[DGDevin]

"Andre Jute" wrote in message
news:8e890716-579f-4c75-840e-

Osama bin Laden is Richard P Leavitt's rabbi...

You two morons curl me up with laughter: you're so ignorant, you don't
even understand that the IPCC, whom you're trying to protect against
the crimes of its footsoldiers, was born in the bloody Club of Rome
and belongs to the UN which you twice condemned.

God, you global warmies are tenth-rate.

*********

Are you pretending to be as crazy as you appear to be, or did you just start
off pretending and gradually actually become the victim of delusional
paranoia your odd little posts suggest?

[Andre Jute[_2_]]

On Dec 19, 11:42*pm, "DGDevin" wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote in message

news:8e890716-579f-4c75-840e-


*********

Are you pretending to be as crazy as you appear to be, or did you just start
off pretending and gradually actually become the victim of delusional
paranoia your odd little posts suggest?

You're suffering from a discrimination handicap, Devin. You quote a
joke I make without given any indication that you know it is joke:
Osama bin Laden is Richard P Leavitt's rabbi...

Then you quote, without contesting it, a passage in which I trace the
source of an idea:
You two morons curl me up with laughter: you're so ignorant, you don't
even understand that the IPCC, whom you're trying to protect against
the crimes of its footsoldiers, was born in the bloody Club of Rome
and belongs to the UN which you twice condemned.

Then you quote my conclusion on people who are so ignorant that they
believe with a religious fervour in politics as science:
God, you global warmies are tenth-rate.

And then you give a joke, the derivation of a philosophical idea, and
my dismissive conclusion the same value! Even worse, you're so thick
you think the derivation of a political idea is mere pananoia! And
you're so poorly educated, you don't understand that the source of a
political concept, which is what global warming was confirmed as by
Climategate, crucially influences our evaluation of it.

I can only conclude that you're a warmie because you altogether lack
the ability to think for yourself. So, tell me, why should I care ****
for your opinion, except to use it to ridicule the warmieloons a bit
longer?

Andre Jute
Global Warming is like Scientology, only with less science -- and I
said it long before the Climategate exposed those clowns as crooks

[DGDevin]

"Andre Jute" wrote in message
...

I can only conclude that you're a warmie because you altogether lack
the ability to think for yourself. So, tell me, why should I care ****
for your opinion, except to use it to ridicule the warmieloons a bit
longer?

**********

Your kind have been on Usenet almost as long as Usenet has existed, your
spoor is unmistakable--the beer-hall know-it-all. With you it's the Club Of
Rome, with the next clown it's the Bilderberg Group, or the Council On
Foreign Relations and so on--but what you blowhards all have in common is
the delusion that you're the one in a million who knows what's going on, the
rest of us are just ignorant sheep who don't understand the hidden forces
pulling the strings. The conspiracy theory industry thrives on goofballs
like you.

Aside from your obsession with conspiracy theories another sure sign is the
way you try too hard when it comes to writing, like you have a dictionary
open on one knee and a thesaurus on the other in hopes of coming across as
better-educated and/or smarter than you really are. Sadly (but hilariously)
you don't realize the effect is more like Cliff Claven than Frasier Crane.

You're a fraud, "Andre," compensating for being a powerless little droid by
pretending to be one of the few who *really* know what's going on. Make all
the noise you want in your tiny way, pretend to be so much better informed
than everyone around you--the world can always use more comedy, and that's
all you provide.

[Andre Jute[_2_]]

"Andre Jute" wrote

******
If 220,000,000 murders, and counting, were necessary to ban DDT, how
many billion will be the 'few necessary murders' of global warming?

And who will those few billion murdered by anti-global warming
measures be?

Here are a few extracts from the MEIN KAMPF of the next genocide:

“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100
million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see
wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout
the world.”
--Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!

“The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man.”
-- Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from
present levels, would be ideal.”
-- Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor

„A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the
present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion.
At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would
be possible.“
-- United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment

„In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000
people per day.“
-- Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier

Osama bin Laden never dreamed such dreams of genocide...

