Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#201
Posted to rec.music.gdead,rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
24-bit on tap at Apple?
"Randy Yates" wrote in message
m On 03/13/2011 07:34 AM, Arny Krueger wrote: "Randy wrote in message m On 03/11/2011 01:10 AM, josephkk wrote: On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 08:36:23 -0500, "Arny wrote: wrote in message On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 12:46:12 -0500, "Arny Krueger" wrote: snip At some points in a comparison the analog signal will be degraded to the extent that it is no longer enjoyable, while a comparable digital signal will still be ideal. In many locations the analog signal will never be totally free of ghosts, while the digital signal will be unchanged from optimal. And at other locations the analog signal was eminently watchable and the digital signal never receivable (black screen with broken audio) in spite of plenty of signal strength. If the digital signa was at the same frequency, I'm not sure why that would occur unless you had a multipath problem. The digital and analog signals were never at the same frequency during the period when we could compare OTA digital with analog signals for pretty obvious reasons. In most cases the analog signal was VHF and the digital signal was UHF. ...except when the analog signal was UHF and the digital signal was UHF. It turned out that in every case but one, the HDTV channels that once were UHF analog, ended up at lower frequencies 50 went to 14 56 went to 43 62 went to 44 The exception: 38 went to 39 Actually one could still have compared the two, even if they weren't present simultaneously, given the fact that human beings have memory; indeed this is the scenario I had in mind. It is just that simultaneous comparison is easier and potentially more accurate. Perhaps this was the exception rather than the rule, however - I really don't know. |
#202
Posted to rec.music.gdead,rec.audio.tech,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
24-bit on tap at Apple?
On Mar 14, 8:16*am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
50 went to 14 56 went *to 43 62 went to 44 The exception: 38 went to 39 Yeah, well, this one here . . . goes to eleven. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|