[George M. Middius[_3_]]

Vinylanach said:

Every racist thread, every anti-Semetic post...just report him. If
one person does it, it will probably get ignored. If everyone does,
who knows. I was once threatened by Usenet for dropping an f-bomb.

You prolly mean your Usenet provider (e.g. AOL or Google), not
"Usenet" itself.

Ignoring this stupid asshole is futile.

I really don't see what the fuss is all about. Robert fears Bratzi,
Krooger admires him, some others detest him, and the rest of us laugh
at him. If you ask me, Bratzi is just another Usenet clown.

[George M. Middius[_3_]]

The Krooborg has apparently borrowed Steindrone's AutoRepeatModule.

As usual, Marc's posting trash.
As usual, Marc's posting trash/
As usual, Marc's posting trash
As usual, Marc's posting trash.
As usual, Marc's posting trash.
As usual, Marc's posting trash.

Arnii, do you have any clue at all how Normals react to repetitious
whining like this? (It's not with admiration.)

But Marc, since you have proven that you yourself lack the maturity and
self-control to ignore anybody, you are your own worst enemy.

Well, there you have it, Marc. Every RAOer who is in or near Detroit
is compelled to post gibberish from time to time. Somebody get
Nousiane in here to babble about the E.H.E.E. destroying his
subwoofers.

[George M. Middius[_3_]]

Winifred gives in to his his self-pity.

Sorry Bob, Bret's posts don't bother me. I find Boon and the[sic] middius[sic]
more offensive by starting new threads for the purpose of verbally
berating individuals for different reasons.

Translation: Winnie lacks the wit to come up with an insult that's
remotely funny or ironic. The poor dumb schmuck would love to feel
appreciated, but his social development stopped around age 9. In his
frustration at being unable to generate a laugh -- or even the
occasional smirk -- he pretends to be "above" competing in the
wit-stakes.

Winnie, you're well-suited to your place at the nerds' table with the
Krooborg, Lyin' Bwian, and Bratzi the Rabid Nazi. If you stay in your
comfort zone, you won't be made to feel inferior by Normals.

[Vinylanach]

On Mar 29, 8:51�am, George M. Middius wrote:
Vinylanach said:

Every racist thread, every anti-Semetic post...just report him. �If
one person does it, it will probably get ignored. �If everyone does,
who knows. I was once threatened by Usenet for dropping an f-bomb.

You prolly mean your Usenet provider (e.g. AOL or Google), not
"Usenet" itself.

Ignoring this stupid asshole is futile.

I really don't see what the fuss is all about. Robert fears Bratzi,
Krooger admires him, some others detest him, and the rest of us laugh
at him. If you ask me, Bratzi is just another Usenet clown.

For me, it's just a matter of volume. If Ludwig came on here and
spewed his crap every once in a while, it wouldn't be that bad. But
it's just depressing to come on here and see an entire's day activity
on RAO reduced to 6-12 cut-and-paste threads from the loser. He's a
clown, Arny's a clown and Winless Fox can be turned into a clown at
the flick of a switch. Sometimes it's entertaining. But sometimes it
just gets in the way.

Boon

[Vinylanach]

On Mar 29, 8:57�am, George M. Middius wrote:
The Krooborg has apparently borrowed Steindrone's AutoRepeatModule.

As usual, Marc's posting trash.
As usual, Marc's posting trash/
As usual, Marc's posting trash
As usual, Marc's posting trash.
As usual, Marc's posting trash.
As usual, Marc's posting trash.

Arnii, do you have any clue at all how Normals react to repetitious
whining like this? (It's not with admiration.)

But Marc, since you have proven that you yourself lack the maturity and
self-control to ignore anybody, you are your own worst enemy.

Well, there you have it, Marc. Every RAOer who is in or near Detroit
is compelled to post gibberish from time to time. Somebody get
Nousiane in here to babble about the E.H.E.E. destroying his
subwoofers.

Whenever Arny refers to me as a child or immature, I know he's typing
with just one hand.

Boon

[dizzy]

Vinylanach wrote:

dizzy wrote:

I have a proposal. Consider the following two statements:

IF I DO NOT have an EE degree, then I am an idiot, an asshole, and a
liar.

IF I DO have an EE degree, then YOU are an idiot, an asshole, and a
pathetic loser.

I accept and agree-with the above two statements. Do you?

Those statements are not logical.

There is nothing illogical about them, you lying ****wit.

First of all, three out of the four
terms are subjective and cannot be proven.

That does not make the statements illogical, you lying ****wit.

Neither are they exclusive.

I either have an EE degree or I do not, you lying ****wit.

Not very precise thinking from an EE.

Actually, quite precise thinking, you lying ****wit.

That's one non-sequitur and three false statements, all with *zero*
supporting evidence, and you're just getting started!

Besides, I'm
starting to think you may be an EE, but just an incompetent one. See
how the truth exists in shades of grey now?

I either have an EE degree or I do not - no "shades of grey" there.
Even if I were an incompetent EE, I am still an EE. I only claimed to
be an EE, and I either am or I am not.

Here's the facts: you had a chance to display your knowledge and you
declined. Any engineer worth his salt would have stood up and stated
his case briefly without having to make a half dozen drug references
first.

What you claim "any engineer worth his salt would do" is not the
reality of the situation, you lying ****wit. In other words, you
*again* are making-up a claim for which you have *zero* evidence.

I had no desire to "display my knowledge". I do not find WIRES to be
a particularly interesting subject. I only wanted to make the point
that your claim that someone should worry about "increased near end
crosstalk and attenuation" while routing their speaker-wires was
ridiculous.