Andre Jute
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea
that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine
and the like would fit the bill.” -- Club of Rome, The First Global
Revolution

*****

To which "DGDevin" replied :

Your kind have been on Usenet almost as long as Usenet has existed, your
spoor is unmistakable--the beer-hall know-it-all. *With you it's the Club Of
Rome, with the next clown it's the Bilderberg Group, or the Council On
Foreign Relations and so on--but what you blowhards all have in common is
the delusion that you're the one in a million who knows what's going on, the
rest of us are just ignorant sheep who don't understand the hidden forces
pulling the strings. *The conspiracy theory industry thrives on goofballs
like you.

Aside from your obsession with conspiracy theories another sure sign is the
way you try too hard when it comes to writing, like you have a dictionary
open on one knee and a thesaurus on the other in hopes of coming across as
better-educated and/or smarter than you really are. *Sadly (but hilariously)
you don't realize the effect is more like Cliff Claven than Frasier Crane..

You're a fraud, "Andre," compensating for being a powerless little droid by
pretending to be one of the few who *really* know what's going on. *Make all
the noise you want in your tiny way, pretend to be so much better informed
than everyone around you--the world can always use more comedy, and that's
all you provide.

Now what did I ever do to upset this warmieloon Devin so badly?

Andre Jute
Charisma is the art of infuriating the undeserving by merely existing
elegantly

[sam booka]

flipper tapped the mic and amongst other things,
said, "Is this on?" :

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:06:38 -0500, * Still Just Me *
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:41:51 -0800, "Bill Sornson"
wrote:

Bill "and read the Authorization to Use Force (hint: WMD just one of
many reasons cited)" S.

You and Cheney are the only two idiots on the planet still claiming
that the Iraq invasion was justified in any way, shape, or form.

Wrong. Those who paid attention to the history, facts, and rationale
over the falsehoods incessantly babbled by the left know the action
was not only justified but imperative.

Yes, the central banks must reset capitalism by mobilizing these lo0ns to
kill themselves off, so they can start the whole growth ponzi scheme
again. The reason they love socialism is because it is the most efficient
way to achieve these ends, eg: killing off 55-90% of the population. The
reason they love liberals is that only they are stupid enough and
sufficiently malleable to be their robots of destruction. And of course
when the dust all settles, only capitalists will be left standing to seed
the next wave.


--
All the perplexities, confusion, and distress in America arise,
not from defects in their Constitution or confederation, not
from want of honor or virtue, so much as from downright ignorance
of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation,
John Adams

[oasysco]

On Dec 14, 5:20*pm, Andre Jute wrote:
If 220,000,000 murders, and counting, were necessary to ban DDT, how
many billion will be the 'few necessary murders' of global warming?

And who will those few billion murdered by anti-global warming
measures be?

Here are a few extracts from the MEIN KAMPF of the next genocide:

“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100
million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see
wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout
the world.”
--Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!

“The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man.”
-- Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from
present levels, would be ideal.”
-- Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor

„A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the
present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion.
At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would
be possible.“
-- United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment

„In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000
people per day.“
-- Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier

Osama bin Laden never dreamed such dreams of genocide...

Andre Jute
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea
that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine
and the like would fit the bill.” -- Club of Rome, The First Global
Revolution

I researched some of your quotes and sadly found that they are
correct, though the context of Cousteau's quote may not have been as
much a call to genocide as it was a statement of fact.

Ted Turner, it seems, is the real deal when ti comes to depopulation.
To wit: http://noworldsystem.com/2008/05/13/...ation-control/

When children disguised as the "birth rate" are identified as the
cause of overpopulation, global warming, deforestation, and world-wide
poverty, it's no wonder that the western nations fund abortion as a
right world-wide.

[DGDevin]

"Andre Jute" wrote in message
...

Now what did I ever do to upset this warmieloon Devin so badly?

