Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#201
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Powell" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Powell" wrote in message After reading your post I have no idea why you're opposed to "nondestructive" editing technology that Sonic Foundry/Sony programs utilize. Their programs can be downloaded for evaluation. Perhaps you should do some homework. For one thing Powell you obviously can't read, because I just described for you the rich selection of nondestructive features of Audition/CE. Actually you said "generally non-destructive." So what? I have no problems with people who choose SF. And why should you? No reason other than the fact that you claimed I did. Thanks for destroying your own line of attack, Powell. You lack empirical experiences with SF 5, 6, 7 or Audition. Horsefeathers. First, I have had empirical experience with SF. Since it can't do multitracking and I multitrack extensively, it is irrelevant to me. Secondly, I do in fact own and use Audition. No attempt was made to ram Audition down the throat. Powell, you're the guy who decided to turn a friendly discussion of audio editors into a duel to the death. Actually I responded to George's question. You inserted yourself and answered in your typical dehumanizing fashion devoid of any meaningful answers. Powell, while this is untrue, even if it were true it doesn't change the fact that you turned this discussion into a duel to the death I see a lot of evidence that SF has been playing "catch up" by copying features that Audition has had for a long time. Hehehe... oh right, conspiracy theories. What conspiracy? I made factual comments that were backed up with a direct quote from the SF web site. SF lacked 24/96 support for years and years, while CEPro has always been able to handle any format up to 32/999. BTW Powell, wanna tell me... Why would I bother , mr. Narcissist? Prerequisite radical subjectivist personal attack noted. |
#202
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Arny Krueger" wrote After reading your post I have no idea why you're opposed to "nondestructive" editing technology that Sonic Foundry/Sony programs utilize. Their programs can be downloaded for evaluation. Perhaps you should do some homework. For one thing Powell you obviously can't read, because I just described for you the rich selection of nondestructive features of Audition/CE. Actually you said "generally non-destructive." So what? Define specific attributes of "generally non-destructive" including program and version, please? I have no problems with people who choose SF. And why should you? No reason other than the fact that you claimed I did. Thanks for destroying your own line of attack, Powell. You lack empirical experiences with SF 5, 6, 7 or Audition. Horsefeathers. First, I have had empirical experience with SF. Yes, I searched outside this new group and found “Since it's going to cost me nothing to upgrade, and I get to pick the one I like after I see Audition, I'm sure I'll do it.” and “I got Audition because of curiosity and because it cost me so little to play.” It always comes down to the money, doesn’t it, Arny ? In regards to your empirical claim of knowledgeable use of Sound Forge/Sony you wrote “I have briefly used a lite verison of SF, but really didn't see enough of a difference to justify switching” and this “I don't have a ton of experience with SF” and “the SF people haven't sent me a copy of SF5 to to review, and I use CoolEdit Pro.” Obviously no 5,6 or 7 experience. The light version you refereed to was Sound Forge XP 4.5 designed for W95. Your SF knowledge base is really quite pathetic, mr. Know-it-all. Given how cheap you are and your claim of knowledgeable advice there is no reason for your apathy other than narcissism. It costs you nothing to download and evaluate the product (SF7). Do some homework before you try to edify others. Actually I responded to George's question. You inserted yourself and answered in your typical dehumanizing fashion devoid of any meaningful answers. Powell, while this is untrue, even if it were true it doesn't change the fact that you turned this discussion into a duel to the death "duel to the death"... oh please, you're not that important. I see a lot of evidence that SF has been playing "catch up" by copying features that Audition has had for a long time. Hehehe... oh right, conspiracy theories. What conspiracy? I made factual comments that were backed up with a direct quote from the SF web site. SF lacked 24/96 support for years and years, while CEPro has always been able to handle any format up to 32/999. Well yes, what did you expect from Sound Forge XP 4.5 it was designed for W95. Please edify yourself. http://mediasoftware.sonypictures.co...FeatureID=5799 BTW Powell, wanna tell me... Why would I bother , mr. Narcissist? Prerequisite radical subjectivist personal attack noted. Hehehe... I'm just looking out for your *lack* of spiritual growth. |
#203
