[[email protected]]

On 9 Mai, 22:13, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On May 9, 8:00*pm, wrote:





On 9 Mai, 19:50, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On May 8, 8:45*pm, wrote:

On 8 Mai, 19:27, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On May 8, 3:30*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
*I guess you can quit cruising Michigan in a bus.

Um, there's a word I'm looking for. It starts with an "I" and ends
with an "e". LoL.-

the one i am thinking of begins with h and ends with e
it has one more letter than yours

2pid is a haranguer? LoL.

"rrrrr"?

I know, but that's the closest I could come up with.

What starts with an "H", ends with an "E" and has one more letter than
imbecile?-

hypocrite

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 9, 9:21*pm, George M. Middius wrote:
Shhhh! said:

What starts with an "H", ends with an "E" and has one more letter than
imbecile?

halfwidge?

I at first thought perhaps Clyde meant “hypocrite". But 2pid
frequently accuses others of being one and further 2pid denies being
one himself. Since 2pid places such a premium on his Integrity ™ and
Honesty ™ I immediately realized that Clyde had to mean some other
word.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 9, 9:28*pm, wrote:
On 9 Mai, 22:13, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"





wrote:
On May 9, 8:00*pm, wrote:

On 9 Mai, 19:50, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On May 8, 8:45*pm, wrote:

On 8 Mai, 19:27, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On May 8, 3:30*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
*I guess you can quit cruising Michigan in a bus.

Um, there's a word I'm looking for. It starts with an "I" and ends
with an "e". LoL.-

the one i am thinking of begins with h and ends with e
it has one more letter than yours

2pid is a haranguer? LoL.

"rrrrr"?

I know, but that's the closest I could come up with.

What starts with an "H", ends with an "E" and has one more letter than
imbecile?

hypocrite

Already proven false in another post.

Sorry!

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

On May 9, 9:28*pm, wrote:
On 9 Mai, 22:13, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"





wrote:
On May 9, 8:00*pm, wrote:

On 9 Mai, 19:50, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On May 8, 8:45*pm, wrote:

On 8 Mai, 19:27, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On May 8, 3:30*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
*I guess you can quit cruising Michigan in a bus.

Um, there's a word I'm looking for. It starts with an "I" and ends
with an "e". LoL.-

the one i am thinking of begins with h and ends with e
it has one more letter than yours

2pid is a haranguer? LoL.

"rrrrr"?

I know, but that's the closest I could come up with.

What starts with an "H", ends with an "E" and has one more letter than
imbecile?

hypocrite

Already proven false in another post.

Sorry!

Himbecile?

Stephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 9, 11:01*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,
*"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:





On May 9, 9:28*pm, wrote:
On 9 Mai, 22:13, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On May 9, 8:00*pm, wrote:

On 9 Mai, 19:50, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On May 8, 8:45*pm, wrote:

On 8 Mai, 19:27, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On May 8, 3:30*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
*I guess you can quit cruising Michigan in a bus.

Um, there's a word I'm looking for. It starts with an "I" and ends
with an "e". LoL.-

the one i am thinking of begins with h and ends with e
it has one more letter than yours

2pid is a haranguer? LoL.

"rrrrr"?

I know, but that's the closest I could come up with.

What starts with an "H", ends with an "E" and has one more letter than
imbecile?

hypocrite

Already proven false in another post.

Sorry!

Himbecile?

Since your resorting to name-calling and being impolite you're
argument is in tatter's.

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

Himbecile?

Since your resorting to name-calling and being impolite you're
argument is in tatter's.

Your nuts.

Stephen

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On May 8, 7:57*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
This is a mental illness (giving him the benefit of the doubt) that can
be
ameliorated by professional help, which Arny refuses to get.

*Kind of like someones son here who didn't stay on their meds

It's all a game of gotcha for Scottie.

Pointing out hypocrisy and unjustifiable ill-will.

That's what I find myself doing around here a lot.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 9, 11:39*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,
*"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

Himbecile?

