Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
I just bought a used 100 foot snake.
I was surprised at the configuration. It has 2 pair of heavy wires designated as speaker 1 and 2. I had always though that running amps of current through a cable parallel to mic cables would magnetically induce unacceptable amounts of crosstalk into the mic cables. So I ran a test. There was some measurable crosstalk but is was surprisingly low. Low enough that if the mic and speaker are in the same room, acoustic feedback by far dominates the electrical feedback caused by the crosstalk. So it seems this is a usable configuration. Does anyone have experience with snakes of this configuration? thanks Mark |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
On Tue, 29 May 2018 10:15:13 -0400, Mike Rivers
wrote: On 5/29/2018 9:49 AM, wrote: I just bought a used 100 foot snake. I was surprised at the configuration. It has 2 pair of heavy wires designated as speaker 1 and 2. I had always though that running amps of current through a cable parallel to mic cables would magnetically induce unacceptable amounts of crosstalk into the mic cables. There was some measurable crosstalk but is was surprisingly low. Low enough that if the mic and speaker are in the same room, acoustic feedback by far dominates the electrical feedback caused by the crosstalk. Does anyone have experience with snakes of this configuration? No problems, as long as it's built correctly. It works because you have balanced connections. Your mic inputs are differential, so that any induced current in the mic pair will be cancelled out at the preamp input. And, to boot, the speaker leads are, in essence, balanced, since one goes positive and the other goes negative at the same time, so the electromagnetic field around the speaker pairs is mostly cancelled, too. It's not perfect, but as you determined, it's good enough for the application for which you intend to use it. Sometimes technology works in your favor. Balanced connections work well, but not when they are very close to a source of interference. They rely for their effect on exactly the same field impinging on both phases. This doesn't apply when the source of interference is close by - whichever wire is locally closer will receive more interference. That's why cancellation is not perfect. I would not run cables this way. d --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
On Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 8:49:40 AM UTC-5, wrote:
I just bought a used 100 foot snake. I was surprised at the configuration. It has 2 pair of heavy wires designated as speaker 1 and 2. I had always though that running amps of current through a cable parallel to mic cables would magnetically induce unacceptable amounts of crosstalk into the mic cables. So I ran a test. There was some measurable crosstalk but is was surprisingly low. Low enough that if the mic and speaker are in the same room, acoustic feedback by far dominates the electrical feedback caused by the crosstalk. So it seems this is a usable configuration. Does anyone have experience with snakes of this configuration? thanks Mark I've used snakes like this, admittedly in relatively low-volume applications (folk clubs). Never had any problems. Peace, Paul Stamler |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables
On 5/29/2018 12:35 PM, Don Pearce wrote:
Balanced connections work well, but not when they are very close to a source of interference. I test common mode rejection by holding The Wall Wart From Hell (I believe Paul Stamler owns a copyright on that name) right next to a cable going to whatever I'm testing. The test fixture that THAT uses to demonstrate the CMRR of their inGenius chip consists of two pieces of cable as close together as they can get, one with the interference, and that's a good enough demo for them. You do need to use good twisted pair for the gozinta in order to get the best results. I would not run cables this way. Well, don't, if you don't have a need to. But it's a convenience for certain setups, for example, when using a powered mixer. And in general, people who use powered mixers don't worry about a barely measurable amount of crosstalk. My preference is to put the power amplifiers near the speakers and run line level from the mixer to the amplifiers. But there's less need to do that in smaller installations now that powered speakers are becoming the norm for a "no engineer" system. -- For a good time, call http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
wrote:
I just bought a used 100 foot snake. I was surprised at the configuration. It has 2 pair of heavy wires designated as speaker 1 and 2. This is called a "powered snake" which seems like a bad description to me, but that's what it is. I had always though that running amps of current through a cable parallel to mic cables would magnetically induce unacceptable amounts of crosstalk into the mic cables. It can. You don't have capacitive coupling so much to worry about because the shielding is pretty effective against that, but you do have inductive coupling especially at very low frequencies. One of the tricks to dealing with this is cable twist, and having different twist lengths on different cables (which cat5 cable does). If everything is done just right, the inductive coupling on one twist is opposite polarity from the coupling on the next twist and they all cancel one another out. So I ran a test. There was some measurable crosstalk but is was surprisingly low. Low enough that if the mic and speaker are in the same room, acoustic feedback by far dominates the electrical feedback caused by the crosstalk. So it seems this is a usable configuration. I have seen some very crappy (and possibly damaged) powered snakes where there was enough coupling to cause very low frequency motorboating on the amp. Mike will know what I mean when I mention the old Adventure Theatre. But I have also seen a lot more where everything worked just fine. Does anyone have experience with snakes of this configuration? Yes, they mostly work just fine. But, they are much less popular in the modern age of powered speakers. Also... don't use the speaker returns to run AC power to the board. I saw someone do that once too. Interference resulted, and also the cable is not rated for that. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables
On 30/05/2018 9:48 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
Yes, they mostly work just fine. But, they are much less popular in the modern age of powered speakers. Also... don't use the speaker returns to run AC power to the board. I saw someone do that once too. Interference resulted, and also the cable is not rated for that. --scott However in this day of powered speakers we now have combination speaker and mains cable. Official, compliant ones. Just one balanced signal pair with mains included. The ones that I tried (10m, ~33ft) had no obtrusive induced hum. However the signal wires would fracture (2 sets = same result) presumably due to them being stressed when curved along beside the heavier, thicker mains wires/lead. So I gave up. However an acquaintance who uses similar cables of another brand has not had this problem. geoff |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
wrote:
I just bought a used 100 foot snake. I was surprised at the configuration. It has 2 pair of heavy wires designated as speaker 1 and 2. I had always though that running amps of current through a cable parallel to mic cables would magnetically induce unacceptable amounts of crosstalk into the mic cables. So I ran a test. ** Can you detail how you did that? Were mics connected to the balanced lines ? There was some measurable crosstalk but is was surprisingly low. Low enough that if the mic and speaker are in the same room, acoustic feedback by far dominates the electrical feedback caused by the crosstalk.. So it seems this is a usable configuration. Does anyone have experience with snakes of this configuration? ** In a portable PA system, this can be risky when you allow for simple mistakes made during set up. The risk is supersonic oscillation, induced by crosstalk. Running balanced and speaker lines tied together is commonly done with amp racks. It works fine until someone powers the rack up without connections being made at the far end of the cables and advances the amp gain controls. The unterminated balanced line couples capacitively to the hot speaker wire and oscillation is possible. Usually at a frequency like 50 or 100kHz. The risk is higher if you are using a powered desk since so much more gain is available. ..... Phil |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
Phil Allison wrote:
** In a portable PA system, this can be risky when you allow for simple mistakes made during set up. The risk is supersonic oscillation, induced by crosstalk. Running balanced and speaker lines tied together is commonly done with amp racks. It works fine until someone powers the rack up without connections being made at the far end of the cables and advances the amp gain controls.. The unterminated balanced line couples capacitively to the hot speaker wire and oscillation is possible. Usually at a frequency like 50 or 100kHz. The risk is higher if you are using a powered desk since so much more gain is available. ** I should point out that supersonic oscillations, while inaudible, will destroy high frequency drivers and seriously damage most power amplifiers in a few seconds. ..... Phil |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
The risk is higher if you are using a powered desk since so much more gain is available. ** I should point out that supersonic oscillations, while inaudible, will destroy high frequency drivers and seriously damage most power amplifiers in a few seconds. .... Phil Yep, thats what I was worried about, the magnetic coupling between the balanced lines has a high pass characteristic. For the tests I ran, yes I had a mic connected and the other end connected to a mixer. The crosstalk was not present with the mic disconnected but was present with the mic connected. That makes sense that it is magnetic coupling that needs a closed circuit. The mic pairs are electrostatic shielded with foil so that should do a good job to drastically reduce capacitive coupling, but no so effective for magnetic coupling. But still the coupling is more effective at the higher frequencies so I was concerned about ultrasonic oscillations. I plan to use these only for the stage monitors and will keep the high end EQd down in the amp. I get all the theory but practice and theory don't always agree, that's why I am asking about real world experiences with these types of snakes. thanks Mark |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
