Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
For the unintentional e-mail.
ScottW |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:32:20 -0800, "ScottW"
wrote: For the unintentional e-mail. ScottW Thank you. I appreciate it. If you sent in by accidentally replying by email, then accept my apologies for being tough on you. I've done it accidentally in the past as well... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
"dave weil" wrote in message ... On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:32:20 -0800, "ScottW" wrote: For the unintentional e-mail. ScottW Thank you. I appreciate it. If you sent in by accidentally replying by email, then accept my apologies for being tough on you. I've done it accidentally in the past as well... No problem, it was my mistake. I deserve to be chastised. ScottW |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
Move over, Arnii. The RAO Masochism Tango has begun. I deserve to be chastised. And yet you never are. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... Move over, Arnii. The RAO Masochism Tango has begun. I deserve to be chastised. And yet you never are. Admitting your impotence, George? Amazing clarity of self awareness on occasion. ScottW |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
Is there such a thing as Lack Of Intellectual Self-Awareness Syndrome? Move over, Arnii. The RAO Masochism Tango has begun. I deserve to be chastised. And yet you never are. Admitting your impotence, George? No. BTW, I've completely given up trying to decipher your twisted notion of "conversation". Amazing clarity of self awareness on occasion. Like the Krooborg and its protectors, you dunk yourself in the toilet and don't even realize what a fool you've made of yourself. Let's try again: I deserve to be chastised. And yet you never are. There are many online dictionaries. Go forth and surf -- maybe you'll learn something, Idiot. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... Is there such a thing as Lack Of Intellectual Self-Awareness Syndrome? Move over, Arnii. The RAO Masochism Tango has begun. I deserve to be chastised. And yet you never are. Admitting your impotence, George? No. BTW, I've completely given up trying to decipher your twisted notion of "conversation". Amazing clarity of self awareness on occasion. Like the Krooborg and its protectors, you dunk yourself in the toilet and don't even realize what a fool you've made of yourself. Let's try again: I deserve to be chastised. And yet you never are. There are many online dictionaries. Go forth and surf -- maybe you'll learn something, Idiot. Main Entry: chas·tise Pronunciation: (")chas-'tIz Function: transitive verb Inflected Form(s): chas·tised; chas·tis·ing Etymology: Middle English chastisen, alteration of chasten 1 : to inflict punishment on (as by whipping) 2 : to censure severely : CASTIGATE You have attempted to chastise me and failed due to your impotence. So much for the failed IT guy becoming a grammar teacher. ScottW |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
The Idiot runs roughshod over his spittle-soaked keyboard. I deserve to be chastised. And yet you never are. There are many online dictionaries. Go forth and surf -- maybe you'll learn something, Idiot. Main Entry: chas·tise Pronunciation: (")chas-'tIz Function: transitive verb Inflected Form(s): chas·tised; chas·tis·ing Etymology: Middle English chastisen, alteration of chasten 1 : to inflict punishment on (as by whipping) 2 : to censure severely : CASTIGATE You have attempted to chastise me and failed due to your impotence. Do you not know the difference between "chastise" (v.t.) and "chastised" (pp & adj)? You truly are a world-class idiot. I am amazed you found a profitable company in which to insinuate yourself for so long. So much for the failed IT guy becoming a grammar teacher. I agree. I have failed to teach you what you should have learned in junior high school. