Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
NAT:Pelosi losing it
On 2009-02-07 23:04:54 -0500, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
said: On Feb 7, 6:40*pm, ScottW wrote: On Feb 7, 3:27*pm, Herbert Hoover wrote: And with these responses, Scott, we're basically done. You just don't know enough, and I'm not up to exchanging ideological punches. That's a waste of time. * I've yet to see you demonstrate more. Imbecile. LoL. People who both care and know something are delighted to be associated with whichever schools of thought they elect to be a part of, and understanding each's position allows for greater depth of discussion and a recognition when and where middle ground is reached. You, OTOH, are hopeless. *Because I choose not to declare allegiance to a school of thought? *Now that's absurd. LoL. "Absurd" is in thinking reasonable discussion is possible with you, 2pid. But you're too ****ing stupid to know why that is. LoL. *Just suggesting that bonds can replace equities as a means of raising capital is as dumb, as stupid, as muddle-headed an economic thought as I've ever heard. *Consider a world without equities if you can. Perhap you lack sufficient imagination. See, Mr. President? 2pid's gibberish is *your* fault. LoL. I can't see a point in wasting hours trying to explain why both are necessary. *I can't you see mustering a reason why in a different world where everything is possible. *Your school won't allow it. 5, Offer up "differing POVs" and alternate universes where there are "nothing but possibilities" as a defense of your incredibly dumb 'ideas'. Day by day I'm astonished how insghtful your pet monicker for Rush Breath really is. The great thing is he can't ever be 1pid because no matter what he does he's always 2nd rate. Herbert |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Iraq: Why Winning Is Losing | Audio Opinions | |||
Fed up with losing your remote controls? | Pro Audio |