| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Hey...
|
|
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
|
|
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
geoff wrote: "JackAss posting on r.a.p ?
geoff " No. A wakeup shot!  Place went dead for about a day or two. Everyone on vacation? |
|
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
|
|
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
"UnsteadyKen" wrote in message
... In article: thekma @gmail.com says... Everyone on vacation? No, technical problem at Google Groups over the last few days,I've seen it mentioned in a couple of internet support newsgroups. Thekma thinks that what he sees on gurgle is what the newsgroup is all about. After all, he's a dumb**** and a short-bus gurgle-head. You can try to explain it to him, but he's just too much of a moron to ever comprehend. FCKWAFM. |
|
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
" thinks that what he sees on gurgle is what the newsgroup is all
about. After all, he's a dumb**** and a short-bus gurgle-head. You can try to explain it to him, but he's just too much of a moron to ever comprehend. FCKWAFM. " KEEP YOUR COWARDLY NEGATIVE ENERGY OFF THIS NEWSGROUP! UNTIL YOU HAVE SOMETHING POSITIVE TO SAY KEEP YOUR LITTLE TRAP SHUT, YA HEAR?! Like I said, wait till YOU have a technical question or problem and post it on he I hope everyone else will have the common sense NOT TO REPLY. Hear me, Scott Dorsey, Mike Rivers, geoff, JackA, et al?! Do not give this nabob of negativity any ammunition!! |
|
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
|
|
#8
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
thekma @gmail.com wrote in message
... " thinks that what he sees on gurgle is what the newsgroup is all about. After all, he's a dumb**** and a short-bus gurgle-head. You can try to explain it to him, but he's just too much of a moron to ever comprehend. FCKWAFM. " KEEP YOUR COWARDLY NEGATIVE ENERGY OFF THIS NEWSGROUP! UNTIL YOU HAVE SOMETHING POSITIVE TO SAY KEEP YOUR LITTLE TRAP SHUT, YA HEAR?! Still ignoring me, I see! Ignoring me like the ignorant ignoramus you are. A ****ing cap-lock ignoramus. Like I said, wait till YOU have a technical question or problem and post it on he I hope everyone else will have the common sense NOT TO REPLY. Hear me, Scott Dorsey, Mike Rivers, geoff, JackA, et al?! Do not give this nabob of negativity any ammunition!! Poor little Thekma, with delusions of authority. Nobody gives a **** what you say, li'l buddy. FCKWAFTB. |
|
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
|
|
#10
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
Lin Sprague wrote: "Learn to quote, ya hear? "
Like that?  |
|
#11
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
UnsteadyKen wrote: "
No, technical problem at Google Groups over the last few days,I've seen it mentioned in a couple of internet support newsgroups. -- Ken O'Meara " Seems to be affecting only *this* newsgroup. There's been activity within the past half-hour on all the other newsgroups I follow/participate in. |
|
#12
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
On Friday, August 14, 2015 at 12:23:10 PM UTC-4, wrote:
http://www.sherv.net/cm/emoticons/fa...super-fart.gif What Geoff's headphones really sound like? Jack |
|
#13
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
JackA wrote: "What Geoff's headphones really sound like?