It can. You don't have capacitive coupling so much to worry about because the shielding is pretty effective yes it appears that way, no crosstalk with the mic unplugged. but you do have inductive coupling especially at very low frequencies. my observation is the opposite, the inductive coupling is greater at the high end. m |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
wrote:
** I should point out that supersonic oscillations, while inaudible, will destroy high frequency drivers and seriously damage most power amplifiers in a few seconds. .... Phil Yep, thats what I was worried about, the magnetic coupling between the balanced lines has a high pass characteristic. For the tests I ran, yes I had a mic connected and the other end connected to a mixer. The crosstalk was not present with the mic disconnected but was present with the mic connected. That makes sense that it is magnetic coupling that needs a closed circuit. The mic pairs are electrostatic shielded with foil so that should do a good job to drastically reduce capacitive coupling, but no so effective for magnetic coupling. But still the coupling is more effective at the higher frequencies so I was concerned about ultrasonic oscillations. ** A lot depends on the mic pre-amps, usually they have good common mode rejection of low and mid frequencies diminishing at high and supersonic frequencies. They deal with supply frequency hum and harmonics well - but not so well with supersonics. I get all the theory but practice and theory don't always agree, that's why I am asking about real world experiences with these types of snakes. ** Other folks experience may have no relevance to to yours. You need to be sure that YOUR set up is not susceptible to supersonic oscillation - or somehow, one day it will happen. ..... Phil |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
wrote:
but you do have inductive coupling especially at very low frequencies. my observation is the opposite, the inductive coupling is greater at the high end. ** Do this simple experiment. With a mic plugged in, wrap one turn of balanced line around a transformer wall wart. For a comparison, place the mic head next to the same wall wart. ..... Phil |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
I can confirm that this type snake CAN create an ultrasonic oscillation that can quickly damage a power amp.
Fortunately this happened during my testing and not during an event and it was a small amp with easy to replace 2N3055's. I WOULD NOT use this configuration with speaker level signals in the snake. If you MUST use it, keep the High end rolled off on the amp. Also I found that the wires intended to be used for the speakers are shielded well enough by all the other cables that the speaker lines can be used to carry line level audio signals. There was some small cross talk between the 2 speaker cables when used as line level but this is of no issue if they are used for 2 monitor mixes for example or for left and right. Bottom line, try very hard to avoid speaker lines and mic lines in the same snake. It definitely can easily damage the amplifier. Mark |
#15
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables
|
#16
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables
|
#17
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
wrote:
I can confirm that this type snake CAN create an ultrasonic oscillation that can quickly damage a power amp. Fortunately this happened during my testing and not during an event and it was a small amp with easy to replace 2N3055's. I WOULD NOT use this configuration with speaker level signals in the snake. If you MUST use it, keep the High end rolled off on the amp. ** Not a simple thing to do ... Bottom line, try very hard to avoid speaker lines and mic lines in the same snake. It definitely can easily damage the amplifier. ** Glad to hear you took the advice and tried using the snake in test situation rather than at a gig. I did a bench test with a 1m length of figure 8 speaker cable running alongside a balanced mic line and found that while cross-talk was only minor at audible frequencies it could became severe at 70 kHz or so depending on the mic cable in use. ..... Phil |
#18
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 11:46:16 PM UTC-5, Tim Sprout wrote:
On 6/5/2018 6:24 AM, wrote: I can confirm that this type snake CAN create an ultrasonic oscillation that can quickly damage a power amp. snipped Mark How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations? The first sign is that your amp is horribly distorted with no obvious clipping. Or your tweeter burns up with no apparent cause. Then you hang an oscilloscope on the amp's output and you see the oscillation happening. Peace, Paul Stamler |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