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Arny Krueger" wrote After reading your post I have no idea why you're opposed to "nondestructive" editing technology that Sonic Foundry/Sony programs utilize. Their programs can be downloaded for evaluation. Perhaps you should do some homework. For one thing Powell you obviously can't read, because I just described for you the rich selection of nondestructive features of Audition/CE. Actually you said "generally non-destructive." So what? Define specific attributes of "generally non-destructive" including program and version, please? I have no problems with people who choose SF. And why should you? No reason other than the fact that you claimed I did. Thanks for destroying your own line of attack, Powell. You lack empirical experiences with SF 5, 6, 7 or Audition. Horsefeathers. First, I have had empirical experience with SF. Yes, I searched outside this new group and found “Since it's going to cost me nothing to upgrade, and I get to pick the one I like after I see Audition, I'm sure I'll do it.” and “I got Audition because of curiosity and because it cost me so little to play.” It always comes down to the money, doesn’t it, Arny ? In regards to your empirical claim of knowledgeable use of Sound Forge/Sony you wrote “I have briefly used a lite verison of SF, but really didn't see enough of a difference to justify switching” and this “I don't have a ton of experience with SF” and “the SF people haven't sent me a copy of SF5 to to review, and I use CoolEdit Pro.” Obviously no 5,6 or 7 experience. The light version you refereed to was Sound Forge XP 4.5 designed for W95. Your SF knowledge base is really quite pathetic, mr. Know-it-all. Given how cheap you are and your claim of knowledgeable advice there is no reason for your apathy other than narcissism. It costs you nothing to download and evaluate the product (SF7). Do some homework before you try to edify others. Actually I responded to George's question. You inserted yourself and answered in your typical dehumanizing fashion devoid of any meaningful answers. Powell, while this is untrue, even if it were true it doesn't change the fact that you turned this discussion into a duel to the death "duel to the death"... oh please, you're not that important. I see a lot of evidence that SF has been playing "catch up" by copying features that Audition has had for a long time. Hehehe... oh right, conspiracy theories. What conspiracy? I made factual comments that were backed up with a direct quote from the SF web site. SF lacked 24/96 support for years and years, while CEPro has always been able to handle any format up to 32/999. Well yes, what did you expect from Sound Forge XP 4.5 it was designed for W95. Please edify yourself. http://mediasoftware.sonypictures.co...FeatureID=5799 BTW Powell, wanna tell me... Why would I bother , mr. Narcissist? Prerequisite radical subjectivist personal attack noted. Hehehe... I'm just looking out for your *lack* of spiritual growth. |
#204
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Arny Krueger" wrote After reading your post I have no idea why you're opposed to "nondestructive" editing technology that Sonic Foundry/Sony programs utilize. Their programs can be downloaded for evaluation. Perhaps you should do some homework. For one thing Powell you obviously can't read, because I just described for you the rich selection of nondestructive features of Audition/CE. Actually you said "generally non-destructive." So what? Define specific attributes of "generally non-destructive" including program and version, please? I have no problems with people who choose SF. And why should you? No reason other than the fact that you claimed I did. Thanks for destroying your own line of attack, Powell. You lack empirical experiences with SF 5, 6, 7 or Audition. Horsefeathers. First, I have had empirical experience with SF. Yes, I searched outside this new group and found “Since it's going to cost me nothing to upgrade, and I get to pick the one I like after I see Audition, I'm sure I'll do it.” and “I got Audition because of curiosity and because it cost me so little to play.” It always comes down to the money, doesn’t it, Arny ? In regards to your empirical claim of knowledgeable use of Sound Forge/Sony you wrote “I have briefly used a lite verison of SF, but really didn't see enough of a difference to justify switching” and this “I don't have a ton of experience with SF” and “the SF people haven't sent me a copy of SF5 to to review, and I use CoolEdit Pro.” Obviously no 5,6 or 7 experience. The light version you refereed to was Sound Forge XP 4.5 designed for W95. Your SF knowledge base is really quite pathetic, mr. Know-it-all. Given how cheap you are and your claim of knowledgeable advice there is no reason for your apathy other than narcissism. It costs you nothing to download and evaluate the product (SF7). Do some homework before you try to edify others. Actually I responded to George's question. You inserted yourself and answered in your typical dehumanizing fashion devoid of any meaningful answers. Powell, while this is untrue, even if it were true it doesn't change the fact that you turned this discussion into a duel to the death "duel to the death"... oh please, you're not that important. I see a lot of evidence that SF has been playing "catch up" by copying features that Audition has had for a long time. Hehehe... oh right, conspiracy theories. What conspiracy? I made factual comments that were backed up with a direct quote from the SF web site. SF lacked 24/96 support for years and years, while CEPro has always been able to handle any format up to 32/999. Well yes, what did you expect from Sound Forge XP 4.5 it was designed for W95. Please edify yourself. http://mediasoftware.sonypictures.co...FeatureID=5799 BTW Powell, wanna tell me... Why would I bother , mr. Narcissist? Prerequisite radical subjectivist personal attack noted. Hehehe... I'm just looking out for your *lack* of spiritual growth. |
