Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DELTA - distortion problem
Past threads have discussed rebuilding a Soundcraft Delta 200B -- new
chips, recapping, new oversized PS, etc. Initially the console seemed to sound pretty sweet, but lately I've been noticing some real crunch in the sound. Any thoughts on these questions: 1. Prior to getting the new PS, the old original PS did drop its positive rail on two separate occasions. Fortunately, one of my very first mods was to put LED pilot lights in the master module so that I could see rail status. On each failed rail occasion the console was not up more than 1 to 1.5 seconds before I killed the power (and I then removed some modules to reduce the load and allow the PS to come up). I'm wondering if during two such instances any of the new caps were reverse biased and damaged (perhaps the 1000 uf/6,3V in the summing circuit); though I'm not even sure how much offset the OPA2134 chips would generate. (I don't recall that the OP275s showed offset under this condition -- been a while since I'd tested that, however, and have not tested the 2134s.) 2. If I could get my hands on a distortion analyzer I could probably find out pretty quickly what's going on; whether the problem is cumulative throughout the unit or whether there's something specifically wrong, such as in the summing. I don't have an AP (and renting one is a little pricy). I'm wondering if the Neutrik Minilyzer and its companion oscillator would have sufficient resolution in its distortion measurements. Any other thoughts or ideas on what/how to check are appreciated. Thanks, Frank Stearns Mobile Audio -- |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DELTA - distortion problem
Frank Stearns wrote:
Any thoughts on these questions: 1. Prior to getting the new PS, the old original PS did drop its positive rail on two separate occasions. Fortunately, one of my very first mods was to put LED pilot lights in the master module so that I could see rail status. On each failed rail occasion the console was not up more than 1 to 1.5 seconds before I killed the power (and I then removed some modules to reduce the load and allow the PS to come up). I'm wondering if during two such instances any of the new caps were reverse biased and damaged (perhaps the 1000 uf/6,3V in the summing circuit); though I'm not even sure how much offset the OPA2134 chips would generate. (I don't recall that the OP275s showed offset under this condition -- been a while since I'd tested that, however, and have not tested the 2134s.) That should be easy enough to test with an ESR meter. It's not likely to be the big issue, though. 2. If I could get my hands on a distortion analyzer I could probably find out pretty quickly what's going on; whether the problem is cumulative throughout the unit or whether there's something specifically wrong, such as in the summing. I don't have an AP (and renting one is a little pricy). I'm wondering if the Neutrik Minilyzer and its companion oscillator would have sufficient resolution in its distortion measurements. Is the issue on both channels of the 2-buss? Is it on all strips? If you use an aux buss, is it there? Any other thoughts or ideas on what/how to check are appreciated. I'd put a channel strip on extenders, run a 1 KHz square wave through the thing, and look around with a scope. It should be nice and square from beginning to end. No overshoot, nice parallel tops and bottoms, no ringing and definitely NOT fuzziness. My first suspicion would be an ultrasonic oscillation issue with those high-speed op-amps. That's something easily enough found with a scope and a square wave too. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DELTA - distortion problem
Frank Stearns wrote:
1. Prior to getting the new PS, the old original PS did drop its positive rail on two separate occasions. Fortunately, one of my very first mods was to put LED pilot lights in the master module so that I could see rail status. On each failed rail occasion the console was not up more than 1 to 1.5 seconds before I killed the power (and I then removed some modules to reduce the load and allow the PS to come up). The protection circuit in the Soundcraft power supply design would have prevented this from happening. If one rail goes down the other shuts off immediately. (I know from experience this function works) Was the protection defeated ? rd |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DELTA - distortion problem
"RD Jones" writes:
