Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I have a theory/design question.
I have a 300M with the Infinity II system - all in all not bad. The amps
get harsh and the bass gets muddy when pushed hard though. I don't want to spend allot of money but I do want a better sound. I know what I'm talking about as far as sound goes I've sold home CE for 15 years - Adcom , Aragon, B&K, Sunfire, Denon and Yamaha electronics and as far as speakers KEF, Apogee, Martin Logan, Vienna, Sonus, Mirage Monitor Audio to name a few. So I am familiar with what's out there. Those are my goals now here's the theory. I'm looking at the Infinity BassLink - $300.00 - online and just adding some 60 - 80hz bass blockers. This should lighten up the load on the amps and give me about 6dB more head room - at least if you did this in home these are the numbers you would be looking at. Does this sound correct. The 300M system is bizarre - powered head unit - speaker level into amps - amps have and internal cross over that then go out to what are in essence component speakers. Should I 1) put the bass blockers in between the head unit and the amp or 2) the amp and the speakers. Marc |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I have a theory/design question.
Those are my goals now here's the theory. I'm looking at the Infinity
BassLink - $300.00 - online and just adding some 60 - 80hz bass blockers. This should lighten up the load on the amps and give me about 6dB more head room - at least if you did this in home these are the numbers you would be looking at. Does this sound correct. No, it's not correct. Passive filters on the amplified output will not improve headroom. The 300M system is bizarre - powered head unit - speaker level into amps - amps have and internal cross over that then go out to what are in essence component speakers. Should I 1) put the bass blockers in between the head unit and the amp or 2) the amp and the speakers. Putting a filter between the head unit and amp will improve headroom, but between the amp and speakers won't improve headroom. However, the cutoff frequency depends on the load, so you need to know the amplifier's input impedance to determine what size capacitors you need. A standard ohmmeter will give you that information, and a calculator will tell you what size caps you need. Go to passivecrossovers.com for the equation. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I have a theory/design question.
If you could stretch your budget a little more and add a CD headunit
with line level subwoofer outputs, that would be better IMHO. There's nothing wrong with most newer stock head units. In fact, I've gone from Eclipse 5342in one car, to Nakamichi cd-45z in my last car, now to the stock HU. No degradation in performance. In fact, I like this one better than the Nak. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I have a theory/design question.
I like the 4 disk changer and just the other all look. I don't want to take
up anymore room in the truck than I have too. The only place that I listened to the sub was at CC and the "soundroom" opened onto the main floor so it was real hard to tell what the sub could do short of getting right on top of it. Marc "Mark Zarella" wrote in message ... If you could stretch your budget a little more and add a CD headunit with line level subwoofer outputs, that would be better IMHO. There's nothing wrong with most newer stock head units. In fact, I've gone from Eclipse 5342in one car, to Nakamichi cd-45z in my last car, now to the stock HU. No degradation in performance. In fact, I like this one better than the Nak. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I have a theory/design question.
True... I just recommended a HU because many come with a built in active
sub crossover. Although many amps already have a simple low pass filter. Garrett Mark Zarella wrote: If you could stretch your budget a little more and add a CD headunit with line level subwoofer outputs, that would be better IMHO. There's nothing wrong with most newer stock head units. In fact, I've gone from Eclipse 5342in one car, to Nakamichi cd-45z in my last car, now to the stock HU. No degradation in performance. In fact, I like this one better than the Nak. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I have a theory/design question.
No way..double checked that.
It just fell short in terms of clean SPL and sub-frequency extension (below 50 Hz) for the ammopunt of $$$ spent. For $300 this is a far better set up (IMHO): One of these in a small sealed enclosure. http://www.adireaudio.com/Merchant2/...ory_Code=30.10 Either of these amps bridged, using their active crossover. http://www.crutchfield.com/cgi-bin/S...&cc =01&avf=N http://www.crutchfield.com/cgi-bin/S...&cc =01&avf=N 300 clean watts @ 12.9 Volts with plenty of sub-bass output. Just my oppinion... Garrett Greg wrote: I have a Basslink in the trunk of my Civic and I am more than satisfied with the sound. Your co-worker must have had it hooked up wrong. Greg "Sanitarium" wrote in message ... Hi Marc... if your ears like the way it sounds then by all means go for it. you are correct in assuming the CC showroom acoustics are completely different than your vehicle. What sounds good in the showroom may sound bad in the car. My previous oppinion is based on a co-workers basslink in the trunk of his civic. One more thing... many 10" subs are optimized for small enclosures of less than 1 cubic foot (not much bigger than a basslink). Whatever you choose, use your ears and go with what sounds good. Garrett Marc wrote: I like the 4 disk changer and just the other all look. I don't want to take up anymore room in the truck than I have too. The only place that I listened to the sub was at CC and the "soundroom" opened onto the main floor so it was real hard to tell what the sub could do short of getting right on top of it. Marc "Mark Zarella" wrote in message ... If you could stretch your budget a little more and add a CD headunit with line level subwoofer outputs, that would be better IMHO. There's nothing wrong with most newer stock head units. In fact, I've gone from Eclipse 5342in one car, to Nakamichi cd-45z in my last car, now to the stock HU. No degradation in performance. In fact, I like this one better than the Nak. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I have a theory/design question.
