Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
"The Ghost" wrote in message
om... No, but I wouldn't be surprised if I have unknowingly kissed both your wife and your daughter. What's with the belated replies? Did your therapist tell you to stay away from the newsgroups for a week or something? You're a sad little man. Your "science" is funny and your insults are not. How pathetic. |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
"The Ghost" wrote in message om... "Jim Carr" wrote in message news:p0Q_c.75103$yh.51210@fed1read05... "The Ghost" wrote in message om... "Jim Carr" wrote in message news:ndwYc.62149$yh.14812@fed1read05... "The Ghost" wrote in message om... No. A meaningful experiment is one that yields the correct result. Knowing the correct results in advance sounds like good science to me! Who said anything about knowing the correct result in advance, you ****ing moron. Read some science history, asshole! LOL! Do you kiss your mother with a mouth like that? No, but I wouldn't be surprised if I have unknowingly kissed both your wife and your daughter. One thing is for certain, Gary, you had better hope you never run into any of us face to face. Frankly, I would be very surprised if you had ever kissed any female other than your mother. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim Carr" wrote in message news:Wuq6d.109$mS1.22@fed1read05...
"The Ghost" wrote in message om... No, but I wouldn't be surprised if I have unknowingly kissed both your wife and your daughter. What's with the belated replies? Did your therapist tell you to stay away from the newsgroups for a week or something? You're a sad little man. Your "science" is funny and your insults are not. How pathetic. I don't have a therapist and I don't get up each morning eagerly awaiting to find out the latest insult that you have bestowed upon me. You are the one, not I, who is sad, little and pathetic. You have not had anything technically substantive to contribute, and it is clear that you are now simply on a hate crusade. I suggest that you go into a corner and play with yourself because I am not going to waste any more of my time playing that game with you. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
"Porky" wrote in message .. .
One thing is for certain, Gary, you had better hope you never run into any of us face to face. Not my hope, but certainly my preference. It would be best, but not for the reason/outcome that you imply. Frankly, I would be very surprised if you had ever kissed any female other than your mother. And I would be very surprised if you have ever kissed anyone of the opposite sex. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
"The Ghost" wrote in message om... "Porky" wrote in message .. . One thing is for certain, Gary, you had better hope you never run into any of us face to face. Not my hope, but certainly my preference. It would be best, but not for the reason/outcome that you imply. I implied nothing, and you're welcome to take my remark any way you choose. Frankly, I would be very surprised if you had ever kissed any female other than your mother. And I would be very surprised if you have ever kissed anyone of the opposite sex. And I would be surprised if you even knew which was the opposite sex.... *LOL* Gary, you can't possibly win this one, so perhaps you should go back to the physics groups, where everybody knows your name, and where you're a legend in your own mind. |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
"Porky" wrote in message ...
"The Ghost" wrote in message om... "Porky" wrote in message .. . One thing is for certain, Gary, you had better hope you never run into any of us face to face. Not my hope, but certainly my preference. It would be best, but not for the reason/outcome that you imply. I implied nothing, and you're welcome to take my remark any way you choose. Frankly, I would be very surprised if you had ever kissed any female other than your mother. And I would be very surprised if you have ever kissed anyone of the opposite sex. And I would be surprised if you even knew which was the opposite sex.... *LOL* Gary, you can't possibly win this one, LOL again. Then, recognize that in a mud-slinging match everyone winds up completely covered with the same mud. The only distinction among participants is that such a condition is quite normal to swine like you. so perhaps you should go back to the physics groups, where everybody knows your name, and where you're a legend in your own mind. Perhaps, you should stay here where your gross technical ignorance will continue to be tolerated, where nobody really cares who or what you are, and where the fantasy that you have anything technically substantive to say exists solely in your own mind. |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
"Porky" wrote in
: "The Ghost" wrote in message om... "Porky" wrote in message .. . One thing is for certain, Gary, you had better hope you never run into any of us face to face. Not my hope, but certainly my preference. It would be best, but not for the reason/outcome that you imply. I implied nothing, and you're welcome to take my remark any way you choose. The tone, meaning and implication of your statement is obvious to anyone who has half a brain. It is clearly an implicit threat and your denial won't change that. Nonetheless, if, as you claim, your statement implies nothing, please clarify for everyone reading this exchange now, as well as anyone who is may read it in the future, precisely why I had better hope that I never run into any of you face to face. Also, who specifically is "us"? Should I expect to see your mother running down the street toward me swinging a frying pan? While I would have no problem sending you to the sausage factory, I would hate to be put in the uncomfortable and unpleasant position that required me to shoot your mother in the foot. Finally, perhaps you should disscuss your implicit threat with your audio-group friend Bob Cain because he recently made a very similar threat in one of his more vulgar recently-posted diatribes. |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
