[Danny ~~_/) ~~_/) ~~_/) ~~]

On May 20, 9:29*am,
(Richard Webb) wrote:
PEter Larsen writes:
MIght be as well, if the room is there, and they're properly delayed.
Chances are good they'll need to be flown as well. Hard to say, but
I'd hazard a guess that those with moderate hearing difficulties
normally would probably benefit even more from pew back speakers,
which could operate at a lower
And architecturally they do not change the way the room is
experienced.

WHich may be important for some as well. *One of the biggest complaints I've seemed to hear after every church sound
upgrade in a traditional church is about those unsightly
speaker boxes. *This is one reason I suggested them as
strongly to DAnny as well. *Since they won't jump right out
and visually shout "loud sound reinforcement" at the old
folks they'll not even really notice the difference, until
you turn 'em off one Sunday grin.

Regards,
* * * * * *Richard
--
| Remove .my.foot for email
| via Waldo's Place USA Fidonet-Internet Gateway Site
| Standard disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his own.

If you've never been to a Lutheran church you'd never believe it.
Change is the dirtiest word in the english language and I'm not
kidding. It's a joke really. We've got to figure out what the budget
is going to be and find the speakers but I think the speakers will be
able to be disguised well. One of the elders there is an excellent
woodworker and he's planning on making some kind of enclosure (or at
least as much as they can get covered) so you see wood and not
speakers.