Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A question about dynamic and condenser microphones and maths
Hey. This might be a stupid question, but here goes.
A dynamic microphone's output, in voltage, is proportional to dx/dt (where x is diaphragm displacement), right? And a condenser's output is proportional to x, right? So in theory (disregarding, for the moment, differences in capsules, components, sensitivity, etc), if you differentiated the signal from a condenser in terms of t, you'd get a dynamic-like signal, and if you integrated the signal from a dynamic mic in terms of t, you'd get a condenser-like signal, right? In some applications, a condenser might sound better but a dynamic might be more practical due to high SPL or the risk of damaging an expensive condenser etc. Has anyone ever tried to design a plugin that could integrate or differentiate a sound file's signal (numerically, obviously, not analytically)? Maybe even in realtime? Or am I just being stupid... and is this how mic/speaker simulators work? I'd be interested to hear any thoughts. -- tj hertz |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Budget Condenser Microphones | Pro Audio | |||
Some Recording Techniques | Pro Audio | |||
question regarding beyer dynamic condenser mic mc740 | Pro Audio | |||
What's in your mic cabinet? | Pro Audio |