"John Atkinson" wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Malcolm Omar Hawksford's seminal article on cable theory is
posted today at www.stereophile.com/reference/1095cable.
Those who state that the "laws of physics" don't allow
for differences in cable performance at audio frequencies
might be surprised to learn that the laws of physics predict
the opposite.

But naturally, there is not one single bias controlled comparison
of cables where anyone, ever, heard a difference between normal
cables. In short wire is wire.

Actually, at the time Dan Dugan of the AES was doing cable tests
at the 1991 AES Convention, he subjected John Hunter of Sumiko
to a series of bias-controlled tests comparing the cables
distributed by Sumiko to others. John identified the cables to
a statistically significant degree. When Dan wrote up his 1991
cable tests for the JAES, he omitted Hunter's results.

Thank you for yet another meaningless anecdote, as ever you offer no real
proof.

The fact that you continue to offer up such crap, is the reason so many
people either despise you for the huckster you are, or laugh at you because
it might actually be possible that you believe your propaganda.

There's still $5000.00 at least waiting for anybody who can prove they can
hear differences between normally designed cables. Naturally it will be
safe forever.