Since your resorting to name-calling and being impolite you're
argument is in tatter's.

Your nuts.

LoL. It's clear and obvious that sadly your upholstery.

[[email protected]]

On 9 Mai, 22:29, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On May 9, 9:28*pm, wrote:





On 9 Mai, 22:13, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On May 9, 8:00*pm, wrote:

On 9 Mai, 19:50, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On May 8, 8:45*pm, wrote:

On 8 Mai, 19:27, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On May 8, 3:30*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
*I guess you can quit cruising Michigan in a bus.

Um, there's a word I'm looking for. It starts with an "I" and ends
with an "e". LoL.-

the one i am thinking of begins with h and ends with e
it has one more letter than yours

2pid is a haranguer? LoL.

"rrrrr"?

I know, but that's the closest I could come up with.

What starts with an "H", ends with an "E" and has one more letter than
imbecile?

hypocrite

Already proven false in another post.

Sorry!-

wrong answer, faulty logic, your causality does not compute.

[[email protected]]

On 10 Mai, 00:39, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,
*"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

Himbecile?

Since your resorting to name-calling and being impolite you're
argument is in tatter's.

Your nuts.


I don't care whose nuts you eat!

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On May 9, 2:31*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article ,





*"ScottW" wrote:
"MiNe 109" wrote in message
...
In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On May 9, 10:47 am, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article
,

ScottW2 wrote:
On May 9, 10:17 am, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article

m,

ScottW2 wrote:
On May 8, 7:57 pm, MiNe 109
wrote:
In article

s.co
m,

ScottW2 wrote:
This is a mental illness (giving him the benefit of the
doubt)
that
can
be
ameliorated by professional help, which Arny refuses to
get.

Kind of like someones son here who didn't stay on their
meds

It's all a game of gotcha for Scottie.

Pointing out hypocrisy and unjustifiable ill-will.

No, you're not.

Yes, I am.

You think you are but since there's no hypocrisy in evidence you are
mistaken.

*Your hypocrisy detector has long been broken.

Nope. Your ability to use the word correctly has been a joke for ages.

Only to the loons who dislike their own hypocrisy being discussed.

Good one! but only if you're stupid. Besides, you were talking about
Harry so you aren't even making sense on your own terms.

Yawn. This is a lame ass weak obfuscation that is attack the
messenger
when the message can't be refuted.

You don't recognize that I used your own construction to reply to your
original personal attack. Your "message" can't be refuted because it's a
weak-ass assertion with no substance to refute. Simple negation is all
that is needed.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

I want it to be about music, audio, events of the day, that kind of
thing. Not Scott's Daily Grievance.

I see you doing very little on those topics.
Try using the "new post" link on google..it's in the upper right
corner.

Try reading my posts and you'll see I'm active on all those. How much
help did you give Snell Dude? Didn't see you discussing guitar tunings
either.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On May 9, 2:32*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article ,





*"ScottW" wrote:
"MiNe 109" wrote in message
...
In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

MiNe 109 said:

*Pointing out ... unjustifiable ill-will.
[snip]
(edited so I could get to the joke juncture quickly)

And how is ill-will to Arny unjustifiable? Did you read his posts?

Witless forgives all of Turdborg's excesses because of their shared
hatreds. Primarily, they hate The Magazine and its Lord High Editor
and
hope to send them all to Hell. Secondarily, they hate Mistress Jenn
and
all other females who dare to speak in their presence. Thirdly, they
hate
the entire notion that many consumer products are not marketed to the
likes of them, and furthermore, the likes of them are not rewarded for
"debunking" said products.

In short, the Krooborg is Scottie Witlessmongrel's comfy old shoes. I
know
this is true because Witless kept silent when I asked him directly to
explain his adoration of Mr. ****.

