Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
Andre Jute
 
Posts: n/a
Default WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 1. BACKGROUND

WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE

1. BACKGROUND
Stewart Pinkerton, an employee in the postroom of a bank, claims to
be a qualified engineer. He waves his certificate to excuse his
constant and insistent destructive invasions of other people's
hobbies or professions on the pretext of protecting them against their
own ignorance. As a result Pinkerton is banned from several
professional, moderated conferences, but of course the unmoderated
newsgroups are easy prey to his invasions. When he is gainsaid he
instantly turns nasty. Here is Pinkerton abusing Glenn Richards in the
first thread I open, concurrently on uk.rec.audio: "I don't worry
about ****ing off stupid, lying, ******s like you. Clear enough for
you?" The cause is a mild disagreement about audio cables.

Such continuous abuse, and Pinkerton's constant appeals to authority
(his own of course) rather than reason, raises questions about
Pinkerton's motives, knowledge and honesty. This series of articles
on the unreliability of Stewart Pinkerton continues with three examples
I have personal knowledge of, with a conclusion in the final article.

Andre Jute

Part of a series of articles:
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE
1. BACKGROUND
2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
3. PINKERTON'S IGNORANCE OF THE BASICS
4. PINKERTON LIES ON PROFESSIONAL MATTERS FOR PERSONAL REASONS
5. CONCLUSION

  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
 
Posts: n/a
Default WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 1. BACKGROUND

God help us all...

Mr. McCoy has lost it entirely. Five (5) new threads. I expected only
2, maybe 3.

This is the mark of a rational, calm, human being writing from full
confidence in his position?

Or a that of a totally fixated psychopath off his medication?

Doesn't matter whom he might be writing about, there is no sanity here.
As Mr. T might say: Pity the poor fool.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA

  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion
 
Posts: n/a
Default WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 1. BACKGROUND


"Andre Jute" wrote in message
oups.com...
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE

1. BACKGROUND
Stewart Pinkerton, an employee in the postroom of a bank, claims to
be a qualified engineer.


Translation: Stewart Pinkerton is an engineer who regularly exposes Jute's
incompetence.

He waves his certificate to excuse his
constant and insistent destructive invasions of other people's
hobbies or professions on the pretext of protecting them against their
own ignorance.


Tranlation: Jute is caught again trying to pretend he did something he
didn't and Steart has let peole know about it on a public newsgroup where
anyone is free to comment.

As a result Pinkerton is banned from several
professional, moderated conferences, but of course the unmoderated
newsgroups are easy prey to his invasions.


Translation: Jute has not been able to keep Stewart off his back, and
Steart won't let Jute's Munchausen syndrome go unnoticed.

When he is gainsaid he
instantly turns nasty.


Tranlation: Jute is a nastly little bugger who uses personal attacks and
name calling against anyone who exposes Jute's lies and incompetence.

Here is Pinkerton abusing Glenn Richards in the
first thread I open, concurrently on uk.rec.audio: "I don't worry
about ****ing off stupid, lying, ******s like you. Clear enough for
you?" The cause is a mild disagreement about audio cables.

Translation: Somebody claimed the impossible about cables and then argued
with Stewart about it.


Such continuous abuse, and Pinkerton's constant appeals to authority
(his own of course) rather than reason, raises questions about
Pinkerton's motives, knowledge and honesty.


Translation: Jute doesn't like it when Stewart exposes Jute or any other
person who claims that the impossible is possible.

This series of articles
on the unreliability of Stewart Pinkerton continues with three examples
I have personal knowledge of, with a conclusion in the final article.

Andre Jute

Part of a series of articles:
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE
1. BACKGROUND
2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
3. PINKERTON'S IGNORANCE OF THE BASICS
4. PINKERTON LIES ON PROFESSIONAL MATTERS FOR PERSONAL REASONS
5. CONCLUSION

Translation: Jute is on another of his crybaby jags because Stewart won't
let Jute's lies and attacks go unpunished, so Jute thinks he can hound
Steart off the newsgroups and thereby save his sorry ass from further
embarassment. This of course demonstrates what a complete idiot Jute is.


Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wet your pants funny-- A.J. as an EE Ancient_Hacker Vacuum Tubes 31 February 27th 06 01:09 AM
Stewart Pinkerton is a tube hating fool. Patrick Turner Vacuum Tubes 46 May 2nd 05 07:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:06 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"