"Rob Tweed" wrote in message
On 29 Aug 2008 00:26:38 GMT,
wrote:
On Aug 27, 9:20 am, Rob Tweed
wrote:
On 26 Aug 2008 12:43:00 GMT, Steven Sullivan
You can make other assumptions that are just as
reasonable, based on the evidence so far.
One is that the difference you heard, was imaginary.
Oh no! Here we go down this road again sigh
Are you suggesting that this is simply not one
possible explanation, or are you suggesting that
you simply aren't interested in including this
as a possible explanation?
No, I just think this "is it real or imaginary" argument
has been done to death.
The issue remains huge as long as people don't lift a finger to resolve it.
There are two ways out, both pretty viable for many people.
(1) Actually do a proper level-matched, time-synched, bias-controlled
listening test.
(2) Do a technical test that sheds light on the problem.
As I detail in my response to another post in this thread, option (2) is far
from being out of the reach of the average audiophile.