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... The Idiot runs roughshod over his spittle-soaked keyboard. I deserve to be chastised. And yet you never are. There are many online dictionaries. Go forth and surf -- maybe you'll learn something, Idiot. Main Entry: chas·tise Pronunciation: (")chas-'tIz Function: transitive verb Inflected Form(s): chas·tised; chas·tis·ing Etymology: Middle English chastisen, alteration of chasten 1 : to inflict punishment on (as by whipping) 2 : to censure severely : CASTIGATE You have attempted to chastise me and failed due to your impotence. Do you not know the difference between "chastise" (v.t.) and "chastised" (pp & adj)? Meriam says bzzzzzt, you're full of bull. Heres what you get when entering "chastised". Main Entry: chas·tise Pronunciation: (")chas-'tIz Function: transitive verb Inflected Form(s): chas·tised; chas·tis·ing Etymology: Middle English chastisen, alteration of chasten 1 : to inflict punishment on (as by whipping) 2 : to censure severely : CASTIGATE 3 archaic : CHASTEN 2 synonym see PUNISH - chas·tise·ment /(")chas-'tIz-m&nt also 'chas-t&z-/ noun - chas·tis·er /(")chas-'tI-z&r/ noun You truly are a world-class idiot. I am amazed you found a profitable company in which to insinuate yourself for so long. No pp & adj which is irrelevant anyway as that wasn't the useage. I love it when you go off and swallow your foot upto your knee, you're so cute that way. So much for the failed IT guy becoming a grammar teacher. I agree. I have failed to teach you what you should have learned in junior high school. You failed to teach yourself. Is this why you couln't hold a job? You spent more time correcting grammar than servicing desktops. ScottW |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
The Terrierborg debating-trades his way back into Krooger's good graces. I deserve to be chastised. No pp & adj which is irrelevant anyway as that wasn't the useage. God, but you are stupid. Do you prefer "World-Class ****ing Idiot" to just plain "Idiot"? |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... The Terrierborg debating-trades his way back into Krooger's good graces. I deserve to be chastised. No pp & adj which is irrelevant anyway as that wasn't the useage. God, but you are stupid. Do you prefer "World-Class ****ing Idiot" to just plain "Idiot"? Do you ever make a point? I haven't seen one from you in years. ScottW |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
World-Class ****ing Idiot struts his stuff: The Terrierborg debating-trades his way back into Krooger's good graces. I deserve to be chastised. No pp & adj which is irrelevant anyway as that wasn't the useage. God, but you are stupid. Do you prefer "World-Class ****ing Idiot" to just plain "Idiot"? Do you ever make a point? I haven't seen one from you in years. Your stupidity is boundless. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... World-Class ****ing Idiot struts his stuff: The Terrierborg debating-trades his way back into Krooger's good graces. I deserve to be chastised. No pp & adj which is irrelevant anyway as that wasn't the useage. God, but you are stupid. Do you prefer "World-Class ****ing Idiot" to just plain "Idiot"? Do you ever make a point? I haven't seen one from you in years. Your stupidity is boundless. Your pointlessness is endless. ScottW |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
More idiocy from the Majestic Supreme Idiot. World-Class ****ing Idiot struts his stuff: The Terrierborg debating-trades his way back into Krooger's good graces. I deserve to be chastised. No pp & adj which is irrelevant anyway as that wasn't the useage. God, but you are stupid. Do you prefer "World-Class ****ing Idiot" to just plain "Idiot"? Do you ever make a point? I haven't seen one from you in years. Your stupidity is boundless. Your pointlessness is endless. Do you make yourself puke when you act like this? Not only have you contradicted yourself in a clumsy way, you're now resorting to lamebrained parroting of the people you fear. Give us another rant about your great self-awareness, why don't you. Oh, and lest we forget: I deserve to be chastised. No pp & adj which is irrelevant anyway as that wasn't the useage. Apparently you, the Lord of the Idiots, have already forgotten that when you said "that", you were referring to the adjectival form of the past participle that you your very stupid self used. Yourself. You used it. Then you said it wasn't "the useage[sic]". This is obtuseness on a Kroogerian scale. Have you "won" another "debate", Your Idiotship? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... More idiocy from the Majestic Supreme Idiot. World-Class ****ing Idiot struts his stuff: The Terrierborg debating-trades his way back into Krooger's good graces. I deserve to be chastised. No pp & adj which is irrelevant anyway as that wasn't the useage. God, but you are stupid. Do you prefer "World-Class ****ing Idiot" to just plain "Idiot"? Do you ever make a point? I haven't seen one from you in years. Your stupidity is boundless. Your pointlessness is endless. Do you make yourself puke when you act like this? Not only have you contradicted yourself in a clumsy way, you're now resorting to lamebrained parroting of the people you