[Scott Dorsey]

In article , Tobiah wrote:

What do you want increased throughput for? For disks, USB3 is a considerable
performance win.
--scott

I use synths and samplers, and sometimes monitor a guitar through
a VST effect, etc. That's what the emphasis on latency is all about.
When I can, I use the hardware monitor on the interface.

I just thought that if the hose was pushing water a lot faster (USB3)
then the round trip would be faster. It sounds like you guys are saying
that USB2.0 is fine, and that the latency comes from the CPU.


Tobiah




--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."