"The Ghost" wrote in message om... "Porky" wrote in message ... "The Ghost" wrote in message om... "Porky" wrote in message .. . One thing is for certain, Gary, you had better hope you never run into any of us face to face. Not my hope, but certainly my preference. It would be best, but not for the reason/outcome that you imply. I implied nothing, and you're welcome to take my remark any way you choose. Frankly, I would be very surprised if you had ever kissed any female other than your mother. And I would be very surprised if you have ever kissed anyone of the opposite sex. And I would be surprised if you even knew which was the opposite sex.... *LOL* Gary, you can't possibly win this one, LOL again. Then, recognize that in a mud-slinging match everyone winds up completely covered with the same mud. The only distinction among participants is that such a condition is quite normal to swine like you. Yep, us pigs and southern rednecks just love that mud, and you'd know why if you had ever seen a good ol' female mud rasslin' contest, that is if you happen to be interested in females... BTW, the amount of mud one accululates on one's person in a mud-slinging match is inversely proportional to the imagination and creativity one uses in slinging the mud. You got a lot more on you than I did. so perhaps you should go back to the physics groups, where everybody knows your name, and where you're a legend in your own mind. Perhaps, you should stay here where your gross technical ignorance will continue to be tolerated, where nobody really cares who or what you are, and where the fantasy that you have anything technically substantive to say exists solely in your own mind. Finally, a bit of creativity in your reply, perhaps I misjudged you a bit (but just a bit). You managed to phrase an insult without using any of those tired old gutter slang expressions of which you seem to be so fond. In any event, you started this particular mud-slinging contest because you thought we were defending Bob Cain. It had nothing to do with anything technical, or even whether you thought we were right or wrong. |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
"The Ghost" wrote in message . 29... "Porky" wrote in : "The Ghost" wrote in message om... "Porky" wrote in message .. . One thing is for certain, Gary, you had better hope you never run into any of us face to face. Not my hope, but certainly my preference. It would be best, but not for the reason/outcome that you imply. I implied nothing, and you're welcome to take my remark any way you choose. The tone, meaning and implication of your statement is obvious to anyone who has half a brain. You, in other words... It is clearly an implicit threat and your denial won't change that. It is neither an implicit nor an explicit threat, and I not only implied nothing, I denied nothing, I said you may take it anyway you choose. Nonetheless, if, as you claim, your statement implies nothing, please clarify for everyone reading this exchange now, as well as anyone who is may read it in the future, precisely why I had better hope that I never run into any of you face to face. Since anyone with a whole brain would understand the meaning of what I said, I don't think it needs clarification. In light of the unearned insults you've cast my way, I'd prefer to leave you in the dark. BTW, do you know how to keep a moron in suspense?... I'll tell you later. To make it simple enough for even you to understand, you don't like us and we don't like you, so it would be an unpleasant experience for all concerned if we were to meet you face to face, and be forced to spend any time with you. You've shown here that you're a rather unpleasant person to be around, and you've also shown that you're a rank amateur at the high art of trading insults, so it would be more unpleasant for you than for us. The "us" would be all those you've chosen to insult for no valid reason. Also, who specifically is "us"? Should I expect to see your mother running down the street toward me swinging a frying pan? My mother is dead, you jerk, and if she were alive, she wouldn't need a frying pan to deal with you. She would just look pityingly at you and walk on. While I would have no problem sending you to the sausage factory, I would hate to be put in the uncomfortable and unpleasant position that required me to shoot your mother in the foot. Now who is making threats? You are making direct public threats against me and against my mother. Nothing implied there! You have threatened to kill me and to shoot my mother, and I'm sure the authorities (and the attorney I work for) will be quite interested to hear about this. Of course you're mentally, physically, and emotionally incapable of carrying them out, so I'm not worried, but you have violated news group policy, and the law as well. Your apparent lack of intelligence is matched by your apparent lack of common sense! Also, you must be one hell of a coward to have to threaten to shoot an old woman in the foot, even in implied self-defense. Finally, perhaps you should disscuss your implicit threat with your audio-group friend Bob Cain because he recently made a very similar threat in one of his more vulgar recently-posted diatribes. As I said, I made no threat, implicit or otherwise, so if Bob made a similar statement, I would assume that he made no threat either. Perhaps you should seek treatment for your paranoia. |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
"Porky" wrote in message ...