#205
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Arny Krueger" wrote After reading your post I have no idea why you're opposed to "nondestructive" editing technology that Sonic Foundry/Sony programs utilize. Their programs can be downloaded for evaluation. Perhaps you should do some homework. For one thing Powell you obviously can't read, because I just described for you the rich selection of nondestructive features of Audition/CE. Actually you said "generally non-destructive." So what? Define specific attributes of "generally non-destructive" including program and version, please? I have no problems with people who choose SF. And why should you? No reason other than the fact that you claimed I did. Thanks for destroying your own line of attack, Powell. You lack empirical experiences with SF 5, 6, 7 or Audition. Horsefeathers. First, I have had empirical experience with SF. Yes, I searched outside this new group and found “Since it's going to cost me nothing to upgrade, and I get to pick the one I like after I see Audition, I'm sure I'll do it.” and “I got Audition because of curiosity and because it cost me so little to play.” It always comes down to the money, doesn’t it, Arny ? In regards to your empirical claim of knowledgeable use of Sound Forge/Sony you wrote “I have briefly used a lite verison of SF, but really didn't see enough of a difference to justify switching” and this “I don't have a ton of experience with SF” and “the SF people haven't sent me a copy of SF5 to to review, and I use CoolEdit Pro.” Obviously no 5,6 or 7 experience. The light version you refereed to was Sound Forge XP 4.5 designed for W95. Your SF knowledge base is really quite pathetic, mr. Know-it-all. Given how cheap you are and your claim of knowledgeable advice there is no reason for your apathy other than narcissism. It costs you nothing to download and evaluate the product (SF7). Do some homework before you try to edify others. Actually I responded to George's question. You inserted yourself and answered in your typical dehumanizing fashion devoid of any meaningful answers. Powell, while this is untrue, even if it were true it doesn't change the fact that you turned this discussion into a duel to the death "duel to the death"... oh please, you're not that important. I see a lot of evidence that SF has been playing "catch up" by copying features that Audition has had for a long time. Hehehe... oh right, conspiracy theories. What conspiracy? I made factual comments that were backed up with a direct quote from the SF web site. SF lacked 24/96 support for years and years, while CEPro has always been able to handle any format up to 32/999. Well yes, what did you expect from Sound Forge XP 4.5 it was designed for W95. Please edify yourself. http://mediasoftware.sonypictures.co...FeatureID=5799 BTW Powell, wanna tell me... Why would I bother , mr. Narcissist? Prerequisite radical subjectivist personal attack noted. Hehehe... I'm just looking out for your *lack* of spiritual growth. |
#206
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"The Artist" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. I've been do it for years with Audition/CE and I do it all the time - was doing it today a few hours ago. For a professional solution consider ProTools, SX, SawPlus, Vegas, Bias, Logic, Sonar, Samplitude... ...or Audition or several others. |
#207
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"The Artist" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. I've been do it for years with Audition/CE and I do it all the time - was doing it today a few hours ago. For a professional solution consider ProTools, SX, SawPlus, Vegas, Bias, Logic, Sonar, Samplitude... ...or Audition or several others. |
#208
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"The Artist" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. I've been do it for years with Audition/CE and I do it all the time - was doing it today a few hours ago. For a professional solution consider ProTools, SX, SawPlus, Vegas, Bias, Logic, Sonar, Samplitude... ...or Audition or several others. |
#209
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"The Artist" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. I've been do it for years with Audition/CE and I do it all the time - was doing it today a few hours ago. For a professional solution consider ProTools, SX, SawPlus, Vegas, Bias, Logic, Sonar, Samplitude... ...or Audition or several others. |
#210
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. The original poster (SPS22) wrote: "Well, I am essentially trying to convert cassettes to CD's". What benefit is there for utilizing "12 track multitrack" for the user's two channel application, Arny? Zero, none, nada, zip. |
#211
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. The original poster (SPS22) wrote: "Well, I am essentially trying to convert cassettes to CD's". What benefit is there for utilizing "12 track multitrack" for the user's two channel application, Arny? Zero, none, nada, zip. |
#212
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. The original poster (SPS22) wrote: "Well, I am essentially trying to convert cassettes to CD's". What benefit is there for utilizing "12 track multitrack" for the user's two channel application, Arny? Zero, none, nada, zip. |
#213