Tim Sprout wrote:
How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations? ** The first sign will usually be that VU meters on the amplifier or desk become hard pegged when there is no loud sound. A few seconds later, smoke will appear from the amp/amp rack. Large cone speakers are normally immune from damage ( VC inductance saves them) while small horn driers including piezos are vulnerable and will also smoke. ...... Phil |
#20
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables
On 6/06/2018 4:46 PM, Tim Sprout wrote:
On 6/5/2018 6:24 AM, wrote: I can confirm that this type snake CAN create an ultrasonic oscillation that can quickly damage a power amp. snipped Mark How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations? Tim Sprout See if your bat cringes. Or smoke comes from tweeters. Or an oscilloscope. geoff |
#21
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables
On 6/6/2018 12:46 AM, Tim Sprout wrote:
How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations? With an ultraoscilloscope, of course. Actually, any oscilloscope worth a hoot will display waveforms up to 500 kHz which, other than in exceptional cases, is all you need to worry about. You can still find 50 year old Hewlett-Packard scopes for under $25, and you can learn a lot about audio (and about oscilloscopes) with one. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio" - John Watkinson Drop by http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com now and then |
#22
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables
In article , Tim Sprout wrote:
On 6/5/2018 6:24 AM, wrote: I can confirm that this type snake CAN create an ultrasonic oscillation that can quickly damage a power amp. How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations? Usually by the smoke. I once saw a Phase Linear amp shoot fire three feet in the air due to stability issues. It was very impressive but cut the band's act somewhat short. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#23
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
I recall an event at Peabody Institute in Baltimore. They ran long lines from a concert hall to their recording studio. How long I don't recall, but long. They had a Sony MXP3000 console. The long lines were ringing so much from local EMI that it was blowing out the preamps in the console. They had to modify the console inputs with transformers. That solved the problem.
|
#24
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables
On 7/06/2018 1:40 AM, Mike Rivers wrote:
On 6/6/2018 12:46 AM, Tim Sprout wrote: How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations? With an ultraoscilloscope, of course.Â* Actually, any oscilloscope worth a hoot will display waveforms up to 500 kHz which, other than in exceptional cases, is all you need to worry about. You can still find 50 year old Hewlett-Packard scopes for under $25, and you can learn a lot about audio (and about oscilloscopes) with one. Surely most of even the cheapest nastiest (but perfectly adequate) scopes from the last 50 years do 10MHz ? geoff |
#25
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables
On 7/06/2018 3:05 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article , Tim Sprout wrote: On 6/5/2018 6:24 AM, wrote: I can confirm that this type snake CAN create an ultrasonic oscillation that can quickly damage a power amp. How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations? Usually by the smoke. I once saw a Phase Linear amp shoot fire three feet in the air due to stability issues. It was very impressive but cut the band's act somewhat short. --scott Naa - it was part of the stage-show pyrotechnics. geoff |
#26
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables
On 7/06/2018 6:26 AM, geoff wrote:
On 7/06/2018 1:40 AM, Mike Rivers wrote: On 6/6/2018 12:46 AM, Tim Sprout wrote: How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations? With an ultraoscilloscope, of course.Â* Actually, any oscilloscope worth a hoot will display waveforms up to 500 kHz which, other than in exceptional cases, is all you need to worry about. You can still find 50 year old Hewlett-Packard scopes for under $25, and you can learn a lot about audio (and about oscilloscopes) with one. Surely most of even the cheapest nastiest (but perfectly adequate) scopes from the last 50 years do 10MHz ? Yep, my first scope was made well over 50 years ago and did 10MHz. But there have been some cheap audio scopes over the years that only did 1MHz. But of course even a 1MHz analog scope will still display waveforms well above that frequency at a reduced level. Trevor. |
#27
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables
On 7/06/2018 1:05 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article , Tim Sprout wrote: On 6/5/2018 6:24 AM, wrote: I can confirm that this type snake CAN create an ultrasonic oscillation that can quickly damage a power amp. How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations? Usually by the smoke. I once saw a Phase Linear amp shoot fire three feet in the air due to stability issues. It was very impressive but cut the band's act somewhat short. They weren't nick-named "Flame Linear's" for nothing. :-) Trevor. |
