Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie enjoys his ST-70
I recently joined this group and bought my first toob power amp, a
Dynaco ST-70. I fully intended to start modifying it right away, but it sounds so much better than the solid state amp I was previously using that I think I will just listen to it for awhile before tearing into it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How many ST-70 will be left, after you molest yours?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
in article , Jon Yaeger at
wrote on 5/10/05 6:03 PM: in article , at wrote on 5/10/05 5:10 PM: How many ST-70 will be left, after you molest yours? Ya gotta die in order to resurrect, Harry. The choice is between leaving a thing vintage and original and silent vs. fixing what needs to be fixed and enjoying the music. I have second thoughts about deciding to perform surgery on an amp as common and pedestrian as a Dyna ST-70. And while you're at it, you ought to try the Welbourne Labs mod. Done two that way and both sounded fabulous! Jon That is, I "never" have second thoughts about it . . . |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Billy Boy (78's Rule!)" wrote in message ups.com... I recently joined this group and bought my first toob power amp, a Dynaco ST-70. I fully intended to start modifying it right away, but it sounds so much better than the solid state amp I was previously using that I think I will just listen to it for awhile before tearing into it. Long as I can remember, I've been a toob amp hobbiest. The first amp I built was right out of the back of an RCA RC26 tube manual that I lifted out of a college radio station in the mid '70's. It was the 30 watt job; 7868's, 7199, Stancor iron, Bud chassis and all. Only built one monoblock, worked great! Still, when the funds came available, I went and bought an expensive HK SS job to use with my new Martin speakers. One day, at a "friend of a friend's" house, I saw he had an ST-70 & PAS in his living room. When I asked about them, he said "want to buy 'em?, $50; I want to get something more modern". Turns out his dad put them together in the mid sixties. This was around ~1982, so $50 for pristine Dyna's wouldn't be the jaw dropper it would be today. In any case, after $50, getting them home, a cleaning and a bias adjustment on the power amp, I connected them to my Martins and turntable. After spinning Santana's Zebop, I was simply stunned! Well, after reconnecting the HK one more time to make sure I wasn't going nuts, the ST-70 stayed. Although I'm using my own design amp and preamp these days, I still have the ST-70 & PAS.. About 4-5 years ago, I stripped the ST-70 down to the bare chassis, cleaned and polished the chassis, reassembled the amp with new resistors, caps, and NOS tubes. Point is, whatever your opinion is regarding the ST-70, that damn little jewel might be responsible for more Toobie converts out there today than any other consumer amp. Probably because there are so damn many of 'em and, while not perfect, they do have the Magic. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Mark S wrote: "Billy Boy (78's Rule!)" wrote in message ups.com... I recently joined this group and bought my first toob power amp, a Dynaco ST-70. I fully intended to start modifying it right away, but it sounds so much better than the solid state amp I was previously using that I think I will just listen to it for awhile before tearing into it. Long as I can remember, I've been a toob amp hobbiest. The first amp I built was right out of the back of an RCA RC26 tube manual that I lifted out of a college radio station in the mid '70's. It was the 30 watt job; 7868's, 7199, Stancor iron, Bud chassis and all. Only built one monoblock, worked great! Still, when the funds came available, I went and bought an expensive HK SS job to use with my new Martin speakers. One day, at a "friend of a friend's" house, I saw he had an ST-70 & PAS in his living room. When I asked about them, he said "want to buy 'em?, $50; I want to get something more modern". Turns out his dad put them together in the mid sixties. This was around ~1982, so $50 for pristine Dyna's wouldn't be the jaw dropper it would be today. In any case, after $50, getting them home, a cleaning and a bias adjustment on the power amp, I connected them to my Martins and turntable. After spinning Santana's Zebop, I was simply stunned! Well, after reconnecting the HK one more time to make sure I wasn't going nuts, the ST-70 stayed. Although I'm using my own design amp and preamp these days, I still have the ST-70 & PAS.. About 4-5 years ago, I stripped the ST-70 down to the bare chassis, cleaned and polished the chassis, reassembled the amp with new resistors, caps, and NOS tubes. Point is, whatever your opinion is regarding the ST-70, that damn little jewel might be responsible for more Toobie converts out there today than any other consumer amp. Probably because there are so damn many of 'em and, while not perfect, they do have the Magic. The ST70 has a lousy power supply. The OPTs are better than Quad II or anything from Leak. So the potential for good or better sound than from the original amp which was built down to a price and not up to a quality is there, and a latter day perfectionist can take the amp design a little further than Dynaco dared, or could afford. As long as 3 mint specimens exist in 3 museum locations in the US, the species will always be inspectable, even though it will largely have become an extinct species, but then it will have evolved into something different. ST70's bootstrapped input pentode and CPI was a bean counter's delight, saving the maker the cost of a tube socket and tube and wiring and chassis real estate for each channel. The input stage isn't what I call a very nice idea, and I prefer a triode V1, and an LTP with triodes for V2 and V3. Rather than keep the 5AR4, better to junk it and use the space for large amounts of capacitance. Si diodes are fine, and with series resistors to drop the B+ down a bit to keep it as low as with the tube rectifier, and keep the peak charge currents into C1 of the CLC filter nice and low. The choke in the CLC filter should be retained, but since it is only 1 or 2 henrys, it will be all the more effective when the C1 and C2 of the revised CLC filter have been increased to 235 uF with a total of 4 seriesed 350v x 470 uf caps. Then there will be virtually no hum in the rails and the IMD caused by PS ripple during class AB operation will vanish. The Magic isn't unique to Dynaco; Magic is sprinkled into ears all over the world by other tube designs, and is the principle reason why tube amps have not gone the way of the wind up gramophone. So basically, its very easy to improve on what Dynaco offered, and those who revise such amps sensibly need not feel remorse, guilt, or depression, since they do not warrant being called sacred objects, and they will not spoil the Magic. Patrick Turner. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I also like the Wellbourne mod, and the Van Alstine as well. Check out
both. "Jon Yaeger" wrote in message ... in article , at wrote on 5/10/05 5:10 PM: How many ST-70 will be left, after you molest yours? Ya gotta die in order to resurrect, Harry. The choice is between leaving a thing vintage and original and silent vs. fixing what needs to be fixed and enjoying the music. I have second thoughts about deciding to perform surgery on an amp as common and pedestrian as a Dyna ST-70. And while you're at it, you ought to try the Welbourne Labs mod. Done two that way and both sounded fabulous! Jon |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Newbie questions: CD jukebox, software, soundcard | Tech | |||
newbie question, tape player to transfer voice recordings from tape to CD | General | |||
Newbie question: Any good resources on audio production? | Tech | |||
Newbie question: Any good resources on audio production? | Tech | |||
Newbie question 12s vs. 10s | Car Audio |