If he really wanted to poke at Stereophile, he would have to read it to
comment on its content. Something like, hey, Linn wants to sell an
active crossover that requires a separate super-tweeter amp for its
Majik speaker. As if! ::snork::

*Having active crossovers and seperate amps for drivers which have
real technical merit, your attempt to make a point has served to
only reveal your own technical ignorance.

hahahahahahahahaha

Tell it to my three-way Kaber Aktiv system.

It was you who implied your system is an example of
snake oil. Or more likely, you're just spouting off
without really meaning what you wrote...again.

No, I offered a paragraph as an example of something you might say.
Besides, isn't a separate super-tweeter amp kinda dodgy and expensive
even for Linn?

BTW, I tend to mean what I write, something you profess not to do.

Stephen

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said to Witless:

Didn't see you discussing guitar tunings either.

The best "tuning" is the one that garrottes a 'borg in under 10 seconds.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said:

BTW, I tend to mean what I write, something you profess not to do.

Whose nuts now, Professer?


--

"It is you who are completely unaware of what I perceive until
I choose to tell you. I rarely do."
-- Scottie Witlessmongrel, RAO, Feb. 3 2009

[MiNe 109]

In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

MiNe 109 said to Witless:

Didn't see you discussing guitar tunings either.

The best "tuning" is the one that garrottes a 'borg in under 10 seconds.

Yes, dyslexics should be careful around guitars.

There have been several Borg in the news recently.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

MiNe 109 said:

BTW, I tend to mean what I write, something you profess not to do.

Whose nuts now, Professer?

CD's nutz.

Stephen

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said:

Didn't see you discussing guitar tunings either.

The best "tuning" is the one that garrottes a 'borg in under 10 seconds.

Yes, dyslexics should be careful around guitars.

Thank's Steephen for, admitting Stepehne that its like you're have never
been inside, a Hive Steven.

There have been several Borg in the news recently.

Really? Not in the ST movie, but where?

[MiNe 109]

In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

MiNe 109 said:

Didn't see you discussing guitar tunings either.

The best "tuning" is the one that garrottes a 'borg in under 10 seconds.

Yes, dyslexics should be careful around guitars.

Thank's Steephen for, admitting Stepehne that its like you're have never
been inside, a Hive Steven.

There have been several Borg in the news recently.

Really? Not in the ST movie, but where?

Sweden, for one. The Finance Minister seems to get quoted when he
mentions the US.

Stephen

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said:

There have been several Borg in the news recently.

Really? Not in the ST movie, but where?

Sweden, for one. The Finance Minister seems to get quoted when he
mentions the US.

Oh, THAT kind of Borg. Aren't you ashamed to go so far off-topic?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

[yapping snipped]

Chain-smoking mama? Check.
Obvious signs of mental deficiency? Check.
Inability to contain emotional outbursts? Check.

to be continued...



--

" * I don't know why you always focus on the irrelevant while ignoring
the relevant."

Scottie Witlessmongrel, RAO, 1 May 2009

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

[more yapping snipped]


Could Witlessness be an actual disease, like alcoholism?


--

"It is you who are completely unaware of what I perceive until
I choose to tell you. I rarely do."
-- Scottie Witlessmongrel, RAO, Feb. 3 2009

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 10, 3:31*am, wrote:
On 9 Mai, 22:29, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"





wrote:
On May 9, 9:28*pm, wrote:

On 9 Mai, 22:13, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On May 9, 8:00*pm, wrote:

On 9 Mai, 19:50, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On May 8, 8:45*pm, wrote:

On 8 Mai, 19:27, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On May 8, 3:30*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
*I guess you can quit cruising Michigan in a bus.

Um, there's a word I'm looking for. It starts with an "I" and ends
with an "e". LoL.-

the one i am thinking of begins with h and ends with e
it has one more letter than yours

2pid is a haranguer? LoL.

"rrrrr"?

I know, but that's the closest I could come up with.

What starts with an "H", ends with an "E" and has one more letter than
imbecile?

hypocrite

Already proven false in another post.