#28
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
Tim Sprout wrote:
How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations? ** Strangely, an analog multimeter does the job quite well. My own 20kohms/V one is only -3dB at 150kHz on the 50V AC range, ...... Phil |
#29
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
Trevor said...news
On 7/06/2018 1:05 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote: In article , Tim Sprout wrote: On 6/5/2018 6:24 AM, wrote: I can confirm that this type snake CAN create an ultrasonic oscillation that can quickly damage a power amp. How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations? Usually by the smoke. I once saw a Phase Linear amp shoot fire three feet in the air due to stability issues. It was very impressive but cut the band's act somewhat short. They weren't nick-named "Flame Linear's" for nothing. :-) Trevor. The SAEs didn't seem to be far behind, either. david --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#30
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
Trevor said...news
On 7/06/2018 6:26 AM, geoff wrote: On 7/06/2018 1:40 AM, Mike Rivers wrote: On 6/6/2018 12:46 AM, Tim Sprout wrote: How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations? With an ultraoscilloscope, of course.Â* Actually, any oscilloscope worth a hoot will display waveforms up to 500 kHz which, other than in exceptional cases, is all you need to worry about. You can still find 50 year old Hewlett-Packard scopes for under $25, and you can learn a lot about audio (and about oscilloscopes) with one. Surely most of even the cheapest nastiest (but perfectly adequate) scopes from the last 50 years do 10MHz ? Yep, my first scope was made well over 50 years ago and did 10MHz. But there have been some cheap audio scopes over the years that only did 1MHz. But of course even a 1MHz analog scope will still display waveforms well above that frequency at a reduced level. Trevor. Still have mine, a Heathkit 10-12 (500kc) scope I bought at a Ham Fest 40 years ago. It needs a little TLC, but still very functional. Always reminds me of the intro to "The Outer Limits" TV show. david --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#31
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
Phil Allison wrote:
Tim Sprout wrote: How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations? ** Strangely, an analog multimeter does the job quite well. My own 20kohms/V one is only -3dB at 150kHz on the 50V AC range, Old-style VU meters are pretty good at responding to ultrasonic and subsonic stuff. It's kind of cool using B&K mikes and watching the meters bouncing up and down from the air currents in the hall. However, if you're looking for very small ultrasonic sources (or even high frequency sonic ones, like small amounts of TV sweep leakage), you'll need something a bit tighter, like an FFT display. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#32
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
david gourley wrote:
Trevor said...news On 7/06/2018 1:05 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote: In article , Tim Sprout wrote: On 6/5/2018 6:24 AM, wrote: I can confirm that this type snake CAN create an ultrasonic oscillation that can quickly damage a power amp. How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations? Usually by the smoke. I once saw a Phase Linear amp shoot fire three feet in the air due to stability issues. It was very impressive but cut the band's act somewhat short. They weren't nick-named "Flame Linear's" for nothing. :-) The SAEs didn't seem to be far behind, either. Agreed, and SWTPC also was famous for instability. The Phase Linear, though, was famous because it just had such an enormous amount of power and such poor stability margins. The combination was bad. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#33
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
(Scott Dorsey) said...news
david gourley wrote: Trevor said...news On 7/06/2018 1:05 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote: In article , Tim Sprout wrote: On 6/5/2018 6:24 AM, wrote: I can confirm that this type snake CAN create an ultrasonic oscillation that can quickly damage a power amp. How does one detect ultrasonic oscillations? Usually by the smoke. I once saw a Phase Linear amp shoot fire three feet in the air due to stability issues. It was very impressive but cut the band's act somewhat short. They weren't nick-named "Flame Linear's" for nothing. :-) The SAEs didn't seem to be far behind, either. Agreed, and SWTPC also was famous for instability. The Phase Linear, though, was famous because it just had such an enormous amount of power and such poor stability margins. The combination was bad. --scott Yessir, those Tigers could roar ! david --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#34
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