fear. Give us another rant about your great self-awareness, why don't you. Oh, and lest we forget: I deserve to be chastised. No pp & adj which is irrelevant anyway as that wasn't the useage. Apparently you, the Lord of the Idiots, have already forgotten that when you said "that", you were referring to the adjectival form of the past participle that you your very stupid self used. Yourself. You used it. Then you said it wasn't "the useage[sic]". This is obtuseness on a Kroogerian scale. Have you "won" another "debate", Your Idiotship? Yup, anyone who is this anal over whether chastised is transitive verb, a noun, or the "adjectival form of the past participle" is in desperate need of a life. Sorry, but I can't help you today. ScottW |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
Unrepentant at his ignorance and mindless bloviations, the World-Class ****ing Idiot blathers on like a 'borg on hyped-up nanites. Do you make yourself puke when you act like this? Not only have you contradicted yourself in a clumsy way, you're now resorting to lamebrained parroting of the people you fear. Give us another rant about your great self-awareness, why don't you. Oh, and lest we forget: I deserve to be chastised. No pp & adj which is irrelevant anyway as that wasn't the useage. Apparently you, the Lord of the Idiots, have already forgotten that when you said "that", you were referring to the adjectival form of the past participle that you your very stupid self used. Yourself. You used it. Then you said it wasn't "the useage[sic]". This is obtuseness on a Kroogerian scale. Have you "won" another "debate", Your Idiotship? Yup, anyone who is this anal over whether chastised is transitive verb, a noun, or the "adjectival form of the past participle" is in desperate need of a life. Translation:"Waaah! Stop picking on me! WAAAAAH!" Face it, Terrierborg, you are just not equipped to deal with normal people with fully developed reasoning faculties. You've shown us over and over what a complete dork you are in this kind of "debate". Why do you keep coming back for more humiliation? We really want to know. We've speculated endlessly, but now we want you to tell us. What drives you to be such a masochist, and in the thrall of people you don't know at that? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
George M. Middius a écrit :
Unrepentant at his ignorance and mindless bloviations, the World-Class ****ing Idiot blathers on like a 'borg on hyped-up nanites. Do you make yourself puke when you act like this? Not only have you contradicted yourself in a clumsy way, you're now resorting to lamebrained parroting of the people you fear. Give us another rant about your great self-awareness, why don't you. Oh, and lest we forget: I deserve to be chastised. No pp & adj which is irrelevant anyway as that wasn't the useage. Apparently you, the Lord of the Idiots, have already forgotten that when you said "that", you were referring to the adjectival form of the past participle that you your very stupid self used. Yourself. You used it. Then you said it wasn't "the useage[sic]". This is obtuseness on a Kroogerian scale. Have you "won" another "debate", Your Idiotship? Yup, anyone who is this anal over whether chastised is transitive verb, a noun, or the "adjectival form of the past participle" is in desperate need of a life. Translation:"Waaah! Stop picking on me! WAAAAAH!" Face it, Terrierborg, you are just not equipped to deal with normal people with fully developed reasoning faculties. You've shown us over and over what a complete dork you are in this kind of "debate". Why do you keep coming back for more humiliation? We really want to know. We've speculated endlessly, but now we want you to tell us. What drives you to be such a masochist, and in the thrall of people you don't know at that? George "rat face" Middius has finally taken Dave's relay... ;-) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:31:55 +0100, Lionel
wrote: George "rat face" Middius has finally taken Dave's relay... ;-) Trolling again, I see. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
dave weil a écrit :
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:31:55 +0100, Lionel wrote: George "rat face" Middius has finally taken Dave's relay... ;-) Trolling again, I see. Sorry Dave, but when I want to tell him that he is a jerk he doesn't read my message... :-( ....So I'm obliged to insult him through a third person. BTW Middius is trolling too but this would rip your ass to admit this. :-) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
George M. Middius wrote in message . ..
