Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Realistic-sounding recordings via MP3
MP3 recordings can provide unusually realistic playback, if made the
right way. You wouldn't believe the degree of "you are there" feeling you'd get from playing a free download --- unless you actually visit a certain website and do it. The site address, and an explanation of the science behind all this, are in an article that just go printed (August 2005) in a music and equipment review magazine, "The Audiophile Voice," Vol. 11, Number 1. (If you subscribe, ask to start with that issue, that has Janis Joplin on the cover.) Info available at http://audiophilevoice.com/ Generally, the secret of super-realism seems to be that some recordings (like those downloadable from the URL in the article) happened to be close-miked and then MP3-encoded at 160 kbps. However, you could probably do some of this yourself, if you have decent equipment and carefully read the article. (Also, the reviewers in the "T.A.V." magazine often describe other super-realistic recordings, available on specific CDs, when they use them to test loudspeakers, etc.) DanS. -------------------------------------------- OK, the Moderator insisted, so here is the site for downloading (even tho I don't like to post anything that's copyrighted and still for sale [and I'm not claiming to be any saint or angel ! ] ) By the way, the LP recordings in the downloadable site are no longer being manufactured. Since I earn part of my income from texbook and magazine-article royalties, I try to be careful about not competing with things that are still for sale (not that you guys care about that!) : http://shanefield99.blogspot.com/ DanS. --------------------------------------------- Since the Moderator wanted me to add stuff, here's more (but maybe he'll delete this). I sez I'm not any angel, which you guys can see, if you quickly read thru my little electronics industry stories linked from the following site. (Yeah, I did "steal" the $30,000 tool, but I gave it back when thru. And, yeah my geometry error did pollute the James River fisheries for a week, but at least we did save the jobs of a couple thousand workers. And, yeah my stupid process did burn down a guy's factory, but he eventuall made a ton of money (more than I ever made!) when he rebuilt and resumed stealing my patented process. And no, I did not (NOT!) murder Jack! And so on. http://homepage.mac.com/shanefield/Resume19.html Dan Ain't-no-saint S. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"MP3 recordings can provide unusually realistic playback, if made the
right way. You wouldn't believe the degree of "you are there" feeling you'd get " I have heard excellent "you are there" recordings done with inexpensive cassete gear and mics. In my experience this is due to capturing phase and other information in a way near that we normally use for direction clues and ambient information. This can happen even with recordings with limited frequency response and highish noise levels and has nothing to do with the "hocus pocus" said to be contained in some majic gear, often expressed as "throwing such and such an image". The information that produces such effects can also be added during the reproduction, as in: "Ambiophonics" http://www.ambiophonics.org/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
DanS. wrote:
snip Since the Moderator wanted me to add stuff, here's more (but maybe he'll delete this). I sez I'm not any angel, which you guys can see, if you quickly read thru my little electronics industry stories linked from the following site. (Yeah, I did "steal" the $30,000 tool, but I gave it back when thru. And, yeah my geometry error did pollute the James River fisheries for a week, but at least we did save the jobs of a couple thousand workers. And, yeah my stupid process did burn down a guy's factory, but he eventuall made a ton of money (more than I ever made!) when he rebuilt and resumed stealing my patented process. And no, I did not (NOT!) murder Jack! And so on. http://homepage.mac.com/shanefield/Resume19.html Dan Ain't-no-saint S. Dan, Ur probably wrong about MP3 "fidelity", hard of hearing or otherwise derranged from work with dangerous heavy metals and other exotic materials that have toxified key centers in your brain... ;_) --- --(indicates sarcastic, cutting edge humor) But, your "war tales" at AT&T are a worthy read! " ... two thumbs up on the B+!"- not Ebert & not Roper _-_-bear |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bad Bear:
Well, I've prob'ly ingested more than my share of heavy metal (the chemical kind, not the musical kind) and other toxins, and might be a bit deranged by now --- wouldn't be surprised. Still, you ought to actually download my file and play it (especially at the 15 minute point--- the bass clarinet piece) before claiming I'm hard of hearing. If you do that and think it's lo fi, then post a little report on your results --- I'd be interested. Dirty Dan, the hard-of-hearing man |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
DanS. wrote:
Big Bad Bear: Well, I've prob'ly ingested more than my share of heavy metal (the chemical kind, not the musical kind) and other toxins, and might be a bit deranged by now --- wouldn't be surprised. Still, you ought to actually download my file and play it (especially at the 15 minute point--- the bass clarinet piece) before claiming I'm hard of hearing. If you do that and think it's lo fi, then post a little report on your results --- I'd be interested. Dirty Dan, the hard-of-hearing man MP3 sounds good - that's why it works. Where you find the "difference" is when you get a chance to compare it to "redbook" or better recordings on a system that has low enough distortion and bandwidth, imho. No matter what the compression method, the "higher" the "sampling" the less the effective compression, eh? So, at some point, presumably the methods do start to converge. And, I wouldn't pick bass clarinet as an indicative sort of source material (for a variety of well known reasons), nor would I pick electric guitar, btw... _-_-bear |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Well, of course MP3 sounds "different" from standard CD, or from live
perfomance. All I'm saying is that MP3 isn't bad enuf to spoil "realism illusion" cues, if the original recording had them. I picked the bass clarinet and the guitar and others on this download because the original LPs each had WAY more than usual realism cues (confirmed by many listeners). But anyhow, it's all an illusion --- you are not really "there," of course. (When I invent that kind of teletransportation machine, you won't have to visit this website to hear about it [I hope].) More about all this is in the article. Dan the illusion man |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
DanS. wrote:
Well, of course MP3 sounds "different" from standard CD, or from live perfomance. Not necessarily. Chances are you would have a very hard time distinguishing some MP3s from their CD sources, if at all. -- -S "God is an asshole!" -- Ruth Fisher, 'Six Feet Under' |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
There's no doubt in my mind: MP3 can sound really good, if done right.
In my particular system, I can hear very slight freq. resp. change when using it, but nothing really bad. (After all, moving the loudspkr. can do that also, of course.) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Simple Newbie CD vs Vinyl Question | High End Audio | |||
MP3 can be very realistic sounding | Tech | |||
About the reviewer | Audio Opinions | |||
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
Why don't mp3 conversions of my recordings sound so good? | Pro Audio |