**********

Nobody is upset, Burlap Boy, although it is standard operating procedure for
your kind to pretend that someone pointing out your compulsive foolishness
is upset, or angry, or dismayed in some way. Like I said, people like you
compensate for living in powerless obscurity by ranting and raving on
Usenet, naturally part of the formula is pretending you have the power to
"upset" those who are in reality laughing at you. One has to wonder what
people like you--those who wear paper hats at work--did before the internet
gave you an outlet for your frustration.

[Andre Jute[_2_]]

On Dec 21, 9:17*pm, "DGDevin" wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote in message

...

Now what did I ever do to upset this warmieloon Devin so badly?

**********

Nobody is upset, Burlap Boy, although it is standard operating procedure for
your kind to pretend that someone pointing out your compulsive foolishness
is upset, or angry, or dismayed in some way. *Like I said, people like you
compensate for living in powerless obscurity by ranting and raving on
Usenet, naturally part of the formula is pretending you have the power to
"upset" those who are in reality laughing at you. *One has to wonder what
people like you--those who wear paper hats at work--did before the internet
gave you an outlet for your frustration.

It's very perceptive of you, Devin, to see that I'm a pussycat,
purring like mad, "I'm harmless, I'm harmless," and your Christian
kindness in taking so much of your no doubt valuable time to explain
my worthlessness to me will no doubt be noted in the Big Book at the
Pearly Gates.

Yours gratefully,

Andre Jute
I'm not a know-all. I don't need to be. I know who to ask.

[Andre Jute[_2_]]

On Dec 21, 4:50*pm, oasysco wrote:
On Dec 14, 5:20*pm, Andre Jute wrote:





If 220,000,000 murders, and counting, were necessary to ban DDT, how
many billion will be the 'few necessary murders' of global warming?

And who will those few billion murdered by anti-global warming
measures be?

Here are a few extracts from the MEIN KAMPF of the next genocide:

“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100
million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see
wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout
the world.”
--Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!

“The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man.”
-- Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from
present levels, would be ideal.”
-- Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor

„A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the
present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion.
At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would
be possible.“
-- United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment

„In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000
people per day.“
-- Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier

Osama bin Laden never dreamed such dreams of genocide...

Andre Jute
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea
that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine
and the like would fit the bill.” -- Club of Rome, The First Global
Revolution

I researched some of your quotes and sadly found that they are
correct,

The reason I headlined that collation of shocking statements "Mein
Kampf" is that nobody believed Hitler's intentions either when he laid
them out plain as daylight in his book. People said, "Oh, he's just
being outrageous to bump up his book sales. Nobody who really intended
doing such despicable things as extermination the Jews would say so in
public, would they then? Anyhow, Herr Hitler is a socialist, and
socialists are for people, not for killing them." I keep telling our
little friends on these newsgroups that there is no conspiracy: these
people are very open global warming being an entirely invented,
artificial artifact in the service of world government, with the aim
of enforcing population control. It is no coincidence that Maurice
Strong, founder of the UN Environment Panel, of which the IPCC which
he also founded is an offshoot, is an executive council member of the
Club of Rome, which openly calls Man a Cancer on Earth. But it is
*not*, repeat *not* a conspiracy: it was all done openly. (The only,
and very inept conspiracy, was characteristically conducted by
scientists -- those Climategate Crooks -- who were too naive to know
they stood a better change of getting away with their crime if they
did it it openly and brazenly.) -- Andre Jute

[Chalo]

flipper wrote:

[laughable discredited Neoconservative claptrap]

I suppose the crack cocaine in your neighborhood must be heavily
tainted, for you still to buy into the most egregious lies and
misdeeds of the Bush syndicate.

It's sad, really, that so many minds, or whatever passes for minds in
these cases, can be bought so cheaply.

[Bill Sornson[_2_]]

flipper wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:33:48 -0500, * Still Just A Cluless Anti-Semite *
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:30:31 -0600, flipper wrote:

On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:39:35 -0500, * Still Completely Clueless *
wrote:

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:21:47 -0600, flipper
wrote:


You and Cheney are the only two idiots on the planet still
claiming that the Iraq invasion was justified in any way, shape,
or form.