Unrepentant at his ignorance and mindless bloviations, the World-Class ****ing Idiot blathers on like a 'borg on hyped-up nanites. Do you make yourself puke when you act like this? Not only have you contradicted yourself in a clumsy way, you're now resorting to lamebrained parroting of the people you fear. Give us another rant about your great self-awareness, why don't you. Oh, and lest we forget: I deserve to be chastised. No pp & adj which is irrelevant anyway as that wasn't the useage. Apparently you, the Lord of the Idiots, have already forgotten that when you said "that", you were referring to the adjectival form of the past participle that you your very stupid self used. Yourself. You used it. Then you said it wasn't "the useage[sic]". This is obtuseness on a Kroogerian scale. Have you "won" another "debate", Your Idiotship? Yup, anyone who is this anal over whether chastised is transitive verb, a noun, or the "adjectival form of the past participle" is in desperate need of a life. Translation:"Waaah! Stop picking on me! WAAAAAH!" Real translation: George can't make it past grammar into meaning. Can't see the forest for the trees sort of problem. Face it, Terrierborg, you are just not equipped to deal with normal Are you claiming to be "normal" mr. analretentive participle dweeb? You aren't normal. In fact you are a shutin. Why haven't you allowed a single person from RAO meet you face to face? A couple live in your area and you still refuse a visit. What are you afraid of? people with fully developed reasoning faculties. You've shown us over and over what a complete dork you are in this kind of "debate". Who turned the debate into a spelling bee? What kind of debate is that? I'll tell you. Boring. Very very boring. Why do you keep coming back for more humiliation? Why do you keep making ridiculous claims? Here's a newsflash for you George. A normal person doesn't find making a mistake in grammar or spelling humiliating. But you do. Can you figure out what that means? Let's take a poll. How many people want everyone banned from this newsgroup who have ever made a mistake of spelling or grammar in an RAO post? Come all ye dwellers of glass houses, vote. ScottW |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:14:12 +0100, Lionel
wrote: dave weil a écrit : On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:31:55 +0100, Lionel wrote: George "rat face" Middius has finally taken Dave's relay... ;-) Trolling again, I see. Sorry Dave, but when I want to tell him that he is a jerk he doesn't read my message... :-( Wow, that's *some* codependency you've got there. Sitting by the phone waiting for your imaginary unrequited love to call, are we? (metaphorically speaking of course) ...So I'm obliged to insult him through a third person. Obligations are funny things... BTW Middius is trolling too but this would rip your ass to admit this. :-) So, as my mother used to say, "If he jumps off the bridge, you're going to jump too"? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry Dave
dave weil a écrit :
So, as my mother used to say, "If he jumps off the bridge, you're going to jump too"? This is what I would let him believe up to the last second. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
There is no "George M. Middius"
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
There is no "George M. Middius"
"Torresists" wrote in message ... From: (ScottW) Date: 1/26/2004 4:05 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: snip Are you claiming to be "normal" mr. analretentive participle dweeb? You aren't normal. In fact you are a shutin. Why haven't you allowed a single person from RAO meet you face to face? Because there is no such person as "George M. Middius"! A couple live in your area and you still refuse a visit. What are you afraid of? What was the man behind the curtain in "The Wizard of Oz" afraid of? ;-) One thing for sure, he is not a colony of mice pounding on a keyboard. It is somebdy, and what difference does it make if we don't know his real name, MR. TORRESISTS, or whoever 'you' happen to be. ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
There is no "George M. Middius"
Sockpuppet Yustabe said: One thing for sure, he is not a colony of mice pounding on a keyboard. It is somebdy, and what difference does it make if we don't know his real name, MR. TORRESISTS, or whoever 'you' happen to be. Is the slimy little sewer-dweller still fixated on my "real" ;-) identity? Somebody needs to get a life. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
There *is* no "George M. Middius"!
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
There *is* no "George M. Middius"!
"Torresists" wrote in message ... From: George M. Middius Date: 1/28/2004 7:24 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Sockpuppet Yustabe said: One thing for sure, he is not a colony of mice pounding on a keyboard. It is somebdy, and what difference does it make if we don't know his real name, MR. TORRESISTS, or whoever 'you' happen to be. Is the slimy little sewer-dweller still fixated on my "real" ;-) identity? Somebody needs to get a life. Are you admitting at long last that you are not "George M. Middius", oh ****ed-up-one? This is the first time that I have heard anyone suggest that I am Middius. Of course, it is equally possible that Middius is me. After all, he got 'here' first. I probably could have done him ten years ago, but after my parting of the ways with modern liberalaism, I couldn't stomach even pretending to have his political views. But actually, I think that I share his rage over the struggles of the underclass, but we differ on whether or not modern liberalism has anything to offer other than the 'slavery' of well intended, but ultimitely destructive, social programs an/or hatred towards the upperclass. ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
There *is* no "George M. Middius"!
