Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Audio Reception [was Microwave Spectrum - Amplitude Modulation]
How would the audio quality in microwave-frequency AM reception differ
from that in microwave-frequency FM reception? How would the audio quality in microwave-frequency AM reception differ from that in mediam-wave AM reception? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Audio Reception [was Microwave Spectrum - Amplitude Modulation]
If the audio bandwidth is the same, the audio quality should be similar,
with a couple of exceptions. Because an FM receiver has a limiter to remove amplitude variations from the received signal, a capture effect is present, whereby the strongest received signal captures the limiter. With am AM system, you will hear multiple signals at once, if they are on the same channel. Another advantage of FM systems................because of the limiter, noise spikes (interference) is rejected, since they represent amplitude variations of the received signal. For high fidelity music reproduction in medium to strong signal areas, FM is better. If you are located close to an AM transmitter and you are using a wide bandwidth system, the sound quality would be very close. If you have ever listened to an old TRF set, it will be evident. Pete "Curious" wrote in message om... How would the audio quality in microwave-frequency AM reception differ from that in microwave-frequency FM reception? How would the audio quality in microwave-frequency AM reception differ from that in mediam-wave AM reception? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Audio Reception [was Microwave Spectrum - Amplitude Modulation]
If the audio bandwidth is the same, the audio quality should be similar,
with a couple of exceptions. Because an FM receiver has a limiter to remove amplitude variations from the received signal, a capture effect is present, whereby the strongest received signal captures the limiter. With am AM system, you will hear multiple signals at once, if they are on the same channel. Another advantage of FM systems................because of the limiter, noise spikes (interference) is rejected, since they represent amplitude variations of the received signal. For high fidelity music reproduction in medium to strong signal areas, FM is better. If you are located close to an AM transmitter and you are using a wide bandwidth system, the sound quality would be very close. If you have ever listened to an old TRF set, it will be evident. Pete "Curious" wrote in message om... How would the audio quality in microwave-frequency AM reception differ from that in microwave-frequency FM reception? How would the audio quality in microwave-frequency AM reception differ from that in mediam-wave AM reception? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Audio Reception [was Microwave Spectrum - Amplitude Modulation]
If the audio bandwidth is the same, the audio quality should be similar,
with a couple of exceptions. Because an FM receiver has a limiter to remove amplitude variations from the received signal, a capture effect is present, whereby the strongest received signal captures the limiter. With am AM system, you will hear multiple signals at once, if they are on the same channel. Another advantage of FM systems................because of the limiter, noise spikes (interference) is rejected, since they represent amplitude variations of the received signal. For high fidelity music reproduction in medium to strong signal areas, FM is better. If you are located close to an AM transmitter and you are using a wide bandwidth system, the sound quality would be very close. If you have ever listened to an old TRF set, it will be evident. Pete "Curious" wrote in message om... How would the audio quality in microwave-frequency AM reception differ from that in microwave-frequency FM reception? How would the audio quality in microwave-frequency AM reception differ from that in mediam-wave AM reception? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Audio Reception [was Microwave Spectrum - Amplitude Modulation]
If the audio bandwidth is the same, the audio quality should be similar,
with a couple of exceptions. Because an FM receiver has a limiter to remove amplitude variations from the received signal, a capture effect is present, whereby the strongest received signal captures the limiter. With am AM system, you will hear multiple signals at once, if they are on the same channel. Another advantage of FM systems................because of the limiter, noise spikes (interference) is rejected, since they represent amplitude variations of the received signal. For high fidelity music reproduction in medium to strong signal areas, FM is better. If you are located close to an AM transmitter and you are using a wide bandwidth system, the sound quality would be very close. If you have ever listened to an old TRF set, it will be evident. Pete "Curious" wrote in message om... How would the audio quality in microwave-frequency AM reception differ from that in microwave-frequency FM reception? How would the audio quality in microwave-frequency AM reception differ from that in mediam-wave AM reception? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dithering Digital Audio | High End Audio | |||
Internet Stream Audio [Was Bit-resolution decrease for internet] | Tech | |||
science vs. pseudo-science | High End Audio | |||
Why DBTs in audio do not deliver (was: Finally ... The Furutech CD-do-something) | High End Audio | |||
New Audio Editing Software, Dexster | Pro Audio |