Chung wrote:
Harry Lavo wrote:
"John Corbett" wrote in message
...
In article , "Harry Lavo"
wrote (re
http://www.hfm-detmold.de/eti/projek...paper_6086.pdf):


It is certainly a test that probably is as good an abx test as could be
done.

Huh?


Meaning, they paid attention to most details.

Are there any details that they missed?

They acknowledge two possible flaws in their work:

1) switching noise that they tried very hard to eliminate,
but could not

2) lack of time to re-test the four outliers.

Which is a shame in both cases, but given that this appears to
have been master's thesis work, perhaps understandable.



--
-S
"The most appealing intuitive argument for atheism is the mindblowing stupidity of religious
fundamentalists." -- Ginger Yellow