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. The original poster (SPS22) wrote: "Well, I am essentially trying to convert cassettes to CD's". What benefit is there for utilizing "12 track multitrack" for the user's two channel application, Arny? Zero, none, nada, zip. |
#214
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Powell" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. The original poster (SPS22) wrote: "Well, I am essentially trying to convert cassettes to CD's". What benefit is there for utilizing "12 track multitrack" for the user's two channel application, Arny? Zero, none, nada, zip. Nice job Powell, of trying to avoid taking responsibility for your attempts to move the discussion off of the original topic. Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job of digitizing most cassettes, as would Audacity and Goldwave. BTW Powell, why not tell us about your vast empirical experiences with digitizing cassettes. I've been doing them for years with CE. |
#215
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Powell" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. The original poster (SPS22) wrote: "Well, I am essentially trying to convert cassettes to CD's". What benefit is there for utilizing "12 track multitrack" for the user's two channel application, Arny? Zero, none, nada, zip. Nice job Powell, of trying to avoid taking responsibility for your attempts to move the discussion off of the original topic. Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job of digitizing most cassettes, as would Audacity and Goldwave. BTW Powell, why not tell us about your vast empirical experiences with digitizing cassettes. I've been doing them for years with CE. |
#216
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Powell" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. The original poster (SPS22) wrote: "Well, I am essentially trying to convert cassettes to CD's". What benefit is there for utilizing "12 track multitrack" for the user's two channel application, Arny? Zero, none, nada, zip. Nice job Powell, of trying to avoid taking responsibility for your attempts to move the discussion off of the original topic. Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job of digitizing most cassettes, as would Audacity and Goldwave. BTW Powell, why not tell us about your vast empirical experiences with digitizing cassettes. I've been doing them for years with CE. |
#217
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Powell" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. The original poster (SPS22) wrote: "Well, I am essentially trying to convert cassettes to CD's". What benefit is there for utilizing "12 track multitrack" for the user's two channel application, Arny? Zero, none, nada, zip. Nice job Powell, of trying to avoid taking responsibility for your attempts to move the discussion off of the original topic. Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job of digitizing most cassettes, as would Audacity and Goldwave. BTW Powell, why not tell us about your vast empirical experiences with digitizing cassettes. I've been doing them for years with CE. |
#218
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. The original poster (SPS22) wrote: "Well, I am essentially trying to convert cassettes to CD's". What benefit is there for utilizing "12 track multitrack" for the user's two channel application, Arny? Zero, none, nada, zip. Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job of digitizing most cassettes, as would Audacity and Goldwave. You’re still trying to make a decision for the consumer. Like your amps=amps mentality you believe that technical specifications and cost are the sole determiners in the selection process. You ignore many other deal breakers/makers like the software suitability for the skill level of the user. Personal preferences play a significant role in the user's long term satisfaction. Each program you name-dropped has its own unique menus and intuitiveness. The audiophile approach would be to try-before-you- buy. You’re just trying to put your hat on everyone else's head. So in answer to your statement “Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job” I still reply, "How would you know?" BTW Powell, why not tell us about your vast empirical experiences with digitizing cassettes. I've been doing them for years with CE. Quack, quack, quack... |
#219
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. The original poster (SPS22) wrote: "Well, I am essentially trying to convert cassettes to CD's". What benefit is there for utilizing "12 track multitrack" for the user's two channel application, Arny? Zero, none, nada, zip. Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job of digitizing most cassettes, as would Audacity and Goldwave. You’re still trying to make a decision for the consumer. Like your amps=amps mentality you believe that technical specifications and cost are the sole determiners in the selection process. You ignore many other deal breakers/makers like the software suitability for the skill level of the user. Personal preferences play a significant role in the user's long term satisfaction. Each program you name-dropped has its own unique menus and intuitiveness. The audiophile approach would be to try-before-you- buy. You’re just trying to put your hat on everyone else's head. So in answer to your statement “Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job” I still reply, "How would you know?" BTW Powell, why not tell us about your vast empirical experiences with digitizing cassettes. I've been doing them for years with CE. Quack, quack, quack... |