It is neither an implicit nor an explicit threat, and I not only implied nothing, I denied nothing, I said you may take it anyway you choose. snip.....snip Since anyone with a whole brain would understand the meaning of what I said, I don't think it needs clarification. In light of the unearned insults you've cast my way, I'd prefer to leave you in the dark. BTW, do you know how to keep a moron in suspense?... I'll tell you later. To make it simple enough for even you to understand, you don't like us and we don't like you, so it would be an unpleasant experience for all concerned if we were to meet you face to face, and be forced to spend any time with you. You've shown here that you're a rather unpleasant person to be around, and you've also shown that you're a rank amateur at the high art of trading insults, so it would be more unpleasant for you than for us. The "us" would be all those you've chosen to insult for no valid reason. For "no valid reason?" You are either brain dead or you are in serious need of a reality check. For starters, I suggest that you re-read your insulting diatribe (above). Then go back and re-read your posts for the last few weeks and tell me why they should be considered anything other than a litany of personal insults. My mother is dead, you jerk, and if she were alive, she wouldn't need a frying pan to deal with you. She would just look pityingly at you and walk on. Assuming that your mother was a honorable person, you obvously didn't take after her. In light of your pathetic and disgraceful behavior, it is more likely that she would look pityingly at you and walk on. Now who is making threats? You are making direct public threats against me and against my mother. Nothing implied there! You have threatened to kill me and to shoot my mother, and I'm sure the authorities (and the attorney I work for) will be quite interested to hear about this. Of course you're mentally, physically, and emotionally incapable of carrying them out, so I'm not worried, but you have violated news group policy, and the law as well. Your apparent lack of intelligence is matched by your apparent lack of common sense! Also, you must be one hell of a coward to have to threaten to shoot an old woman in the foot, even in implied self-defense. The extent of your stupidity is clearly not limited to audio matters. You really need to re-read my post. I made no threats to kill anyone, and your assertion that I did is absurd and preposterous. As I said, I made no threat, implicit or otherwise, so if Bob made a similar statement, I would assume that he made no threat either. Perhaps you should seek treatment for your paranoia. If I were paranoid, treatment is available. Unfortunately no treatment is available that would enable you to overcome your gross technical incompetence. |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
"The Ghost" wrote in message m... "Porky" wrote in message ... It is neither an implicit nor an explicit threat, and I not only implied nothing, I denied nothing, I said you may take it anyway you choose. snip.....snip Since anyone with a whole brain would understand the meaning of what I said, I don't think it needs clarification. In light of the unearned insults you've cast my way, I'd prefer to leave you in the dark. BTW, do you know how to keep a moron in suspense?... I'll tell you later. To make it simple enough for even you to understand, you don't like us and we don't like you, so it would be an unpleasant experience for all concerned if we were to meet you face to face, and be forced to spend any time with you. You've shown here that you're a rather unpleasant person to be around, and you've also shown that you're a rank amateur at the high art of trading insults, so it would be more unpleasant for you than for us. The "us" would be all those you've chosen to insult for no valid reason. For "no valid reason?" You are either brain dead or you are in serious need of a reality check. For starters, I suggest that you re-read your insulting diatribe (above). Then go back and re-read your posts for the last few weeks and tell me why they should be considered anything other than a litany of personal insults. I suggest that YOU go back and look, because you started insulting me merely because you thought I was defending Bob Cain, I said nothing out of the way to you until you started inslutlng and cursing me. I've only posted insults in response to your litany of insults, and mine were much more imaginative and creative than yours were. It is you who need the reality check, and I would suggest you get it from a professional before it is too late, if it isn't already. Your behavior here has been hostile at best, and has bordered on the edge of paranoid psychosis. My mother is dead, you jerk, and if she were alive, she wouldn't need a frying pan to deal with you. She would just look pityingly at you and walk on. Assuming that your mother was a honorable person, you obvously didn't take after her. In light of your pathetic and disgraceful behavior, it is more likely that she would look pityingly at you and walk on. Now I know you're psychotic and it seems that you may very well have a deathwish as well. Now who is making threats? You are making direct public threats against me and against my mother. Nothing implied there! You have threatened to kill me and to shoot my mother, and I'm sure the authorities (and the attorney I work for) will be quite interested to hear about this. Of