"Torresists" wrote in message ... From: "Sockpuppet Yustabe" Date: 1/28/2004 9:25 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: "Torresists" wrote in message ... From: George M. Middius Date: 1/28/2004 7:24 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Sockpuppet Yustabe said: One thing for sure, he is not a colony of mice pounding on a keyboard. It is somebdy, and what difference does it make if we don't know his real name, MR. TORRESISTS, or whoever 'you' happen to be. Is the slimy little sewer-dweller still fixated on my "real" ;-) identity? Somebody needs to get a life. Are you admitting at long last that you are not "George M. Middius", oh ****ed-up-one? This is the first time that I have heard anyone suggest that I am Middius. Of course, it is equally possible that Middius is me. After all, he got 'here' first. I probably could have done him ten years ago, but after my parting of the ways with modern liberalaism, I couldn't stomach even pretending to have his political views. But actually, I think that I share his rage over the struggles of the underclass, but we differ on whether or not modern liberalism has anything to offer other than the 'slavery' of well intended, but ultimitely destructive, social programs an/or hatred towards the upperclass. Your post proves one of two things: a) You really are as stupid as Arny Krueger says you are. or b) You really enjoy making an ass of yourself on a public forum. Which is it? c) I am George Middius. Know that you know that, there is no longer any purpose to your life. You may commit suicide now. ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
There *is* no "George M. Middius"!
Sockpuppet Yustabe said to The Thing: Know that you know that, there is no longer any purpose to your life. You may commit suicide now. Only if its keeper lets it out of its cell. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
He "Yustabe Smart" ;-)
From: "Sockpuppet Yustabe"
Date: 1/28/2004 10:07 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: "Torresists" wrote in message ... From: "Sockpuppet Yustabe" Date: 1/28/2004 9:25 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: "Torresists" wrote in message ... From: George M. Middius Date: 1/28/2004 7:24 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Sockpuppet Yustabe said: One thing for sure, he is not a colony of mice pounding on a keyboard. It is somebdy, and what difference does it make if we don't know his real name, MR. TORRESISTS, or whoever 'you' happen to be. Is the slimy little sewer-dweller still fixated on my "real" ;-) identity? Somebody needs to get a life. Are you admitting at long last that you are not "George M. Middius", oh ****ed-up-one? This is the first time that I have heard anyone suggest that I am Middius. Of course, it is equally possible that Middius is me. After all, he got 'here' first. I probably could have done him ten years ago, but after my parting of the ways with modern liberalaism, I couldn't stomach even pretending to have his political views. But actually, I think that I share his rage over the struggles of the underclass, but we differ on whether or not modern liberalism has anything to offer other than the 'slavery' of well intended, but ultimitely destructive, social programs an/or hatred towards the upperclass. Your post proves one of two things: a) You really are as stupid as Arny Krueger says you are. or b) You really enjoy making an ass of yourself on a public forum. Which is it? c) I am George Middius. Know that you know that, there is no longer any purpose to your life. You may commit suicide now. You have sucessfully pointed us to: a) You really are as stupid as Arny Krueger says you are. *Know we all know* ;-) |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
He "Yustabe Smart" ;-)
"Torresists" wrote in message ... From: "Sockpuppet Yustabe" Date: 1/28/2004 10:07 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: "Torresists" wrote in message ... From: "Sockpuppet Yustabe" Date: 1/28/2004 9:25 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: "Torresists" wrote in message ... From: George M. Middius Date: 1/28/2004 7:24 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Sockpuppet Yustabe said: One thing for sure, he is not a colony of mice pounding on a keyboard. It is somebdy, and what difference does it make if we don't know his real name, MR. TORRESISTS, or whoever 'you' happen to be. Is the slimy little sewer-dweller still fixated on my "real" ;-) identity? Somebody needs to get a life. Are you admitting at long last that you are not "George M. Middius", oh ****ed-up-one? This is the first time that I have heard anyone suggest that I am Middius. Of course, it is equally possible that Middius is me. After all, he got 'here' first. I probably could have done him ten years ago, but after my parting of the ways with modern liberalaism, I couldn't stomach even pretending to have his political views. But actually, I think that I share his rage over the struggles of the underclass, but we differ on whether or not modern liberalism has anything to offer other than the 'slavery' of well intended, but ultimitely destructive, social programs an/or hatred towards the upperclass. Your post proves one of two things: a) You really are as stupid as Arny Krueger says you are. or b) You really enjoy making an ass of yourself on a public forum. Which is it? c) I am George Middius. Know that you know that, there is no longer any purpose to your life. You may commit suicide now. You have sucessfully pointed us to: a) You really are as stupid as Arny Krueger says you are. *Know we all know* ;- Well, I challenge you to an IQ test. Who knows, maybe you are a little smarter than your mentor. Anything is possible these days. Maybe you will have the guts and self confidence to accept. Your mentor sure doesn't. ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
There *is* no "George M. Middius"!