Now you're using typical Internet asshole tactics

Oh, I think we can all see who the asshole is, here. The ASSHOLE is
the guy who makes claims like "you don't behave like I claim a
competent engineer would behave, so that is proof that you are
incompetent.

to try to weasel out, most notably obfuscation and projection.

*More* claims with absolutely *zero* supporting evidence. Indeed,
shameless LIES, as I have obfuscated nothing and projected *nothing*.

Rather ironic, coming from the asshole who has been obfuscating the
simple fact that he made a technical error and was called on it.
Whether or not I'm a competent engineer, or whether or not I'm a fat
bicycle repairman, has NOTHING to do with the FACT that, on the
technical issue in question, I was right and you were wrong! THAT is
"obfuscation", and the fact that you accuse ME of obfuscation is
"projection".

So, you shamelessly LIE and accuse me of exactly what you are doing!
You are a piece of work.

For instance, I
really can't have the last word if you've never said anything of
substance in the first place.

Wow, that is one of the ****witted things that I've ever read in my
life. You are mentally defective, aren't you?

You may or may not be an EE. Let's just say for now that you're a really bad one.

Let's just say for now that you're making yet *another* claim for
which you have *zero* evidence, just like your claims above, and just
like your previous claims that I didn't "get" something about bending
wires, that I'm a fat bicycle repairman, and that I don't think like
an engineer.

It seems that all you know how to do is make **** up, even when
there's *zero* evidence for your claim, and then you use your made-up
claim to insult and evade! In other words, you're a ****ing liar, and
you're a ****ing asshole.

In summary, you are a piece of ****. Seriously.

Plonk!

[Clyde Slick]

On 26 Mar, 16:37, Bret Ludwig wrote:


*Are there animals I hate? Of course, and there are animals you hate
also. I suspect I'm one. But the anmals I hate I hate as individuals,
and for good reason. I don't hate groups per se, though I do like to kill
lots of feral cats, crows and prairie dogs.

[Vinylanach]

On Mar 29, 8:45�pm, dizzy wrote:
Vinylanach wrote:
dizzy wrote:

I have a proposal. Consider the following two statements:

IF I DO NOT have an EE degree, then I am an idiot, an asshole, and a
liar.

IF I DO have an EE degree, then YOU are an idiot, an asshole, and a
pathetic loser.

I accept and agree-with the above two statements. �Do you?

Those statements are not logical. �

There is nothing illogical about them, you lying ****wit.

First of all, three out of the four
terms are subjective and cannot be proven. �

That does not make the statements illogical, you lying ****wit.

Neither are they exclusive. �

I either have an EE degree or I do not, you lying ****wit.

Not very precise thinking from an EE. �

Actually, quite precise thinking, you lying ****wit.

That's one non-sequitur and three false statements, all with *zero*
supporting evidence, and you're just getting started!

Besides, I'm
starting to think you may be an EE, but just an incompetent one. �See
how the truth exists in shades of grey now?

I either have an EE degree or I do not - no "shades of grey" there.
Even if I were an incompetent EE, I am still an EE. �I only claimed to
be an EE, and I either am or I am not.

Here's the facts: �you had a chance to display your knowledge and you
declined. �Any engineer worth his salt would have stood up and stated
his case briefly without having to make a half dozen drug references
first. �

What you claim "any engineer worth his salt would do" is not the
reality of the situation, you lying ****wit. �In other words, you
*again* are making-up a claim for which you have *zero* evidence.

I had no desire to "display my knowledge". �I do not find WIRES to be
a particularly interesting subject. �I only wanted to make the point
that your claim that someone should worry about "increased near end
crosstalk and attenuation" while routing their speaker-wires was
ridiculous.

Now you're using typical Internet asshole tactics

Oh, I think we can all see who the asshole is, here. �The ASSHOLE is
the guy who makes claims like "you don't behave like I claim a
competent engineer would behave, so that is proof that you are
incompetent.

to try to weasel out, most notably obfuscation and projection. �

*More* claims with absolutely *zero* supporting evidence. �Indeed,
shameless LIES, as I have obfuscated nothing and projected *nothing*.

Rather ironic, coming from the asshole who has been obfuscating the
simple fact that he made a technical error and was called on it.
Whether or not I'm a competent engineer, or whether or not I'm a fat
bicycle repairman, has NOTHING to do with the FACT that, on the
technical issue in question, I was right and you were wrong! �THAT is
"obfuscation", and the fact that you accuse ME of obfuscation is
"projection".

So, you shamelessly LIE and accuse me of exactly what you are doing!
You are a piece of work.

For instance, I
really can't have the last word if you've never said anything of
substance in the first place.

Wow, that is one of the ****witted things that I've ever read in my
life. �You are mentally defective, aren't you?

You may or may not be an EE. �Let's just say for now that you're a really bad one.

Let's just say for now that you're making yet *another* claim for
which you have *zero* evidence, just like your claims above, and just
like your previous claims that I didn't "get" something about bending
wires, that I'm a fat bicycle repairman, and that I don't think like
an engineer.

It seems that all you know how to do is make **** up, even when
there's *zero* evidence for your claim, and then you use your made-up
claim to insult and evade! �In other words, you're a ****ing liar, and
you're a ****ing asshole.

In summary, you are a piece of ****. �Seriously.

Plonk!

I like how you go around accusing others of drug abuse, and then you
cry like a ****ing baby when they take you to task for it. And I'm the
piece of **** for objecting to it? What kind of engineer would think
that way?

I've also enjoyed how much effort you put into the above post, even
though the only thing it accomplished was to let everyone know I hurt
your wittle feewings. LOL!

Boon