Wrong. Those who paid attention to the history, facts, and
rationale over the falsehoods incessantly babbled by the left
know the action was not only justified but imperative.

I'm almost afraid to ask as the response you give can only be
filled with rabid wing-nut lunacy, but pray tell, give me your
justifications.

Sure, just as soon as lying left wing loons explain how they'll
behave differently this time it's explained.

For starters you could try UN Security Council Resolutions 660, 661,
662, 664, 665, 666, 667, 669, 670, 674, 677, 678, 686, 687, 688,
707, 715, 986, 1284, and 1441.


Puhleeze.

Typical left wing loon simply erases the facts presented and then
proceeds on to fantasy creation.

Much of what you posted dates back to Clinton.

Because the US spend 12 years trying everything in the book to get
Saddam to comply with a 120 day requirement, which he never did.

Clinton's
offensives against Saddaam had rendered him a toothless tiger.

Not even Clinton claimed that.

No
inspection team had found any evidence of WMD's whatsoever in the
Bush era and they had been quite vocal about that.

Another fantasy. No one was 'vocal' about anything because after
Clinton's bombing Saddam never let another inspector set foot in the
country till Bush surrounded the place and the "one last chance" UN
1441 resolution that Blix himself said Saddam did not comply with.


Instead of accepting that, the Bush Administration worked to
discredit them.

Pure left wing loon invention. Nothing to 'accept' as there were no
inspections from 1998 onwards.

When Wilson reported back that the rumors of nuke purchases from
Africa were bogus, they worked to discredit him too and then outed
his wife.

More left wing loon inventions. What you call 'rumors' were the UK
intelligence assessment and Wilson's own report but the FACT is the
claim was Iraq *sought* yellow cake. That was another left wing, and
Wilson, lie: substituting 'bought' for 'sought'.

The exact quote from Bush's 2003 State of the Union is ""The British
government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant
quantities of uranium from Africa."



The White House sent emails to the CIA directing them to find
evidence of Saddaam being a bad boy, and to reject other scenarios.
Even after all that, there was still no evidence that Saddaam had
WMD's,

Your fantasy encompasses three more left wing lies with the first
being there was 'no evidence' when Blix's last report rattles off a
whole list of non compliances. The second is the job of 'finding'
whatever. As Blix stated, inspections is NOT a game of catch as catch
can. It was Saddam's obligation to SHOW compliance and not the
inspector's, or anyone else's, responsibility to 'find something'.

And then the 'big lie': that having stockpiles', or as you put it
simply 'WMD', was the sole criteria. It's another case of left wing
loons mangling what's said. The term is WMD *programmes* which
included not only 'stockpiles' but, among other things, manufacturing
capability, research documentation, and a demonstrated commitment to
not seek WMD capability in any way.

It's is meaningless to simply show the warheads aren't, at the moment,
ready to lock and load with toxins if one retains the know how and
technology to simply replenish the stock in 6 months, or a year, or
two years, or whenever.

Left wing loony tunes 'stockpile' gibberish is like 'removing
sanctions' from Jack the Ripper because, at the moment, he's not
holding a knife so after you've gone he simply picks one up and
slashes away.

but the Bush/Cheney wanted to invade at all costs. They ignored
every contrary piece of evidence and magnified every rumor about
Saddaam's bad behavior that they could find - to the point of not
even cross checking their sources (after the Wilson check embarrassed
them). They kept up the constant lies to the gullible public - even
forcing Colin Powell to lie to the UN. (He resigned right after that
speech as his integrity was on the line and he knew it).

Pure fantasy and Blix's report lists, among many violations, 'missing'
warheads, chemical and biological agents as well as illegal missiles,
both in development and in service, contraband purchases, and hidden
papers.


snip of more fantasies

I presented the UN report that specifically states non-compliance and
after 12 years of non compliance and a "last chance" mandatory
resolution time was up.