On 29 Jan 2004 02:39:42 GMT, (Torresists) wrote:
From: George M. Middius Date: 1/28/2004 7:24 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Sockpuppet Yustabe said: One thing for sure, he is not a colony of mice pounding on a keyboard. It is somebdy, and what difference does it make if we don't know his real name, MR. TORRESISTS, or whoever 'you' happen to be. Is the slimy little sewer-dweller still fixated on my "real" ;-) identity? Somebody needs to get a life. Are you admitting at long last that you are not "George M. Middius", oh ****ed-up-one? Who's askin'? |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
There is no "George M. Middius"
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
"Torresists" wrote in message ... From: (ScottW) Date: 1/26/2004 4:05 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: snip Are you claiming to be "normal" mr. analretentive participle dweeb? You aren't normal. In fact you are a shutin. Why haven't you allowed a single person from RAO meet you face to face? Because there is no such person as "George M. Middius"! A couple live in your area and you still refuse a visit. What are you afraid of? What was the man behind the curtain in "The Wizard of Oz" afraid of? ;-) One thing for sure, he is not a colony of mice pounding on a keyboard. It is somebdy, and what difference does it make if we don't know his real name, MR. TORRESISTS, or whoever 'you' happen to be. Since you are so ashamed of your own identity Yustabe, and humiliated daily by your childish antics on RAO, there's not a chance you could perceive the irony of unmasking someone like sockpuppet "Middius" who has claimed for years to be a real person with the name he used on Usenet. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
The "Yustabe Smart" Challenge ;-)
"Torresists" wrote in message
From: "Sockpuppet Yustabe" Date: 1/28/2004 11:11 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Art "Yustabe Smart" Sackman croaked: Well, I challenge you to an IQ test. I think you have demonstrated your mental acuity, or lack thereof, right here on RAO. Who needs an IQ test? ;-) Since it is well-known that IQ tests are a highly flawed measure of intelligence, it is quite clear that anybody who wants to decide something relevant to the real world based on an IQ test, lacks intelligence. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
There is no "George M. Middius"
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
There is no "George M. Middius"
"Torresists" wrote in message
From: "Arny Krueger" Date: 1/29/2004 12:27 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: snip Arny Krueger wrote to "Yustabe Smart": Problem with "Yustsabe Smart" is that I've supposedly known "Yustabe" just about forever, and he's always been a Sackman-o'-crap dimwit. there's not a chance you could perceive the irony of unmasking someone like sockpuppet "Middius" who has claimed for years to be a real person with the name he used on Usenet. And, in the height of hypocrisy, "George M. Middius" would loudly scream "YACA", "anonymous coward" , etc. at anyone and everyone who was unwilling to disclose their personal details here on RAO. Exactly. All while he was posting under an alias!!! You've got to understand that for many of these posters, its all about the mind game. Obviously audio is at best a vehicle for their real agenda. Take David "I'm a dominatrix, I'll cut it off and hand it to you" Weil. Now, what about the possibility that Yustabe and Middius are posted by the same person? I've noticed a few other cases here where there seem to be duals - two sockpuppets that always seem to be johnny-on-the-spot to help *each* other out. Sometimes a pair composed of a "good guy" and a "bad guy". |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
There is no "George M. Middius"