Sorry!-

wrong answer, faulty logic, your causality does not compute.

Well, OK then. If 2pid is a hypocrite then he's also a liar who lacks
integrity.

I'm fine with leaving it there. Really, I am.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 10, 10:07*am, ScottW2 wrote:

Only if you really like to waste time and be painfully boring.

'Nuff said.

BTW, George, I'll chip in for an additional hard drive if storing
2pidgems like this are eating up too much memory. LoL.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 10, 4:32*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On May 10, 11:08*am, MiNe 109 * wrote:





In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
On May 9, 2:32*pm, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article ,

*"ScottW" wrote:
"MiNe 109" wrote in message
...
In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

MiNe 109 said:

*Pointing out ... unjustifiable ill-will.
[snip]
(edited so I could get to the joke juncture quickly)

And how is ill-will to Arny unjustifiable? Did you read his posts?

Witless forgives all of Turdborg's excesses because of their shared
hatreds. Primarily, they hate The Magazine and its Lord High Editor
and
hope to send them all to Hell. Secondarily, they hate Mistress Jenn
and
all other females who dare to speak in their presence. Thirdly, they
hate
the entire notion that many consumer products are not marketed to the
likes of them, and furthermore, the likes of them are not rewarded for
"debunking" said products.

In short, the Krooborg is Scottie Witlessmongrel's comfy old shoes. I
know
this is true because Witless kept silent when I asked him directly to
explain his adoration of Mr. ****.

If he really wanted to poke at Stereophile, he would have to read it to
comment on its content. Something like, hey, Linn wants to sell an
active crossover that requires a separate super-tweeter amp for its
Majik speaker. As if! ::snork::

*Having active crossovers and seperate amps for drivers which have
real technical merit, your attempt to make a point has served to
only reveal your own technical ignorance.

hahahahahahahahaha

Tell it to my three-way Kaber Aktiv system.

*It was you who implied your system is an example of
snake oil. * Or more likely, you're just spouting off
without really meaning what you wrote...again.

No, I offered a paragraph as an example of something you might say.
Besides, isn't a separate super-tweeter amp kinda dodgy and expensive
even for Linn?

BTW, I tend to mean what I write,

*You tend to ....that means a significant amount of the time
you don't mean what you write. *

No, 2pid, that's not what that means at all.

Are you planning to provide a
hint when you don't mean something?

LoL. You stated clearly that you seldom let people know what you mean.

What a ninny.

something you profess not to do.

*This must be one of those countertendency times.

LoL. Or your a imbecile.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 10, 4:32*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
[more yapping snipped]

Could Witlessness be an actual disease, like alcoholism?

It's probably some combination like borderline IQ, autism, poor
education and years of swallowing whatever the right-wing blogs and
media types say whole.

2pid may be the smoking gun that Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, Malkin et al
are destroying the US.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 10, 10:02*am, ScottW2 wrote:
On May 9, 4:12*pm, wrote:
On 9 Mai, 13:33, ScottW2 wrote:

*If you think Arny is mentally ill or suffers a personality disorder,
then
ill-will is unjustifiable regardless of what he does.

no matter what he does?

If the illness is the cause of what he does...yes.

So you would not feel ill-will towards an illegal immigrant who was
cleared of wrongdoing by a jury who shot 15 kids in a school.

That's good to know.

Do you offer such good will to all the mentally ill
criminals who have murdered, maiamed and raped their
victims?

*It's not up to me, but society does recognize insanity as
a defense.

But this is about you, 2pid. You're telling people who have a
'differing POV' how wrong they are.

What is interesting here is that if an illegal immigrant who, say, ran
over your wife or broke into your house and robbed and shot you, was
found innocent by reason of some mental disorder you would say, "Go,
and sin no more!"

Somehow I don't buy that one, 2pid. Somehow I think your legendary
double standards are at work...again. LoL.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 10, 4:19*pm, ScottW2 wrote:

*For someone as shallow as you.

