"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
news

"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ink.net...

"John Richards" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ink.net...
Where are the equally scholarly pieces of research that show that
some
other form of testing for audio differences have merit?

Define "scholarly".
http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Scholarly_method

Scholarly method - or as it is more commonly called, scholarship - is
the
body of principles and practices used by scholars to make their claims
about the world as valid and trustworthy as possible, and to make them
known to the scholarly public. In its broadest sense, scholarship can
be
taken to include the scientific method, which is the body of scholarly
practice that governs the sciences. This article focuses on
scholarship
in the narrower sense, covering rational inquiry in areas that are
mostly
too complex as yet to be treated by science. These include history as
well as the creations of the human mind in the form of art, music,
literature, religion, philosophy, and cultural beliefs.
But since you have a weak mind, how would you be able to judge whether
the
article is true?
All you can do is put it on your bathroom scale, tell us how many
ounces
it weighs, and then use it for **** tickets.
As expected no offer of any sort of proof that any form of DBT is
invalid,
nor any offer of proof that sighted listening is a valid way to discern
subtle difference.

As expected, no offer of any sort of proof that ABX is valid for hifi
comparisons.

An obvious lie.

Faillure of Mikey to distinguish between industrial applications of ABX
and
high fidelity, noted.

Another obvious lie.

General failure of Mikey's weak brain, noted.

Another obvious lie.

Failure of Mikey to read cited materials, noted.

Something that you want to believe, but which is not true. How many of them
have you read?

Fraudulent and obsessive nature of Mikey's claims, noted.

Denial of reality by yourself a matter of historical and legal record.

Noted, Mikey's obsessive occupation with destroying the free will and
pleasure of others.

As if such a thing were possible, espcecially since you believe I have such
a weak mind.

Repetitious posting about discredited ABX ideas, noted.

There iare no discredited ABX ideas, only denials from fools.

Noted, failure to distinguish between crummy Radio Shack SPL meter and
useful instruments.

Another denail of reality.

General failure of Mikey to think on an adult level, noted.

If yours is supposed to be the adult standard, I'm very glad I don't
function that way.

Noted, Mikey has an unnatural interest in sheep as recreational animals.

Obligatory personal attacks in lieu of actual facts noted.