"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ink.net...

"John Richards" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ink.net...
Where are the equally scholarly pieces of research that show that some
other form of testing for audio differences have merit?

Define "scholarly".
http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Scholarly_method

Scholarly method - or as it is more commonly called, scholarship - is the
body of principles and practices used by scholars to make their claims
about the world as valid and trustworthy as possible, and to make them
known to the scholarly public. In its broadest sense, scholarship can be
taken to include the scientific method, which is the body of scholarly
practice that governs the sciences. This article focuses on scholarship
in the narrower sense, covering rational inquiry in areas that are mostly
too complex as yet to be treated by science. These include history as
well as the creations of the human mind in the form of art, music,
literature, religion, philosophy, and cultural beliefs.
But since you have a weak mind, how would you be able to judge whether the
article is true?
All you can do is put it on your bathroom scale, tell us how many ounces
it weighs, and then use it for **** tickets.
As expected no offer of any sort of proof that any form of DBT is invalid,
nor any offer of proof that sighted listening is a valid way to discern
subtle difference.