course you're mentally, physically, and emotionally incapable of carrying them out, so I'm not worried, but you have violated news group policy, and the law as well. Your apparent lack of intelligence is matched by your apparent lack of common sense! Also, you must be one hell of a coward to have to threaten to shoot an old woman in the foot, even in implied self-defense. The extent of your stupidity is clearly not limited to audio matters. You really need to re-read my post. I made no threats to kill anyone, and your assertion that I did is absurd and preposterous. I know what you said, and so does everyone else here. My attorney friend informs me that no court in the land would be likely to interpret my previous statements as a threat against you, implied or otherwise. On the other hand, considering that I go by the name "Porky" here, your statement, "While I would have no problem sending you to the sausage factory,... etc", could be legally construed as a death threat against me, and if I took you seriously, I would be within my legal rights using any means of self defense necessary if you approached me. As I said, I made no threat, implicit or otherwise, so if Bob made a similar statement, I would assume that he made no threat either. Perhaps you should seek treatment for your paranoia. If I were paranoid, treatment is available. Unfortunately no treatment is available that would enable you to overcome your gross technical incompetence. It would seem that you are suffering from paranoid phychosis with delusions of technical competence, and are halucinating that you actually know something. If I were really technically incompetant, education is avaliable that would cure it. There is no cure for your paranoid psychosis, you will require medication for the rest of your life. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
"Porky" wrote in message news:Kyq8d.139780
I suggest that YOU go back and look, because you started insulting me merely because you thought I was defending Bob Cain, I started insulting you because you are one of the most technically-inept jackasses posting in the audio newsgroups. Initially, I judged you solely on the basis of the technical accuracy/content your posts. Your behavior here has been hostile at best, and has bordered on the edge of paranoid psychosis. snip....snip Now I know you're psychotic and it seems that you may very well have a deathwish as well. snip.....snip My attorney friend informs me that no court in the land would be likely to interpret my previous statements as a threat against you, implied or otherwise. On the other hand, considering that I go by the name "Porky" here, your statement, "While I would have no problem sending you to the sausage factory,... etc", could be legally construed as a death threat against me, and if I took you seriously, I would be within my legal rights using any means of self defense necessary if you approached me. Your attorney friend is a whore, and the advice he is giving you is not worth any more than what you are paying him. The clear and undeniable context of my statement pertained to the possibility of you approaching me, not me approaching you. You need not worry about me approaching you because I avoid stepping in **** at all cost. It would seem that you are suffering from paranoid phychosis with delusions of technical competence, and are halucinating that you actually know something. If I were really technically incompetant, education is avaliable that would cure it. There is no cure for your paranoid psychosis, you will require medication for the rest of your life. Please pass me another air sickness bag. You are clearly no more competent/qualified in the area of psychoanalysis than you are in scientific/engineering/technical matters. On the usenet, morons with a Beavis & Butthead mentality can call Einstein a fool. Now, I am not implying that I am an Einstein, but I do think that a reality check is long overdue. Accordingly, what specifically are your academic credentials that enable you to justify the assertions that you have made in the area of psychoanalysis and science/engineering? |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
"The Ghost" wrote in message
om... Your attorney friend is a whore, and the advice he is giving you is not worth any more than what you are paying him. The clear and undeniable context of my statement pertained to the possibility of you approaching me, not me approaching you. You need not worry about me approaching you because I avoid stepping in **** at all cost. I have to give credit where credit is due. Your insults are definitely improving. We're so proud of you!! Everyone has missed you so much since you ran away in tears a while back. It's good to see you're back in form! On the usenet, morons with a Beavis & Butthead mentality can call Einstein a fool. Now, I am not implying that I am an Einstein, but I do think that a reality check is long overdue. Accordingly, what specifically are your academic credentials that enable you to justify the assertions that you have made in the area of psychoanalysis and science/engineering? Here you go with the credentials thing again. The last ditch cry of the defeated! |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