Find this on page 1,113 of the new book, "2pidquotes: Irony, Self-
Mocking and Other General Stupidity".

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

Only if you really like to waste time and be painfully boring.

'Nuff said.

BTW, George, I'll chip in for an additional hard drive if storing
2pidgems like this are eating up too much memory. LoL.

Your tone deaf.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 10, 4:23*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On May 10, 11:05*am, MiNe 109 * wrote:

Try reading my posts and you'll see I'm active on all those.

You call that active? *Is picking up the TV remote cardio
for you?

LoL. 2pid gets his ass kicked (several times actually) by Stephen and
resorts to insult.

Um, doesn't 2pid say he's against that sort of thing? LoL.

How much
help did you give Snell Dude?

*All he deserved. *We'll grant you the meet and greet duty
for all newbs. *At least you're a far cry better at it than Middiot.

LoL. 2pid (as usual) drags in another of his 'enemies' when confronted
with a horrible truth. LoL.

*Didn't see you discussing guitar tunings
either.

*Nope, not my forte. *But when was that...a month ago?
2 per month...and you didn't actually start that thread so
it's somewhat irrelevant.

Oh, no wonder you post so much crap. You simply count who *starts* the
most threads to see who's a 'good' contributor here.

I hate to break this to you, 2pid, but Bratzi is kicking your ass on
that front. LoL.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

*For someone as shallow as you.

Find this on page 1,113 of the new book, "2pidquotes: Irony, Self-
Mocking and Other General Stupidity".

Not so fast. The Editorial Review Board has yet to confirm that Witless
knows the human meaning of "shallow".


--

"It is you who are completely unaware of what I perceive until
I choose to tell you. I rarely do."
-- Scottie Witlessmongrel, RAO, Feb. 3 2009

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 10, 4:31*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
[yapping snipped]

Chain-smoking mama? Check.
Obvious signs of mental deficiency? Check.
Inability to contain emotional outbursts? Check.

to be continued...

....spinning in circles? Check.
Echoing words that are spoken to him? Check.
Strong signs of general confusion? Check
Inability to understand simple words? Check...

[MiNe 109]

In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

MiNe 109 said:

There have been several Borg in the news recently.

Really? Not in the ST movie, but where?

Sweden, for one. The Finance Minister seems to get quoted when he
mentions the US.

Oh, THAT kind of Borg. Aren't you ashamed to go so far off-topic?

Deeply.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On May 10, 11:03*am, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW2 wrote:
On May 9, 2:31*pm, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article ,

*"ScottW" wrote:
"MiNe 109" wrote in message
...
In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On May 9, 10:47 am, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article

,

ScottW2 wrote:
On May 9, 10:17 am, MiNe 109
wrote:
In article

s.co
m,

ScottW2 wrote:
On May 8, 7:57 pm, MiNe 109
wrote:
In article

roup
s.co
m,

ScottW2 wrote:
This is a mental illness (giving him the benefit of
the
doubt)
that
can
be
ameliorated by professional help, which Arny refuses
to
get.

Kind of like someones son here who didn't stay on
their
meds

It's all a game of gotcha for Scottie.

Pointing out hypocrisy and unjustifiable ill-will.

No, you're not.

Yes, I am.

You think you are but since there's no hypocrisy in evidence you
are
mistaken.

*Your hypocrisy detector has long been broken.

Nope. Your ability to use the word correctly has been a joke for
ages.

Only to the loons who dislike their own hypocrisy being discussed.

Good one! but only if you're stupid. Besides, you were talking about
Harry so you aren't even making sense on your own terms.

Yawn. *This is a lame ass weak obfuscation that is attack the
messenger
when the message can't be refuted.

You don't recognize that I used your own construction to reply to your
original personal attack. Your "message" can't be refuted because it's a
weak-ass assertion with no substance to refute.

LoL. speaking of weak-as assertions.

Yes, yours.

Simple negation is all
that is needed.