Cease fire agreements are worthless if the terms can be simply ignored
and UN Security Council Chapter 7 mandatory resolutions are also
worthless if they can be simply ignored.

And that's before one even gets into the very real potential threat of
Saddam providing chemical/biological/nuclear material or expertise to
terrorists, not to mention the distinct possibility of Saddam, who
always maintained he was "at war" with the U.S., deciding to assist or
ally with the recently made 'homeless', and fellow 'at war with the
US', Al Qaida.

None of which will make any difference to you because the loony left
would happily, for their own political gain, leave entire nations in
servitude to mass murdering dictators who've killed millions,
especially if it comes with the double thrill of harming the United
States.

What's really funny (damning) is the way the loony left as you call them
WORSHIP the U.N. for its stance on issues like Global Warming, yet riducule
references to the 20 or so "binding resolutions" condemning a brutal regime
like Saddam's Iraq.

Bill "calling Clueless loony is an insult to loons" S.

[Ben C]

On 2009-12-24, flipper wrote:
[...]
When Wilson reported back that the rumors of nuke purchases from
Africa were bogus, they worked to discredit him too and then outed his
wife.

More left wing loon inventions. What you call 'rumors' were the UK
intelligence assessment

The UK intelligence assessment was rumours.

[Bill Sornson[_2_]]

Chalo wrote:
flipper wrote:

[laughable discredited Neoconservative claptrap]

I suppose the crack cocaine in your neighborhood must be heavily
tainted, for you still to buy into the most egregious lies and
misdeeds of the Bush syndicate.

It's sad, really, that so many minds, or whatever passes for minds in
these cases, can be bought so cheaply.

Typical. You delete everything the person wrote (numerous facts, along with
well supported opinions) and stoop to personal attacks and insults.

Must suck to be so bitterly hypocritical so much of the time.

BS (not even a little)

[Bill Sornson[_2_]]

Ben C wrote:
On 2009-12-24, flipper wrote:
[...]
When Wilson reported back that the rumors of nuke purchases from
Africa were bogus, they worked to discredit him too and then outed
his wife.

More left wing loon inventions. What you call 'rumors' were the UK
intelligence assessment

The UK intelligence assessment was rumours.

Whoosh.

[Bill Sornson[_2_]]

flipper wrote:
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:35:23 -0800, "Bill Sornson"
wrote:

Chalo wrote:
flipper wrote:

[laughable discredited Neoconservative claptrap]

I suppose the crack cocaine in your neighborhood must be heavily
tainted, for you still to buy into the most egregious lies and
misdeeds of the Bush syndicate.

It's sad, really, that so many minds, or whatever passes for minds
in these cases, can be bought so cheaply.

Typical. You delete everything the person wrote (numerous facts,
along with well supported opinions) and stoop to personal attacks
and insults.

Must suck to be so bitterly hypocritical so much of the time.

BS (not even a little)


That's how the left works. You *quote*; they delete and rain a hail of
insults and fabrications at you.

What's really bizarre is these people insist you can solve problems
like Iraq and Iran if one would simply 'talk' when you can see it is
flat impossible to 'talk' to the very ones making the claim.

Excellent point. Yet more hypocrisy. (Hard to believe possible!)

Must have been a real surprise for The Chosen One to hear Iran tell
him to shove his outstretched hand up where the sun don't shine.

You're assuming he really wants resolution. I'm less and less convinced of
that.

BS

[DGDevin]

"Andre Jute" wrote in message
...

It's very perceptive of you, D...

[snip]

Sorry Jute, your fifteen minutes are up.

Send in the next ko0k please.

[Andre Jute[_2_]]

On Dec 27, 6:35*am, "DGDevin" wrote:

Send in the next ko0k please.

Now that Climategate and the Copenhagen Freeze has knocked the nails
into the coffin of global warming, our respective fruit and nut cases
(Asher, Weiner, Leavitt, etc) will soon rush in here to start
screeching about the coming ice age as loudly as they did about global
warming.

