[Audio Empire]

On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:15:52 -0700, Scott wrote
(in article ):

On Mar 16, 4:35=A0pm, Audio Empire wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 02:44:11 -0700, Scott wrote
(in article ):

On Mar 15, 4:09=3DA0pm, Audio Empire wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 03:54:30 -0700, Scott wrote
(in article ):

Sorry but you do not get to tell me what is ideal and what is not
ideal.

I do get to tell you the definition of an "ideal" amplifier.

Sorry no you don't.

I.E. one that is
"perfect".

perfect is an abstract that requires a person to subjectively select a
*desired* state of being or goal.

That you don't want a "perfect" amplifier, and prefer one that
alters the signal fed to it is none of my business and definitely beyond =
my
interest. IOW, I don't care what you want. I was merely answering the
question. So don't kill the messenger.

I'm not killing the messanger just correcting his eroneous message.

You don't get to make up definitions of technical terms any more than you get
to make up definitions for dictionary words.



=A0We are just going round and round. If distortion makes

something sound better, as in more pleasing and /or more life like
than it is better by my ideals.

Your ideals have nothing to do with the definition of an "ideal" amplifie=
r.

a persons *Ideals* have nothing to do with an *ideal*(fill in the
blank). OK.....I would hope the failed logic there would be self
evident


You still fail to understand that the definition of an ideal amplifier IS NOT
MY IDEAL, it's a TECHNICAL TERM that's already defined. It has nothing to do
with taste!

Ideal Amplifier: An amplifier which is perfect in that it adds nothing to and
detracts nothing from the signal that it is amplifying. A straight wire with
gain.

If you can't get this through your skull then the problem is yours, not mine.