|
|
|
|
Doppler Distoriton?
ow (Goofball_star_dot_etal) writes:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:28:45 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 02:57:26 GMT, Randy Yates wrote:
An accelerometer, a la Velodyne?
And those who are not asleep will note that this is a very good
solution from an experimental point of view. Points to those that say
why.
It gives you acelleration, forthwith.
Integrate it (essentially pass it through a low pass filter) once and you
get velocity.
Integrate it again and you get position.
Every time you integrate it, a lot of spurious noise gets low-pass filtered
@ 6 dB/octave.
Yes, and that's a good thing(TM).
OK, 2 points but remember what Svante said. . and there is more. . .
Think "one variable at a time" and "how should we record and process
the accelerometer data?"
What's the bandwidth of an accelerometer signal when stuck on a speaker
cone? Could you use a sound card input to digitize it?
--
Randy Yates
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications
Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
, 919-472-1124
|