For someone as shallow as you.

Hey! It's that Arny-ism where the dig assumes its own point.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On May 10, 11:05*am, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW2 wrote:
I want it to be about music, audio, events of the day, that kind of
thing. Not Scott's Daily Grievance.

*I see you doing very little on those topics.
Try using the "new post" link on google..it's in the upper right
corner.

Try reading my posts and you'll see I'm active on all those.

You call that active?

Yes, I do.

Is picking up the TV remote cardio for you?

How much
help did you give Snell Dude?

All he deserved. We'll grant you the meet and greet duty
for all newbs. At least you're a far cry better at it than Middiot.

It's almost as if you admit my point.

Didn't see you discussing guitar tunings
either.

Nope, not my forte. But when was that...a month ago?
2 per month...and you didn't actually start that thread so
it's somewhat irrelevant.

Entirely relevant and who says that's the only musical topic I discussed.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

On May 10, 11:08*am, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW2 wrote:
On May 9, 2:32*pm, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article ,

*"ScottW" wrote:
"MiNe 109" wrote in message
...
In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

MiNe 109 said:

*Pointing out ... unjustifiable ill-will.
[snip]
(edited so I could get to the joke juncture quickly)

And how is ill-will to Arny unjustifiable? Did you read his
posts?

Witless forgives all of Turdborg's excesses because of their
shared
hatreds. Primarily, they hate The Magazine and its Lord High
Editor
and
hope to send them all to Hell. Secondarily, they hate Mistress
Jenn
and
all other females who dare to speak in their presence. Thirdly,
they
hate
the entire notion that many consumer products are not marketed to
the
likes of them, and furthermore, the likes of them are not rewarded
for
"debunking" said products.

In short, the Krooborg is Scottie Witlessmongrel's comfy old
shoes. I
know
this is true because Witless kept silent when I asked him directly
to
explain his adoration of Mr. ****.

If he really wanted to poke at Stereophile, he would have to read
it to
comment on its content. Something like, hey, Linn wants to sell an
active crossover that requires a separate super-tweeter amp for its
Majik speaker. As if! ::snork::

*Having active crossovers and seperate amps for drivers which have
real technical merit, your attempt to make a point has served to
only reveal your own technical ignorance.

hahahahahahahahaha

Tell it to my three-way Kaber Aktiv system.

*It was you who implied your system is an example of
snake oil. * Or more likely, you're just spouting off
without really meaning what you wrote...again.

No, I offered a paragraph as an example of something you might say.

and you were completely wrong.

So what?


Besides, isn't a separate super-tweeter amp kinda dodgy and expensive
even for Linn?

I don't know..why did you buy it if you feel it was a rip-off?

I don't have a super-tweeter system.

I'm using 8 amplifier channels and actually spent less on them
than my Krell.

I probably spent less on my six channels than you did on your Krell.

BTW, I tend to mean what I write,

Meaning it doesn't make it true.

Another card from Scotty's Deck of Truisms.

something you profess not to do.

Proof of my point.

That you don't mean what you say? Yes.

Stephen

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW2 wrote:

BTW, I tend to mean what I write,

You tend to ....that means a significant amount of the time
you don't mean what you write. Are you planning to provide a
hint when you don't mean something?

something you profess not to do.

This must be one of those countertendency times.

It took two times to come with this wit. You must be the bomb at French
stairways.

Stpehen

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said:

Proof of my point.

That you don't mean what you say? Yes.

To be fair, sometimes Yapper doesn't say what he means.

[MiNe 109]

In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

MiNe 109 said:

Proof of my point.

That you don't mean what you say? Yes.

To be fair, sometimes Yapper doesn't say what he means.

I wonder if he still gets mad when anyone responds to you.

Stephen

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

MiNe 109 said:

Proof of my point.

That you don't mean what you say? Yes.

To be fair, sometimes Yapper doesn't say what he means.

I wonder if he still gets mad when anyone responds to you.

grrr....