#220
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. The original poster (SPS22) wrote: "Well, I am essentially trying to convert cassettes to CD's". What benefit is there for utilizing "12 track multitrack" for the user's two channel application, Arny? Zero, none, nada, zip. Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job of digitizing most cassettes, as would Audacity and Goldwave. You’re still trying to make a decision for the consumer. Like your amps=amps mentality you believe that technical specifications and cost are the sole determiners in the selection process. You ignore many other deal breakers/makers like the software suitability for the skill level of the user. Personal preferences play a significant role in the user's long term satisfaction. Each program you name-dropped has its own unique menus and intuitiveness. The audiophile approach would be to try-before-you- buy. You’re just trying to put your hat on everyone else's head. So in answer to your statement “Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job” I still reply, "How would you know?" BTW Powell, why not tell us about your vast empirical experiences with digitizing cassettes. I've been doing them for years with CE. Quack, quack, quack... |
#221
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. The original poster (SPS22) wrote: "Well, I am essentially trying to convert cassettes to CD's". What benefit is there for utilizing "12 track multitrack" for the user's two channel application, Arny? Zero, none, nada, zip. Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job of digitizing most cassettes, as would Audacity and Goldwave. You’re still trying to make a decision for the consumer. Like your amps=amps mentality you believe that technical specifications and cost are the sole determiners in the selection process. You ignore many other deal breakers/makers like the software suitability for the skill level of the user. Personal preferences play a significant role in the user's long term satisfaction. Each program you name-dropped has its own unique menus and intuitiveness. The audiophile approach would be to try-before-you- buy. You’re just trying to put your hat on everyone else's head. So in answer to your statement “Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job” I still reply, "How would you know?" BTW Powell, why not tell us about your vast empirical experiences with digitizing cassettes. I've been doing them for years with CE. Quack, quack, quack... |
#222
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Powell" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. The original poster (SPS22) wrote: "Well, I am essentially trying to convert cassettes to CD's". What benefit is there for utilizing "12 track multitrack" for the user's two channel application, Arny? Zero, none, nada, zip. Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job of digitizing most cassettes, as would Audacity and Goldwave. You're still trying to make a decision for the consumer. How, by NOT ramming SF down his throat? Like your amps=amps mentality you believe that technical specifications and cost are the sole determiners in the selection process. Absolute nonsense. You ignore many other deal breakers/makers like the software suitability for the skill level of the user. A figment of your imagination, Powell. BTW Powell, tell us about your empirical experiences with Goldwave and Audacity. Personal preferences play a significant role in the user's long term satisfaction. Each program you name-dropped has its own unique menus and intuitiveness. Right, and both Goldwave and Audacity are distributed for free. Goldwave is freely distributed as mildly-limited shareware and Audacity is out-and-out freeware. The audiophile approach would be to try-before-you- buy. Entirely feasible with a number of the alternatives I listed. You're just trying to put your hat on everyone else's head. How, by NOT shoving SF down people's throat? So in answer to your statement "Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job" I still reply, "How would you know?" Been there, done that. BTW Powell, why not tell us about your vast empirical experiences with digitizing cassettes. I've been doing them for years with CE. Quack, quack, quack... This non-answer speaks for itself. |
#223
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Powell" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. The original poster (SPS22) wrote: "Well, I am essentially trying to convert cassettes to CD's". What benefit is there for utilizing "12 track multitrack" for the user's two channel application, Arny? Zero, none, nada, zip. Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job of digitizing most cassettes, as would Audacity and Goldwave. You're still trying to make a decision for the consumer. How, by NOT ramming SF down his throat? Like your amps=amps mentality you believe that technical specifications and cost are the sole determiners in the selection process. Absolute nonsense. You ignore many other deal breakers/makers like the software suitability for the skill level of the user. A figment of your imagination, Powell. BTW Powell, tell us about your empirical experiences with Goldwave and Audacity. Personal preferences play a significant role in the user's long term satisfaction. Each program you name-dropped has its own unique menus and intuitiveness. Right, and both Goldwave and Audacity are distributed for free. Goldwave is freely distributed as mildly-limited shareware and Audacity is out-and-out freeware. The audiophile approach would be to try-before-you- buy. Entirely feasible with a number of the alternatives I listed. You're just trying to put your hat on everyone else's head. How, by NOT shoving SF down people's throat? So in answer to your statement "Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job" I still reply, "How would you know?" Been there, done that. BTW Powell, why not tell us about your vast empirical experiences with digitizing cassettes. I've been doing them for years with CE. Quack, quack, quack... This non-answer speaks for itself. |
