Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
High Quality Preamps Help
These days there are very few preamps, particularly those built into modestly priced mixers, that are "head and shoulders" above any others. It may be possible, because of the internal levels and bus headroom, EQ, length of fader throw, and such, that you can come up with a better sounding mix with an A&H than with a Mackie in roughly the same ballpark, but it isn't going to be because of the mic preamps. Oh Mike, you going to spoil the party... this is no place for facts. :-) Mark |
#82
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
High Quality Preamps Help
Mike Rivers wrote:
On 4/16/2011 9:15 PM, donh wrote: I find the Allen&Heath to be head and shoulders above the Mackie, but have no experience with the Great River stuff. It's mostly a wasteland in this area These days there are very few preamps, particularly those built into modestly priced mixers, that are "head and shoulders" above any others. It may be possible, because of the internal levels and bus headroom, EQ, length of fader throw, and such, that you can come up with a better sounding mix with an A&H than with a Mackie in roughly the same ballpark, but it isn't going to be because of the mic preamps. But thanks for trying, and for listening to your own work. I think the Mackie Onyx preamps are better than those in the previous versions of Mackies, and that the EQ, and DI inputs, too, are very much better than in the older models. However, working with an Onyx recently installed in a church, I suspect that overall there are huge tolerances in things like faders, resistors, capacitors, etc. Observing level variances in outputs fed by identical sources leads me to that suspicion. -- shut up and play your guitar * http://hankalrich.com/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpqXcV9DYAc http://www.sonicbids.com/HankandShai...withDougHarman |
#83
Posted to rec.music.makers.guitar.acoustic,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
High Quality Preamps Help
donh wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:29:22 -0500, hank alrich wrote: I find the Allen&Heath to be head and shoulders above the Mackie, but have no experience with the Great River stuff. It's mostly a wasteland in this area The new Mackie Onyx stuff is head and shoulders above the old Mackie stuff, but the original Great River is a big step above all of the Mackie/A&H grade stuff for transparency and noise rejection. I recommend that if you live in the middle of nowhere (like I do) that you take a trip to the AES show just to see what is out there and touch it and try to listen to it (not that you can hear much at a show). --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#84
Posted to rec.music.makers.guitar.acoustic,rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
High Quality Preamps Help
PStamler wrote:
On Apr 12, 7:50 am, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Without bench tests and a schematic, it is hard to guess why the GR sounds like it does. Maybe because it doesn't do anything? It's designed to add as little to the signal as possible, and succeeds. I suspect that the input transformers may provide some practical advantages in say high EMI contexts, and also add some measurable and audible (FR) effects. You probably suspect right on the first clause; they also add excellent rejection of RFI, which is useful in today's RF jungle. You probably suspect wrong on the second clause. Frequency response when properly terminated, as spec'd by the transformer manufacturer, is typically -0.08dB at 20Hz and 20kHz, and dead flat in between. The transformer only adds 1dB of noise (due to coil resistance) to the thermal noise of a 150 ohm microphone. And unless you hit it with 0dBu of signal at 40Hz, distortion is negligible. These are really, really good transformers (Jensen JT-13k7-A), and are part of the reason the preamps sound so good. By "sound good", I mean not having a sound at all. I wish the market had supported GR in its effort to sell a really uncolored preamp. Alas, the later version (NV series) is more popular. The original series sold decently, but was never designed for modfern mass production. It was all hand-built and the process raeched a point in economic time that made it too costly to continue that approach. Those are still terrific preamps, in my mind, and one can find them used for reasonable money, though not cheaply priced. -- shut up and play your guitar * http://hankalrich.com/ http://www.youtube.com/walkinaymusic http://www.sonicbids.com/HankandShaidri |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
High End Preamps With Remote Balance Control | High End Audio | |||
Digi 003 Rack Preamps and Converter -- Quality? | Pro Audio | |||
Different Studer preamps sound's quality ? | Pro Audio | |||
sage electronics - high quality MIC PREAMPS | Marketplace | |||
FS: high end MIC PREAMPS - Sage Electronics | General |