Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
a good example of bad technical writing
Someone recently posted the following Web page
http://www.beis.de/Elektronik/DeltaS...eltaSigma.html for those who wanted to learn how delta-sigma modulation works. Although Herr Beis's writing, per se, is better than that of most American engineers, this is a terrible piece of documentation. It's not only poorly organized (it doesn't properly "start at the beginning"), but it doesn't explain what it's supposed to explain. All I'm shown is a block diagram of a delta-sigma converter, without any coherent explanation of how it works. What is the purpose of the integrator after the difference circuit? If the feedback signal from the internal DAC is to roughly equal to the input signal (so that the difference circuit doesn't clip), whence comes the differentiation needed to reverse the integration? What are the threshold levels for the comparator? And so on, and so on, and so on... The quality of technical documentation that comes from US electronics firms isn't just poor -- it's horrible. It's written primarily by engineers, 99% of whom have zero communications skills. * They think that because the reader has a college degree, he'll automatically understand whatever they write, no matter how disorganized or incoherent. The result is COIK writing -- "clear only if known". Now... Can someone please point me to a site that actually explains how delta-sigma conversion works? Thanks! * I've seen a few very well-written documents. But they're about as rare as hen's teeth. |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
a good example of bad technical writing
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:30:50 -0800, "William Sommerwerck"
wrote: Now... Can someone please point me to a site that actually explains how delta-sigma conversion works? Thanks! FInd yourself a copy of Horowitz and Hill (The Art of Electronics) - there is a good explanation in there. d Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
a good example of bad technical writing
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 07:30:50 -0500, William Sommerwerck wrote
(in article ): Someone recently posted the following Web page http://www.beis.de/Elektronik/DeltaS...eltaSigma.html for those who wanted to learn how delta-sigma modulation works. Although Herr Beis's writing, per se, is better than that of most American engineers, this is a terrible piece of documentation. It's not only poorly organized (it doesn't properly "start at the beginning"), but it doesn't explain what it's supposed to explain. All I'm shown is a block diagram of a delta-sigma converter, without any coherent explanation of how it works. What is the purpose of the integrator after the difference circuit? If the feedback signal from the internal DAC is to roughly equal to the input signal (so that the difference circuit doesn't clip), whence comes the differentiation needed to reverse the integration? What are the threshold levels for the comparator? And so on, and so on, and so on... The quality of technical documentation that comes from US electronics firms isn't just poor -- it's horrible. It's written primarily by engineers, 99% of whom have zero communications skills. * They think that because the reader has a college degree, he'll automatically understand whatever they write, no matter how disorganized or incoherent. The result is COIK writing -- "clear only if known". Now... Can someone please point me to a site that actually explains how delta-sigma conversion works? Thanks! * I've seen a few very well-written documents. But they're about as rare as hen's teeth. My recently departed mother spent most of her life as the public affairs officer of a US Navy experimental laboratory. Her job was to "distill" the poor communications of brilliant engineers into something the rest of us could understand. It's a gift. Regards, Ty Ford -- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric stuff are at www.tyford.com |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
a good example of bad technical writing
"William Sommerwerck" wrote in message . .. Someone recently posted the following Web page http://www.beis.de/Elektronik/DeltaS...eltaSigma.html for those who wanted to learn how delta-sigma modulation works. you may want to try one of the engineering newsgroups. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
a good example of bad technical writing
Now... Can someone please point me to a site that actually
explains how delta-sigma conversion works? Thanks! FInd yourself a copy of Horowitz and Hill (The Art of Electronics) -- there is a good explanation in there. Guess what... It's sitting on my bookshelf! (Bought it years ago, but only browsed it.) Thanks. |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
a good example of bad technical writing
My recently departed mother spent most of her life as the public affairs
officer of a US Navy experimental laboratory. Her job was to "distill" the poor communications of brilliant engineers into something the rest of us could understand. It's a gift. I have that gift, but no one wants to hire me for it. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Some Recording Techniques | Pro Audio | |||
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |