Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#481
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DR-40 vs. H4n (now something completely different)
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Right I'm happy without what Microsoft calls "support", but you can't get an OEM/non support copy without buying a new computer. Just licensing sillyness IMO. Not true in the US, as I prove with this link: http://www.microcenter.com/single_pr...uct_id=0361167 I'm sorry, what is that proving again? That it costs far more than what Dell pay, and that you do need to purchase it with a new computer by the terms of the license. Isn't that what I said already? Trevor. |
#482
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DR-40 vs. H4n (now something completely different)
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... There was a time when dealers (mostly the mail order houses) would well an OEM copy of Windows by throwing a defunct disk drive or graphics card into the package on the basis that they were selling it along with parts to build a computer. One time I went that route, and the qualifying hardware was a highly obsolete and tiny CPU fan. Which was fine then, but most dealers won't do that any more so I can only assume Microsoft cracked down on them and threatened their supply. Trevor. |
#483
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DR-40 vs. H4n
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:35:13 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:
However, the 64-bit address space will be exhausted just about as quickly as the 32-bit space, mainly because of poor software engineering. It's a bit like IPv6, which will be exhausted about as quickly as IPv4, because of poor allocation techniques. I haven't yet read a reasoned critique of IPV6's allocation scheme, but I have a suspicion that the plan behind increasing IP address lengths by a factor of 4 instead of (as you might expect) 2 was to make sure they couldn't run out in any foreseeable length of time. 128 bits is a lot of addresses, however you cut the cake. Note that even Ethernet addresses (so called 'MAC' addresses) have had a good run. Every piece of Ethernet kit ever made has a world-wide unique address, with manufacturers allocated blocks by IEEE, and I haven't heard any rumours they are likely to run out soon, and they are 'only' 48 bits. -- Anahata -+- http://www.treewind.co.uk Home: 01638 720444 Mob: 07976 263827 |
#484
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DR-40 vs. H4n
Anahata writes:
I haven't yet read a reasoned critique of IPV6's allocation scheme, but I have a suspicion that the plan behind increasing IP address lengths by a factor of 4 instead of (as you might expect) 2 was to make sure they couldn't run out in any foreseeable length of time. 128 bits is a lot of addresses, however you cut the cake. They can easily run out. The problem is that engineers think in linear terms when looking at address spaces, but the results are exponential. For example, the 128-bit IPv6 address has already been divided into two 64-bit fields for some purposes. Intuitively, the people doing this "feel" as if the address space has been reduced by half, but it hasn't. It has been reduced by more than 99.99999999999999999%. Continued allocation of fields within the 128-bit address will continue to reduce the address space exponentially until there is nothing left. That's exactly the same mistake that was made with 32-bit addresses. Engineers and others often forget that a linear reduction in address size is an exponential reduction in address space. Encoding information into the address itself dramatically restricts the number of addresses available. I've seen software engineers exhaust huge virtual address spaces in the same way. Often engineers think that an address space of n bits equates to "infinite" and allocate virtual space serially and generously, and are then surprised when systems crash because they've run out of address space. Note that even Ethernet addresses (so called 'MAC' addresses) have had a good run. Every piece of Ethernet kit ever made has a world-wide unique address, with manufacturers allocated blocks by IEEE, and I haven't heard any rumours they are likely to run out soon, and they are 'only' 48 bits. The 48-bit addresses are expected to last until 2100 by the IEEE. This sounds generous until you realize that a 48-bit address space assigned serially would accommodate 281,474,976,710,656 Ethernet cards. The address space has been severely (exponentially) reduced by linear allocation of address bits. |