Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping?
|
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping?
|
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping?
|
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping?
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping?
Can a wave file with stronger bit-resolution handle more decibels w/out clipping than a wave file with weaker bit-resolution? I think what you are asking is if it can handle a higher input level and the answer to that is no. The dynamic range may be greater and the resolution at low levels will be a lot better. The main advantage to the higher resolution and dynamic range of a 24 bit file over 16 bit is that you can record at a lower level with better resolution and not run into the danger of clipping in the first place. Richard H. Kuschel "I canna change the law of physics."-----Scotty |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping?
Can a wave file with stronger bit-resolution handle more decibels w/out clipping than a wave file with weaker bit-resolution? I think what you are asking is if it can handle a higher input level and the answer to that is no. The dynamic range may be greater and the resolution at low levels will be a lot better. The main advantage to the higher resolution and dynamic range of a 24 bit file over 16 bit is that you can record at a lower level with better resolution and not run into the danger of clipping in the first place. Richard H. Kuschel "I canna change the law of physics."-----Scotty |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping?
Can a wave file with stronger bit-resolution handle more decibels w/out clipping than a wave file with weaker bit-resolution? I think what you are asking is if it can handle a higher input level and the answer to that is no. The dynamic range may be greater and the resolution at low levels will be a lot better. The main advantage to the higher resolution and dynamic range of a 24 bit file over 16 bit is that you can record at a lower level with better resolution and not run into the danger of clipping in the first place. Richard H. Kuschel "I canna change the law of physics."-----Scotty |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping
|
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping
|
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping
|
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping
|
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping?
Radium wrote: Can a wave file with stronger bit-resolution handle more decibels w/out clipping than a wave file with weaker bit-resolution? Wot - no Soundblaster statement? Tom |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping?
Radium wrote: Can a wave file with stronger bit-resolution handle more decibels w/out clipping than a wave file with weaker bit-resolution? Wot - no Soundblaster statement? Tom |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping?
Radium wrote: Can a wave file with stronger bit-resolution handle more decibels w/out clipping than a wave file with weaker bit-resolution? Wot - no Soundblaster statement? Tom |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Bit-resolution and Clipping?
Radium wrote: Can a wave file with stronger bit-resolution handle more decibels w/out clipping than a wave file with weaker bit-resolution? Wot - no Soundblaster statement? Tom |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Louder IS Better (With Lossy) | Pro Audio |