#224
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Powell" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. The original poster (SPS22) wrote: "Well, I am essentially trying to convert cassettes to CD's". What benefit is there for utilizing "12 track multitrack" for the user's two channel application, Arny? Zero, none, nada, zip. Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job of digitizing most cassettes, as would Audacity and Goldwave. You're still trying to make a decision for the consumer. How, by NOT ramming SF down his throat? Like your amps=amps mentality you believe that technical specifications and cost are the sole determiners in the selection process. Absolute nonsense. You ignore many other deal breakers/makers like the software suitability for the skill level of the user. A figment of your imagination, Powell. BTW Powell, tell us about your empirical experiences with Goldwave and Audacity. Personal preferences play a significant role in the user's long term satisfaction. Each program you name-dropped has its own unique menus and intuitiveness. Right, and both Goldwave and Audacity are distributed for free. Goldwave is freely distributed as mildly-limited shareware and Audacity is out-and-out freeware. The audiophile approach would be to try-before-you- buy. Entirely feasible with a number of the alternatives I listed. You're just trying to put your hat on everyone else's head. How, by NOT shoving SF down people's throat? So in answer to your statement "Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job" I still reply, "How would you know?" Been there, done that. BTW Powell, why not tell us about your vast empirical experiences with digitizing cassettes. I've been doing them for years with CE. Quack, quack, quack... This non-answer speaks for itself. |
#225
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Powell" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote "Arny Krueger" emitted : BTW Powell, wanna tell me how to do 12 track multitrack recording and production with SF? Why ask such a stupid question? It was never designed for that purpose. They have Vegas for that. You know that, I know that, but Powell keeps ranting and raving about SF. The original poster (SPS22) wrote: "Well, I am essentially trying to convert cassettes to CD's". What benefit is there for utilizing "12 track multitrack" for the user's two channel application, Arny? Zero, none, nada, zip. Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job of digitizing most cassettes, as would Audacity and Goldwave. You're still trying to make a decision for the consumer. How, by NOT ramming SF down his throat? Like your amps=amps mentality you believe that technical specifications and cost are the sole determiners in the selection process. Absolute nonsense. You ignore many other deal breakers/makers like the software suitability for the skill level of the user. A figment of your imagination, Powell. BTW Powell, tell us about your empirical experiences with Goldwave and Audacity. Personal preferences play a significant role in the user's long term satisfaction. Each program you name-dropped has its own unique menus and intuitiveness. Right, and both Goldwave and Audacity are distributed for free. Goldwave is freely distributed as mildly-limited shareware and Audacity is out-and-out freeware. The audiophile approach would be to try-before-you- buy. Entirely feasible with a number of the alternatives I listed. You're just trying to put your hat on everyone else's head. How, by NOT shoving SF down people's throat? So in answer to your statement "Both CE/Audition and SF would do a fine job" I still reply, "How would you know?" Been there, done that. BTW Powell, why not tell us about your vast empirical experiences with digitizing cassettes. I've been doing them for years with CE. Quack, quack, quack... This non-answer speaks for itself. |
#226
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"The Artist" wrote in message
Put Audition and the several others at the bottom of the list to get a true reflection of the pecking order in the market place for multitrack production facilities. Prove it. |
#227
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"The Artist" wrote in message
Put Audition and the several others at the bottom of the list to get a true reflection of the pecking order in the market place for multitrack production facilities. Prove it. |
#228
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"The Artist" wrote in message
Put Audition and the several others at the bottom of the list to get a true reflection of the pecking order in the market place for multitrack production facilities. Prove it. |
#229
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"The Artist" wrote in message
