Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
SSJVCmag"
** Another ****ing schizoid. The studio business is crawling with them. ............ Phil |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
"SSJVCmag" wrote in message... Hmmm... It DOES seem to repeat itself... DVD is just a fad. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
bobfan wrote: Looks to me like a pretty good portrait of you, Bob. This moron is incapable of repartee beyond that of tu quoque. What a nightmare to have a mind that infantile, sterile and boring. http://www.fallacyfiles.org/tuquoque.html Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
I think that they are different sides of the same coin, Bob.
Ever hear the phrase, "I feel like the biggest piece of whale **** in the universe". Welcome to paradox on parade! Tom "Bob Cain" wrote in message ... Dave H. wrote: P.S. You might consider therapy, you'd be a far happier person without the outpourings of bile, and living in Hell as you do must make every day a living misery. Actually the more recent thinking on the sociopathic/psychopatic personality disorder is that the person truly does believe in their superiority, that their abusive behavior is honest contempt rather than a compensation for feelings of inadequacy, that they have a pathologically large ego rather than one screaming for existence, that they are quite satisfied with themselves and that their anger derives from frustration with the inability of others to acknowledge their clear superiority. That's the reason it is an untreatable disorder. The last thing such an individual wants is to be cured of his/her superiority. Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
The AKG 460 will respond down to a few hertz once the output
transformer is removed. Air blasts pick up quite well. If you have a DC or 2 hz response of the playback system, you can watch the woofers pump in and out as you move the mic forwards and backwards. Makes for really tight and deep bass, just watch out for wind! (And subways) Jim Williams Audio Upgrades |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
On 6/21/05 2:35 AM, in article NyOte.526$HU.506@trnddc03, "David Morgan
(MAMS)" wrote: "SSJVCmag" wrote in message... Hmmm... It DOES seem to repeat itself... DVD is just a fad. HAH! Got me w/that one! Almost hacked maple-banana yogurt across everything. (and image I'm sure you needed...!) |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
"SSJVCmag" wrote in message ... On 6/21/05 2:35 AM, in article NyOte.526$HU.506@trnddc03, "David Morgan (MAMS)" wrote: "SSJVCmag" wrote in message... Hmmm... It DOES seem to repeat itself... DVD is just a fad. HAH! Got me w/that one! Almost hacked maple-banana yogurt across everything. (and image I'm sure you needed...!) Good to know there are others who actually read in sequence.... DM |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Cain wrote in
: bobfan wrote: Looks to me like a pretty good portrait of you, Bob. This moron is incapable of repartee beyond that of tu quoque. Repartee trumps truth only in the minds of fools, and I doubt that even the stupidest of your admirers will fail to recognize the fact that your pathetic retort is a classic red herring. What a nightmare to have a mind that infantile, sterile and boring. I am sure that you have had that nightmare as well as the one in which you realize that you have a soul that is hateful, deranged and evil. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Cain wrote in
: bobfan wrote: One can only wonder why you have such a personal preoccupation with sociopathic/psychopathic personality disorder, Well, I have this wingnut stalker who once went by the name Gary Sokolich. That has given me the motivation to put some time into learning more about it. You were preoccupied with the purported mental disorders of other numerous fans of yours long before you devleoped your recent paranoia about being stalked. It's pretty easy to spot when you know what to look for. That certainly explains why you don't have any mirrors in your house. |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Ty Ford wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:26:49 -0400, Les Cargill wrote (in article ) : wrote: hello everyone, some small-d condensers like Earthworks have *really* small diaphragms. and other "measurement" mics are also often very small in this way. i would think those small mics would lose bass response. because in a loudspeaker, you need a big woofer to produce the low end. so how does a tiny little mic like that capture low end? the spec sheets show that those things measure flat way down into the 30hz range or even down to 10hz. i just don't understand the physics of it. It's not an antenna - it just detects one tiny slice of the wavefronts. The smaller moving mass makes 'em more likely to be accurate. -- Les Cargill A lot has to do with the tensioning of the diaphragm. Looser, more lows. I like bigger diaphragms for lower selfnoise especially for quiet sources. Louder sources and you don't hear the selfnoise. I can not make sense of this, a nearby manufacturer prides themselves of having the tensest membranes around, ie. they put the membrane main resonance above the audible range, and they also seem to have exquisite bass response. The membrane area vs. self noise issue is however obvious from their data as I recall them without checking. Could it be that you have omitted something from your explanation, such as perhaps directional characteristic? Ty Ford Kind regards Peter Larsen -- ******************************************* * My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk * ******************************************* |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:25:46 -0400, Peter Larsen wrote
(in article ): Ty Ford wrote: On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:26:49 -0400, Les Cargill wrote (in article ) : wrote: hello everyone, some small-d condensers like Earthworks have *really* small diaphragms. and other "measurement" mics are also often very small in this way. i would think those small mics would lose bass response. because in a loudspeaker, you need a big woofer to produce the low end. so how does a tiny little mic like that capture low end? the spec sheets show that those things measure flat way down into the 30hz range or even down to 10hz. i just don't understand the physics of it. It's not an antenna - it just detects one tiny slice of the wavefronts. The smaller moving mass makes 'em more likely to be accurate. -- Les Cargill A lot has to do with the tensioning of the diaphragm. Looser, more lows. I like bigger diaphragms for lower selfnoise especially for quiet sources. Louder sources and you don't hear the selfnoise. I can not make sense of this, a nearby manufacturer prides themselves of having the tensest membranes around, ie. they put the membrane main resonance above the audible range, and they also seem to have exquisite bass response. The membrane area vs. self noise issue is however obvious from their data as I recall them without checking. Could it be that you have omitted something from your explanation, such as perhaps directional characteristic? Ty Ford Kind regards Peter Larsen not without becoming encylopedic. Best, Ty -- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric stuff are at www.tyford.com |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
question regarding beyer dynamic condenser mic mc740 | Pro Audio | |||
question on small room acoustics. | Pro Audio | |||
Doppler Distortion - Fact or Fiction | Pro Audio | |||
Small PA question | Pro Audio |