On 6/18/2012 4:44 PM, Audio Empire wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 05:50:32 -0700, Arny Krueger wrote
(in ):
"Audio wrote in message
...
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:42:09 -0700, wrote
(in ):
On Saturday, June 16, 2012 10:31:54 AM UTC-4, Audio Empire wrote:
I can hear the howls of derision now from certain parties who post here
regularly. I'm out of my mind. There can just be no other explanation
for
it!
Actually, what you'll hear is a big yawn. Cuz we've heard it all
before, too many times.
There are some who post here regularly who have so much invested in LP
being
inferior to EVERYTHING, that those are the folks from whom I expected (and
still expect) the howls of derision.
Trust me, my investment in digital audio or just audio seriously pales
compared to the aforementioned investment in equipment with highly
questionable price/performance.
If I'm prejudiced against what he has, he must be 100 times+ more prejudiced
against what I have.
Who said I was talking about you?
Ahem, I should have thought that to be self-evident...though maybe not
confined to him :-)
Besides, no one is talking about the
equipment here, the mention of which is just background
Speak for yourself. I'm coveting those Sashas no matter what you say.
Never met a Watt/Puppy that didn't sound hollow in the mids to me, but
the Sasha changed that. Over twice the price of my demo Sophias however,
so...
- to set the stage,
as it were. The "howls of derision" would come from the premise and the
conclusion, that even a modest LP rig can outperform a $7000 - and highly
touted - DAC.
I don't think the modest LP rig can outperform a good digital 'rig' in
any objective, measurable sense. Doesn't mean you don't enjoy the sound
of the LP rig more though, which is what counts.
Keith