Put Audition and the several others at the bottom of the list to get a true reflection of the pecking order in the market place for multitrack production facilities. Prove it. |
#230
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"The Artist" says to Arny:. It's not like you make an income from audio production, after all. Ouch!! ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#231
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"The Artist" says to Arny:. It's not like you make an income from audio production, after all. Ouch!! ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#232
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"The Artist" says to Arny:. It's not like you make an income from audio production, after all. Ouch!! ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#233
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"The Artist" says to Arny:. It's not like you make an income from audio production, after all. Ouch!! ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#234
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
"The Artist" says to Arny:. It's not like you make an income from audio production, after all. Ouch!! Not at all. It simply shows how desperate Dormer is to be overbearing, officious and insulting. Dormer seems to be going over the top with his habit of being presumptuous. He now fancies himself "The Artist". LOL! If the posts on rec.audio.pro and the Adobe audition newsgroups are any indication, there are a great many professionals who rely on CE/Audition. One area where it seems to be heavily used is broadcasting. There's even a whole newsgroup devoted to that one application of Audition. Adobe if nothing else, knows who their market is! |
#235
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
"The Artist" says to Arny:. It's not like you make an income from audio production, after all. Ouch!! Not at all. It simply shows how desperate Dormer is to be overbearing, officious and insulting. Dormer seems to be going over the top with his habit of being presumptuous. He now fancies himself "The Artist". LOL! If the posts on rec.audio.pro and the Adobe audition newsgroups are any indication, there are a great many professionals who rely on CE/Audition. One area where it seems to be heavily used is broadcasting. There's even a whole newsgroup devoted to that one application of Audition. Adobe if nothing else, knows who their market is! |
#236
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
"The Artist" says to Arny:. It's not like you make an income from audio production, after all. Ouch!! Not at all. It simply shows how desperate Dormer is to be overbearing, officious and insulting. Dormer seems to be going over the top with his habit of being presumptuous. He now fancies himself "The Artist". LOL! If the posts on rec.audio.pro and the Adobe audition newsgroups are any indication, there are a great many professionals who rely on CE/Audition. One area where it seems to be heavily used is broadcasting. There's even a whole newsgroup devoted to that one application of Audition. Adobe if nothing else, knows who their market is! |
#237
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
"The Artist" says to Arny:. It's not like you make an income from audio production, after all. Ouch!! Not at all. It simply shows how desperate Dormer is to be overbearing, officious and insulting. Dormer seems to be going over the top with his habit of being presumptuous. He now fancies himself "The Artist". LOL! If the posts on rec.audio.pro and the Adobe audition newsgroups are any indication, there are a great many professionals who rely on CE/Audition. One area where it seems to be heavily used is broadcasting. There's even a whole newsgroup devoted to that one application of Audition. Adobe if nothing else, knows who their market is! |
#238
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message "The Artist" says to Arny:. It's not like you make an income from audio production, after all. Ouch!! Not at all. It simply shows how desperate Dormer is to be overbearing, officious and insulting. Dormer seems to be going over the top with his habit of being presumptuous. He now fancies himself "The Artist". LOL! Beats "Arny the Internet Dork". ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#239
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message "The Artist" says to Arny:. It's not like you make an income from audio production, after all. Ouch!! Not at all. It simply shows how desperate Dormer is to be overbearing, officious and insulting. Dormer seems to be going over the top with his habit of being presumptuous. He now fancies himself "The Artist". LOL! Beats "Arny the Internet Dork". ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#240
|
|||
|
|||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message "The Artist" says to Arny:. It's not like you make an income from audio production, after all. Ouch!! Not at all. It simply shows how desperate Dormer is to be overbearing, officious and insulting. Dormer seems to be going over the top with his habit of being presumptuous. He now fancies himself "The Artist". LOL! Beats "Arny the Internet Dork". ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sound analyse software | Pro Audio | |||
[OT] Sound measure software with equivalent sound level meter? | Pro Audio | |||
Sound vs. Audio | Pro Audio | |||
What Software for Editing Sound on PC | General | |||
science vs. pseudo-science | High End Audio |