Jack "See, now that isn't necessary - and lowers yourself to the level of ENON or Nil. geoff and I are clearly on opposite sides of the loudness in production issues, but we at least can disagree respectfully. Yes, I called him a "denialist" regarding that topic, but I didn't tease him or make fun of his equipment inventory which I'm not aware of what is in it. |
|
#14
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
On Monday, August 17, 2015 at 7:34:53 AM UTC-4, wrote:
JackA wrote: "What Geoff's headphones really sound like? Jack "See, now that isn't necessary - and lowers yourself to the level of ENON or Nil. geoff and I are clearly on opposite sides of the loudness in production issues, but we at least can disagree respectfully. Yes, I called him a "denialist" regarding that topic, but I didn't tease him or make fun of his equipment inventory which I'm not aware of what is in it. Like I collect CDs, Geoff collects headphones and electric guitars!! Anyway, a YouTube poster gave me permission to post his fine rendition of a Rolling Stones tune, in stereo, on my site!! Even offered me a flac!! Sweet! Jack |
|
#15
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
On Saturday, August 15, 2015 at 11:40:43 AM UTC-4, UnsteadyKen wrote:
In article: says... Everyone on vacation? No, technical problem at Google Groups over the last few days,I've seen it mentioned in a couple of internet support newsgroups. -- Ken O'Meara I'm guessing Google Groups was intended to be a Facebook. But, on this end, you reply to a post and most of the time, you can no longer read the post until Google updates, ie, I get a lot of "Loading.....", nothing more!! I hope their self-driving car is more reliable!!!! Jack |
|
#16
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
On Saturday, August 15, 2015 at 10:57:39 AM UTC-4, wrote:
geoff wrote: "JackAss posting on r.a.p ? geoff " No. A wakeup shot! Place went dead for about a day or two. Everyone on vacation? Anyway, even though his site is no longer updated, I sent a Thank You to David Torrey of (defunct) DRT Mastering, since HE was there during early CD mastering and provided some nice information! Jack |
|
#17
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
|
|
#18
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
On 18/08/2015 12:11 a.m., JackA wrote:
Like I collect CDs, Geoff collects headphones and electric guitars!! Possibly have more CDs than you too. My guitars, keyboards, and other music and recording equipment, etc are not for the sake of 'collecting' - they have been acquired over decades are for a purpose. geoff |
|
#19
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
On Monday, August 17, 2015 at 3:46:15 PM UTC-4, geoff wrote:
On 17/08/2015 11:33 p.m., wrote: JackA wrote: "What Geoff's headphones really sound like? Jack "See, now that isn't necessary - and lowers yourself to the level of ENON or Nil. geoff and I are clearly on opposite sides of the loudness in production issues, but we at least can disagree respectfully. Yes, I called him a "denialist" regarding that topic, but I didn't tease him or make fun of his equipment inventory which I'm not aware of what is in it. Um, we are not on different sides of the 'loudness issue' at all. The difference is that I now and understand the technical and musical aspects of it. I think you'll find that most posters here value dynamics in musics. geoff I'm finding a lot of "BBR Remasters", and, yes, some claim audio pushed to limits. I wouldn't expect more from the UK!!! Jack |
|
#20
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
On Monday, August 17, 2015 at 3:49:43 PM UTC-4, geoff wrote:
On 18/08/2015 12:11 a.m., JackA wrote: Like I collect CDs, Geoff collects headphones and electric guitars!! Possibly have more CDs than you too. My guitars, keyboards, and other music and recording equipment, etc are not for the sake of 'collecting' - they have been acquired over decades are for a purpose. You are just a hoarder! Mike Rivers believes I'm into file sharing!!!But, you don't gain knowledge of what people "mastered" and/or "remastered" by collecting shared files!!! Jack geoff |
|
#21
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
On Monday, August 17, 2015 at 3:46:15 PM UTC-4, geoff wrote:
On 17/08/2015 11:33 p.m., wrote: JackA wrote: "What Geoff's headphones really sound like? Jack "See, now that isn't necessary - and lowers yourself to the level of ENON or Nil. geoff and I are clearly on opposite sides of the loudness in production issues, but we at least can disagree respectfully. Yes, I called him a "denialist" regarding that topic, but I didn't tease him or make fun of his equipment inventory which I'm not aware of what is in it. Um, we are not on different sides of the 'loudness issue' at all. The difference is that I now and understand the technical and musical aspects of it. I think you'll find that most posters here value dynamics in musics. But, I haven't seen any proof of it. What songs do YOU find impressive sounding? I found The Definitive Collection - Blood, Sweat & Tears impressive sounding (I wouldn't have purchased it if it wasn't for someone, during review, yelling, "Buy this CD for superior sound!". Others, like Randy challenged me, though I appreciate a challenge, that's when I expressed I'm not in favor of tape hiss noise. Why I have doubts about the level of professionalism in this group. They talk a good story. Jack geoff |
|
#22
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
On 15 Aug 2015, thekma wrote in rec.audio.pro:
Lin Sprague wrote: "Learn to quote, ya hear? " Like that? Every time you try to "out" me you pick a different candidate. Thanks for demonstrating again what a complete loony tune you are. And now you reveal yourself to be a stalker. |
|
#23
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
thekma @ omnibus.ignramus.edu wrote in message
