Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ping: John Byrns, was unity gain annode follower
Thanks for the link John, got a question though.
If I understand it correctly, your annode load combination, capacitively coupled through the 0.1 (C21) coupling cap must approach the 1.5k cathode resistor in value for the circuit to be unity gain, correct? In looking at V6-A and we remove the connection of R33 and grid connection going down to R210, I don't need that stuff, we have the 2.2M (R34), 220k (R31) in series with 220k (R29) all in parallel with the 100k plate resistor (R30) and we want the resulting value to approach the 1.5k cathode resistor...right? Assuming my sub will be around 20k load at the RCA jack, it doesn't appear to be low enough in value to approach the value of the cathode resistor for unity gain? Also, I guess you need the high value of series resistance 220k (R29) so that the feedback/load value combination doesn't load the loudness pot and input signal too much? Is it possible to reduce the plate resistor more and thus loading the dynamic plate resistance (ra) more since we aren't using this as a 'gain' stage? If anyone else is looking, the schematic is here http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/pics/LC-21-23.jpg Thanks, Gilbert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Gilbert Bates
wrote: Thanks for the link John, got a question though. If I understand it correctly, your annode load combination, capacitively coupled through the 0.1 (C21) coupling cap must approach the 1.5k cathode resistor in value for the circuit to be unity gain, correct? In looking at V6-A and we remove the connection of R33 and grid connection going down to R210, I don't need that stuff, we have the 2.2M (R34), 220k (R31) in series with 220k (R29) all in parallel with the 100k plate resistor (R30) and we want the resulting value to approach the 1.5k cathode resistor...right? Assuming my sub will be around 20k load at the RCA jack, it doesn't appear to be low enough in value to approach the value of the cathode resistor for unity gain? Also, I guess you need the high value of series resistance 220k (R29) so that the feedback/load value combination doesn't load the loudness pot and input signal too much? Is it possible to reduce the plate resistor more and thus loading the dynamic plate resistance (ra) more since we aren't using this as a 'gain' stage? If anyone else is looking, the schematic is here http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/pics/LC-21-23.jpg Hi Gilbert, Unity gain is not achieved in this circuit by loading down the anode as you suggest, rather unity gain is achieved by the negative feedback provided by two 220k resistors, R31 and R29, which form a voltage divider putting the grid at a "virtual ground". This means that the voltage across the two resistors must be equal and the voltage at the signal input end of R29 will be forced to be approximately equal and opposite to the signal voltage at the anode end of R31, hence unity gain. The purpose of R29 is not to prevent loading of the volume control, but rather is to provide the required resistance in the input leg of the feedback network to insure unity gain. If the grid were driven from a low impedance source then the feedback resistor R31 would have little effect and the tube would have its full gain. The 12AX7 shown in the schematic is a pretty wimpy tube, if you are going to drive a 20k load, I would use a more muscular tube like a 12AU7 or better. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the link John, got a question though.
If I understand it correctly, your annode load combination, capacitively coupled through the 0.1 (C21) coupling cap must approach the 1.5k cathode resistor in value for the circuit to be unity gain, correct? In looking at V6-A and we remove the connection of R33 and grid connection going down to R210, I don't need that stuff, we have the 2.2M (R34), 220k (R31) in series with 220k (R29) all in parallel with the 100k plate resistor (R30) and we want the resulting value to approach the 1.5k cathode resistor...right? Assuming my sub will be around 20k load at the RCA jack, it doesn't appear to be low enough in value to approach the value of the cathode resistor for unity gain? Also, I guess you need the high value of series resistance 220k (R29) so that the feedback/load value combination doesn't load the loudness pot and input signal too much? Is it possible to reduce the plate resistor more and thus loading the dynamic plate resistance (ra) more since we aren't using this as a 'gain' stage? If anyone else is looking, the schematic is here http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/pics/LC-21-23.jpg Hi Gilbert, Unity gain is not achieved in this circuit by loading down the anode as you suggest, rather unity gain is achieved by the negative feedback provided by two 220k resistors, R31 and R29, which form a voltage divider putting the grid at a "virtual ground". This means that the voltage across the two resistors must be equal and the voltage at the signal input end of R29 will be forced to be approximately equal and opposite to the signal voltage at the anode end of R31, hence unity gain. The purpose of R29 is not to prevent loading of the volume control, but rather is to provide the required resistance in the input leg of the feedback network to insure unity gain. If the grid were driven from a low impedance source then the feedback resistor R31 would have little effect and the tube would have its full gain. The 12AX7 shown in the schematic is a pretty wimpy tube, if you are going to drive a 20k load, I would use a more muscular tube like a 12AU7 or better. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ Thanks John, I played around with the circuit last night and a few things came to light in my head. Yes, the two resistors must be equal for unity gain and/or I guess you could trim them a little for a shift up or down in gain perhaps. I understand now how I incorrectly stated the loading of R29 on the volume control but I was still curious about the relative size of R29, R31. After experimenting, I seem to find that the size of R29 helps to isolate the input signal from the feedback. By reducing the size of R29, R31 you *inject* more of the feedback signal back onto the volume control which reduces or feeds back on the input signal. The 220K size seems to have a small impact at the volume control but is minimal. I guess then that R29 (and R31) could approach the maximum size allowed for the particular tube, 1M for the 12AX7 in this case? Or would feedback current be reduced to a point to where it would be impractical? I'm setting up an SE 2A3 with a single 6SL7 gain stage, yeah I know, should have used a 6SN7 or paralled the 6SL7, but I think I've worked out enough of the details to make the single 6SL7 stage work ok and want to use the other half in a buffered sub-woofer output. While the 6SL7 might be whimpy too, what I plan on doing is to adjust the feedback loop to give me unity gain with a 20k load attached. It pops up slightly in gain when the 20k load is removed obviously. The operating point of the 6SL7 is currently set at a little over a milliamp with a 100k plate and 1k cathode resistor at about 275V B+. Does this make sense? Thanks!!! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Finding unity gain | Pro Audio | |||
triode vs. pentodes | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Tube line and phono pre amp project | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Infinity Modulus System (The Original) - Unit Gain Question | Pro Audio | |||
What is a Distressor ? | Pro Audio |