Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.sports.football.pro.sd-chargers,alt.engineering.electrical,rec.audio.car
|
|||
|
|||
Typical Kike on Gun Control
Don Kelly wrote: On 19/04/2013 9:29 AM, Michael A. Terrell wrote: Don Kelly wrote: On 18/04/2013 8:36 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: **What part of "....well regulated militia..." do you not understand. Face it, the 2nd Amendment was written: * At a time when reload times were measured in MINUTES, not milliseconds. * At a time when accuracy of muzzle-loading weapons was inferior to a bow and arrow. * At a time when dangerous animals roamed free. * At a time when a vicious colonial power ruled America. * At a time when angry indigenous people roamed free. * At a time when refrigeration was unheard of. **Of course. Equally as moronic as those who defend the NRA and their gutless politicians they have in their pocket. Thank you- some common sense coming out. (the vicious colonial power excepted-the Mel Gibson movie is not a historically valid reference). In a later time- prior to and after the war of 1812 fiasco- it was expected that "Canadians" were to carry and use arms in defense of their country.An obligation -not a right. It was always noted that, as a frontier country, that there would be a need to have arms and training in the use of these arms for defense was required (and the need for providing fresh meat was also rather important). What I don't understand is the need for an assault weapon for defense dragging it out from under the pillow to shoot at the horde of home invaders (or late returning children) who are after one's virtue ( if their intention was otherwise they would solve this problem earlier)- or for hunting (instant hamburger?). The term "assault" comes to mind. These weapons are not intended for defense but are intended to throw a lot of bullets in the assumed direction of an enemy. If someone innocent gets in the way it is "collateral damage". A gun registry may be of limited or no use. The banning of weapons that can spray a theater or school with bullets can help and doesn't infringe on a right to bear arms. This wouldn't affect the responsible gun owners but could reduce the availability of such weapons to the kooks. I am not a US citizen and as such, all I can do is stand by in dismay at what some; in a country I respect and whose people I have met and lived with ( as well as claim as relatives) who are warm, helpful, friendly, supportive of strangers and just good neighbors; have this gun fetish based on ?? Guns aren't the problem, and it only takes a second or two to change a magazine, so the size doesn't make any difference if no one is shooting back. The problem is that sleazy lawyers got 'rights' for the mentally ill to be on the streets. A gun is a tool, and doesn't kill by itself. It takes an unstable person or criminal who places no value on human life to use one to maim or kill in cold blood. I disagree in part-any legal limitations don't mean a damn to criminals-but what you have is a situation where any kook can walk into a store and buy a gun, or where this isn't allowed, go to a gun show and do it -without any background checks. The "rights" should be limited- do you have a "right" to drive a car- I don't think so- you have the privilege- provided that you present information as to your ability to do it within conditions of capability. Shouldn't the same be done with respect to weapons? As to reloading magazines- true-just think, instead of firing 50 rounds into a movie theater, one has to stop after 10 to reload. Even that is too much. As for shooting back- the odds are that in such a firefight, the collateral damage is high-my experience with an automatic (or semi-) weapon is that it tends to walk around a lot from where it is aimed. Oh ****- spraying bullets around hit some innocent people- while the intended target is unharmed- witness gang shootouts. I do think a "long gun" registry doesn't work- but restrictions on particular weapons do help. Illegal weapons do get into criminal hands- but facts may indicate that making these weapons licit increases the chance of innocents being harmed. The old west idea of gunfights as a form of duel - may well be fiction- it is easier to shoot an opponent in the back that to walk down the street and duel to appropriate music. Anyhow, I can disagree with you -but it will not be beyond the extent of arguing over which of us is to buy the next round if we ever meet. I was taught to fire a three round burst with the M16. Using full auto, and wasting the entire magazine is for bad movies. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Do you think typical studios would do this? | Pro Audio | |||
Typical Uses for Classic Compressors | Pro Audio | |||
typical audio impedances | Pro Audio | |||
ADC distortion typical near 0dB?? | Pro Audio | |||
New Deck Typical outputs | Car Audio |