... See, now that isn't necessary - and lowers yourself to the level of ENON or Nil Hey, Thekma, you're ignoring me again! Despite your gibbering demands that everyone else ignore me, you don't seem to be able to do it yourself. You also seem to have developed some kind of taboo superstition about my user name; you are unable to type it. After posting that brief video of your own birth, you're pretending that you're worried about someone lowering something. Sometimes, nobody posts here for a few days. Sometimes, google (and its users) are too stupid to mirror posts. Get over it. Stop being so retarded. And keep ignoring me! |
|
#24
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
Lin wrote:
"Every time you try to "out" me you pick a different candidate. Thanks for demonstrating again what a complete loony tune you are. And now you reveal yourself to be a stalker. " Anyone who spouts the negative diatribe that you have deserves to be exposed. How about trying a different tack, like "Hey K-Man, I understand your concern for the degradation of popular commercial audio quality in the digital era, but there are some business relationships behind it that you need to understand. ..... " And then lay out key issues and key people(producers, labels, et al) involved. That's how you help others and promote understanding, instead of coming across like a world-class suitcase. |
|
#25
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
On 18 Aug 2015, thekma wrote in rec.audio.pro:
Anyone who spouts the negative diatribe that you have deserves to be exposed. Anyone who spouts the same ignorant spiel over and over and over and over, no matter how many times they're corrected deserves pity and ridicule. How about trying a different tack, like "Hey K-Man, I understand your concern for the degradation of popular commercial audio quality in the digital era, but there are some business relationships behind it that you need to understand. ..... " Why bother? Everyone I've seen address the issue here already knows and understands it. It's been explained to you repeatedly and in detail. You clearly don't want to or can't read or comprehend or learn. You only hear the voices in your head. |
|
#26
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 6:42:56 PM UTC-4, Nil wrote:
On 18 Aug 2015, thekma wrote in rec.audio.pro: Anyone who spouts the negative diatribe that you have deserves to be exposed. Anyone who spouts the same ignorant spiel over and over and over and over, no matter how many times they're corrected deserves pity and ridicule. How about trying a different tack, like "Hey K-Man, I understand your concern for the degradation of popular commercial audio quality in the digital era, but there are some business relationships behind it that you need to understand. ..... " Why bother? Everyone I've seen address the issue here already knows and understands it. It's been explained to you repeatedly and in detail. Can it be explained again? I must have missed it. But K-Man is correct, even my younger friend claims radio sounds worse than it once did. I question why HD Radio still uses sound processors with digital media. I can understand with FM Stereo transmissions, widening the stereo, since radio had to compete with Stereo vinyl, but those days are past. Only twice, once in usenet and once on Amazon did others even mention the processed FM stereo sound, so it isn't well known, and people don't actually memorize music. Same with vinyl, I had one too many (hit) 45s where the audio quality cleared as the song faded, but no one griped about that, claiming loudness wars started recently. Also, you don't hear Scott or Mike saying, "Not many are into HQ sound, so I wouldn't invest a lot of money in audio equipment". But Scott did mention, pretty much as I agree, there hasn't been any breathtaking audio advances in decades. Jack You clearly don't want to or can't read or comprehend or learn. You only hear the voices in your head. |
|
#27
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey...
Theck Mama @ omnibus.brevis.edu wrote in message
... How about trying a different tack, like "Hey K-Man, I understand your concern for the degradation of popular commercial audio quality in the digital era, but there are some business relationships behind it that you need to understand. ..... " But you refuse to understand. It's all been laid out for you, extensively and comprehensively, including putting it in a simplified form that a simpleton like you should understand. Only rarely has there been any glimmer resembling comprehension, and none of that stuck with you longer than a day or two. Over and over and over and over again, you've circled around in your short bus, back to the same old same old dumb****ery that's your calling card. Instead of trying to get it, you'll waste your time scouring the net for some random statement that you think "proves" that you're "right" about your cretinous idiocy, and the audio engineers are wrong, and you win, or some such horse ****. And you will be ridiculed, and you will throw tantrums and whine a lot. The first time I saw your pathetic carcass on the net was more than five years ago, and you played out the exact same script (on a different subject). And quite justifiably, your sorry excuse for forum membership was summarily revoked. And here you are again, playing out the same ridiculous charade yet again, lather, repeat, repeat, and repeat again, ad nauseam, ad omnibus brevis. And then lay out key issues and key people(producers, labels, et al) involved. Why would he, or anyone else, bother? A complete waste of time. That's how you help others and promote understanding, instead of coming across like a world-class suitcase. You've refused all help, you've publicly insulted those who have tried, and you are incapable of understanding. Did your parents beat on on the head with a suitcase when you were very young? That would explain both the brain damage and the bizarre obsession with suitcases. Did you have a hobby horse too? You must miss that horsy very much. But I'm sure the hobby horsy had to be taken away, after the ... well, you know. That would explain the hobby horse **** obsessions that drive you in lieu of a normal life. |
Linear Mode