He used monster 201 RCA cables, and used the line level subwoofer output
from his Pioneer MP3/CD headunit. his crossover point was set to 80 Hz. Scoshe 4 gage and 8 gage cables were used with a 1-4 distribution block for power and ground. Tested it with Bass Mechanik CD for sub bass performance, test tones, and sine sweeps below 50 Hz. This was his 4th or 5th install. It was a pretty clean install IMHO. Im not saying it sounded terrible... just that he could have gotten more for $300 IMHO. Garrett Greg wrote: just curious, did he use line level inputs or did he tap into the speaker wires. and if he did use the line level, was it a designated sub out or was it just a regular line out? this question is regarding Sanitarium's co-workers civic. "Sanitarium" wrote in message ... No way..double checked that. It just fell short in terms of clean SPL and sub-frequency extension (below 50 Hz) for the ammopunt of $$$ spent. For $300 this is a far better set up (IMHO): One of these in a small sealed enclosure. http://www.adireaudio.com/Merchant2/...ory_Code=30.10 Either of these amps bridged, using their active crossover. http://www.crutchfield.com/cgi-bin/S...&cc =01&avf=N http://www.crutchfield.com/cgi-bin/S...&cc =01&avf=N 300 clean watts @ 12.9 Volts with plenty of sub-bass output. Just my oppinion... Garrett Greg wrote: I have a Basslink in the trunk of my Civic and I am more than satisfied with the sound. Your co-worker must have had it hooked up wrong. Greg "Sanitarium" wrote in message ... Hi Marc... if your ears like the way it sounds then by all means go for it. you are correct in assuming the CC showroom acoustics are completely different than your vehicle. What sounds good in the showroom may sound bad in the car. My previous oppinion is based on a co-workers basslink in the trunk of his civic. One more thing... many 10" subs are optimized for small enclosures of less than 1 cubic foot (not much bigger than a basslink). Whatever you choose, use your ears and go with what sounds good. Garrett Marc wrote: I like the 4 disk changer and just the other all look. I don't want to take up anymore room in the truck than I have too. The only place that I listened to the sub was at CC and the "soundroom" opened onto the main floor so it was real hard to tell what the sub could do short of getting right on top of it. Marc "Mark Zarella" wrote in message ... If you could stretch your budget a little more and add a CD headunit with line level subwoofer outputs, that would be better IMHO. There's nothing wrong with most newer stock head units. In fact, I've gone from Eclipse 5342in one car, to Nakamichi cd-45z in my last car, now to the stock HU. No degradation in performance. In fact, I like this one better than the Nak. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I have a theory/design question.