The Ghost wrote: Now, I am not implying that I am an Einstein, but I do think that a reality check is long overdue. Have at it. We all agree with you on both counts and we'll give you all the time you need if you'll just shut up while you're working it all out again. Accordingly, what specifically are your academic credentials that enable you to justify the assertions that you have made in the area of psychoanalysis... "It doesn't take a weatherman to know which way the wind blows." Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
"The Ghost" wrote in message om... "Porky" wrote in message news:Kyq8d.139780 I suggest that YOU go back and look, because you started insulting me merely because you thought I was defending Bob Cain, I started insulting you because you are one of the most technically-inept jackasses posting in the audio newsgroups. Initially, I judged you solely on the basis of the technical accuracy/content your posts. More of your ectoplasmic bull****... Your behavior here has been hostile at best, and has bordered on the edge of paranoid psychosis. snip....snip Now I know you're psychotic and it seems that you may very well have a deathwish as well. snip.....snip My attorney friend informs me that no court in the land would be likely to interpret my previous statements as a threat against you, implied or otherwise. On the other hand, considering that I go by the name "Porky" here, your statement, "While I would have no problem sending you to the sausage factory,... etc", could be legally construed as a death threat against me, and if I took you seriously, I would be within my legal rights using any means of self defense necessary if you approached me. Your attorney friend is a whore, and the advice he is giving you is not worth any more than what you are paying him. The clear and undeniable context of my statement pertained to the possibility of you approaching me, not me approaching you. You need not worry about me approaching you because I avoid stepping in **** at all cost. You should, because if you were to step in ****, it would be impossible to ascertain which is the **** and which is you. It would seem that you are suffering from paranoid phychosis with delusions of technical competence, and are halucinating that you actually know something. If I were really technically incompetant, education is avaliable that would cure it. There is no cure for your paranoid psychosis, you will require medication for the rest of your life. Please pass me another air sickness bag. You are clearly no more competent/qualified in the area of psychoanalysis than you are in scientific/engineering/technical matters. I never claimed to be an expert in either. On the usenet, morons with a Beavis & Butthead mentality can call Einstein a fool. Now, I am not implying that I am an Einstein, I certainly hope not, you are much, much closer to Beavis and Butthead than you are to Einstein. but I do think that a reality check is long overdue. Accordingly, what specifically are your academic credentials that enable you to justify the assertions that you have made in the area of psychoanalysis and science/engineering? Since I made no claim of expertise, I have no need to post credentials. However, since you intimated a comparison of yourself to Einstein, perhaps you should post your credentials... |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
"Porky" wrote in message t...
More of your ectoplasmic bull****... snip...snip .... if you were to step in ****, it would be impossible to ascertain which is the **** and which is you. snip....snip I never claimed to be an expert in either. snip.....snip ....... you are much, much closer to Beavis and Butthead than you are to Einstein. Since I made no claim of expertise, I have no need to post credentials. However, since you intimated a comparison of yourself to Einstein, perhaps you should post your credentials... While you will no doubt deny it, the fact of the matter is that your claim of expertise was/is implicit in your judgement/dismissal of my opinions on the subject matter. While you are certainly entitled to your opinions on technical matters, you are not justified in dismissing mine without being willing to state your academic credentials which may assign some credibility of your opinion. Othewise, your opinion on the matter is just your opinion and has no credibility whatsoever. |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Cain wrote in
: The Ghost wrote: Now, I am not implying that I am an Einstein, but I do think that a reality check is long overdue. Have at it. We all agree with you on both counts and we'll give you all the time you need if you'll just shut up while you're working it all out again. With all due respect, you ****ing, arrogant asshole, the question was not directed at you. Furthermore, you are the one who is flaunting his ignorance, and nees to shut up. Accordingly, what specifically are your academic credentials that enable you to justify the assertions that you have made in the area of psychoanalysis... "It doesn't take a weatherman to know which way the wind blows." Bob Apparently for you it does. |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
