOU?

I think I smell a contradiction.

Of course it could be you're just lying. Again.

"Marc Phillips" wrote

What a big baby you are.

Boon

Once again, pot, meet kettle.

Are you done now?

McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote

What a big baby you are.

Boon

Once again, pot, meet kettle.

IKYABWAI #1337 duly noted.


Are you done now?

Well, you kept repeating yourself over and over. I can only prove you wrong so
many times.

Boon

McKelvy said:

Booniebug (I just think that's so cutesy)Sez:


Here is the truth, McKelvy. You are not smart enough to be here.

That can't be true, BECAUSE I AM HERE.

No, if you were smarter, you wouldn't have people lining up to kick your
ass.
You either have zero self-awareness, or zero self-esteem, because you and
Arny
are nothing more than punching bags for the vast majority of RAO regulars,
and
you still remain here, pretending that you're actually winning arguments.
No
wonder you hate Dr. Richman, because having a psychologist observe your
behavior has to be your worst nightmare.


Everyone
gets the better of you constantly, and you are oblivious to that fact.

OSAF.

Nope. You're just biased toward yourself. Do you really think anyone
here
sees you as you apparently see yourself? Why do people call you a bug
eater?
Why do they call you stupid? Why do they call you duh-Mikey? Are you
just
hopelessly misunderstood? Or are you just another Internet geek who
thinks he
is smarter, more powerful, or more important than he is in real life?


You are
the Usenet equivalent of the loud, drunk guy at the bar who says a lot
of
stupid **** even though everyone else is telling him to shut the ****
up
so
they can watch the game.

Then we have that in common, then?

Another IKYABWAI. It's a testament to your stupidity that you haven't yet
understood that when you make an IKYABWAI, it means you have automatically
conceded the argument, because you have run out of things to say.


Either you can leave and preserve whatever dignity
you think you have left, or we can continue rolling you in the parking
lot
every night.

Boon

Bring it on meat.

Bring what on? I'm trying to help you. You need to give it up, because
you're
a waste of bandwidth. I'm a conservative, too, yet your presence here
embarrasses me because you are a walking, talking stereotype of what the
liberals hate about conservatives. Why do you think I can get along with
liberals like George and Jim? Because I don't walk around saying idiotic
things about my politics.

Listen, you really aren't smart enough to be here. You are entertainment
here.
You are stress relief. You are a punching bag. You are a joke. You are
duh-Mikey, the Bug Eater. Why the **** would you want to stay here? I
JUST
DON'T GET IT.

Boon

I'm sorry you don't get the fact that I'm not intimidated by you.

I'm sorry you feel so threatened by my being here even though you think I'm
not smart enough.

Mostly though, I'm confused at why you and your buddies feel so compelled to
use me as punching bag, when you claim I'm not really a worthy opponent.
Because if all that's true, what does it say it about YOU?

I think I smell a contradiction.

Of course it could be you're just lying. Again.

Isn't this the second time you've responded to this post? Is your life really
this empty?

Boon