sounds like a pretty clean install. i guess i just have a different
preference in sound. i just wanted some bass fill in and it sounds like he wanted some spleen rupturing bass. "Sanitarium" wrote in message ... He used monster 201 RCA cables, and used the line level subwoofer output from his Pioneer MP3/CD headunit. his crossover point was set to 80 Hz. Scoshe 4 gage and 8 gage cables were used with a 1-4 distribution block for power and ground. Tested it with Bass Mechanik CD for sub bass performance, test tones, and sine sweeps below 50 Hz. This was his 4th or 5th install. It was a pretty clean install IMHO. Im not saying it sounded terrible... just that he could have gotten more for $300 IMHO. Garrett Greg wrote: just curious, did he use line level inputs or did he tap into the speaker wires. and if he did use the line level, was it a designated sub out or was it just a regular line out? this question is regarding Sanitarium's co-workers civic. "Sanitarium" wrote in message ... No way..double checked that. It just fell short in terms of clean SPL and sub-frequency extension (below 50 Hz) for the ammopunt of $$$ spent. For $300 this is a far better set up (IMHO): One of these in a small sealed enclosure. http://www.adireaudio.com/Merchant2/...ory_Code=30.10 Either of these amps bridged, using their active crossover. http://www.crutchfield.com/cgi-bin/S...&cc =01&avf=N http://www.crutchfield.com/cgi-bin/S...&cc =01&avf=N 300 clean watts @ 12.9 Volts with plenty of sub-bass output. Just my oppinion... Garrett Greg wrote: I have a Basslink in the trunk of my Civic and I am more than satisfied with the sound. Your co-worker must have had it hooked up wrong. Greg "Sanitarium" wrote in message ... Hi Marc... if your ears like the way it sounds then by all means go for it. you are correct in assuming the CC showroom acoustics are completely different than your vehicle. What sounds good in the showroom may sound bad in the car. My previous oppinion is based on a co-workers basslink in the trunk of his civic. One more thing... many 10" subs are optimized for small enclosures of less than 1 cubic foot (not much bigger than a basslink). Whatever you choose, use your ears and go with what sounds good. Garrett Marc wrote: I like the 4 disk changer and just the other all look. I don't want to take up anymore room in the truck than I have too. The only place that I listened to the sub was at CC and the "soundroom" opened onto the main floor so it was real hard to tell what the sub could do short of getting right on top of it. Marc "Mark Zarella" wrote in message ... If you could stretch your budget a little more and add a CD headunit with line level subwoofer outputs, that would be better IMHO. There's nothing wrong with most newer stock head units. In fact, I've gone from Eclipse 5342in one car, to Nakamichi cd-45z in my last car, now to the stock HU. No degradation in performance. In fact, I like this one better than the Nak. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I have a theory/design question.
Yup. beauty is in the eye of the listener.
everyone hears things different. Garrett Greg wrote: sounds like a pretty clean install. i guess i just have a different preference in sound. i just wanted some bass fill in and it sounds like he wanted some spleen rupturing bass. "Sanitarium" wrote in message ... He used monster 201 RCA cables, and used the line level subwoofer output from his Pioneer MP3/CD headunit. his crossover point was set to 80 Hz. Scoshe 4 gage and 8 gage cables were used with a 1-4 distribution block for power and ground. Tested it with Bass Mechanik CD for sub bass performance, test tones, and sine sweeps below 50 Hz. This was his 4th or 5th install. It was a pretty clean install IMHO. Im not saying it sounded terrible... just that he could have gotten more for $300 IMHO. Garrett Greg wrote: just curious, did he use line level inputs or did he tap into the speaker wires. and if he did use the line level, was it a designated sub out or was it just a regular line out? this question is regarding Sanitarium's co-workers civic. "Sanitarium" wrote in message ... No way..double checked that. It just fell short in terms of clean SPL and sub-frequency extension (below 50 Hz) for the ammopunt of $$$ spent. For $300 this is a far better set up (IMHO): One of these in a small sealed enclosure. http://www.adireaudio.com/Merchant2/...ory_Code=30.10 Either of these amps bridged, using their active crossover. http://www.crutchfield.com/cgi-bin/S...&cc =01&avf=N http://www.crutchfield.com/cgi-bin/S...&cc =01&avf=N 300 clean watts @ 12.9 Volts with plenty of sub-bass output. Just my oppinion... Garrett Greg wrote: I have a Basslink in the trunk of my Civic and I am more than satisfied with the sound. Your co-worker must have had it hooked up wrong. Greg "Sanitarium" wrote in message ... Hi Marc... if your ears like the way it sounds then by all means go for it. you are correct in assuming the CC showroom acoustics are completely different than your vehicle. What sounds good in the showroom may sound bad in the car. My previous oppinion is based on a co-workers basslink in the trunk of his civic. One more thing... many 10" subs are optimized for small enclosures of less than 1 cubic foot (not much bigger than a basslink). Whatever you choose, use your ears and go with what sounds good. Garrett Marc wrote: I like the 4 disk changer and just the other all look. I don't want to take up anymore room in the truck than I have too. The only place that I listened to the sub was at CC and the "soundroom" opened onto the main floor so it was real hard to tell what the sub could do short of getting right on top of it. Marc "Mark Zarella" wrote in message ... If you could stretch your budget a little more and add a CD headunit with line level subwoofer outputs, that would be better IMHO. There's nothing wrong with most newer stock head units. In fact, I've gone from Eclipse 5342in one car, to Nakamichi cd-45z in my last car, now to the stock HU. No degradation in performance. In fact, I like this one better than the Nak. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ipod question | General | |||
Newbie question: What software 2 use 4 recording 2 x AES/EBU (2xstereo) | General | |||
Question on OHM and Speaker | General | |||
Question time - help please | General | |||
Yes its a noise question... sorry | Car Audio |