"The Ghost" wrote in message om... "Porky" wrote in message t... More of your ectoplasmic bull****... snip...snip .... if you were to step in ****, it would be impossible to ascertain which is the **** and which is you. snip....snip I never claimed to be an expert in either. snip.....snip ....... you are much, much closer to Beavis and Butthead than you are to Einstein. Since I made no claim of expertise, I have no need to post credentials. However, since you intimated a comparison of yourself to Einstein, perhaps you should post your credentials... While you will no doubt deny it, the fact of the matter is that your claim of expertise was/is implicit in your judgement/dismissal of my opinions on the subject matter. While you are certainly entitled to your opinions on technical matters, you are not justified in dismissing mine without being willing to state your academic credentials which may assign some credibility of your opinion. Othewise, your opinion on the matter is just your opinion and has no credibility whatsoever. You have posted nothing even worthy of dismissal, just a piece on a sound source mounted on a motor, which is not a model of a loudspeaker producing two tones simultaneously, and thus not relevant to the discussion about the existance of Doppler distortion in a speaker. That conclusion requires only a modicum of common sense, so posting of qualifications isn't necessary. I don't like you, for obvious reasons, but if you post something that is relevant to the discussion, I'll look at it without bias and if it's worthy of consideration, I'll consider it. Who knows, I might even agree with you, but if so it will be on the merits of your presentation and not because of your academic credentials. Personally, there are no academic "credentials" that you can post that will change my opinion of you, I believe in results, not "qualifications". Since I have promised to decrease the volume of my posts, I will no longer be responding to your insults. If you post any on-topic technical info, I'll comment if I feel that I can contribute something, but I no longer have the time or the desire to trade insults with you. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
"Porky" wrote in message ...
You have posted nothing even worthy of dismissal, just a piece on a sound source mounted on a motor, which is not a model of a loudspeaker producing two tones simultaneously, and thus not relevant to the discussion about the existance of Doppler distortion in a speaker. That conclusion requires only a modicum of common sense, so posting of qualifications isn't necessary. You can assert whatever you wish, but unless you are prepared to back up your assertions with appropriate cridentials, your assertions have no credibility and represent nothing more than ignorant opinion. I don't like you, for obvious reasons, but if you post something that is relevant to the discussion, I'll look at it without bias and if it's worthy of consideration, I'll consider it. Who knows, I might even agree with you, but if so it will be on the merits of your presentation and not because of your academic credentials. Personally, there are no academic "credentials" that you can post that will change my opinion of you, I believe in results, not "qualifications". You are not qualified to determine what is/not relevant to the discussion, and you believe in nothing other than your technically-inept opinion. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
"The Ghost" wrote in message
m... You can assert whatever you wish, but unless you are prepared to back up your assertions with appropriate cridentials, your assertions have no credibility and represent nothing more than ignorant opinion. For the last time it's CREDENTIALS, not CRIDENTIALS. C'mon! I mean, you can spell credibility right, but you can't manage credentials even after being repeatedly corrected? You're so stipud. |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
"The Ghost" wrote in message m... "Porky" wrote in message ... You have posted nothing even worthy of dismissal, just a piece on a sound source mounted on a motor, which is not a model of a loudspeaker producing two tones simultaneously, and thus not relevant to the discussion about the existance of Doppler distortion in a speaker. That conclusion requires only a modicum of common sense, so posting of qualifications isn't necessary. You can assert whatever you wish, but unless you are prepared to back up your assertions with appropriate cridentials, your assertions have no credibility and represent nothing more than ignorant opinion. Since you have posted no credentials either, that would apply to you even more than it would to me, since you're the one claiming expertise. I don't like you, for obvious reasons, but if you post something that is relevant to the discussion, I'll look at it without bias and if it's worthy of consideration, I'll consider it. Who knows, I might even agree with you, but if so it will be on the merits of your presentation and not because of your academic credentials. Personally, there are no academic "credentials" that you can post that will change my opinion of you, I believe in results, not "qualifications". You are not qualified to determine what is/not relevant to the discussion, and you believe in nothing other than your technically-inept opinion. That being as it may, I'm still better qualified than you are, because I can spell "credentials" Go back to sci.physics, Gary, you obviously know nothing about music, recording, or home studios. Oh wait, I see... No Gary, it's spelled "h", "o", "m", "e', the last letter isn't an "o".... *LOL* |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Audiophile glossary | High End Audio | |||
science vs. pseudo-science | High End Audio | |||
Why DBTs in audio do not deliver (was: Finally ... The Furutech CD-do-something) | High End Audio | |||
Negative/Positive Phase Shift in a Transformer | Pro Audio |