Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Greg Wormald[_3_] Greg Wormald[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Do blind tests need being "calibrated" ?

In article ,
Audio Empire wrote:

it comes down to that old Frederick Nietsche=20
connundrum first postulated in his "Man and Superman": "If a tree =

falls in=20
the forest and there is no one there to hear it fall, did it make a =

sound?"=20

If old Nietsche had had access to Google he could have answered that. =
And the answer is: It depends on the definition of the word "sound". =
Some definitions are only about the vibrations generated, so the answer =
is "yes", the tree made a sound. Some definitions include the sensation =
in the hearing apparatus, in which case the answer is "no" because no =
one heard it, there was no sound.

In the case of the "sensation included" definitions we are back to one =
of the favourite problems in hi-fi--"If I can't hear it, or that test =
didn't hear it, then it doesn't exist." Which of course is perfectly =
correct when using that definition. And possibly incorrect when using =
other definitions.

This is one of the reasons why many discussions here go nowhere--no =
common definitions are being used.

Greg=

 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do blind tests need being "calibrated" ? [email protected] High End Audio 64 July 12th 10 05:27 PM
"AKAI", "KURZWEIL", "ROLAND", DVDs and CDs [email protected] Audio Opinions 0 January 31st 06 09:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:00 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"