Andre Jute
"By definition, the presence of a cam tells you it's not 2-stroke."
-- "jim beam", internet ignoramus, proving his "competence"

[AMuzi]

-snip snip-
* Still Just Me * wrote:
Iran would have been
solved, and perhaps still could be, by a few surgical strikes.
-snip-


and on to The Hole Which Was Once Mecca!

--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org/
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

[sam booka]

flipper tapped the mic and amongst other things, said,
"Is this on?" :

You're so brainwashed that you see everyone who opposes any of your
neo-con talking points as the "loony left" - not even understanding
that there are many other political viewpoints. Consider your
brainwashing complete.

I have no problem, past disagreement, with "other political
viewpoints." What I have a problem with are the loony left's incessant
fabrications, fantasies, misrepresentations, irrational babble, flat
out lies, ad hominems and every other logic fallacy in the book and it
is the left who *begin* with the sneering jeer any disagreement,
before having even heard it, comes from stupidity, as you did, and
when I first replied with *nothing* but *quotations* from official
U.N. documentation, including Blix's report, without so much as one
word of 'opinion', you flat deleted the *entire thing*, leaving not a
jot, and embarked on this fantasy fest.

Wanna watch his gaunchies explode? Try this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygQVyznw2zE

http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/...lation/ILA.htm

--
All the perplexities, confusion, and distress in America arise,
not from defects in their Constitution or confederation, not
from want of honor or virtue, so much as from downright ignorance
of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation,
John Adams

[Bill Sornson[_2_]]

flipper wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:01:31 -0500, * Still Just Me *
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:37:10 -0600, flipper wrote:

Specify the threat to the USA, in detail. Please try to include
some FACTS, you tend to lack them in your posts.

I already presented a case of facts and your lying ass promptly
deleted the entire thing to engage in this fantasy fest.

You're a brainwashed tool without the capacity to think for yourself
who avoids direct questions. Why don't you and Snorti go play
together, you'll have fun.

At least you left in the description of what you just did, again.

ROTFL (again)

Man, if this were a boxing match Clueless would have been counted out five
rounds ago.

Bill "good stuff...in a pathetic sorta way" S.

[Anonymous[_2_]]

* Still Just Me * wrote:

Saddamm was no threat to anyone but his own people. The attacks during
the Clinton Administration left him powerless.

*laugh*

Ya' can't even type two marginally coherent sentences in sequence,
without one contradicting the other.

Fscking idgit.

[sam booka]

flipper tapped the mic and amongst other things,
said, "Is this on?" :

On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:25:52 +0000 (UTC), sam booka
wrote:

flipper tapped the mic and amongst other things,
said, "Is this on?" :

You're so brainwashed that you see everyone who opposes any of your
neo-con talking points as the "loony left" - not even understanding
that there are many other political viewpoints. Consider your
brainwashing complete.

I have no problem, past disagreement, with "other political
viewpoints." What I have a problem with are the loony left's
incessant fabrications, fantasies, misrepresentations, irrational
babble, flat out lies, ad hominems and every other logic fallacy in
the book and it is the left who *begin* with the sneering jeer any
disagreement, before having even heard it, comes from stupidity, as
you did, and when I first replied with *nothing* but *quotations*
from official U.N. documentation, including Blix's report, without
so much as one word of 'opinion', you flat deleted the *entire
thing*, leaving not a jot, and embarked on this fantasy fest.

Wanna watch his gaunchies explode? Try this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygQVyznw2zE

http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/...lation/ILA.htm

Ah yes, the official U.S. policy of "regime change."

He'll find some way to cope. If nothing else, like my U.N quotations,
delete it.

One could also go through a litany of quotes from damn near everyone
condemning Saddam but the left simply reinvents history at will to
suit their mood.
snip
|
|
V
President Clinton ~ 1998

Welcome back to the 9-10 world. These ko0k5 still don't get it!

--
All the perplexities, confusion, and distress in America arise,
not from defects in their Constitution or confederation, not
from want of honor or virtue, so much as from downright ignorance
of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation,
John Adams