[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 24, 12:48*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article ,

*"ScottW" wrote:
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stori...terror23415-us...
more-aid-allies-terror-/?uniontrib

What do you think?

Sounds cheaper. What do you think?

I'm not sure who 2pid is calling a hero or villain. Is it spelled out
in his link, or is Clyde just someone else who has failed in trying to
teach 2pid effective communication techniques?

I've stopped following 2pidlinks...again. The last one I followed
proved the opposite of what 2pid was claiming. That grows old.

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

On May 24, 12:48*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article ,

*"ScottW" wrote:
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stori...terror23415-us...
more-aid-allies-terror-/?uniontrib

What do you think?

Sounds cheaper. What do you think?

I'm not sure who 2pid is calling a hero or villain. Is it spelled out
in his link, or is Clyde just someone else who has failed in trying to
teach 2pid effective communication techniques?

I've stopped following 2pidlinks...again. The last one I followed
proved the opposite of what 2pid was claiming. That grows old.

It's a NYT article about using local security forces to arrest and hold
terror suspects instead of US forces. The policy, begun under Bush, "has
gained momentum under Mr. Obama" because of court rulings and closed
secret prisons "and all but ended the transfer of prisoners from outside
Iraq and Afghanistan to American military prisons."

Bush?

Stephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 26, 12:52*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On May 26, 5:20*am, MiNe 109 * wrote:





In article
,
*"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

On May 24, 12:48*pm, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article ,

*"ScottW" wrote:
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stori...terror23415-us...
more-aid-allies-terror-/?uniontrib

What do you think?

Sounds cheaper. What do you think?

I'm not sure who 2pid is calling a hero or villain. Is it spelled out
in his link, or is Clyde just someone else who has failed in trying to
teach 2pid effective communication techniques?

I've stopped following 2pidlinks...again. The last one I followed
proved the opposite of what 2pid was claiming. That grows old.

It's a NYT article about using local security forces to arrest and hold
terror suspects instead of US forces. The policy, begun under Bush, "has
gained momentum under Mr. Obama" because of court rulings and closed
secret prisons "and all but ended the transfer of prisoners from outside
Iraq and Afghanistan to American military prisons."

Bush = Obama

Clinton = bushie

Bush I = Clinton

And so on.

Therefore, Obama = Washington.