Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
John Oster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Upgrading to SACD

I have a high-end two channel system with Levinson electronics (380S
preamp, 334 poweramp)with Martin-Logan ReQuest speakers, and I'm
considering switching to SACD. Does someone make a multi-channel processor
that I could add? (along with an additional and speakers, I realize!)
Thank you.
  #2   Report Post  
Kalman Rubinson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 28 Jun 2005 21:58:27 GMT, John Oster
wrote:

I have a high-end two channel system with Levinson electronics (380S
preamp, 334 poweramp)with Martin-Logan ReQuest speakers, and I'm
considering switching to SACD. Does someone make a multi-channel processor
that I could add? (along with an additional and speakers, I realize!)


You do not need a processor for SACD. What you need is a multichannel
controller. They range from the superb-but-discontinued Sony P9000ES
and up through the McIntosh and BelCanto units. Feed the SACD player
to the MCH controller and its L/R outputs to the HT bypass (or other
calibrated) input on the 380s. The other outputs should go to the new
center, surround and sub and their associated speakers.

Kal

  #3   Report Post  
Eric
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kalman Rubinson wrote:

I have a high-end two channel system with Levinson electronics (380S
preamp, 334 poweramp)with Martin-Logan ReQuest speakers, and I'm
considering switching to SACD. Does someone make a multi-channel processor
that I could add? (along with an additional and speakers, I realize!)


You do not need a processor for SACD. What you need is a multichannel
controller. They range from the superb-but-discontinued Sony P9000ES
and up through the McIntosh and BelCanto units. Feed the SACD player
to the MCH controller and its L/R outputs to the HT bypass (or other
calibrated) input on the 380s. The other outputs should go to the new
center, surround and sub and their associated speakers.


Or just listen to the SACD in stereo. 99% of SACDs have a stereo SACD
track. The other 1% will just give you the front L/R of the surround
track or (depending on the hardware) down convert the 5.1 to stereo.

Music in 5.1 doesn't thrill me, but I have to admit that "Dark Side of
the Moon" in 5.1 was kinda nifty.
  #4   Report Post  
Kalman Rubinson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 29 Jun 2005 15:00:33 GMT, Eric wrote:

Music in 5.1 doesn't thrill me, but I have to admit that "Dark Side of
the Moon" in 5.1 was kinda nifty.


DSOT aside, 5.1 (or other MCH formats) is, imho, the best reason for
SACD. The music blossoms.

Kal
  #5   Report Post  
Harry Lavo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Kalman Rubinson" wrote in message
...
On 29 Jun 2005 15:00:33 GMT, Eric wrote:

Music in 5.1 doesn't thrill me, but I have to admit that "Dark Side of
the Moon" in 5.1 was kinda nifty.


DSOT aside, 5.1 (or other MCH formats) is, imho, the best reason for
SACD. The music blossoms.


Ditto that. And double ditto it.

Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
will sound improve with a sacd player? [email protected] High End Audio 103 June 22nd 05 01:11 AM
SACD v.s. XRCD : No Debate ? bordin High End Audio 11 June 16th 05 01:04 AM
Any SACD Experience to Report? langvid High End Audio 1 February 13th 04 04:00 PM
Sony Digital Amps (and SACD) vs. Sony Analog Amps banspeakerports High End Audio 0 February 8th 04 06:18 PM
Is the war over yet? DVD-audio vs SACD langvid High End Audio 60 January 26th 04 09:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:35 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"