david gourley wrote:
Still have mine, a Heathkit 10-12 (500kc) scope I bought at a Ham Fest 40 years ago. It needs a little TLC, but still very functional. ** That Heathkit model is an "IO-12" with 5 MHz bandwidth. The fastest sweep is 500kHz. Always reminds me of the intro to "The Outer Limits" TV show. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CtjhWhw2I8 ..... Phil |
#35
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables
On 6/7/2018 9:06 AM, Phil Allison wrote:
** Strangely, an analog multimeter does the job quite well. My own 20kohms/V one is only -3dB at 150kHz on the 50V AC range, Today, someone who doesn't already own a multimeter will almost certainly buy a digital one, and most all of those poop out somewhere between 200 and 500 Hz. I have one that measures frequency up to a few MHz, but not AC voltage. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio" - John Watkinson Drop by http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com now and then |
#36
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables
On 8/06/2018 12:50 PM, Mike Rivers wrote:
On 6/7/2018 9:06 AM, Phil Allison wrote: ** Strangely, an analog multimeter does the job quite well. My own 20kohms/V one is only -3dB at 150kHz on the 50V AC range, Today, someone who doesn't already own a multimeter will almost certainly buy a digital one, and most all of those poop out somewhere between 200 and 500 Hz. I have one that measures frequency up to a few MHz, but not AC voltage. My multimeter collection, HF responses starting to drop at: Fluke 114 4.5kHz Fluke 17B+ 2.5kHz Dick Smith (OEM ?) 10kHz versus Fluke 8050A benchtop 20kHz(+?), which is as high as my iPod Touch with SignalSuite goes ... geoff |
#37
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
Mike Rivers wrote:
Phil Allison wrote: ** Strangely, an analog multimeter does the job quite well. My own 20kohms/V one is only -3dB at 150kHz on the 50V AC range, Today, someone who doesn't already own a multimeter will almost certainly buy a digital one, and most all of those poop out somewhere between 200 and 500 Hz. ** An analogue multimeter is still vastly cheaper, easy enough to find and easy to carry about than any scope. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio" - John Watkinson ** Oh that is good !! ..... Phil |
#38
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables
On 6/7/2018 9:47 PM, geoff wrote:
My multimeter collection, HF responses starting to drop at: Fluke 114Â*Â*Â* 4.5kHz Fluke 17B+Â*Â*Â* 2.5kHz Dick Smith (OEM ?)Â*Â*Â* 10kHz That's pretty good. My Fluke 77 goes up to about 2 kHz if I recall correctly. I'm not near it at the moment. Fluke 8050A benchtopÂ*Â*Â* 20kHz(+?), which is as high as my iPod Touch with SignalSuite goes ... The iPad is limited to 20 kHz or so due to the fact that it's going through an A/D converter running at a sample rate of 44.1 or maybe 48 kHz. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio" - John Watkinson Drop by http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com now and then |
#39
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and mic cables
On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 20:50:02 -0400, Mike Rivers
wrote: On 6/7/2018 9:06 AM, Phil Allison wrote: ** Strangely, an analog multimeter does the job quite well. My own 20kohms/V one is only -3dB at 150kHz on the 50V AC range, Today, someone who doesn't already own a multimeter will almost certainly buy a digital one, and most all of those poop out somewhere between 200 and 500 Hz. I have one that measures frequency up to a few MHz, but not AC voltage. My Fluke meter does a lot better than that. I also have a very old analogue scope - but that lives in a cupboard awaiting the day it may fetch something on Ebay. My best ever move was taking advantage of a deal from Rigol. I bout one of their four-channel digital scopes and it is nothing short of brilliant. d --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#40
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Crosstalk in snake cable that include speaker cables and miccables
On 8/06/2018 2:12 PM, Mike Rivers wrote:
On 6/7/2018 9:47 PM, geoff wrote: My multimeter collection, HF responses starting to drop at: Fluke 114Â*Â*Â* 4.5kHz Fluke 17B+Â*Â*Â* 2.5kHz Dick Smith (OEM ?)Â*Â*Â* 10kHz That's pretty good. My Fluke 77 goes up to about 2 kHz if I recall correctly. I'm not near it at the moment. Fluke 8050A benchtopÂ*Â*Â* 20kHz(+?), which is as high as my iPod Touch with SignalSuite goes ... The iPad is limited to 20 kHz or so due to the fact that it's going through an A/D converter running at a sample rate of 44.1 or maybe 48 kHz. iPOD. Yeah. Only Apple product I own - got it especially for SignalSuite and Guitar Toolbax. Android didn't do that back then. geoff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crosstalk on snake | Pro Audio | |||
Feeder cables to the snake | Audio Opinions | |||
Feeder cables to the snake | Pro Audio | |||
Monster RCA cables vs. regular RCA cables for analog devices | Pro Audio | |||
FS: Speaker cables: Zu Cable, Discovery, RIPOFF ALERT! | Marketplace |