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 1/29/2004 9:31 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: "Torresists" wrote in message From: "Arny Krueger" Date: 1/29/2004 12:27 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: snip Arny Krueger wrote to "Yustabe Smart": Problem with "Yustsabe Smart" is that I've supposedly known "Yustabe" just about forever, and he's always been a Sackman-o'-crap dimwit. "At least" he takes a good IQ test. ;-) there's not a chance you could perceive the irony of unmasking someone like sockpuppet "Middius" who has claimed for years to be a real person with the name he used on Usenet. And, in the height of hypocrisy, "George M. Middius" would loudly scream "YACA", "anonymous coward" , etc. at anyone and everyone who was unwilling to disclose their personal details here on RAO. Exactly. All while he was posting under an alias!!! You've got to understand that for many of these posters, its all about the mind game. Obviously audio is at best a vehicle for their real agenda. Take David "I'm a dominatrix, I'll cut it off and hand it to you" Weil. Now, what about the possibility that Yustabe and Middius are posted by the same person? Not likely, IMO. "George M. Middius" is far too smart, in a sociopathic way, to be played by Yustabe. Unless, of course, Yustabe is dumbing down his online persona! ;-) I've noticed a few other cases here where there seem to be duals - two sockpuppets that always seem to be johnny-on-the-spot to help *each* other out. Like Marc "Porky" Phillips and "Andrew Z. MacGowan" a few years back? ;-) |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
There is no "George M. Middius"
"Torresists" wrote in message
From: "Arny Krueger" Date: 1/29/2004 9:31 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: "Torresists" wrote in message From: "Arny Krueger" Date: 1/29/2004 12:27 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: snip Arny Krueger wrote to "Yustabe Smart": Problem with "Yustsabe Smart" is that I've supposedly known "Yustabe" just about forever, and he's always been a Sackman-o'-crap dimwit. "At least" he takes a good IQ test. ;-) Exactly. Passing tests and doing well at life can be two different things. Yustabe has said it all when he admitted that he lives to retire. It fits with his whole retro-attitude towards life. This in turn infects his audio beliefs. And of course, he's really just another RAO troll who mostly just wants to get some kind of response, any response. He's just a lonely boy, lonely and blue. there's not a chance you could perceive the irony of unmasking someone like sockpuppet "Middius" who has claimed for years to be a real person with the name he used on Usenet. And, in the height of hypocrisy, "George M. Middius" would loudly scream "YACA", "anonymous coward" , etc. at anyone and everyone who was unwilling to disclose their personal details here on RAO. Exactly. All while he was posting under an alias!!! You've got to understand that for many of these posters, its all about the mind game. Obviously audio is at best a vehicle for their real agenda. Take David "I'm a dominatrix, I'll cut it off and hand it to you" Weil. Now, what about the possibility that Yustabe and Middius are posted by the same person? Not likely, IMO. "George M. Middius" is far too smart, in a sociopathic way, to be played by Yustabe. Unless, of course, Yustabe is dumbing down his online persona! ;-) Middius seems to have lost a lot of his edge in the past few years. Once he could put on a pretense of hipness, but those days are long gone. Like Yustabe, he really could care less about audio. I've noticed a few other cases here where there seem to be duals - two sockpuppets that always seem to be johnny-on-the-spot to help *each* other out. Like Marc "Porky" Phillips and "Andrew Z. MacGowan" a few years back? Something like that. ;-) Really, its all quite sad. RAO is one of Usenet's well-known armpits and these are some of our dominant personalities, or lack-thereof. Nothing can be more ironic than Marc Phillips or George Middius complaining about "Internet dweebs". |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A message for Dave Weil | Audio Opinions | |||
Libs vs Cons | Audio Opinions | |||
About Dave Weil's deception. | Audio Opinions | |||
Question for Gregipus & dave | Audio Opinions | |||
Note to dave | Audio Opinions |