Frank Stearns wrote: 1. Prior to getting the new PS, the old original PS did drop its positive rail on two separate occasions. Fortunately, one of my very first mods was to put LED pilot lights in the master module so that I could see rail status. On each failed rail occasion the console was not up more than 1 to 1.5 seconds before I killed the power (and I then removed some modules to reduce the load and allow the PS to come up). The protection circuit in the Soundcraft power supply design would have prevented this from happening. If one rail goes down the other shuts off immediately. (I know from experience this function works) Was the protection defeated ? This was the very cheap supply for smaller frame units - 1.5A 317/337 regulators ala the manu's app notes and that's is -- no cross-rail shut down at all. Frank Mobile Audio -- |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DELTA - distortion problem
On Mar 17, 12:38 pm, Frank Stearns
wrote: Past threads have discussed rebuilding a Soundcraft Delta 200B -- new chips, recapping, new oversized PS, etc. Initially the console seemed to sound pretty sweet, but lately I've been noticing some real crunch in the sound. Any thoughts on these questions: 1. Prior to getting the new PS, the old original PS did drop its positive rail on two separate occasions. Fortunately, one of my very first mods was to put LED pilot lights in the master module so that I could see rail status. On each failed rail occasion the console was not up more than 1 to 1.5 seconds before I killed the power (and I then removed some modules to reduce the load and allow the PS to come up). I'm wondering if during two such instances any of the new caps were reverse biased and damaged (perhaps the 1000 uf/6,3V in the summing circuit); though I'm not even sure how much offset the OPA2134 chips would generate. (I don't recall that the OP275s showed offset under this condition -- been a while since I'd tested that, however, and have not tested the 2134s.) 2. If I could get my hands on a distortion analyzer I could probably find out pretty quickly what's going on; whether the problem is cumulative throughout the unit or whether there's something specifically wrong, such as in the summing. I don't have an AP (and renting one is a little pricy). I'm wondering if the Neutrik Minilyzer and its companion oscillator would have sufficient resolution in its distortion measurements. Any other thoughts or ideas on what/how to check are appreciated. Thanks, Frank Stearns Mobile Audio -- . Fuzzees are probably a non-linear opamp. Many stages in this design are not stable with other than 1~3 mhz opamps. Local feedback caps are needed on many of the stages and local .1 uf psu bypasses are also needed. The line input stage with it's voltage follower in the feedback loop is not stable with wide band opamps without a re-design. If you re-install the TL072's does the grind go away? Just the EQ stages need 10~22 pf feedback caps and .1 uf psu bypasses. I have mine fitted with class A TI THS opamps that have heat sinks on them. They are running at 300 mhz, but are entirely stable. If you saw the 25+ parts installed on the rear of the pcb to insure stability you would probably wonder if it's worth it. I get around .0008% THD+noise with the AP while extending the audio bandwidth to -1 db at 200k hz, line in to stereo buss out. This does require extensive mods to accomplish but I find it worth it and very satisfing to use in place of the computer mix, the delta is cleaner, wider, fatter. Jim Williams Audio Upgrades |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DELTA - distortion problem
Frank Stearns wrote:
I'd put a channel strip on extenders, run a 1 KHz square wave through the thing, and look around with a scope. It should be nice and square from beginning to end. No overshoot, nice parallel tops and bottoms, no ringing and definitely NOT fuzziness. Thanks, Scott. As I recall, things have looked pretty clean, but I will start a more methodical point-by-point check. I do have a lower-end scope and oscillator, but will see what I can see. A $10 Heathkit from a hamfest is fine. You don't need to be able to accurately reproduce the ultrasonic trash, you just need to be able to see that the trace gets fuzzy when it's present. The old Tek scopes have a 1 KC square wave generator built in for calibrating scope probes, which make them really convenient. Just make sure you have the thing set up to see a nice square wave on the input to begin with. I can lay out several modules on a spare loom on the bench so that makes the process a little easier. They may behave differently alone than they do when loaded by the master module. And don't forget to check the master module. Pull all the other unneeded modules out of the frame (talkback, oscillators, etc.) so you don't confuse any issues. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CAL Delta Transport problem Help! | High End Audio | |||
CAL Delta Transport problem Help! | Tech | |||
M-audio Delta 1010LT Problem | Tech | |||
Problem running M-Audio Delta 66 card w/Dell 400 SC | Pro Audio | |||
Arcam Alpha 3 Alpha3 Distortion Problem | Tech |